P1 -->
debate, not surprising over BLBT, as though they may lead to useful products, but the process are not yet fully understood.
example of how GFP (a BLBT) can be used to make a more cost-effective product.
P2 -->
Despite (contradiction - means there may be a counter example or something w.r.t to earlier example.)
yes, about the decline of the creatures from where GFP is extracted. but how the creature does this activity is not understood. and the lab results vary alot.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Main Point --> There is a debate, with example show/explain the both sides of the argument.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q1. The author's primary purpose in this passage is to A. discuss potential benefits of bioluminescence-based biotechnology and potential problems with its research.Correct --> Perfect, as this is debate pointing out both sides the potential benefits and potential problems.
B. discourage further research into Aequorea victoria's bioluminescent capabilities.Not Correct --> Not discouraging, but pointing out a potential problem.
C. celebrate the promised benefits of biophotovoltaic production.Not Correct --> there is a debate, not celebration.
D. raise questions that need to be answered before research in bioluminescence-based biotechnologies can be sustainable or effective.Not Correct --> there are no questions but debate on potential benefits and limitations.
E. describe the beauty of the glow of bioluminescent jellyfish.Not Correct -->Irrelevant and out of scope. the debate is not about beauty but research.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q2. The passage's discussion of biophotovoltaic power provides support for which of the following assertions? Think and work this out like a strengthen (through inference) question of CR.A. The natural world is too fragile to endure the development of this technology.Not Correct --> This is a limitation not support.
B. The development of better solar cells is vital to renewable energy research.Not Correct --> better solar cells development is a potential benefit which would be good but not vital.
C. The use of biophotovoltaic power may cause declining jellyfish populations in Puget Sound.Not Correct --> This is jumbling mix of words from 2 paragraphs to make out gibberish. and it don't strengthen the question.
D. A biological process might yield technological benefits even before it is fully understood.Not Correct --> cannot be inferred from the passage and is almost opposite to what is said in passage. As the internal process of creatures is not understood, the development of technology is difficult.
E. Bioluminescence-based biotechnology will revolutionize the energy industry.Correct -->
will revolutionize - yes in future, if the technology can be successfully developed. A potential benefit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q3. The first paragraph performs which of the following functions in the passage? A. It lists problems associated with research into bioluminescent jellyfish in Puget Sound.Not Correct --> Problems / limitations are in 2nd paragraph.
B. It gives an example of a controversial area of research and the benefits it may yield.Correct --> yes, debate - controversy & benefits it may)potential) yield.
C. It investigates the practicality of a potentially beneficial area of research and gives examples of problems that must be solved.Not Correct --> This is part 1st paragraph and part 2nd paragraph. though there is no investigation at all, only debate.
D. It describes the technique used to cause extracted GFPs to emit electrical current.Not Correct --> though no technique is described, the statement is part 2nd paragraph.
E. It encourages increased corporate and academic support of research into bioenergies.Not Correct --> This is complete out of scope. Nothing is mentioned or can be inferred about support from corporate and academics.