Last visit was: 12 Jul 2025, 13:10 It is currently 12 Jul 2025, 13:10
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
AdmitJA
Joined: 04 Jul 2014
Last visit: 26 Mar 2018
Posts: 276
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 420
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.58
WE:Analyst (Accounting)
Products:
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
Posts: 276
Kudos: 1,203
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 12 July 2025
Posts: 102,636
Own Kudos:
740,747
 [1]
Given Kudos: 98,172
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,636
Kudos: 740,747
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AdmitJA
Joined: 04 Jul 2014
Last visit: 26 Mar 2018
Posts: 276
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 420
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.58
WE:Analyst (Accounting)
Products:
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
Posts: 276
Kudos: 1,203
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 12 July 2025
Posts: 102,636
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98,172
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,636
Kudos: 740,747
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
joseph0alexander
Bunuel
joseph0alexander
Bunuel,

Can we try this question by evaluating each of these expressions separately? Is this a correct approach, though time consuming?

1) x+1 > 0 ---> x > -1
2) x-1 > 0 ---> x > 1
3) -x-1 > 0 ---> -x > 1 or x > -1

If correct, could you please demonstrate on how to proceed?

This would not the best approach. You should consider two cases for |x|: when x<0, then |x| = x and when x>0, then |x| = -x. As well as two cases when (x+1) and (|x| - 1) are both positive and both negative.

Fair enough Bunuel, but just for the sake of understanding and learning the concept.

If we proceed with the 3 equations, I am getting the results in red above. Comparing them, we can take the greatest limiting factor, which is x>1, and prove sufficiency. I find this approach a little easier. Is my arithmetic correct?

Thank you. :-D

Again you should consider 2*2 = 4 cases.

(x+1)(|x| - 1) > 0.

1. x < 0 --> (x+1)(-x - 1) > 0.

(x + 1) > 0 and (-x - 1) > 0 --> x > -1 and x < -1. No solution here.

2. x < 0 --> (x+1)(-x - 1) > 0.

(x + 1) < 0 and (-x - 1) < 0 --> x < -1 and x > -1. No solution here.

3. x > 0 --> (x+1)(x - 1) > 0.

(x + 1) > 0 and (x - 1) > 0 --> x > -1 and x > 1. This gives x > 1.

4. x > 0 --> (x+1)(x - 1) < 0.

(x + 1) < 0 and (x - 1) < 0 --> x < -1 and x < 1. No solution here.

So, (x+1)(|x| - 1) > 0 holds true only when x > 1.

Hope it's clear.
avatar
sinhap07
Joined: 27 Aug 2014
Last visit: 09 Oct 2018
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 47
Kudos: 30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Good question. +1.

Is x> 1?

(1) (x+1) (|x| - 1) > 0. Consider two cases:

If \(x>0\) then \(|x|=x\) so \((x+1) (|x| - 1) > 0\) becomes \((x+1) (x - 1) > 0\) --> \(x^2-1>0\) --> \(x^2>1\) --> \(x<-1\) or \(x>1\). Since we consider range when \(x>0\) then we have \(x>1\) for this case;

If \(x\leq{0}\) then \(|x|=-x\) so \((x+1) (|x| - 1) > 0\) becomes \((x+1) (-x - 1) > 0\) --> \(-(x+1) (x+1) > 0\) --> \(-(x+1)^2>0\) --> \((x+1)^2<0\). Now, since the square of a number cannot be negative then for this range given equation has no solution.

So, we have that \((x+1) (|x| - 1) > 0\) holds true only when \(x>1\). Sufficient.


(2) |x| < 5 --> \(-5<x<5\). Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunuel

Why are we not changing the inequality sign in statement 1 when we assume x is negative-ideally we should. In that case, we get x<-1 from -(x+1)^2<0 as one of (x+1) can be eliminated.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 12 July 2025
Posts: 102,636
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98,172
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,636
Kudos: 740,747
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sinhap07
Bunuel
Good question. +1.

Is x> 1?

(1) (x+1) (|x| - 1) > 0. Consider two cases:

If \(x>0\) then \(|x|=x\) so \((x+1) (|x| - 1) > 0\) becomes \((x+1) (x - 1) > 0\) --> \(x^2-1>0\) --> \(x^2>1\) --> \(x<-1\) or \(x>1\). Since we consider range when \(x>0\) then we have \(x>1\) for this case;

If \(x\leq{0}\) then \(|x|=-x\) so \((x+1) (|x| - 1) > 0\) becomes \((x+1) (-x - 1) > 0\) --> \(-(x+1) (x+1) > 0\) --> \(-(x+1)^2>0\) --> \((x+1)^2<0\). Now, since the square of a number cannot be negative then for this range given equation has no solution.

So, we have that \((x+1) (|x| - 1) > 0\) holds true only when \(x>1\). Sufficient.


(2) |x| < 5 --> \(-5<x<5\). Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunuel

Why are we not changing the inequality sign in statement 1 when we assume x is negative-ideally we should. In that case, we get x<-1 from -(x+1)^2<0 as one of (x+1) can be eliminated.

\(-(x+1)^2>0\);

Add (x+1)^2 to both sides: \(0>(x+1)^2\), which is the same as \((x+1)^2<0\).
avatar
bhatiavai
Joined: 07 Dec 2009
Last visit: 28 Aug 2018
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
105
 [1]
Given Kudos: 375
GMAT Date: 12-03-2014
Posts: 66
Kudos: 105
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is x > 1?

I would approach it the following way :

(1) (x+1) (|x| - 1) > 0

(+) * (+) > 0 or (-) * (-) > 0

For both of the parts to be positive we can see that x >1 . Just by trying few values you can figure this out. X cant be Zero as then the second part becomes - . X cant be 1 as then second part becomes 0 and hence the whole LHS becomes Zero.

For both of the parts to be negative we try any value less an Zero and see that no value will satisfy the equation. Hence X cannot be negative.. Hence A is Sufficient.

(2) |x| < 5

Clearly not sufficient

Answer is A.
avatar
truongynhi
Joined: 05 Jun 2015
Last visit: 09 Jan 2025
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 444
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V41
GPA: 3.66
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V41
Posts: 22
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Bunuel,

I have a question.

(x+1)(|x|-1)=0 has x=1 and x=-1 as its solution. However, x=-1 is a repeated root. Hence, on the number line, the sign will not change when it passes x=-1.

--------(-1)---------(1)+++++++

Therefore, only when x>1, (x+1)(|x|-1)>0.

Is my solution correct? I remember my highschool math teacher said something like 'the sign doesn't change when it passes a double root'. But, it's years ago and I just want to make sure that the approach is valid.

Thank you!
avatar
wisdomkindred
Joined: 28 May 2018
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tips: The key to unlock confusion with “and” and “or” in inequality:

- Drawing graphs and crossing off all irrelevant values.
- “and” means must; “or” means could

Is x > 1?

(1) (x+1) (|x| - 1) > 0

(2) |x| < 5

(1): There are 2 cases: case 1 or case 2

Case 1: x+1 > 0 AND |x|-1 >0
X+1 >0 → x > -1 (A)
|x|-1 >0 → |x| >1 → x>1 OR x <-1 (B)

→ graph for A: //////////(-1)-------------(1)--------
→ graph for B: ---------(-1)///////////(1)--------

Note about the graphs:
////////////means the values crossed off
----------------- means the values are accepted


Combining the two graphs above: this is the AND case, so we must cross off all values that don’t fit in any graph, represented by “//////////”
So the value of the 2 inequalities of case 1 is: x>1.

Case 2: x+1 <0 AND |x|-1 <0

X+1 < 0 → x <-1 (C)
|x|-1 <0 → |x| < 1 → -1<x<1 (D)

→ graph for C: ---------(-1)/////////(1)///////
→ graph for D: /////////(-1)----------(1)////////

As we see, there is no value of x that satisfy the both graphs. That means there is no solution for the inequalities in case 2.

→ So only case 1 is appropriate to consider. That means (x+1) (|x| - 1) > 0 when x>1. Sufficient.

(2) |x| < 5 → -5<x<5 → graph: //////-5--------1--------5//////

Clearly, x can be bigger than 1 or less than 1. Insufficient.

Answer: A.


P/s: If you are still confused, you can test numbers!
User avatar
Rickooreo
Joined: 24 Dec 2021
Last visit: 15 Feb 2023
Posts: 305
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 240
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.95
WE:Real Estate (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
Posts: 305
Kudos: 30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel KarishmaB
Can you please help me understand what mistake I am making in the attachment
Attachments

Capture.PNG
Capture.PNG [ 132.99 KiB | Viewed 1052 times ]

User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 11 Jul 2025
Posts: 16,101
Own Kudos:
74,286
 [2]
Given Kudos: 475
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,101
Kudos: 74,286
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rickooreo
Bunuel KarishmaB
Can you please help me understand what mistake I am making in the attachment

Note that:

AB = 0 means that either A = 0 or B = 0 or both are 0
AB > 0 means that either Both are positive or Both are negative.
AB < 0 means that exactly one of them is positive and the other is negative.

\((x+1)(|x| - 1) > 0\)

means either (x + 1) > 0 AND (|x| - 1) > 0
or (x + 1) < 0 AND (|x| - 1) < 0

Now review your solution.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 37,369
Own Kudos:
Posts: 37,369
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
   1   2 
Moderator:
Math Expert
102636 posts