It is currently 19 Oct 2017, 15:08

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Judge Bonham denied a motion to allow members of the jury to

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 246

Kudos [?]: 86 [2], given: 0

Judge Bonham denied a motion to allow members of the jury to [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Nov 2005, 08:13
2
KUDOS
63
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

56% (01:15) correct 44% (01:10) wrong based on 2748 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Judge Bonham denied a motion to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of to confine them to a hotel.

(A) to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of to confine them to
(B) that would have allowed members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of confined to
(C) under which memebrs of the jury are allowed to go home at the end of each day instead of confining them in
(D) that would allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day rather than confinement in
(E) to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day rather than be confined to

[Reveal] Spoiler: OE
OG Verbal Review 2, SC#93

Parallelism; Logical predication

The logic of this sentence has two possible options for the members of the jury: they can go home or be confined to a hotel. The first option is expressed using the infinitive to go home; the second option should use the parallel form (to understood) be confined. Since the members of the jury are not doing the confining themselves, the passive form must be used. The construction x instead of y, when x and y are infinitives, is clumsy; the idiomatic construction x rather than y is better here. Both constructions require x and y to be parallel.

(A) The passive form to be confined is required. To allow members of the jury . . . to confne them illogically indicates that the jurors are doing the confining.
(B) The infinitive form to be confned is required, rather than the past participle. The sentence is awkward and wordy.
(C) Members of the jury is the illogical object in confning them. Confining is not parallel to to go home.
(D) The noun confinement is not parallel to to go home.
(E) Correct. Be confined to uses the infinitive form just as to go home does; the to before be confined is understood and does not need to be repeated. The x rather than y construction is appropriately used in this sentence.

The correct answer is E.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 86 [2], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1012

Kudos [?]: 39 [4], given: 0

Show Tags

06 Sep 2006, 22:35
4
KUDOS
OA is E

OE:

In this sentence, members of the jury are presented with two options: they may (1) go home or (2) be confined to a hotel. The rejected motion would have allowed them to do the first rather than [to] suffer the second.
Members of the jury must be the logical subject of both options, and both must be expressed in parallel form, that is, as infinitive clauses. E, the best choice, observes these requirements. In A and C, the phrase members
of the jury is not the logical subject of the second option, to confine them or confining them, since jury members are not doing the confining. In B and D, confined and confinement are not infinitives and thus do not parallel to go in the first option.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [4], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 314

Kudos [?]: 392 [3], given: 9

Re: denied a motion -OG10 [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Aug 2009, 02:16
3
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
186. Judge Bonham denied a motion to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of
to confine them to a hotel.
(A) to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of to confine them to

I think this suggests that the members of the jury confine themselves to a hotel, a fact that does not make any sense
notice that the parallelism is between go and confine so the sentence reads

members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of [members of the jury] to confine them to a hotel

(B) that would have allowed members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of confined to

I think you need passive voice here in confined to suggest that the members are confined. The sentence reads

a motion that would have allowed members of the jury to confined to ...

(C) under which members of the jury are allowed to go home at the end of each day instead of confining
them in

I'm not sure whether confine in is idiomatic. anyway to go home is not parallel to confining

(D) that would allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day rather than confinement in

note parallel structures to go home rather confinement

(E) to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day rather than be confined to

This answer choice maintains parallelism and properly uses passive voice so that the members are confined to a hotel.

Kudos [?]: 392 [3], given: 9

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5206

Kudos [?]: 434 [2], given: 0

Show Tags

12 Nov 2005, 08:34
2
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Two idioms at play here: motion to... and rather than...

That leaves E.

Kudos [?]: 434 [2], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 302

Kudos [?]: 588 [1], given: 22

Re: denied a motion -OG10 [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Aug 2009, 02:20
1
KUDOS
sudeep wrote:
crejoc wrote:
i
motion is not subjunctive so that in B and D wrong, under in C is wrong, motion to is correct

Are you sure about the rule of 'that' in this case? IMO,it is not necessary to use 'that' only for subjunctive mood.

I am sure about 'that' in this problem, and i never mentioned 'that' is used only for subjunctive, it is very well used as an essential modifier in many sentences, but not in this case

Kudos [?]: 588 [1], given: 22

Intern
Joined: 31 Jul 2010
Posts: 34

Kudos [?]: 18 [1], given: 1

Re: Judge Bonham [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Nov 2010, 20:46
1
KUDOS
Judge Bonham denied a motion to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of to confine them to a hotel.
(A) to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of to confine them to
(B) that would have allowed members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of confined to
(C) under which members of the jury are allowed to go home at the end of each day instead of confining
them in
(D) that would allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day rather than confinement in
(E) to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day rather than be confined to

IMO

A - Wrong - Doesn't have parallel structure - X instead of Y. X - Members..To go home vs To confine them -
B - Wrong - no need of would . Also - this isn't parallel with comparative structure at the end
C - Wrong - under which - awkward
D - Wrong - no need of would . Also - this isn't parallel with comparative structure at the end
E - Right - Concise, parallel ( X rather than Y) - Members... To go home vs (to) be confined to hotel

_________________

Kudos Never costs your Pocket ! Give when u feel it worthy

Kudos [?]: 18 [1], given: 1

Senior Manager
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 306

Kudos [?]: 36 [1], given: 35

Re: Judge Bonham [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Nov 2010, 22:01
1
KUDOS
give to the idiom...rather than be confined...
E it is

Kudos [?]: 36 [1], given: 35

Manager
Status: Back to (GMAT) Times Square!!!
Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Posts: 179

Kudos [?]: 87 [1], given: 25

Location: United States (IL)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Judge Bonham [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Aug 2011, 02:12
1
KUDOS
+E
_________________

Working towards a goal...
V.

Kudos [?]: 87 [1], given: 25

Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3157

Kudos [?]: 3299 [1], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: Judge Bonham denied a motion to allow members of the jury to [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Dec 2016, 04:31
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
mbaprep2016 wrote:
I choose E based in Subjunctive Mood , apart from idiom... Experts please correct me if it does not comes under Subjunctive Mood and i did wrong analyses , because in whole discussion no body mentioned anything about the Subjunctive Mood ...
sayantanc2k

No, there is no subjunctive mood in option E - you are probably misguided because of "be confined". Here "be confimed" is not a verb in subjunctive mood. It is an infinitive in parallel with "go home" - "to" is outside the parrallel structure (X rather than Y) and hence covers both "go home" and "be confined".

..allowed memebers of the jury to (go home) rather than (be confined). X = "go home", Y = "be confined".

Kudos [?]: 3299 [1], given: 22

Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 246

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

12 Nov 2005, 09:18
nice one guys, OA is E

I screwed this one up and took A because I was thinking:

to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of to confine them

verb paralellism

But x rather than y is better.

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 1112

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

Location: London, UK
Schools: Tuck'08

Show Tags

12 Nov 2005, 09:34
nero44 wrote:
nice one guys, OA is E

I screwed this one up and took A because I was thinking:

to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of to confine them

verb paralellism

But x rather than y is better.

did the same mistake

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 402

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

12 Nov 2005, 17:07
We should the infinitive form "to allow." Eliminate B, C and D. This sentance has a subjunctive tone to it.... therefore I pick E.

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 115

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Location: Basel

Show Tags

14 Nov 2005, 04:31
Rigger, why do we need the infinitive here? Because it's an order ?Thanks

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1012

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

SC: Judge and Jury [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Sep 2006, 07:25
Judge Bonham denied a motion to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of to confine them to a hotel.
(A) to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of to confine them to
(B) that would have allowed members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of confined to
(C) under which members of the jury are allowed to go home at the end of each day instead of confining
them in
(D) that would allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day rather than confinement in
(E) to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day rather than be confined to
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Aug 2006
Posts: 346

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

Location: San Francisco
Schools: Berkeley Haas

Show Tags

06 Sep 2006, 07:35
E, I'd say. Less wordy than others, and yet the "confined" part sounds good.

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Posts: 1257

Kudos [?]: 106 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: Judge and Jury [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Sep 2006, 08:33

(A) to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of to confine them to

(B) that would have allowed members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of confined to

(C) under which members of the jury are allowed to go home at the end of each day instead of confining
them in

(D) that would allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day rather than confinement in

(E) to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day rather than be confined to

Kudos [?]: 106 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 702

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

06 Sep 2006, 13:01
rather than is better than instead of

So narrow down to D and E.

D has more wordy. (like confinement)

E is concise.

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 15

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Show Tags

06 Sep 2006, 13:05
A, B, C uses "instead of". Between D and E i think E is correct.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5206

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

06 Sep 2006, 22:44
ak_idc wrote:
OA is E

OE:

In this sentence, members of the jury are presented with two options: they may (1) go home or (2) be confined to a hotel. The rejected motion would have allowed them to do the first rather than [to] suffer the second.
Members of the jury must be the logical subject of both options, and both must be expressed in parallel form, that is, as infinitive clauses. E, the best choice, observes these requirements. In A and C, the phrase members
of the jury is not the logical subject of the second option, to confine them or confining them, since jury members are not doing the confining. In B and D, confined and confinement are not infinitives and thus do not parallel to go in the first option.

As usual, late but (E)

***another GMAC best friend, "rather than" (~85% of the time)

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 272

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 2

SC - 459 - jury [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 May 2007, 00:03
459. Judge Bonham denied a motion to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of to confine them to a hotel.

(A) to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of to confine them to
(B) that would have allowed members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of confined to
(C) under which members of the jury are allowed to go home at the end of each day instead of confining them in
(D) that would allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day rather than confinement in
(E) to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day rather than be confined to

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 2

SC - 459 - jury   [#permalink] 28 May 2007, 00:03

Go to page    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 80 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Judge Bonham denied a motion to allow members of the jury to

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.