GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 19 Oct 2018, 06:48

Fuqua EA Calls Expected Soon:

Join us in the chat | track the decision tracker | See forum posts/summary


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

It’s very hard to determine correctly the efficiency of new machines

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 269
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Other
GPA: 2.44
WE: Project Management (Telecommunications)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
It’s very hard to determine correctly the efficiency of new machines  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 18 Sep 2018, 21:33
3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

50% (01:32) correct 50% (01:46) wrong based on 183 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

It’s very hard to determine correctly the efficiency of new machines offered to manufacturers. For example, a new machine producing cartridge cases is considered efficient if it can produce a large number of cartridge cases in a short time. Does this prove the efficiency of the machine? What if a significant portion of the cartridge cases it produces is defective?

The implied objection to the above measure of machine efficiency is based on questioning which of the following statements?


(A) Producing cartridge cases is the primary purpose of the machine discussed in the passage.

(B) The number of cartridge cases produced in a certain amount of time by a cartridge case machine is relevant to determining machine’s efficiency.

(C) Machines producing cartridge cases are representative of all other machines.

(D) The quality of the product produced can be ignored when determining the time efficiency of a certain machine.

(E) The quality of the product may decrease when the quantity of the product produced in a certain amount of time increases.

Originally posted by guerrero25 on 08 Jun 2013, 04:49.
Last edited by Bunuel on 18 Sep 2018, 21:33, edited 2 times in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1076
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: It’s very hard to determine correctly the efficiency of new machines  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jun 2013, 05:08
1
It’s very hard to determine correctly the efficiency of new machines offered to manufacturers. For example, a new machine producing cartridge cases is considered efficient if it can produce a large number of cartridge cases in a short time. Does this prove the efficiency of the machine? What if a significant portion of the cartridge cases it produces is defective?

The implied objection to the above measure of machine efficiency is based on questioning which of the following statements?

We have to take a statement that is questioned by the objection. This objection states that "quantity" is not the only factot that determines efficiency.
So the relationship "quantity=>efficiency" is not correct in the objection, also the quality must be taken into consideration:

(D)The quality of the product produced can be ignored when determining the time efficiency of a certain machine.

This statement is questioned, it clearly states what we said before.
D
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2012
Posts: 6
Re: It’s very hard to determine correctly the efficiency of new machines  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jun 2013, 12:14
Choice D is best.

Same logic as in post man delivering letters - increase in effciency may lead to poor quality.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1036
Location: United States
Premium Member
Re: It’s very hard to determine correctly the efficiency of new machines  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jun 2013, 01:18
1
This is evaluation question, my approach is "variation technique" that is presented in Power Score CR - Bible.

The question stem is quite convoluted, but we can paraphrase it like "which of the following statement can be used to evaluate the measure of machine efficiency?"

The basic idea of "variation technique" is adding YES/NO to each answer. If YES/NO does not change anything ==> The answer is wrong. But if YES/NO can change the part you want to evaluate ==> The answer is correct.

KEY point is "QUALITY", so stick to the options that mention quality.

ANALYZE EACH ANSWER

(A)Producing cartridge cases is THE PRIMARY PURPOSE / NOT THE PRIMARY PURPOSE of the machine discussed in the passage.
Clearly, YES/NO does not affect the objection to the measure of machine efficiency ==> A is wrong.

(B)The number of cartridge cases produced in a certain amount of time by a cartridge case machine is RELEVANT / NOT RELEVANT to determining machine’s efficiency.
Clearly, YES/NO does not affect the objection to the measure of machine efficiency ==> B is wrong

(C)Machines producing cartridge cases are REPRESENTATIVE / NOT REPRESENTATIVE of all other machines.
Clearly, YES/NO does not affect the objection to the measure of machine efficiency ==> C is wrong

(D)The quality of the product produced CAN BE IGNORED / CANNOT BE IGNORED when determining the time efficiency of a certain machine.
If the quality can be ignored ==> the more products, the more efficiency
If the quality must be considered ==> the more products does not mean the more efficiency, cause we have to consider how many defects.
D is correct.

(E)The quality of the product MAY DECREASE / MAY NOT DECREASE when the quantity of the product produced in a certain amount of time increases.
Clearly, YES/NO does not affect the objection to the measure of machine efficiency ==> E is wrong

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 11 Feb 2018
Posts: 139
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
Re: It’s very hard to determine correctly the efficiency of new machines  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Sep 2018, 22:34
I like this question stem.We have to get a good idea about what exactly is being asked.Good question overall

Posted from my mobile device
GMAT Club Bot
Re: It’s very hard to determine correctly the efficiency of new machines &nbs [#permalink] 18 Sep 2018, 22:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

It’s very hard to determine correctly the efficiency of new machines

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.