Last visit was: 18 Jan 2025, 18:00 It is currently 18 Jan 2025, 18:00
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Reviews
Social
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
 1   2   
705-805 Level|   Parallelism|      
User avatar
bharatemail
User avatar
Joined: 26 Sep 2010
Last visit: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
29
 [24]
Schools: HKUST (S) NUS (S) ISB (I) Erasmus
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.65
Schools: HKUST (S) NUS (S) ISB (I) Erasmus
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 30
Kudos: 29
 [24]
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by 04 Aug 2011, 11:50
Kudos
Add Kudos
23
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

39% (01:12) correct 61% (01:16) wrong based on 730 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by speeding vehicles – less than those caused by drunk drivers.

A. vehicles – less than those caused
B. vehicles - fewer than have been caused
C. vehicles, which is fewer than those
D. vehicles, a number that is lower than the fatalities
E. vehicles, fewer than the ones caused


In the OA, Do you think that word "that" is missing to have a parallel structure. Please comment ?
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
B
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
rphardu
User avatar
Joined: 23 May 2011
Last visit: 19 Aug 2012
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
850
 [5]
Given Kudos: 34
Status:Appearing for GMAT
Location: United States (NJ)
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GPA: 3.5
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 70
Kudos: 850
 [5]
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by 04 Aug 2011, 21:27
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bharatemail
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by speeding vehicles – less than those caused by drunk drivers.

A. vehicles – less than those caused
B. vehicles - fewer than have been caused
C. vehicles, which is fewer than those
D. vehicles, a number that is lower than the fatalities
E. vehicles, fewer than the ones caused


In the OA, Do you think that word "that" is missing to have a parallel structure. Please comment ?

Hi bharatemail and sgupta0827,
Option A : Wrong because road fatalities is countable noun and we can not use less for that. Fewer is the correct option.
Option C : Which is modifying preceding noun "Vehicle", so vehicles is fewer than those... = Wrong and moreover vehicles are plural.
Option D : In "a number of X " is plural so can not be followed by "is" but here a number...........modifying vehicles so is wrong.
Option E : Usage of ones (there is nothing like ones, we have one and one's) is incorrect.

So only option B is best in all.

I hope my explanation helped, if indeed, please don't forget to give Kudos.
General Discussion
User avatar
sguptashared
User avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 27 Dec 2013
Posts: 98
Own Kudos:
234
Given Kudos: 33
Status:Dream big, work hard, and drink gallons of beer!
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT Date: 10-01-2011
WE:Web Development (Consulting)
Posts: 98
Kudos: 234
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by 04 Aug 2011, 12:22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If claimed OA is correct, then I am going to wait for the experts to explain this question.
User avatar
sguptashared
User avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 27 Dec 2013
Posts: 98
Own Kudos:
234
 [1]
Given Kudos: 33
Status:Dream big, work hard, and drink gallons of beer!
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT Date: 10-01-2011
WE:Web Development (Consulting)
Posts: 98
Kudos: 234
 [1]
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by 05 Aug 2011, 08:25
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rphardu
bharatemail
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by speeding vehicles – less than those caused by drunk drivers.

A. vehicles – less than those caused
B. vehicles - fewer than have been caused
C. vehicles, which is fewer than those
D. vehicles, a number that is lower than the fatalities
E. vehicles, fewer than the ones caused


In the OA, Do you think that word "that" is missing to have a parallel structure. Please comment ?

Hi bharatemail and sgupta0827,
Option A : Wrong because road fatalities is countable noun and we can not use less for that. Fewer is the correct option.
Option C : Which is modifying preceding noun "Vehicle", so vehicles is fewer than those... = Wrong and moreover vehicles are plural.
Option D : In "a number of X " is plural so can not be followed by "is" but here a number...........modifying vehicles so is wrong.
Option E : Usage of ones (there is nothing like ones, we have one and one's) is incorrect.

So only option B is best in all.

I hope my explanation helped, if indeed, please don't forget to give Kudos.

Thanks! I agree with your explanation. Yet somehow B doesn't sound right to my ears. I am not able to spot any error in B, however. Do you know how can we make B sound better? Just wanted to know out of curiosity. I hope it's not too much trouble for you. :-D
User avatar
rphardu
User avatar
Joined: 23 May 2011
Last visit: 19 Aug 2012
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
850
 [3]
Given Kudos: 34
Status:Appearing for GMAT
Location: United States (NJ)
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GPA: 3.5
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 70
Kudos: 850
 [3]
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by 05 Aug 2011, 08:43
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sgupta0827
rphardu
bharatemail
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by speeding vehicles – less than those caused by drunk drivers.

A. vehicles – less than those caused
B. vehicles - fewer than have been caused
C. vehicles, which is fewer than those
D. vehicles, a number that is lower than the fatalities
E. vehicles, fewer than the ones caused


In the OA, Do you think that word "that" is missing to have a parallel structure. Please comment ?

Hi bharatemail and sgupta0827,
Option A : Wrong because road fatalities is countable noun and we can not use less for that. Fewer is the correct option.
Option C : Which is modifying preceding noun "Vehicle", so vehicles is fewer than those... = Wrong and moreover vehicles are plural.
Option D : In "a number of X " is plural so can not be followed by "is" but here a number...........modifying vehicles so is wrong.
Option E : Usage of ones (there is nothing like ones, we have one and one's) is incorrect.

So only option B is best in all.

I hope my explanation helped, if indeed, please don't forget to give Kudos.

Thanks! I agree with your explanation. Yet somehow B doesn't sound right to my ears. I am not able to spot any error in B, however. Do you know how can we make B sound better? Just wanted to know out of curiosity. I hope it's not too much trouble for you. :-D

Thanks sgupta0827, Kudos to you for further analyzing answer choices.
It seems that correct structure should be :vehicles - fewer than those/some pronoun have been caused by drunk drivers.
The problem with it is that pronoun can refer to either Vehicles or fatalities.

Giving kudos is a decent way to say "Thanks". Please use them, I need two to acess GMAT CLUB Test.
User avatar
sguptashared
User avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 27 Dec 2013
Posts: 98
Own Kudos:
234
 [1]
Given Kudos: 33
Status:Dream big, work hard, and drink gallons of beer!
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT Date: 10-01-2011
WE:Web Development (Consulting)
Posts: 98
Kudos: 234
 [1]
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by 05 Aug 2011, 09:10
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rphardu
Thanks sgupta0827, Kudos to you for further analyzing answer choices.
It seems that correct structure should be :vehicles - fewer than those/some pronoun have been caused by drunk drivers.
The problem with it is that pronoun can refer to either Vehicles or fatalities.

Thanks rphardu for your prompt response! In this question, I am more concerned about the use "have been" than really about missing pronoun. Isn't "have been" implicit even if we miss it in the appositive?

Isn't "fewer than caused by drunk drivers" enough for this appositive?
User avatar
rphardu
User avatar
Joined: 23 May 2011
Last visit: 19 Aug 2012
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
850
Given Kudos: 34
Status:Appearing for GMAT
Location: United States (NJ)
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GPA: 3.5
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 70
Kudos: 850
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by 05 Aug 2011, 09:25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sgupta0827
rphardu
Thanks sgupta0827, Kudos to you for further analyzing answer choices.
It seems that correct structure should be :vehicles - fewer than those/some pronoun have been caused by drunk drivers.
The problem with it is that pronoun can refer to either Vehicles or fatalities.

Thanks rphardu for your prompt response! In this question, I am more concerned about the use "have been" than really about missing pronoun. Isn't "have been" implicit even if we miss it in the appositive?

Isn't "fewer than caused by drunk drivers" enough for this appositive?

Sorry bro, but for me it does not look like appositive. Appositive are modifier here we have comparision.

Regarding removing of "have been", this concept has been illustrated very well on one of the mgmat post. I will post the link, once at home.
User avatar
sguptashared
User avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 27 Dec 2013
Posts: 98
Own Kudos:
234
Given Kudos: 33
Status:Dream big, work hard, and drink gallons of beer!
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT Date: 10-01-2011
WE:Web Development (Consulting)
Posts: 98
Kudos: 234
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by 05 Aug 2011, 09:34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rphardu
sgupta0827
rphardu
Thanks sgupta0827, Kudos to you for further analyzing answer choices.
It seems that correct structure should be :vehicles - fewer than those/some pronoun have been caused by drunk drivers.
The problem with it is that pronoun can refer to either Vehicles or fatalities.

Thanks rphardu for your prompt response! In this question, I am more concerned about the use "have been" than really about missing pronoun. Isn't "have been" implicit even if we miss it in the appositive?

Isn't "fewer than caused by drunk drivers" enough for this appositive?

Sorry bro, but for me it does not look like appositive. Appositive are modifier here we have comparision.

Regarding removing of "have been", this concept has been illustrated very well on one of the mgmat post. I will post the link, once at home.

Sorry for so much trouble. The reason I am calling this appositive is that it is connected by a big dash(--). Since it is connected by a big dash, it can not be a main clause. It doesn't look like a subordinate clause either. Comparison by itself is not a segment fragment as far as I understand. It has to be something, so I think it's an appositive. Grammar experts can help us here.
User avatar
fluke
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Last visit: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 1,105
Own Kudos:
4,890
Given Kudos: 376
Posts: 1,105
Kudos: 4,890
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by 05 Aug 2011, 09:53
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sgupta0827
Sorry for so much trouble. The reason I am calling this appositive is that it is connected by a big dash(--). Since it is connected by a big dash, it can not be a main clause. It doesn't look like a subordinate clause either. Comparison by itself is not a segment fragment as far as I understand. It has to be something, so I think it's an appositive. Grammar experts can help us here.

I am no expert in Grammar. Here's what I think.

Although "--" can be used to list things, here it is not used as an appositive. It is just trying to give us additional information about the fatalities-- in this case comparative analysis.

I think "-fewer than the fatalities that have been caused", in spite of being wordy, would more clearly express what it intended to.

Author:
What's the source?
User avatar
sguptashared
User avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 27 Dec 2013
Posts: 98
Own Kudos:
234
Given Kudos: 33
Status:Dream big, work hard, and drink gallons of beer!
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT Date: 10-01-2011
WE:Web Development (Consulting)
Posts: 98
Kudos: 234
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by 05 Aug 2011, 10:17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fluke
sgupta0827
Sorry for so much trouble. The reason I am calling this appositive is that it is connected by a big dash(--). Since it is connected by a big dash, it can not be a main clause. It doesn't look like a subordinate clause either. Comparison by itself is not a segment fragment as far as I understand. It has to be something, so I think it's an appositive. Grammar experts can help us here.

I am no expert in Grammar. Here's what I think.

Although "--" can be used to list things, here it is not used as an appositive. It is just trying to give us additional information about the fatalities-- in this case comparative analysis.

I think "-fewer than the fatalities that have been caused", in spite of being wordy, would more clearly express what it intended to.

Author:
What's the source?

This answers my question of "have been". So far I was thinking that the sentence fragment is used as an appositive. That's why I was doubting the use of "have been". If it is only used to fill the information, sentence should stand alone by itself. Hence, the verb "have been" is required. Simply having "Caused" would be a comma splice.
User avatar
bharatemail
User avatar
Joined: 26 Sep 2010
Last visit: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
29
Schools: HKUST (S) NUS (S) ISB (I) Erasmus
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.65
Schools: HKUST (S) NUS (S) ISB (I) Erasmus
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 30
Kudos: 29
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by 05 Aug 2011, 12:32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Fluke

I came across this question during one of tests in "e-gmat course". I am still confused why pronoun is not used in the latter portion of the sentence.
User avatar
cledgard
User avatar
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Last visit: 17 Jan 2025
Posts: 157
Own Kudos:
308
Given Kudos: 66
Status:GMAT Coach
Location: Peru
GPA: 3.98
Posts: 157
Kudos: 308
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by 27 Oct 2016, 07:38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rphardu
bharatemail
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by speeding vehicles – less than those caused by drunk drivers.

A. vehicles – less than those caused
B. vehicles - fewer than have been caused
C. vehicles, which is fewer than those
D. vehicles, a number that is lower than the fatalities
E. vehicles, fewer than the ones caused


In the OA, Do you think that word "that" is missing to have a parallel structure. Please comment ?

Hi bharatemail and sgupta0827,
Option A : Wrong because road fatalities is countable noun and we can not use less for that. Fewer is the correct option.
Option C : Which is modifying preceding noun "Vehicle", so vehicles is fewer than those... = Wrong and moreover vehicles are plural.
Option D : In "a number of X " is plural so can not be followed by "is" but here a number...........modifying vehicles so is wrong.
Option E : Usage of ones (there is nothing like ones, we have one and one's) is incorrect.

So only option B is best in all.

I hope my explanation helped, if indeed, please don't forget to give Kudos.

Option E : Usage of ones (there is nothing like ones, we have one and one's) is incorrect.

Sorry to disagree, but the expression “ones“ exists.

There are many kinds of sweets; I really like the chocolate ones.
Or The ones with chocolate frosting have cream fillings.
Or Are these the ones you want?
avatar
Spovil
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2016
Last visit: 06 Feb 2017
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
15
Given Kudos: 49
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
Schools: ISB '18 NUS '19 S.P.Jain Institute
WE:Other (Computer Software)
Schools: ISB '18 NUS '19 S.P.Jain Institute
Posts: 22
Kudos: 15
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by 27 Oct 2016, 08:39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B is the correct answer

Meaning is pretty clear. Let me put forth answer analysis.

- E has fewer just after comma. It modifies the entire clause which is wrong. It should modify only fatalities
- As number of fatalities is countable, fewer than should be used.
- B uses % of fatalities as subject directly without being stated
avatar
SoulSurfer
avatar
Joined: 22 Apr 2015
Last visit: 16 Nov 2017
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
34
 [2]
Given Kudos: 62
WE:Business Development (Internet and New Media)
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 23
Kudos: 34
 [2]
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by 05 Jun 2017, 10:36
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Spovil
B is the correct answer

Meaning is pretty clear. Let me put forth answer analysis.

- E has fewer just after comma. It modifies the entire clause which is wrong. It should modify only fatalities
- As number of fatalities is countable, fewer than should be used.
- B uses % of fatalities as subject directly without being stated


but the comparison here is between the percentage of fatalities caused by speeding vehicles in 2009 and percentage of fatalities caused by drunk drivers, rather between the number of fatalities. percentage is an uncountable noun so less is i guess more appropriate here.

Experts need your comment in this question.
avatar
ENEM
avatar
Joined: 16 Nov 2016
Last visit: 13 Jan 2020
Posts: 242
Own Kudos:
192
Given Kudos: 379
WE:Advertising (Advertising and PR)
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 242
Kudos: 192
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by 08 Jun 2017, 05:34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone please explain why E is incorrect? rphardu said that "ones" doesn't exist, while "cledgard" said that it does exist. So I would request experts to intervene and post their answer and explanation on this. B somehow doesn't sound right to me.
avatar
aroraishita02
avatar
Joined: 30 Apr 2018
Last visit: 17 Apr 2021
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
51
Given Kudos: 68
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: ISB '20 NUS '21 Wharton '21 NTU '20
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Schools: ISB '20 NUS '21 Wharton '21 NTU '20
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
Posts: 30
Kudos: 51
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by 06 Sep 2018, 16:14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
could someone please explain why is E incorrect?
User avatar
dimmak
User avatar
Joined: 08 Sep 2017
Last visit: 04 Jun 2019
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
523
Given Kudos: 185
Location: Colombia
Schools: Haas '21 (S) LBS '21 (A)
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: Haas '21 (S) LBS '21 (A)
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
Posts: 54
Kudos: 523
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by 06 Sep 2018, 18:10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ok, I think I now understand the OA. My thoughts on this...

A. vehicles – less than those caused --> WRONG; "those" refers back to "road fatalities", which is a countable noun, although "less" seems to have some kind of parallelism referring to the percentage... is a little bit ambiguous but is better to use "fewer"/b]
B. vehicles - fewer than have been caused --> [b]right
C. vehicles, which is fewer than those --> "which" modifies only vehicles so it is wrong
D. vehicles, a number that is lower than the fatalities --> wrong, a number that is lower is RIGHT, "a number" is singular. What is wrong in this answer is that ...fatalities by... is wrong, we need sthg like "fatalities caused by..."
E. vehicles, fewer than the ones caused --> "the ones" is an unnecesary pronoun and it is wrong, it creates an slight ambiguity
User avatar
MaheshDuggirala
User avatar
Joined: 19 Jun 2017
Last visit: 12 Apr 2020
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
11
 [1]
Given Kudos: 166
Posts: 5
Kudos: 11
 [1]
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by 07 Sep 2018, 01:34
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dimmak
Ok, I think I now understand the OA. My thoughts on this...

A. vehicles – less than those caused --> WRONG; "those" refers back to "road fatalities", which is a countable noun, although "less" seems to have some kind of parallelism referring to the percentage... is a little bit ambiguous but is better to use "fewer"/b]
B. vehicles - fewer than have been caused --> [b]right
C. vehicles, which is fewer than those --> "which" modifies only vehicles so it is wrong
D. vehicles, a number that is lower than the fatalities --> wrong, a number that is lower is RIGHT, "a number" is singular. What is wrong in this answer is that ...fatalities by... is wrong, we need sthg like "fatalities caused by..."
E. vehicles, fewer than the ones caused --> "the ones" is an unnecesary pronoun and it is wrong, it creates an slight ambiguity


HI a small correction "a number" in option D is plural ."The number" is a singular .here a number is followed by that .so option D can be avoided on this basis.
Hope it helps.
avatar
Gabriel10
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2019
Last visit: 09 Dec 2019
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by 05 Nov 2019, 20:49
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For me, is there any error in the usage of the comma in Option E?
It seems that 'fewer' describes vehicles..
User avatar
PyjamaScientist
User avatar
Admitted - Which School Forum Moderator
Joined: 25 Oct 2020
Last visit: 07 Dec 2024
Posts: 1,111
Own Kudos:
1,169
 [1]
Given Kudos: 628
Schools: Ross '25 (M$)
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: Ross '25 (M$)
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
Posts: 1,111
Kudos: 1,169
 [1]
Just over 5% of road fatalities in 2009 have been caused by 12 Jul 2021, 05:16
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Though the correct answer is B, many have said about the usage of "ones in option E.

Think about what the word "ones" means: you would only use it to refer to specific cases, right?

Silly example: "I eat hundreds of burritos every year, but I particularly enjoy the ones that are stuffed with avocado and carne asada."

"The ones" is NOT a generic pronoun: it refers to a specific subset of burritos. You could translate "the ones" as "the specific burritos" in this case.
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7212 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts