Mar 27 03:00 PM PDT  04:00 PM PDT Join a free live webinar and learn the winning strategy for a 700+ score on GMAT & the perfect application. Save your spot today! Wednesday, March 27th at 3 pm PST Mar 29 06:00 PM PDT  07:00 PM PDT Join a FREE 1day workshop and learn how to ace the GMAT while keeping your fulltime job. Limited for the first 99 registrants. Mar 29 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Right now, their GMAT prep, GRE prep, and MBA admissions consulting services are up to $1,100 off. GMAT (Save up to $261): SPRINGEXTRAGMAT GRE Prep (Save up to $149): SPRINGEXTRAGRE MBA (Save up to $1,240): SPRINGEXTRAMBA Mar 30 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease. Mar 31 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar to learn a structured approach to solve 700+ Number Properties question in less than 2 minutes.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 28 Jun 2010
Posts: 1

Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jun 2010, 19:46
Question Stats:
52% (02:28) correct 48% (02:29) wrong based on 817 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre de Fermat died in 1665 without leaving behind any written proof for a theorem that he claimed nonetheless to have proved. Probably this alleged theorem simply cannot be proved, sinceas the article points outno one else has been able to prove it. Therefore it is likely that Fermat was either lying or else mistaken when he made his claim. Laura: Your encyclopedia is out of date. Recently someone has in fact proved Fermat’s theorem. And since the theorem is provable, your claimthat Fermat was lying or mistakenclearly is wrong. Which one of the following most accurately describes a reasoning error in Laura’s argument? (A) It purports to establish its conclusion by making a claim that, if true, would actually contradict that conclusion. (B) It mistakenly assumes that the quality of a person’s character can legitimately be taken to guarantee the accuracy of the claims that person has made. (C) It mistakes something that is necessary for its conclusion to follow for something that ensures that the conclusion follows. (D) It uses the term “provable” without defining it. (E) It fails to distinguish between a true claim that has mistakenly between believed to be false and a false claim that has mistakenly been believed to be true.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.




GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2338
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46 GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51

Re: Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Jun 2017, 14:54
Mahmud6 wrote: Would you please help me to figure out the followings?
C. It mistakes something that is necessary (what is necessary?) for its conclusion (what is conclusion?) to follow for something (what is this something?) that ensures that the conclusion follows. Let's start with Laura's conclusion, which is that Joseph's claimthat Fermat was lying or mistaken when he claimed that he proved the theoremis clearly wrong. If Fermat was not lying or mistaken, then the theorem must be provable (this is the necessary part). However, just because the theorem is provable does not necessarily mean that Fermat himself proved it. Thus, even if the theorem was known to be provable, Fermat may still have been lying or mistaken. Something that ensures that Fermat was not lying or mistaken would show that Fermat himself proved the theorem, not just that the theorem is provable.
_________________




Manager
Joined: 04 May 2010
Posts: 84
WE 1: 2 yrs  Oilfield Service

Re: Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jun 2010, 02:20
J  Fermat may have lied or did not actually prove the theorem since 1. he did not leave behind any proof. 2. no one else has been able to prove it
L  J's claim is wrong since his point 2 is invalid  someone has proved it.
What is a FLAW in L's argument?
A. L's claim supports her conclusion.
B. Not true, the quality of character is actually J's inference, and even he doesn't use it to guarantee his own claim at all.
C. Exactly. If you notice L has only refuted point no. 2 and forgotten about point 1  that Fermat didn't leave any proof. This still brings doubt to whether he was able to prove it at all. Though her claim about point 2 is valid and necessary for her conclusion it does not necessarily LEAD to the conclusion since there is another counterclaim which she has ignored.
D. Provable is being used in its standard english meaning and need not be defined.
E. This is just meant to confuse you. There is no true claim or false claim that was previously misconstrued  it's simple  L is only saying that point 2 is not true.
Pick C.




Manager
Joined: 24 Dec 2009
Posts: 171

Re: Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jun 2010, 12:35
(A) It purports to establish its conclusion by making a claim that, if true, would actually contradict that conclusion.  Laura's claim to establish the conclusion is not at all contradicting with the conclusion she wants to establish. Hence A cannot be a correct answer choice.
(B) It mistakenly assumes that the quality of a person’s character can legitimately be taken to guarantee the accuracy of the claims that person has made. She is nowhere trying to use quality of person's character to guarantee her claim. Hence B cannot be a correct answer choice.
(C) It mistakes something that is necessary for its conclusion to follow for something that ensures that the conclusion follows.  Laura is trying to ensure that her conclusion follows by stating that is required for the conclusion to be true. Hence C is a correct answer choice.
(D) It uses the term “provable” without defining it.  This is irrelevant. Hence D cannot be a correct answer choice.
(E) It fails to distinguish between a true claim that has mistakenly between believed to be false and a false claim that has mistakenly been believed to be true. [color=#FF0000] There are no two claims. Hence E is not a correct answer choice.[/color] Thank You.
Thanks, Akhil M.Parekh



VP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1045

Re: Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Jul 2010, 19:00
I narrowed to C and E but still cannot understand why C is correct.



Director
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 988

Re: Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 May 2011, 02:21
Joseph Perrie no written proof + ! others proof > lying
laura proof > !lying
proof is not a necessary condition in Joseph's argument.
C brings out this exact reasoning.
Good question.



Senior Manager
Affiliations: UWC
Joined: 09 May 2012
Posts: 361
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 620 Q42 V33 GMAT 2: 680 Q44 V38
GPA: 3.43
WE: Engineering (Entertainment and Sports)

Re: Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 May 2012, 03:22
what is the source of this question?



Intern
Joined: 23 May 2014
Posts: 11

Re: Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Jun 2014, 20:02
macjas wrote: what is the source of this question? I have the the same problem; these are some incredibly wordy answer choices; nothing like what I've seen on GMAT prep 2014. Will questions like this be on the GMAT?



Manager
Joined: 20 Jul 2013
Posts: 54

Re: Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Jun 2014, 08:47
narmfarmer wrote: macjas wrote: what is the source of this question? I have the the same problem; these are some incredibly wordy answer choices; nothing like what I've seen on GMAT prep 2014. Will questions like this be on the GMAT? i agree ~ but there's a reason for that: As you notice, there's a whole lot of midrange level Qs on that software. Those are the questions that deserve the most attention. Ace those questions, and don't fuss too much over the tough ones. Honestly, only if you're doing really well  hovering around the 90%tile range ~ You'll see alot of those convolutedwordy questions. Or, sometimes near the beginning, as the CAT is adjusting to your skill level. If you see this problem, you should: 1) Pat urself on the back b/c ur doing really well 2) Don't worry! Even if you see this near the beginning of the test, don't sweat it. It's not worth alot nor the stress. But, definitely practice the tough ones ~ as they'll make the "lower leveled ones" even easier.



Retired Moderator
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 495

Re: Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 May 2017, 11:58
Would you please help me to figure out the followings? C. It mistakes something that is necessary (what is necessary?) for its conclusion (what is conclusion?) to follow for something (what is this something?) that ensures that the conclusion follows.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2016
Posts: 64
Location: India
GPA: 3.01

Re: Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Jun 2017, 10:24
GMATNinja wrote: Mahmud6 wrote: Would you please help me to figure out the followings?
C. It mistakes something that is necessary (what is necessary?) for its conclusion (what is conclusion?) to follow for something (what is this something?) that ensures that the conclusion follows. Let's start with Laura's conclusion, which is that Joseph's claimthat Fermat was lying or mistaken when he claimed that he proved the theoremis clearly wrong. If Fermat was not lying or mistaken, then the theorem must be provable (this is the necessary part). However, just because the theorem is provable does not necessarily mean that Fermat himself proved it. Thus, even if the theorem was known to be provable, Fermat may still have been lying or mistaken. Something that ensures that Fermat was not lying or mistaken would show that Fermat himself proved the theorem, not just that the theorem is provable. Thanks , your explanations clarifies the OA. But it will be difficult to understand for those members who doesn't have an idea about the relation between necessary condition and sufficient condition. Could you please make a post explaining about those.



GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2338
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46 GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51

Re: Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Jun 2017, 11:44
sriamlan wrote: Thanks , your explanations clarifies the OA. But it will be difficult to understand for those members who doesn't have an idea about the relation between necessary condition and sufficient condition.
Could you please make a post explaining about those. It's funny, we're working on a Topic of the Week on the distinction between necessary and sufficient. There are a few topics in line ahead of it, but we'll get to it. And in the meantime, there are a couple of pretty good explanations of the issue here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/asufficient ... 50740.htmlI hope this helps!
_________________



Manager
Joined: 10 Apr 2015
Posts: 179
GPA: 3.31

Re: Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Jun 2017, 21:05
Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre de Fermat died in 1665 without leaving behind any written proof for a theorem that he claimed nonetheless to have proved. Probably this alleged theorem simply cannot be proved, sinceas the article points outno one else has been able to prove it. Therefore it is likely that Fermat was either lying or else mistaken when he made his claim. Laura: Your encyclopedia is out of date. Recently someone has in fact proved Fermat’s theorem. And since the theorem is provable, your claimthat Fermat was lying or mistakenclearly is wrong. Which one of the following most accurately describes a reasoning error in Laura’s argument? (A) It purports to establish its conclusion by making a claim that, if true, would actually contradict that conclusion. (B) It mistakenly assumes that the quality of a person’s character can legitimately be taken to guarantee the accuracy of the claims that person has made. (C) It mistakes something that is necessary for its conclusion to follow for something that ensures that the conclusion follows. Laura's argument says what is necessary for its conclusion to follow. But, her argument DOES NOT ensure that the conclusion follows, because even if the the theorem is provable, there is no mention whether Fermat has proved it or not. So, still the fact that  "Fermat was lying or...." can be true.
Hence C is right.(D) It uses the term “provable” without defining it. (E) It fails to distinguish between a true claim that has mistakenly between believed to be false and a false claim that has mistakenly been believed to be true.
_________________
In case you find my posts helpful, give me Kudos. Thank you.



Director
Joined: 02 Oct 2017
Posts: 731

Re: Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Dec 2018, 05:24
Tough one to crack. Nice explanation by AbhayPrasanna and GMATninja...
_________________
Give kudos if you like the post



Intern
Joined: 09 Oct 2018
Posts: 4

Re: Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Mar 2019, 18:23
Simple passage, but really tough alternatives!




Re: Joseph: My encyclopedia says that the mathematician Pierre
[#permalink]
02 Mar 2019, 18:23






