Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 30 May 2013
Posts: 168
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.82

Is the number x positive?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Sep 2013, 06:15
Question Stats:
44% (00:59) correct 56% (00:52) wrong based on 611 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Is the number x positive? (1) On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x. (2) On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.




Manager
Joined: 18 Sep 2013
Posts: 53
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.95
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: Is the number x positive?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Sep 2013, 06:24
rrsnathan wrote: Is the number x positive?
(1) On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x. (2) On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1. Ans should be A. 1. x=2, x1 =1 Yes x=1, x1 =2 Yes 2. x=3,x+1 =2 No x=1/3, x+1=2/3 Yes Hence A is sufficient. Please press KUDOS if my post HELPED !!




Intern
Joined: 05 Apr 2013
Posts: 17
GPA: 3.21

Re: Is the number x positive?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Sep 2013, 06:35
Is the number x positive?
(1) On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x. (2) On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1.
Take choice 1,
let x 1 = 0.6 => x = 0.6. so X +ve. let x1 = = 0.2 => x = 1.2. so x +ve
Take choice 2.
let x 1 =  0.4 => x = 0.4, so X +ve. let x1 = 2.4 => x = 1.4, so X ve.
Hence the ans is A.
Hope this helps.



Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Posts: 615

Re: Is the number x positive?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Sep 2013, 06:47
rrsnathan wrote: Is the number x positive?
(1) On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x. (2) On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1. x denotes the distance between 0 and x on the number line. F.S 1 states that 0(x1)<0x > x1<x > Square on both sides, and subtract >\(1*(2x1)>0 > x>\frac{1}{2}\). Sufficient. F.S 2 states that x<x+1 > Just as above, this gives > 1*(2x+1)>0 > \(x>\frac{1}{2}\). Insufficient. A.
_________________
All that is equal and notDeep Dive Inequality
Hit and Trial for Integral Solutions



Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 275

Re: Is the number x positive?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Oct 2013, 02:45
Forgot to substitute the fractional value ((((



Manager
Joined: 30 May 2012
Posts: 210
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.3
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

Re: Is the number x positive?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Nov 2014, 02:04
Bumping up for any other explanation. This is how I approached it 
(1) On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x. (2) On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1
(1) assume x= 2; => x1 = 3. (Given answer choice is not true/satisfied, so x can't be negative) Consider x= 22; => x1 =21 (Given answer choice is true/satisfied)
So, it is true that x is positive.
(2) same assumption, x=32 => x+1 = 31(Given answer choice is not true/satisfied, so x can't be negative) Consider x=1 => x+1 = 2 (Given answer choice is true/satisfied)
So, it is true that x is positive.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 47946

Re: Is the number x positive?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Nov 2014, 02:16
Blackbox wrote: Bumping up for any other explanation. This is how I approached it 
(1) On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x. (2) On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1
(1) assume x= 2; => x1 = 3. (Given answer choice is not true/satisfied, so x can't be negative) Consider x= 22; => x1 =21 (Given answer choice is true/satisfied)
So, it is true that x is positive.
(2) same assumption, x=32 => x+1 = 31(Given answer choice is not true/satisfied, so x can't be negative) Consider x=1 => x+1 = 2 (Given answer choice is true/satisfied)
So, it is true that x is positive. For (2) consider the values of x from 1/2 (not inclusive) to 0 (inclusive) to get that (2) is NOT in fact sufficient.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Manager
Joined: 30 May 2012
Posts: 210
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.3
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

Re: Is the number x positive?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Nov 2014, 00:50
Bunuel wrote: For (2) consider the values of x from 1/2 (not inclusive) to 0 (inclusive) to get that (2) is NOT in fact sufficient. I am not sure what you meant by 1/2 (not inclusive) and 0 (inclusive) and I'd appreciate if you can shed some light on it. But yeah, I messed up not considering fractions. So ... For option 2  if x were 1/2 then x+1 would be 1/2. Given statement of 0 closer to x than x+1 is busted with two answers (0 is as much closer to 1/2 as it is to 1/2). Hence option 2 has multiple answers. It goes to show again how much I suck at picking magic numbers (or numbers at all). I have to keep reminding myself to test for fractions too. Ugh. Is there any other general approach to this problem besides picking numbers?



Director
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Posts: 701
Location: India
GPA: 3.21
WE: Business Development (Other)

Re: Is the number x positive?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Nov 2014, 01:04
Blackbox wrote: Bunuel wrote: For (2) consider the values of x from 1/2 (not inclusive) to 0 (inclusive) to get that (2) is NOT in fact sufficient. I am not sure what you meant by 1/2 (not inclusive) and 0 (inclusive) and I'd appreciate if you can shed some light on it. But yeah, I messed up not considering fractions. So ... For option 2  if x were 1/2 then x+1 would be 1/2. Given statement of 0 closer to x than x+1 is busted with two answers (0 is as much closer to 1/2 as it is to 1/2). Hence option 2 has multiple answers. It goes to show again how much I suck at picking magic numbers (or numbers at all). I have to keep reminding myself to test for fractions too. Ugh. Is there any other general approach to this problem besides picking numbers? Hello Blackbox... What Bunuel intends to says consider value of x between \(1/2<x\leq{0}\).. For option 2  if x were 1/2 then x+1 would be 1/2. Given statement of 0 closer to x than x+1 is busted with two answers (0 is as much closer to 1/2 as it is to 1/2). Hence option 2 has multiple answers. That is why Bunuel says consider a number greater than 1/2.. Consider x=1/3...so x=1/3 and x+1 =2/3 : x is closer to 0 then x+1.. Look at mau5 method above...it is easier to understand and follow..
_________________
“If you can't fly then run, if you can't run then walk, if you can't walk then crawl, but whatever you do you have to keep moving forward.”



Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2717
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)

Re: Is the number x positive?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Feb 2016, 19:18
rrsnathan wrote: Is the number x positive?
(1) On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x. (2) On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1. 1. A is positive. otherwise, if x is negative, then negative minus negative makes an even bigger negative, and the new number would be even farther from 0. 2. it can be x=1 and x+1 =2, and 0 is closer to x, or it can be: x=0.1 and x+1=0.9. x is closer to x than to x+1. since we have 2 outcomes, B is not sufficient. A.



Intern
Joined: 11 Oct 2015
Posts: 2

Re: Is the number x positive?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Feb 2017, 12:07
gmatsheeba wrote: rrsnathan wrote: Is the number x positive?
(1) On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x. (2) On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1. Ans should be A. 1. x=2, x1 =1 Yes x=1, x1 =2 Yes 2. x=3,x+1 =2 No x=1/3, x+1=2/3 Yes Hence A is sufficient. Please press KUDOS if my post HELPED !! What if x=0 in the first case?



CEO
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 2703
Location: Canada

Is the number x positive?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 16 Apr 2018, 12:30
rrsnathan wrote: Is the number x positive?
(1) On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x. (2) On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1. Another approach is the sketch the cases on a number line. Target question: Is x positive? Statement 1: On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x. First, recognize that x1 will always be to the left of x. Second, recognize that there are 3 possible ways to place x1 and x with relation to zero. If zero is closer to x1 than to x, then we can rule out case #2, leaving us with cases #1 and #3 as possible scenarios. If case #1 is true, we can see that x must be positiveIf case #3 is true, we can see that x must be positiveSince both possible cases yield the same answer to the target question, we can answer the target question with certainty. So, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT Statement 2: On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1.Recognize that x+1 will always be to the right of x. Also recognize that there are 3 possible ways to place x and x+1 with relation to zero. If zero is closer to x than to x+1, then we can rule out case #2, leaving us with cases #1 and #3 as possible scenarios. If case #1 is true, we can see that x is negativeIf case #3 is true, we can see that x is positiveSince the two possible cases yield different answers to the target question, we cannot answer the target question with certainty. So, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT Answer = Cheers, Brent
_________________
Brent Hanneson – Founder of gmatprepnow.com
Originally posted by GMATPrepNow on 02 Oct 2017, 11:13.
Last edited by GMATPrepNow on 16 Apr 2018, 12:30, edited 1 time in total.



Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 493
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Transportation)

Is the number x positive?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Feb 2018, 11:00
samridhi30 wrote: gmatsheeba wrote: rrsnathan wrote: Is the number x positive?
(1) On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x. (2) On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1. Ans should be A. 1. x=2, x1 =1 Yes x=1, x1 =2 Yes 2. x=3,x+1 =2 No x=1/3, x+1=2/3 Yes Hence A is sufficient. Please press KUDOS if my post HELPED !! What if x=0 in the first case? ===========>>>>>>>>>>> 1) x1<x square both side 12x<0 x>0.5 => x>0.5 => A or D 2) x<x+1 square both 0<2x+1 x> 0.5 but as we know x can never be negative , but it can be zero 0 => x>=0 so x=0 and x>0 are solution therfore insufficient A is winner
_________________
Give Kudos for correct answer and/or if you like the solution.




Is the number x positive? &nbs
[#permalink]
22 Feb 2018, 11:00






