Last visit was: 24 Apr 2025, 20:13 It is currently 24 Apr 2025, 20:13
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
655-705 Level|   Method of Reasoning|                  
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2025
Posts: 100,914
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 93,176
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 100,914
Kudos: 719,274
 [233]
19
Kudos
Add Kudos
213
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 24 Apr 2025
Posts: 15,908
Own Kudos:
72,793
 [45]
Given Kudos: 463
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 15,908
Kudos: 72,793
 [45]
33
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MikeScarn
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Sep 2017
Last visit: 05 Dec 2024
Posts: 278
Own Kudos:
1,238
 [6]
Given Kudos: 228
Status:Booth 1Y
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
GMAT 1: 690 Q44 V41
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.62
WE:Sales (Computer Software)
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
krazzysaad
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 03 Jan 2019
Last visit: 18 May 2024
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
38
 [4]
Given Kudos: 134
Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
GPA: 4
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
Posts: 21
Kudos: 38
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. Extreme Decision. Wrong
B. Good choice, let's keep going.
C. He does challenge John's position
D. Its hard to pin point any statement, at best we can say the logic derived in incorrect
E. Extreme Decision. Wrong

(B) is the only relevant option and is our answer.

Give Kudos to promote more quality answers!!
Cheers to studying!!
User avatar
shridhar786
Joined: 31 May 2018
Last visit: 08 Feb 2022
Posts: 325
Own Kudos:
1,664
 [4]
Given Kudos: 132
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Posts: 325
Kudos: 1,664
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
John: You told me once that no United States citizen who supports union labor should buy an imported car. Yet you are buying an Alma. Since Alma is one of the biggest makers of imports, I infer that you no longer support unions.

jhon conclude that harry no longer supports the union because
Harry is buying alma and alma is one of the biggest makers of imports
by saying this John assumes that the car that harry is buying is imported (not made is united states)


Harry: I still support labor unions. Even though Alma is a foreign car company, the car I am buying, the Alma Deluxe, is designed, engineered, and manufactured in the United States.

in this statement, harry refutes that assumption by saying the car he is buying is made in the United States

(B) is the correct answer
User avatar
PriyankaPalit7
Joined: 28 May 2018
Last visit: 13 Jan 2020
Posts: 124
Own Kudos:
526
 [3]
Given Kudos: 883
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 1: 640 Q45 V35
GMAT 2: 670 Q45 V37
GMAT 3: 730 Q50 V40
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 3: 730 Q50 V40
Posts: 124
Kudos: 526
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Harry's method of defending his purchase of an Alma is to

Answer: B

A. disown the principle he formerly held - No one disowned any principle here

B. show that John's argument involves a false unstated assumption - Because Alma is a large importer, John assumed that Harry was buying an imported car from Alma. This assumption is false.
Just because Alma is an importer, it is not necessary that the car that Harry is buying is also imported. Harry points out this mistake in assumption


C. contradict John's conclusion without challenging John's reasoning in drawing that conclusion - Harry does challenge John's reason by challenging his assumption.

D. point out that one of the statements John makes in support of his argument is false - Harry did not falsify any statement that John said. John did not specifically say that Harry was buying an imported car. John simply assumed that Harry was buying an imported car from Alma because Alma is a huge importer.

E. claim that his is a special case in which the rule need not apply - No exceptions or special cases were pointed out. Harry only negated John's assumption.
User avatar
elifceylan
Joined: 18 Aug 2018
Last visit: 24 Jul 2019
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 97
Location: Turkey
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GPA: 3.31
Posts: 9
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can somebody please explain why E is wrong? The explanations stated above weren't much convincing since he mentions a spacial case might not necessarily applies for John's assertion. Thanks
User avatar
Tanchat
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 20 Jun 2023
Posts: 226
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 139
Posts: 226
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear expert,

I have 2 questions

1) what does a false unstated assumption? John literally stated the assumption. Why unstated assumption is correct?

2) Why is C incorrect? John inter that Harry is no longer support unions. < This is the conclusion, isn't it? And Harry does disagree John's conclusion.
User avatar
ReedArnoldMPREP
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2021
Last visit: 20 Dec 2024
Posts: 521
Own Kudos:
522
 [1]
Given Kudos: 37
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Posts: 521
Kudos: 522
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tanchat
Dear expert,

I have 2 questions

1) what does a false unstated assumption? John literally stated the assumption. Why unstated assumption is correct?

2) Why is C incorrect? John inter that Harry is no longer support unions. < This is the conclusion, isn't it? And Harry does disagree John's conclusion.

1). What assumption do you think John himself has stated? Make sure you understand what the GMAT means by the word 'assumption.' The 'assumption' of an argument is an UNSTATED premise that MUST BE TRUE for the argument to 'hold.' If an assumption of an argument is false, the argument basically falls apart.

2). Harry does disagree with John's conclusion, but does challenge John's reasoning.

Why does John think Harry doesn't support unions? Why does Harry respond the way he does?
User avatar
Tanchat
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 20 Jun 2023
Posts: 226
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 139
Posts: 226
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ReedArnoldMPREP
Tanchat
Dear expert,

I have 2 questions

1) what does a false unstated assumption? John literally stated the assumption. Why unstated assumption is correct?

2) Why is C incorrect? John inter that Harry is no longer support unions. < This is the conclusion, isn't it? And Harry does disagree John's conclusion.

1). What assumption do you think John himself has stated? Make sure you understand what the GMAT means by the word 'assumption.' The 'assumption' of an argument is an UNSTATED premise that MUST BE TRUE for the argument to 'hold.' If an assumption of an argument is false, the argument basically falls apart.

2). Harry does disagree with John's conclusion, but does challenge John's reasoning.

Why does John think Harry doesn't support unions? Why does Harry respond the way he does?

1) Then, John doesn’t provide an Assumption, right? Then, why B told “a false unstated assumption”? If Assumption is not stated, why it’s false

2) because John assumes that the car is imported and Harry buys it. Then, John infers (concludes) that Harry is no longer support unions.
Harry contradicts the John’s conclusion that Harry still supports union because he buys the car designed and manufactured in US

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
ReedArnoldMPREP
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2021
Last visit: 20 Dec 2024
Posts: 521
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 37
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Posts: 521
Kudos: 522
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tanchat
ReedArnoldMPREP
Tanchat
Dear expert,

I have 2 questions

1) what does a false unstated assumption? John literally stated the assumption. Why unstated assumption is correct?

2) Why is C incorrect? John inter that Harry is no longer support unions. < This is the conclusion, isn't it? And Harry does disagree John's conclusion.

1). What assumption do you think John himself has stated? Make sure you understand what the GMAT means by the word 'assumption.' The 'assumption' of an argument is an UNSTATED premise that MUST BE TRUE for the argument to 'hold.' If an assumption of an argument is false, the argument basically falls apart.

2). Harry does disagree with John's conclusion, but does challenge John's reasoning.

Why does John think Harry doesn't support unions? Why does Harry respond the way he does?

1) Then, John doesn’t provide an Assumption, right? Then, why B told “a false unstated assumption”? If Assumption is not stated, why it’s false

2) because John assumes that the car is imported and Harry buys it. Then, John infers (concludes) that Harry is no longer support unions.
Harry contradicts the John’s conclusion that Harry still supports union because he buys the car designed and manufactured in US

Posted from my mobile device


Notice that you yourself wrote: ' because John assumes that the car is imported.'

John doesn't 'provide' the assumption, he *makes* the assumption. Harry (and you) have realized John is *assuming* the car is imported (without stating that he is assuming that). Harry points out that this unstated assumption is false--the car is in fact not imported; it is made in the United States.
User avatar
Mavisdu1017
Joined: 10 Aug 2021
Last visit: 04 Jan 2023
Posts: 362
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 226
Posts: 362
Kudos: 42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ReedArnoldMPREP
Tanchat
Dear expert,

I have 2 questions

1) what does a false unstated assumption? John literally stated the assumption. Why unstated assumption is correct?

2) Why is C incorrect? John inter that Harry is no longer support unions. < This is the conclusion, isn't it? And Harry does disagree John's conclusion.

1). What assumption do you think John himself has stated? Make sure you understand what the GMAT means by the word 'assumption.' The 'assumption' of an argument is an UNSTATED premise that MUST BE TRUE for the argument to 'hold.' If an assumption of an argument is false, the argument basically falls apart.

2). Harry does disagree with John's conclusion, but does challenge John's reasoning.

Why does John think Harry doesn't support unions? Why does Harry respond the way he does?
ReedArnoldMPREP Hello expert, I cannot understand why C is wrong. I think the two persons just have a disagreement of the definition about “makers of imports” VS “imported car”; but this has nothing to do with John’s reasoning. Could you explain further? Thanks
User avatar
ReedArnoldMPREP
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2021
Last visit: 20 Dec 2024
Posts: 521
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 37
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Posts: 521
Kudos: 522
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mavisdu1017
ReedArnoldMPREP
Tanchat
Dear expert,

I have 2 questions

1) what does a false unstated assumption? John literally stated the assumption. Why unstated assumption is correct?

2) Why is C incorrect? John inter that Harry is no longer support unions. < This is the conclusion, isn't it? And Harry does disagree John's conclusion.

1). What assumption do you think John himself has stated? Make sure you understand what the GMAT means by the word 'assumption.' The 'assumption' of an argument is an UNSTATED premise that MUST BE TRUE for the argument to 'hold.' If an assumption of an argument is false, the argument basically falls apart.

2). Harry does disagree with John's conclusion, but does challenge John's reasoning.

Why does John think Harry doesn't support unions? Why does Harry respond the way he does?
ReedArnoldMPREP Hello expert, I cannot understand why C is wrong. I think the two persons just have a disagreement of the definition about “makers of imports” VS “imported car”; but this has nothing to do with John’s reasoning. Could you explain further? Thanks

It's not a disagreement over definitions, it's about whether or not Harry is buying a car that has been imported. John is assuming that because Alma is one of the "biggest makers of imports," that the Alma-car Harry is buying must be imported. There's no disagreement on the definitions of "makers of imports" or "imported car." John is assuming that a car bought from a company that 'makes a lot of imports' must be an 'imported car.' Harry points out that the car he is buying from Alma is *not* an imported, something John was clearly assuming.

C is wrong because Harry does challenge John's reasoning. John reasons that 'because you're buying from Alma, one of the largest makers of imported cars, you don't support unions.' Harry is challenging that reasoning--"I am buying from Alma, but I'm not buying an imported car. You are assuming that since I'm buying from Alma, I'm buying an imported car."
User avatar
woohoo921
Joined: 04 Jun 2020
Last visit: 17 Mar 2023
Posts: 521
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 623
Posts: 521
Kudos: 114
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi experts,

I realize that this question is discussed in great length on this form, and I understand why Choice B is correct. Not to overthink this, but isn't John still supporting a company does not support union labor, even if his particular car is made in the United States?

Thank you for your time.
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,477
Own Kudos:
5,447
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,431
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,477
Kudos: 5,447
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
woohoo921
Hi experts,

I realize that this question is discussed in great length on this form, and I understand why Choice B is correct. Not to overthink this, but isn't John still supporting a company does not support union labor, even if his particular car is made in the United States?

Thank you for your time.
It's true that the profits derived from Harry's purchase may go to a company that doesn't support union labor, but really, what company does support union labor? Unions support union labor, not companies.

Thus, the point isn't about whether the company that manufactures the car supports union labor. The point is about whether Harry supported union labor. Regardless of what the company supports, since "the Alma Deluxe, is designed, engineered, and manufactured in the United States," it could be made entirely with union labor. Thus, in buying the car, Harry could be supporting union labor.
User avatar
rickyric395
Joined: 07 Mar 2020
Last visit: 24 Apr 2025
Posts: 114
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 114
Kudos: 84
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB
Bunuel
John: You told me once that no United States citizen who supports union labor should buy an imported car. Yet you are buying an Alma. Since Alma is one of the biggest makers of imports, I infer that you no longer support unions.

Harry: I still support labor unions. Even though Alma is a foreign car company, the car I am buying, the Alma Deluxe, is designed, engineered, and manufactured in the United States.

Harry's method of defending his purchase of an Alma is to

A. disown the principle he formerly held
B. show that John's argument involves a false unstated assumption
C. contradict John's conclusion without challenging John's reasoning in drawing that conclusion
D. point out that one of the statements John makes in support of his argument is false
E. claim that his is a special case in which the rule need not apply



CR21661.01
Verbal Review 2020 NEW QUESTION

We need to read the stated principle carefully: No United States citizen who supports union labor should buy an IMPORTED CAR.

John:
You are buying an Alma.
Alma is one of the biggest makers of imports
Conclusion - You no longer support unions.

Harry:
Alma is a foreign car company
The car I am buying is made in US
Conclusion - I still support unions

What is Harry's method of defending?

A. disown the principle he formerly held

He does not disown the principle.

B. show that John's argument involves a false unstated assumption

Correct - He shows that John's argument assumes that because Alma is a foreign car company, the car Harry is buying is an imported car. This is false because the car Harry is buying is made in US. So Harry shows that John's argument involves a false unstated assumption.

C. contradict John's conclusion without challenging John's reasoning in drawing that conclusion

He does contradict John's conclusion but he does not give in to John's reasoning. He challenges John's reasoning by saying that foreign car company does not imply "imported car". The car can still be US made.

D. point out that one of the statements John makes in support of his argument is false

No. Harry does not point out that John's any statement is false. All John's statements are accepted by Harry but he points out a false assumption John makes in his reasoning.

E. claim that his is a special case in which the rule need not apply

No. He does not claim that the rule need not apply to him. He applies the rule to himself too. He clarifies that his car is indeed US made and not imported.

Hi KarishmaB, thanks for the explanation, your explanations always help. But to me it seems like the assumption John made is that 'The car Harry is buying is an imported car (this is an assumption) as Alma is biggest importer (that is a premise)'. And Harry counters the argument by saying that even though Alma is biggest importer, the model he is buying is made in US.
Am I correct or is there something I missed?
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 24 Apr 2025
Posts: 15,908
Own Kudos:
72,793
 [1]
Given Kudos: 463
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 15,908
Kudos: 72,793
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rickyric395
KarishmaB
Bunuel
John: You told me once that no United States citizen who supports union labor should buy an imported car. Yet you are buying an Alma. Since Alma is one of the biggest makers of imports, I infer that you no longer support unions.

Harry: I still support labor unions. Even though Alma is a foreign car company, the car I am buying, the Alma Deluxe, is designed, engineered, and manufactured in the United States.

Harry's method of defending his purchase of an Alma is to

A. disown the principle he formerly held
B. show that John's argument involves a false unstated assumption
C. contradict John's conclusion without challenging John's reasoning in drawing that conclusion
D. point out that one of the statements John makes in support of his argument is false
E. claim that his is a special case in which the rule need not apply



CR21661.01
Verbal Review 2020 NEW QUESTION

We need to read the stated principle carefully: No United States citizen who supports union labor should buy an IMPORTED CAR.

John:
You are buying an Alma.
Alma is one of the biggest makers of imports
Conclusion - You no longer support unions.

Harry:
Alma is a foreign car company
The car I am buying is made in US
Conclusion - I still support unions

What is Harry's method of defending?

A. disown the principle he formerly held

He does not disown the principle.

B. show that John's argument involves a false unstated assumption

Correct - He shows that John's argument assumes that because Alma is a foreign car company, the car Harry is buying is an imported car. This is false because the car Harry is buying is made in US. So Harry shows that John's argument involves a false unstated assumption.

C. contradict John's conclusion without challenging John's reasoning in drawing that conclusion

He does contradict John's conclusion but he does not give in to John's reasoning. He challenges John's reasoning by saying that foreign car company does not imply "imported car". The car can still be US made.

D. point out that one of the statements John makes in support of his argument is false

No. Harry does not point out that John's any statement is false. All John's statements are accepted by Harry but he points out a false assumption John makes in his reasoning.

E. claim that his is a special case in which the rule need not apply

No. He does not claim that the rule need not apply to him. He applies the rule to himself too. He clarifies that his car is indeed US made and not imported.

Hi KarishmaB, thanks for the explanation, your explanations always help. But to me it seems like the assumption John made is that 'The car Harry is buying is an imported car (this is an assumption) as Alma is biggest importer (that is a premise)'. And Harry counters the argument by saying that even though Alma is biggest importer, the model he is buying is made in US.
Am I correct or is there something I missed?

Yes, that is what the assumption is. John assumes that Harry is buying an imported car only because Harry is buying a car of Alma (a foreign company).
But Harry is buying the Alma Deluxe which is made locally, not imported.

With the globalisation, a company originating in country X could be manufacturing products all across the world. It could set up plants in other countries and manufacture and sell there itself. Those goods will not be called imports in those countries because they were made locally.
avatar
rachanarc
Joined: 13 Oct 2020
Last visit: 23 Apr 2025
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 106
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, International Business
Posts: 7
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
elifceylan
Can somebody please explain why E is wrong? The explanations stated above weren't much convincing since he mentions a spacial case might not necessarily applies for John's assertion. Thanks

This is why I think E is wrong :

Ques stem - "Harry's method of defending his purchase of an Alma is to..."
E says - "...claim that his is a special case in which the rule need not apply"


Think about - what's the rule here?

RULE IS -
People who buy imported car <----> Don't support Union Labor


Now think what would be a special case to this rule?
People who buy imported car <-----> Support Union Labor


But, does this special case to the rule apply to Harry?
Special case to the rule applies to people who buy imported car.
But Harry didn't buy an imported car - He bought a car which is manufactured in the US (company could be foreign company but manufactured in the US implies it's not imported).

Hence, special case to the rule doesn't apply to Harry and E is wrong.
User avatar
hellocharu123
Joined: 28 Jan 2025
Last visit: 23 Apr 2025
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
okay.. let's do this

John : If someone buys an imported car then they do not support the union labour. And since, Alma is biggest makers of imports therefore you don't support unions.

Harry : I still do support unions. The car I am buying belongs to an outside car company but it is not imported as it is fully made in our country, only the brand name is of alma which is outside country.

Here Harry is saying that you have assumed that I have purchased from Alma which means it is from outside our country which is not true.

hence as per this option B seems relevant.

Now, let's see other options.

A) disown the principle he formerly held
Incorrect : Harry is not disowning the principle he formerly held rather he says that principle is still valid as that's what he has followed.

B) show that John's argument involves a false unstated assumption
Correct : yes, John assumed that the car Harry is purchasing is imported.

C) contradict John's conclusion without challenging John's reasoning in drawing that conclusion
Incorrect : Harry does contradicts John's conclusions but also challenges his reasoning in drawing that conclusion.

D) point out that one of the statements John makes in support of his argument is false
Incorrect : John does not make any inaccurate statements in the argument.

E) claim that his is a special case in which the rule need not apply
Incorrect : Harry is not saying that his is a special case. He's saying his car is not imported only. There's no exception.

Bunuel
John: You told me once that no United States citizen who supports union labor should buy an imported car. Yet you are buying an Alma. Since Alma is one of the biggest makers of imports, I infer that you no longer support unions.

Harry: I still support labor unions. Even though Alma is a foreign car company, the car I am buying, the Alma Deluxe, is designed, engineered, and manufactured in the United States.

Harry's method of defending his purchase of an Alma is to

(A) disown the principle he formerly held
(B) show that John's argument involves a false unstated assumption
(C) contradict John's conclusion without challenging John's reasoning in drawing that conclusion
(D) point out that one of the statements John makes in support of his argument is false
(E) claim that his is a special case in which the rule need not apply


ID: 500124
CR21661.01
Verbal Review 2020 NEW QUESTION


Evaluation of a Plan

Situation
Harry has bought a car manufactured by Alma, a company among the largest makers of cars imported to the United States. From that fact John infers that Harry no longer holds a principle he formerly professed: that nobody who supports U.S. union labor should buy an imported car. Harry responds by clarifying that the Alma Deluxe he is buying is entirely a U.S. product.

Reasoning
What method has Harry used to show that his purchasing an Alma is not inconsistent with his principles? Harry does this by showing that John is incorrectly assuming that the car Harry is purchasing has been imported.

(A) Harry does not disown the principle he formerly held; rather, he tries to show that his purchase is consistent with it.

(B) Correct. John mistakenly assumes—without asserting—that the Alma that Harry is buying must be an imported car, and Harry indicates that this assumption is false.

(C) Harry challenges John's conclusion but he also challenges John's reasoning, by indicating that it relies on a false unstated assumption.

(D) John does not state the assumption that Harry indicates is false, but Harry recognizes that the assumption in question is unstated.

(E) Harry does not claim this; he claims, rather, that the new Alma he is purchasing is not imported and so his purchase does not violate his principle concerning union labor.
­
User avatar
GmatKnightTutor
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 24 Apr 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 1,488
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
John: You told me once that no United States citizen who supports union labor should buy an imported car. Yet you are buying an Alma. Since Alma is one of the biggest makers of imports, I infer that you no longer support unions.

Harry: I still support labor unions. Even though Alma is a foreign car company, the car I am buying, the Alma Deluxe, is designed, engineered, and manufactured in the United States.

Harry's method of defending his purchase of an Alma is to


(A) disown the principle he formerly held
Nope. Harry doesn’t disown his principle about imported cars. His response clarifies that the car in question wasn’t imported.

(B) show that John's argument involves a false unstated assumption
This is the answer. John basically assumes that all the cars Alma sells in the US are imported. Harry points out that even though the company is foreign, the car in question wasn’t imported.

(C) contradict John's conclusion without challenging John's reasoning in drawing that conclusion
Nope. Had Harry only said the first sentence in his response, perhaps this answer choice may have had some potential.

(D) point out that one of the statements John makes in support of his argument is false
Nope. Other than the inference, Harry doesn’t deny anything John says (e.g. “Alma is one of the biggest makers of imports”).

(E) claim that his is a special case in which the rule need not apply
I can understand how this answer choice can be tempting but, ultimately, Harry isn’t claiming his situation is special. Had he said that, although the car he bought was imported, the company provides a lot of money to union labor for every purchase, that may be a different matter.
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7282 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
233 posts