Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 03:15 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 03:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
EgmatQuantExpert
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Last visit: 02 Apr 2024
Posts: 3,663
Own Kudos:
20,169
 [42]
Given Kudos: 165
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,663
Kudos: 20,169
 [42]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
39
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
UJs
Joined: 18 Nov 2013
Last visit: 17 Feb 2018
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
211
 [9]
Given Kudos: 63
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
Posts: 67
Kudos: 211
 [9]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
reto
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 29 Apr 2015
Last visit: 24 Aug 2018
Posts: 716
Own Kudos:
4,292
 [2]
Given Kudos: 302
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: Economics, Finance
Schools: LBS MIF '19
WE:Asset Management (Finance: Investment Banking)
Schools: LBS MIF '19
Posts: 716
Kudos: 4,292
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
csirishac
Joined: 23 Nov 2014
Last visit: 18 Aug 2015
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 3
Kudos: 2
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is x>5 or x<-7?
S1) x>2
X>5
X<-5 Not suff
S2) x<2 Not suff
Combined not suff
"E"
avatar
Escalate
Joined: 02 Jun 2014
Last visit: 06 Apr 2016
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 37
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Statement 1
(x-2)(|x|-5)> 0

Suppose x>=0 then |x| = x
statement becomes as

(x-2)(x-5)> 0

which gives x<2, x> 5
As we have assumed x>=0 so range of solution is 0=<x<2 , x>5

Now suppose x <0 then satement becomes
(x-2)(-x-5)>0
-(x+5)(x-2)>0
(x+5)(x-2)<0
-5<x<2
Since we assumed x <0 so -5<x<0

Combining both range of solutions we get
-5<x<2 , x> 5

So if you put x=6 ans to the ques is Yes
If you put x=0 ans to the ques is No
Statement 1 insuff

Statement 2 gives
-2<x<2
So any value in this range of x will give a definite NO as answer to the ques
Hence sufficient


Ans B
avatar
rohitd80
Joined: 24 Mar 2013
Last visit: 01 Feb 2016
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
12
 [1]
Given Kudos: 131
Posts: 16
Kudos: 12
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[1]
(x-2)(|x|-5)> 0

for x < 0

(x-2)(-x-5)> 0
or (x-2)(x+5)<0
therefore, -5<x<2.........so, for x<0 |x+1| is not greater than 6

for

Now for x > 0
(x-2)(x-5)>0
therefore, x<2 or x>5
Again, for some values in the above range |x+1|>6 and for some it's not.

So, [1] is insufficient

[2]
Say's X^2 < 4
or x^2-4<0
or (x-2)(x+2) < 0
therefore, -2<x<2....Clearly this range is sufficient to say that for all values in it |x+1| will never be > 0........sufficient


Ans B
User avatar
EgmatQuantExpert
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Last visit: 02 Apr 2024
Posts: 3,663
Own Kudos:
20,169
 [3]
Given Kudos: 165
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,663
Kudos: 20,169
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

Correct Answer: B

|x+1| represents the distance of x from -1 on the number line.

So, the question is asking, ‘Is the distance of x from -1 on the number line greater than 6 units or not?’



We see that:

The answer is YES if
i) x < -7 or
ii) x > 5

Else, the answer is NO

Analyzing Statement 1
(x-2)(|x| - 5) > 0


The product of two terms is positive.

This means, either both the terms on Left Hand Side are positive or both are negative.

Case 1: x – 2 is positive AND |x| - 5 is positive

This means, x > 2 AND |x| > 5

Now, |x| is greater than 5 for x < -5 and for x > 5. But x < -5 violates the condition of this case that x – 2 should be positive.

Therefore, the range that satisfies Case 1: x > 5

In this case, the answer to the asked question is YES.

Case 2: x – 2 is negative AND |x| - 5 is negative

That is, x < 2 AND -5 < x < 5

Upon combining the 2 pieces of information, the resultant inequality is:

-5 < x < 2

In this case, the answer to the asked question is NO.

Thus, we have not been able to get a unique answer to the asked question from St. 1. Therefore, Statement 1 is insufficient.

Analyzing Statement 2
\(x^2 < 4\)


That is, \(x^2 - 2^2 < 0\)
\((x+2)(x-2) < 0\)



By using the Wavy Line method, we can easily find that this inequality holds for -2 < x < 2

In this range, the answer is NO.

Since St. 2 does provide us with a unique answer, it is sufficient.
User avatar
EgmatQuantExpert
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Last visit: 02 Apr 2024
Posts: 3,663
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 165
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,663
Kudos: 20,169
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
abhishek05
Statement 1
(x-2)(|x|-5)> 0

Suppose x>=0 then |x| = x
statement becomes as

(x-2)(x-5)> 0

which gives x<2, x> 5
As we have assumed x>=0 so range of solution is 0=<x<2 , x>5

Now suppose x <0 then satement becomes
(x-2)(-x-5)>0
-(x+5)(x-2)>0
(x+5)(x-2)<0
-5<x<2
Since we assumed x <0 so -5<x<0

Combining both range of solutions we get
-5<x<2 , x> 5

So if you put x=6 ans to the ques is Yes
If you put x=0 ans to the ques is No
Statement 1 insuff

Statement 2 gives
-2<x<2
So any value in this range of x will give a definite NO as answer to the ques
Hence sufficient


Ans B

Dear abhishek05

Your analysis was mostly right. One correction though. Please look at the part in red.

You should completely analyze one case before going to the next case. That is, first completely analyze the case that x is >= 0 (which gives you the pink range of possible values of x in the quoted solution) and only then go to the second case that x is < 0 (which gives the orange range of possible values in the quoted solution)

So, the correct approach would have been:
1. Once you get the (pink) range of values of x in Case 1, check what answer do they give to the question 'Is |x+1| > 6?'
2. After you get the (orange) range of values of x in Case 2, check what answer do they give to the question 'is |x+1| >6?'

Hope this helped! :)

Best Regards

Japinder
User avatar
Supermaverick
Joined: 16 Apr 2017
Last visit: 01 Oct 2018
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 82
Posts: 34
Kudos: 165
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EgmatQuantExpert
abhishek05
Statement 1
(x-2)(|x|-5)> 0

Suppose x>=0 then |x| = x
statement becomes as

(x-2)(x-5)> 0

which gives x<2, x> 5
As we have assumed x>=0 so range of solution is 0=<x<2 , x>5

Now suppose x <0 then satement becomes
(x-2)(-x-5)>0
-(x+5)(x-2)>0
(x+5)(x-2)<0
-5<x<2
Since we assumed x <0 so -5<x<0

Combining both range of solutions we get
-5<x<2 , x> 5

So if you put x=6 ans to the ques is Yes
If you put x=0 ans to the ques is No
Statement 1 insuff

Statement 2 gives
-2<x<2
So any value in this range of x will give a definite NO as answer to the ques
Hence sufficient


Ans B

Dear abhishek05

Your analysis was mostly right. One correction though. Please look at the part in red.

You should completely analyze one case before going to the next case. That is, first completely analyze the case that x is >= 0 (which gives you the pink range of possible values of x in the quoted solution) and only then go to the second case that x is < 0 (which gives the orange range of possible values in the quoted solution)

So, the correct approach would have been:
1. Once you get the (pink) range of values of x in Case 1, check what answer do they give to the question 'Is |x+1| > 6?'
2. After you get the (orange) range of values of x in Case 2, check what answer do they give to the question 'is |x+1| >6?'

Hope this helped! :)

Best Regards

Japinder


The two different solutions here by the corresponding different method yield solution:

Your method: Gives solution X>5, ( Case 1: x – 2 is positive AND |x| - 5 is positive)
Another method considering |X| = X for X>=0 , yields a broad range ie, 0=<x<2 , x>5

There is a difference right, is this difference of approach going to yield same conclusion every time?
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,596
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,596
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105408 posts
496 posts