Last visit was: 11 Jul 2025, 05:36 It is currently 11 Jul 2025, 05:36
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
rrsnathan
Joined: 30 May 2013
Last visit: 04 Aug 2014
Posts: 123
Own Kudos:
430
 [80]
Given Kudos: 72
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.82
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
71
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 13 May 2024
Posts: 6,755
Own Kudos:
34,056
 [24]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,755
Kudos: 34,056
 [24]
13
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
gmatsheeba
Joined: 18 Sep 2013
Last visit: 21 Sep 2013
Posts: 49
Own Kudos:
115
 [14]
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V36
GPA: 3.95
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V36
Posts: 49
Kudos: 115
 [14]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
neelzwiz
Joined: 05 Apr 2013
Last visit: 06 Aug 2015
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
GPA: 3.21
Posts: 14
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is the number x positive?

(1) On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x.
(2) On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1.

Take choice 1,

let x -1 = -0.6 => x = 0.6. so X +ve.
let x-1 = = 0.2 => x = 1.2. so x +ve

Take choice 2.

let x -1 = - 0.4 => x = 0.4, so X +ve.
let x-1 = -2.4 => x = -1.4, so X -ve.


Hence the ans is A.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
mau5
User avatar
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Last visit: 31 Dec 2024
Posts: 479
Own Kudos:
3,278
 [14]
Given Kudos: 141
Posts: 479
Kudos: 3,278
 [14]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rrsnathan
Is the number x positive?

(1) On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x.
(2) On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1.

|x| denotes the distance between 0 and x on the number line.

F.S 1 states that |0-(x-1)|<|0-x| --> |x-1|<|x| --> Square on both sides, and subtract -->\(1*(2x-1)>0 --> x>\frac{1}{2}\). Sufficient.

F.S 2 states that |x|<|x+1| --> Just as above, this gives --> 1*(2x+1)>0 --> \(x>\frac{-1}{2}\). Insufficient.

A.
User avatar
mohnish104
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Last visit: 19 Apr 2014
Posts: 144
Own Kudos:
934
 [3]
Given Kudos: 291
Posts: 144
Kudos: 934
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Forgot to substitute the fractional value :(((((
User avatar
Blackbox
Joined: 30 May 2012
Last visit: 04 Nov 2017
Posts: 163
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 151
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.3
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Posts: 163
Kudos: 667
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bumping up for any other explanation. This is how I approached it -

(1) On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x.
(2) On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1

(1) assume x= -2; => x-1 = -3. (Given answer choice is not true/satisfied, so x can't be negative)
Consider x= 22; => x-1 =21 (Given answer choice is true/satisfied)

So, it is true that x is positive.

(2) same assumption, x=-32 => x+1 = -31(Given answer choice is not true/satisfied, so x can't be negative)
Consider x=1 => x+1 = 2 (Given answer choice is true/satisfied)

So, it is true that x is positive.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 11 Jul 2025
Posts: 102,634
Own Kudos:
740,345
 [2]
Given Kudos: 98,170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,634
Kudos: 740,345
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Blackbox
Bumping up for any other explanation. This is how I approached it -

(1) On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x.
(2) On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1

(1) assume x= -2; => x-1 = -3. (Given answer choice is not true/satisfied, so x can't be negative)
Consider x= 22; => x-1 =21 (Given answer choice is true/satisfied)

So, it is true that x is positive.

(2) same assumption, x=-32 => x+1 = -31(Given answer choice is not true/satisfied, so x can't be negative)
Consider x=1 => x+1 = 2 (Given answer choice is true/satisfied)

So, it is true that x is positive.

For (2) consider the values of x from -1/2 (not inclusive) to 0 (inclusive) to get that (2) is NOT in fact sufficient.
User avatar
Blackbox
Joined: 30 May 2012
Last visit: 04 Nov 2017
Posts: 163
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 151
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.3
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Posts: 163
Kudos: 667
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
For (2) consider the values of x from -1/2 (not inclusive) to 0 (inclusive) to get that (2) is NOT in fact sufficient.

I am not sure what you meant by -1/2 (not inclusive) and 0 (inclusive) and I'd appreciate if you can shed some light on it. But yeah, I messed up not considering fractions. So ...

For option 2 - if x were -1/2 then x+1 would be 1/2. Given statement of 0 closer to x than x+1 is busted with two answers (0 is as much closer to -1/2 as it is to 1/2). Hence option 2 has multiple answers.

It goes to show again :roll: how much I suck at picking magic numbers (or numbers at all). I have to keep reminding myself to test for fractions too. Ugh. Is there any other general approach to this problem besides picking numbers?
User avatar
WoundedTiger
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Last visit: 25 Sep 2024
Posts: 523
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 740
Location: India
GPA: 3.21
WE:Business Development (Other)
Products:
Posts: 523
Kudos: 2,479
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Blackbox
Bunuel
For (2) consider the values of x from -1/2 (not inclusive) to 0 (inclusive) to get that (2) is NOT in fact sufficient.

I am not sure what you meant by -1/2 (not inclusive) and 0 (inclusive) and I'd appreciate if you can shed some light on it. But yeah, I messed up not considering fractions. So ...

For option 2 - if x were -1/2 then x+1 would be 1/2. Given statement of 0 closer to x than x+1 is busted with two answers (0 is as much closer to -1/2 as it is to 1/2). Hence option 2 has multiple answers.

It goes to show again :roll: how much I suck at picking magic numbers (or numbers at all). I have to keep reminding myself to test for fractions too. Ugh. Is there any other general approach to this problem besides picking numbers?

Hello Blackbox...

What Bunuel intends to says consider value of x between \(-1/2<x\leq{0}\)..

For option 2 - if x were -1/2 then x+1 would be 1/2. Given statement of 0 closer to x than x+1 is busted with two answers (0 is as much closer to -1/2 as it is to 1/2). Hence option 2 has multiple answers.

That is why Bunuel says consider a number greater than -1/2..

Consider x=-1/3...so x=-1/3 and x+1 =2/3 : x is closer to 0 then x+1..

Look at mau5 method above...it is easier to understand and follow..
User avatar
mvictor
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Last visit: 14 Jul 2021
Posts: 2,126
Own Kudos:
1,249
 [3]
Given Kudos: 236
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE:General Management (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
Posts: 2,126
Kudos: 1,249
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rrsnathan
Is the number x positive?

(1) On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x.
(2) On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1.

1. A is positive. otherwise, if x is negative, then negative minus negative makes an even bigger negative, and the new number would be even farther from 0.
2. it can be x=1 and x+1 =2, and 0 is closer to x, or it can be:
x=-0.1 and x+1=0.9. x is closer to x than to x+1. since we have 2 outcomes, B is not sufficient.

A.
avatar
samridhi30
Joined: 11 Oct 2015
Last visit: 11 Sep 2022
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 48
Location: India
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatsheeba
rrsnathan
Is the number x positive?

(1) On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x.
(2) On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1.

Ans should be A.

1. x=2, x-1 =1 Yes
x=-1, x-1 =-2 Yes

2. x=-3,x+1 =-2 No
x=-1/3, x+1=2/3 Yes

Hence A is sufficient.
Please press KUDOS if my post HELPED !!


What if x=0 in the first case?
User avatar
sahilvijay
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 16 Apr 2021
Posts: 299
Own Kudos:
872
 [1]
Given Kudos: 76
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
Posts: 299
Kudos: 872
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
samridhi30
gmatsheeba
rrsnathan
Is the number x positive?

(1) On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x.
(2) On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1.

Ans should be A.

1. x=2, x-1 =1 Yes
x=-1, x-1 =-2 Yes

2. x=-3,x+1 =-2 No
x=-1/3, x+1=2/3 Yes

Hence A is sufficient.
Please press KUDOS if my post HELPED !!


What if x=0 in the first case?

===========>>>>>>>>>>>

1) |x-1|<|x|
square both side
1-2|x|<0
|x|>0.5
=> x>0.5 => A or D


2) |x|<|x+1|
square both
0<2|x|+1
|x|> -0.5
but as we know |x| can never be negative , but it can be zero 0
=> |x|>=0
so x=0 and x>0 are solution therfore insufficient



A is winner
avatar
farsar
Joined: 05 Jan 2019
Last visit: 21 Jul 2020
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 59
Posts: 8
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATPrepNow
rrsnathan
Is the number x positive?

(1) On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x.
(2) On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1.
Another approach is the sketch the cases on a number line.

First, recognize that x-1 will always be to the left of x.

Second, recognize that there are 3 possible ways to place x-1 and x with relation to zero.

Target question: Is x positive?

Statement 1: On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x.
If zero is closer to x-1 than to x, then we can rule out case #2, leaving us with cases #1 and #3 as possible scenarios.
If case #1 is true, we can see that x must be positive
If case #3 is true, we can see that x must be positive
Since both possible cases yield the same answer to the target question, we can answer the target question with certainty.
So, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: On the number line, 0 is closer to x than to x + 1.
Recognize that x+1 will always be to the right of x.
Also recognize that there are 3 possible ways to place x and x+1 with relation to zero.
If zero is closer to x than to x+1, then we can rule out case #2, leaving us with cases #1 and #3 as possible scenarios.
If case #1 is true, we can see that x is negative
If case #3 is true, we can see that x is positive
Since the two possible cases yield different answers to the target question, we cannot answer the target question with certainty.
So, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: A

Cheers,
Brent

Thank you for this answer! Its by far the clearest. I loved this approach.
avatar
5JUwiu4
Joined: 01 Apr 2019
Last visit: 22 Apr 2019
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 35
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATPrepNow

Loved the explanation, but I think I'm missing something.

In statement 1 it states " On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x."

You explain x could be on the right of zero and x-1 to the left (0 in the middle). If this is true x must be less than 1 to jump to the negative side of the number line. In this case isn't x and x-1 equidistant from 0? So how can 0 be closer to x-1 than to x?

Thanks in advance.
User avatar
ruchik
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 93
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.99
WE:Engineering (Computer Hardware)
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V40
Posts: 93
Kudos: 198
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
5JUwiu4
GMATPrepNow

Loved the explanation, but I think I'm missing something.

In statement 1 it states " On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x."

You explain x could be on the right of zero and x-1 to the left (0 in the middle). If this is true x must be less than 1 to jump to the negative side of the number line. In this case isn't x and x-1 equidistant from 0? So how can 0 be closer to x-1 than to x?

Thanks in advance.

Hi,
The way i looked at option 1 was 0 is closer to x-1 than x. Now if x is negative, x-1 is going to be more negative and hence going to be farther away from 0. So if we attack the problem in reverse away it might be easier. Can we find a negative number x, such that x-1 is closer to 0 than x? the answer is no hence the option is sufficient.

hope it helped.

Please give kudos if you like the explanation.
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 13 May 2024
Posts: 6,755
Own Kudos:
34,056
 [1]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,755
Kudos: 34,056
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
5JUwiu4
GMATPrepNow

Loved the explanation, but I think I'm missing something.

In statement 1 it states " On the number line, 0 is closer to x – 1 than to x."

You explain x could be on the right of zero and x-1 to the left (0 in the middle). If this is true x must be less than 1 to jump to the negative side of the number line. In this case isn't x and x-1 equidistant from 0? So how can 0 be closer to x-1 than to x?

Thanks in advance.

We could have x = 0.8, and x-1 = -0.2
In this case, 0 is closer to x-1 than to x.

Cheers,
Brent
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 37,373
Own Kudos:
Posts: 37,373
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderator:
Math Expert
102634 posts