It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 22:37

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 197

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangkok
Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2007, 09:02
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

1.Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre de Fermat died in 1665 without leaving behind any written proof for a theorem that he claimed nonetheless to have proved. Probably this alleged theorem simply cannot be proved, since---as the article points out---no one else has been able to prove it. Therefore it is likely that Fermat was either lying or else mistaken when he made his claim.
Laura: Your encyclopedia is out of date. Recently someone has in fact proved Fermatâ€™s theorem. And since the theorem is provable, your claim---that Fermat was lying or mistaken---clearly is wrong.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a reasoning error in Lauraâ€™s argument?
(A) It purports to establish its conclusion by making a claim that, if true, would actually contradict that conclusion.
(B) It mistakenly assumes that the quality of a personâ€™s character can legitimately be taken to guarantee the accuracy of the claims that person has made.
(C) It mistakes something that is necessary for its conclusion to follow for something that ensures that the conclusion follows.
(D) It uses the term â€œprovableâ€
_________________

cool

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
Posts: 212

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2007, 19:21
I am lost between A and C. By the way, E has a typo.

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 28

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2007, 14:28
i say (C) also. she is concluding that because the theorem has since been proved, fermat was definately telling the truth. however, it still could be the case that fermat hadn't solved it.

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 03 Mar 2007
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2007, 07:20
I arrived at C through POE.

May I know what is the OA?

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 20 Nov 2006
Posts: 213

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2007, 09:56
I would opt for Option A.

(A) It purports to establish its conclusion by making a claim that, if true, would actually contradict that conclusion.

It is clearly telling that just by making a claim, it is contradicting the claim. by merely telling that the theorom has been proved now doesn't mean that it had been proved in 1665. It might, it might not.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

23 Mar 2007, 09:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by