okay.. let's do this
John : If someone buys an imported car then they do not support the union labour. And since, Alma is biggest makers of imports therefore you don't support unions.
Harry : I still do support unions. The car I am buying belongs to an outside car company but it is not imported as it is fully made in our country, only the brand name is of alma which is outside country.
Here Harry is saying that you have assumed that I have purchased from Alma which means it is from outside our country which is not true.
hence as per this option B seems relevant.
Now, let's see other options.
A) disown the principle he formerly held
Incorrect : Harry is not disowning the principle he formerly held rather he says that principle is still valid as that's what he has followed.
B) show that John's argument involves a false unstated assumption
Correct : yes, John assumed that the car Harry is purchasing is imported.
C) contradict John's conclusion without challenging John's reasoning in drawing that conclusion
Incorrect : Harry does contradicts John's conclusions but also challenges his reasoning in drawing that conclusion.
D) point out that one of the statements John makes in support of his argument is false
Incorrect : John does not make any inaccurate statements in the argument.
E) claim that his is a special case in which the rule need not apply
Incorrect : Harry is not saying that his is a special case. He's saying his car is not imported only. There's no exception.
Bunuel
John: You told me once that no United States citizen who supports union labor should buy an imported car. Yet you are buying an Alma. Since Alma is one of the biggest makers of imports, I infer that you no longer support unions.
Harry: I still support labor unions. Even though Alma is a foreign car company, the car I am buying, the Alma Deluxe, is designed, engineered, and manufactured in the United States.
Harry's method of defending his purchase of an Alma is to
(A) disown the principle he formerly held
(B) show that John's argument involves a false unstated assumption
(C) contradict John's conclusion without challenging John's reasoning in drawing that conclusion
(D) point out that one of the statements John makes in support of his argument is false
(E) claim that his is a special case in which the rule need not apply
ID: 500124
CR21661.01
Verbal Review 2020 NEW QUESTION
Evaluation of a Plan
Situation
Harry has bought a car manufactured by Alma, a company among the largest makers of cars imported to the United States. From that fact John infers that Harry no longer holds a principle he formerly professed: that nobody who supports U.S. union labor should buy an imported car. Harry responds by clarifying that the Alma Deluxe he is buying is entirely a U.S. product.
Reasoning
What method has Harry used to show that his purchasing an Alma is not inconsistent with his principles? Harry does this by showing that John is incorrectly assuming that the car Harry is purchasing has been imported.
(A) Harry does not disown the principle he formerly held; rather, he tries to show that his purchase is consistent with it.
(B) Correct. John mistakenly assumes—without asserting—that the Alma that Harry is buying must be an imported car, and Harry indicates that this assumption is false.
(C) Harry challenges John's conclusion but he also challenges John's reasoning, by indicating that it relies on a false unstated assumption.
(D) John does not state the assumption that Harry indicates is false, but Harry recognizes that the assumption in question is unstated.
(E) Harry does not claim this; he claims, rather, that the new Alma he is purchasing is not imported and so his purchase does not violate his principle concerning union labor.