Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 00:53

It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 00:53

Toolkit

Practice Tests

Sentence Correction (SC - EA only)

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Go to My Error Log Learn more

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Apr 26
Score High on the GMAT with Target Test Prep
10:00 AM EDT
-
11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 27
Try OnDemand GMAT Masterclass
11:00 AM EDT
-
12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 28
Join - GMAT Day!
08:00 AM PDT
-
11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.

Back to Forum

Create Topic

Industrialization and modern methods of insect control have improved

1 2

Gylmitul

Joined: 03 Mar 2020

Last visit: 07 Apr 2021

Posts: 32

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 125

Location: India

Schools: ISB'22 (A)

GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39 Verified score

Schools: ISB'22 (A)

GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39 Verified score

Posts: 32

Kudos: 10

17 Dec 2020, 02:19

Kudos

Bookmarks

Hi, Can someone please explain if parallelism is not necessary for two clauses/phrases joined by while?

daagh

kivalo wrote

Quote:

Can some explain to me the way 'introducing' is used in B. If it is a verb, how can it be parallel to 'have improved' ??? In case it is a present participle, how can it stand alongside 'while', which I understand is a subordinating conjuction that requires a full clause?

Apart from its usage as a conjunction with a finite verb, 'while' is also used along with participles. GMAT has accepted this usage also, as can be seen below. Therefore, one cannot omit a choice on this count.

1. The themes that Rita Dove explores in her poetry is universal, encompassing much of the human condition while occasionally she deals with racial issues.
A. is universal, encompassing much of the human condition while occasionally she deals
B. is universal, encompassing much of the human condition, also occasionally it deals
C. are universal, they encompass much of the human condition and occasionally deals
D. are universal, encompassing much of the human condition while occasionally dealing
E. are universal, they encompass much of the human condition, also occasionally are dealing

OA D

2. While studying the genetic makeup of corn, a new class of mutant genes was discovered by Barbara McClintock, a discovery which led to greater understanding of cell differentiation.

A. a new class of mutant genes was discovered by Barbara McClintock, a discovery which led
B. a new class of mutant genes in corn were discovered by Barbara McClintock, leading
C. Barbara McClintock discovered a new class of mutant genes, and it led
D. Barbara McClintock discovered a new class of mutant genes, a discovery that led
E. Barbara McClintock, who discovered a new class of mutant genes, leading

The non-underline part uses while along with a participle

3. Meteor showers and individual streaks of light that flash across the sky every night are generated when tiny flecks of celestial detritus, often no larger than grains of sand or of pebbles, burn up speeding through the atmosphere.

(A) grains of sand or of pebbles, burn up speeding
(B) grains of sand or pebbles, burn up while speeding
(C) grains of sand or pebbles, which burn up while speeding
(D) a grain of sand or pebble, which burns up as it speeds
(E) a grain of sand or a pebble burns up when it speeds

OA.B

GMATNinja

GMAT Club Verbal Expert

Joined: 13 Aug 2009

Last visit: 22 Apr 2026

Posts: 7,391

Own Kudos:

70,796

[4]

Given Kudos: 2,129

Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors

Location: United States (CO)

GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46 Verified score

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Products:

Expert

Expert reply

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Posts: 7,391

Kudos: 70,796

[4]

19 Dec 2020, 09:44

Kudos

Bookmarks

Gylmitul

Hi, Can someone please explain if parallelism is not necessary for two clauses/phrases joined by while?

The short answer is that because "while" is not a simple parallelism trigger (like "and"), parallelism is not strictly required when using "while."

Check out this post for more on that, and let us know if you still have questions!

Ranasaymon

Joined: 24 Nov 2019

Last visit: 21 Apr 2026

Posts: 319

Own Kudos:

274

Given Kudos: 838

Location: Bangladesh

GMAT 1: 600 Q46 V27 Verified score

GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37 Verified score

GPA: 3.5

GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37 Verified score

Posts: 319

Kudos: 274

15 Mar 2021, 22:34

Kudos

Bookmarks

I can reach answer B by using POE. But one thing makes me confused. Are while and at the same time not redundant?

GMATNinja

GMAT Club Verbal Expert

Joined: 13 Aug 2009

Last visit: 22 Apr 2026

Posts: 7,391

Own Kudos:

70,796

[1]

Given Kudos: 2,129

Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors

Location: United States (CO)

GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46 Verified score

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Products:

Expert

Expert reply

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Posts: 7,391

Kudos: 70,796

[1]

20 Mar 2021, 09:51

Kudos

Bookmarks

Ranasaymon

I can reach answer B by using POE. But one thing makes me confused. Are while and at the same time not redundant?

Check out this post from earlier in the thread for a not-so-satisfying response to your question!

Basshead

Joined: 09 Jan 2020

Last visit: 07 Feb 2024

Posts: 907

Own Kudos:

323

[2]

Given Kudos: 431

Location: United States

Posts: 907

Kudos: 323

[2]

10 Oct 2021, 03:12

Kudos

Bookmarks

CRACKGMATNUT

Joined: 23 Jul 2020

Last visit: 26 May 2024

Posts: 147

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 30

Location: India

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing

Schools: Ivey '24 (A)

GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35 Verified score

Schools: Ivey '24 (A)

GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35 Verified score

Posts: 147

Kudos: 31

10 Oct 2021, 11:58

Kudos

Bookmarks

Hi sayantanc2k

Hope you re doing good. Can you help in couple of things ?

1) Do you think usage of which is wrong in option C? I'm doubtful because of the verb HAVE, which should refer to a plural noun pollutants in this case
2) What kind of meaning error are we encountering by misplacing modifier at the same time in C?
3) Why is B preferred over C? Don't you think while is used in temporal sense? While & at the same time : shouldn't they be redundant.

ExpertsGlobal5

Experts' Global Representative

Joined: 10 Jul 2017

Last visit: 22 Apr 2026

Posts: 6,216

Own Kudos:

6,163

Given Kudos: 44

Location: India

GMAT Date: 11-01-2019

Expert

Expert reply

Posts: 6,216

Kudos: 6,163

22 Oct 2021, 07:29

Kudos

Bookmarks

CRACKGMATNUT

Hello CRACKGMATNUT,

We hope this finds you well.

Having gone through the question and your queries, we believe we can help resolve your doubts.

In order:

1) In Option C, the use of "which" is incorrect, as it is used to refer to information that is vital to the core meaning of the sentence -- that the 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants have gone virtually unregulated since they were developed; please remember, “that” is used to provide information needed to preserve the core meaning of the sentence, and the “comma + which” construction is used to provide extra information.

2) The construction "introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants at the same time" incorrectly implies that all 10,000 chemical pollutants were released at the same time; the intended meaning is that industrialization and modern methods of insect control have improved the standard of living around the globe, and at the same time, they have introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants.

3) You are correct that the use of "while" alongside "same time" is redundant, as they are both used to indicate that the given actions are simultaneous, however, redundancy is NOT a deal-breaker on the GMAT. Redundancy/Awkwardness is the least serious of all flaws on GMAT sentence correction; an answer choice can easily be redundant but still the right answer if the other options have concrete errors. Redundancy can only be used to eliminate an answer choice if it is otherwise error-free, and there is a more concise answer choice. In this case, C has clear meaning and modifier errors that call for its outright elimination.

To understand the concept of "Which" Versus "That" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~2 minutes):

All the best!
Experts' Global Team

tkorzhan1995

Joined: 16 Oct 2021

Last visit: 30 Aug 2022

Posts: 115

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 22

Location: Canada

Posts: 115

Kudos: 16

25 Apr 2022, 09:48

Kudos

Bookmarks

GMATNinja, can you please clarify on the basis of what we should eliminate A?

GMATNinja

GMAT Club Verbal Expert

Joined: 13 Aug 2009

Last visit: 22 Apr 2026

Posts: 7,391

Own Kudos:

70,796

Given Kudos: 2,129

Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors

Location: United States (CO)

GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46 Verified score

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Products:

Expert

Expert reply

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Posts: 7,391

Kudos: 70,796

03 May 2022, 06:26

Kudos

Bookmarks

tkorzhan1995

GMATNinja, can you please clarify on the basis of what we should eliminate A?

Take another look at (A):

Quote:

Notice that "having" follows a clause and a comma, so it should be describing the entire previous clause. But that doesn't make sense here. The absence of regulation isn't the result of improving the standard of living around the world!

The only thing that could have gone unregulated is the noun "pollutants," so it's more appropriate to use a noun modifier to describe those pollutants.

That's exactly what we get in (B): "chemical pollutants that have gone virtually unregulated."

If (A) has a modifier problem and (B) fixes that modifier problem, (B) is better.

I hope that helps!

VIGHNESHKAMATH

Joined: 28 Sep 2021

Last visit: 21 Nov 2022

Posts: 146

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 259

Posts: 146

Kudos: 54

09 Jun 2022, 01:59

Kudos

Bookmarks

paeagain

Show Spoiler

https://www.nytimes.com/2000/11/28/science/negotiators-focus-on-dirty-dozen-pollutants.html

Industrialization and modern insect control have improved the quality of life around the globe, but they have also added some 100,000 chemical compounds that, some scientists worry, could affect the health of people and wildlife. These persistent organic pollutants, known as POP's, have gone virtually unregulated since they were developed more than 50 years ago.

Is it acceptable to say that ''while'' doesn't demand parallelism, but ''but'' demands parallelism? Thus, Option D and E breaks the parallelism rule, which is, however, not applicable for ''while'' construction.

Thank You
Vighnesh

EducationAisle

Joined: 27 Mar 2010

Last visit: 21 Apr 2026

Posts: 3,903

Own Kudos:

3,585

Given Kudos: 159

Location: India

Schools: ISB

GPA: 3.31

Expert

Expert reply

Schools: ISB

Posts: 3,903

Kudos: 3,585

09 Jun 2022, 03:39

Kudos

Bookmarks

Good observation. As many experts have pointed out, while is just a subordinating conjunction.

Vatsal7794

Retired Moderator

Joined: 17 Mar 2021

Last visit: 12 Oct 2025

Posts: 246

Own Kudos:

127

Given Kudos: 123

Location: India

Schools: IIMB EPGP'25 Schulich Sep'24 intake Fisher '26 ISB '25

GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V36 Verified score

GPA: 3.5

Schools: IIMB EPGP'25 Schulich Sep'24 intake Fisher '26 ISB '25

GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V36 Verified score

Posts: 246

Kudos: 127

19 Apr 2023, 21:38

Kudos

Bookmarks

Hi Experts

GMATNinja KarishmaB MartyTargetTestPrep

Industrialization and modern methods of insect control have improved the standard of living around the globe while at the same time they have introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants, having gone virtually unregulated since they were developed more than 50 years ago.

(A) while at the same time they have introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants, having

(B) while at the same time introducing some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants that have

(C) while they have introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants at the same time, which have

(D) but introducing some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants at the same time that have

(E) but at the same time introducing some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants, having

Hi Experts

GMATNinja KarishmaB MartyTargetTestPrep

Why option C is wrong?
Which can modify checmical pollutants so that is not wrong
Is there a meaning change between B and C?
and Is there any grammatical mistake in option C?

KarishmaB

Tutor

Joined: 16 Oct 2010

Last visit: 21 Apr 2026

Posts: 16,439

Own Kudos:

79,380

[2]

Given Kudos: 484

Location: Pune, India

Expert

Expert reply

Posts: 16,439

Kudos: 79,380

[2]

20 Apr 2023, 04:26

Kudos

Bookmarks

paeagain

Show Spoiler

First of all, here is a bit about the 'while' adverbial clause from my book:

Attachment:

Screenshot 2023-04-20 at 4.53.18 PM.png [ 91.04 KiB | Viewed 1785 times ]

Look at the main point of the original sentence now.

A and B have improved the standard of living while at the same time introducing many pollutants that have gone unregulated since they were developed more than 50 years ago.

The point is that A and B have done some good but at the same time, they have had some ill effects too.

(A) while at the same time they have introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants, having

'having gone unregulated' is perfect participle that makes us expect another action.
Having gone unregulated for so long, the average concentration of pollutants in rivers has reached dangerous levels.
It gives a cause for an effect.

(B) while at the same time introducing some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants that have

uses while adverbial phrase 'while introducing ...' because the subject is the same.
Uses a 'that clause' to talk about the pollutants. All good.

(C) while they have introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants at the same time, which have

The pollutants have not been introduced at the same time. Here it seems that the 100,000 dangerous chemicals were introduced at the same time.
We want to say that the action of introducing was done at the same time as the action of improving the quality of life.

(D) but introducing some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants at the same time that have
(E) but at the same time introducing some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants, having

'but' needs a clause. We cannot use a participle with 'but.'

Also, in (D), 'at the same time' modifies intro of the 100,000 chemicals.
In (E), 'having gone unregulated' is used.
These are the same errors as found above in options (C) and (A).

Answer (B)

Raman109

Joined: 17 Aug 2009

Last visit: 28 Jul 2025

Posts: 706

Own Kudos:

212

Given Kudos: 33

Posts: 706

Kudos: 212

25 Sep 2023, 04:39

Kudos

Bookmarks

Industrialization and modern methods of insect control have improved the standard of living around the globe while at the same time they have introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants, having gone virtually unregulated since they were developed more than 50 years ago.

Option Elimination -

"While" can be used to introduce participle phrases. "While" connects the "participle phrase" to the main clause of a sentence, indicating a simultaneous or contrasting action. Here, "simultaneous" action is important. When "While" is used to introduce a participle phrase, it indicates that the action described in the participle phrase is happening at the same time as the action in the main clause.
For example, While waiting for a bus, Sarah read a book. Or John Sang a song while playing a guitar. Or a contrasting action at the same time e.g. While cooking dinner, she listened to music.

Unlike "But," "while" can be used to introduce subordinating clauses or participle phrases.

(A) At the same time, they have introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants, having the first "they" refer to "Industrialization and modern methods" while the 2nd "they" refers to "chemical pollutants." For "having," normally, the structure is "Having finished his work, John went for a walk" - the action of finishing work happened before John went for a walk. Present perfect participle is used to indicate an action that occurred before another past action (different from past perfect - in past perfect, the action has been completed in the past before another past action, but in present perfect participle, the effect of that action (that occurred before another past action) is present). Here, after "Having won," there is no other action.

Here, "having" while making sense with the "introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants" doesn't make sense with "Industrialization and modern methods of insect control have improved the standard of living around the globe." So two issues, "they" and "having."

(B) while at the same time introducing some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants that have - - Here, the introduction of some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants has been happening at the same time Industrialization and modern methods of insect control have improved the standard of living around the globe. So the use of while is correct. The use of "that" is okay to introduce the essential information.

(C) while they have introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants at the same time, which have - here there are a couple of issues. To show the simultaneous nature, we need a participle phrase. Moreover, to some extent, the use of "they" is ambiguous. They can refer to "Modern methods" or "Industrialization" and "Modern methods." Also, which can either refer to time or pollutants, though reference to pollutants makes more sense. Additionally, "At the same time" is a misplaced modifier because "Modern methods" or "Industrialization" didn't introduce the pollutants in one single moment just like that. The sentence means that as "Modern methods" or "Industrialization" improved the living standards, they also introduced chemical pollutants (in the same 50 to 100 years time).

(D) but introducing some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants at the same time that have - unlike "while" but needs a clause after it. Wrong.

(E) but at the same time introducing some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants, having - unlike "while" but needs a clause after it. Wrong.

1 2

Moderators:

GMATNinja

GMAT Club Verbal Expert

7391 posts

AbhishekP220108

496 posts

bhanu29

358 posts