Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 14:39 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 14:39
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
tapsemi
Joined: 10 May 2004
Last visit: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Location: USA
Posts: 18
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
scottshrum
Joined: 22 Apr 2004
Last visit: 18 Aug 2025
Posts: 1,117
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 59
Schools:Kellogg MBA 2004
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,117
Kudos: 230
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
xgazoe
Joined: 12 Jun 2004
Last visit: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
scottshrum
Joined: 22 Apr 2004
Last visit: 18 Aug 2025
Posts: 1,117
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 59
Schools:Kellogg MBA 2004
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,117
Kudos: 230
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
xgazoe


There is one question that has been lingering in my mind. Top B-schools make leadership traits & abilities almost a must in every applicant. But what makes their academic programs different from those that dont? Let's take HBS for example, I hope I am not wrong by saying that leadership is almost an absolute requirement for a successful HBS applicant. But what is it in particular in HBS' teaching that shapes & creates future leaders? And what difference would it make to an applicant's ability to cope with the program if he never had any leadership experiences?


Truthringer can answer your HBS-specific questions better than I can, but I'll say that b-schools don't *make* leaders. Rather, they look for people with strong evidence of leadership potential, and then they train those people to make them even better leaders. It's like the NBA draft in basketball. Pro teams don't make great basketball players from scratch. They draft guys who are already great and have terrific potential, and then make them even better.

The other thing I'll say is that I think the difference between a schools that teaches someone about leadership vs. one that doesn't is the emphasis that each school places on the types of things that you learn. A school that doesn't place emphasis on developing leaders will focus on teaching specific skills, like how to value a financial instrument, how to execute a stock trade, how to analyze market research data, etc. The schools that do emphasize leadership-type skills will put more emphasis on how to think when analyzing a competitor's actions, how to structure incentives to best motivate people, how to negotiate, etc. These "how to think" skills may serve you less in your first job out of school, but can potentially help you much more down the road, as you take on more and more responsibility.

Some people will argue that one is better than the other. But that's the main difference that I see between schools that emphasize leadership vs. those that don't.

I think that anyone can get through any of these programs without lots of leadership experience. But, getting in will be the hard part. An applicant who has no real leadership experience to point to will have a hard time getting into one of these top schools, in my opinion.

Scott