Last visit was: 12 Dec 2024, 23:03 It is currently 12 Dec 2024, 23:03
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
maikikiuu
Joined: 30 Sep 2018
Last visit: 22 Nov 2021
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 112
Posts: 23
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
maikikiuu
Joined: 30 Sep 2018
Last visit: 22 Nov 2021
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
16
 []
Given Kudos: 112
Posts: 23
Kudos: 16
 []
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
tarobapo
Joined: 20 Nov 2019
Last visit: 14 Feb 2020
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
4
 []
Given Kudos: 4
Location: United States (PA)
Schools: Darden '22
GPA: 3.95
Schools: Darden '22
Posts: 9
Kudos: 4
 []
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
maikikiuu
Joined: 30 Sep 2018
Last visit: 22 Nov 2021
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 112
Posts: 23
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tarobapo
I don't think that the answer choice is correct. The argument is "to improve students' academic performance." How do smoking and drinking have anything to do with this argument? At best, this strengthens the argument: since students smoke and drink, then to pay for it they would have to perform better academically.

E should be correct, in my opinion, since if money is not a good incentive for students, they might not want to work for it.

Edit: I tried to translate explanation from Chinese and the explanation given was that the plan has unintended side effects. But since the question is to weaken the ARGUMENT, I am confused why this would ever be correct.


The argument is a typical plan type of argument: there is a problem (low academic performance), and there is a plan to solve it (pay students on the basis of metrics such as attendance, behavior, tests and class work)

To strengthen or weaken a plan, there are 3 directions: 1. achievable? 2. feasible? 3. side-effects?

E choice is a trap. It simply says that the plan is not a good plan WITHOUT providing any value-added information. "Merely reject the argument without providing any evidence" is a logic error choice in argument evaluation questions, like a question: xxx's response to yyy is flawed because_____. So I think E is at least not GMAC's type of correct answer.

Although C is not straightforward, it is the BEST choice among the 5.
avatar
wjy18300
Joined: 26 Dec 2019
Last visit: 19 Mar 2020
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
6
 []
Given Kudos: 5
Location: China
Schools: HKUST (A)
GPA: 3.7
Schools: HKUST (A)
Posts: 6
Kudos: 6
 []
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i choose E

Spending money on smoking and drinking, the negative result in Choice C, has nothing to do with to improve the academics, the conclusion.

So, choice C cannot be regarded to weaken the conclusion. But E can.
avatar
tarobapo
Joined: 20 Nov 2019
Last visit: 14 Feb 2020
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Location: United States (PA)
Schools: Darden '22
GPA: 3.95
Schools: Darden '22
Posts: 9
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
maikikiuu
tarobapo
I don't think that the answer choice is correct. The argument is "to improve students' academic performance." How do smoking and drinking have anything to do with this argument? At best, this strengthens the argument: since students smoke and drink, then to pay for it they would have to perform better academically.

E should be correct, in my opinion, since if money is not a good incentive for students, they might not want to work for it.

Edit: I tried to translate explanation from Chinese and the explanation given was that the plan has unintended side effects. But since the question is to weaken the ARGUMENT, I am confused why this would ever be correct.


The argument is a typical plan type of argument: there is a problem (low academic performance), and there is a plan to solve it (pay students on the basis of metrics such as attendance, behavior, tests and class work)

To strengthen or weaken a plan, there are 3 directions: 1. achievable? 2. feasible? 3. side-effects?

E choice is a trap. It simply says that the plan is not a good plan WITHOUT providing any value-added information. "Merely reject the argument without providing any evidence" is a logic error choice in argument evaluation questions, like a question: xxx's response to yyy is flawed because_____. So I think E is at least not GMAC's type of correct answer.

Although C is not straightforward, it is the BEST choice among the 5.

I am not sure about the third direction: side-effects. In strengthen, you are suppose to weaken the CONCLUSION. Having a side effect (which in this case is completely unrelated to the academics/conclusion) does not weaken a conclusion.

Can I know the source from which you got 3. side-effects? If this question was "created" with intent to make this "side-effect" answer correct there may very well be no correct answer and this question is flawed.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7153 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts