Last visit was: 03 Jun 2026, 10:38 It is currently 03 Jun 2026, 10:38
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
abhudayaharp
Joined: 27 Aug 2024
Last visit: 05 May 2026
Posts: 5
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
xyz12345678
Joined: 12 Apr 2025
Last visit: 07 Dec 2025
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Posts: 25
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
adarsh2209
Joined: 28 Mar 2024
Last visit: 24 May 2026
Posts: 33
Given Kudos: 361
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q88 V82 DI77
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q88 V82 DI77
Posts: 33
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
kiranreddyp
Joined: 17 Jan 2025
Last visit: 28 Nov 2025
Posts: 12
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 12
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I like the solution - it’s helpful.
User avatar
BinodBhai
Joined: 19 Feb 2025
Last visit: 15 Oct 2025
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 252
Posts: 106
Kudos: 31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The question is so simple.. the language is bit convoluted to be honest and I feel the question isn't great! I spent so much time solving this only to see how simple of a solution this is!
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 03 Jun 2026
Posts: 111,042
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 106,621
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 111,042
Kudos: 818,653
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BinodBhai
The question is so simple.. the language is bit convoluted to be honest and I feel the question isn't great! I spent so much time solving this only to see how simple of a solution this is!

Uh, the wording in the question is actually very precise and 100% in line with GMAT style, it’s exactly the kind of phrasing you’d see on the exam.
User avatar
agrasan
Joined: 18 Jan 2024
Last visit: 01 Jun 2026
Posts: 691
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,706
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 691
Kudos: 180
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I like the solution - it’s helpful.
User avatar
MegB07
Joined: 15 Sep 2022
Last visit: 20 Dec 2025
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 42
Location: India
Posts: 55
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Bunuel,

I was taking the distance flown by the fly one way as 30 km. and adding to that the tmeet of both the hikers as 15. Making it as 30+15 = 45.

I understood the solution, but just want to understand what went wrong with my approach?

Bunuel
Official Solution:

Two hikers simultaneously start walking towards each other from Kensington, MD and Reston, VA, which are 30 km apart. Both hikers walk at a constant speed of 5 km/hour each. At the same time, a fly takes off from Kensington and flies towards the Reston hiker at a speed of 10 km/hour. When the fly reaches the Reston hiker, it immediately turns around and flies back to the Kensington hiker, and it continues to do so until the hikers meet. At the moment when the hikers meet, the fly lands on the shoulder of the Kensington hiker. How many kilometers has the fly flown in total?

A. 25
B. 30
C. 37.5
D. 45
E. 60


To calculate how long the fly was flying, we first determine the time it takes for the hikers to meet. Since the hikers are walking towards each other at a speed of 5 km/hour each, their combined speed is 10 km/hour. Therefore, they will meet after \(\frac{30}{10}=3\) hours.

This means that the fly was flying for 3 hours at a speed of 10 km/hour, covering a distance of 30 km.


Answer: B
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 03 Jun 2026
Posts: 111,042
Own Kudos:
818,653
 [1]
Given Kudos: 106,621
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 111,042
Kudos: 818,653
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MegB07
Hi Bunuel,

I was taking the distance flown by the fly one way as 30 km. and adding to that the tmeet of both the hikers as 15. Making it as 30+15 = 45.

I understood the solution, but just want to understand what went wrong with my approach?



One way is not 30 km, because as soon as the fly starts flying, the hikers also start walking and the distance between them begins shrinking. So the first leg is already less than 30 km, and that’s where your approach goes off track.
User avatar
nestle
Joined: 16 Sep 2025
Last visit: 18 May 2026
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 45
Schools: ISB '26 (S)
Schools: ISB '26 (S)
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I like the solution - it’s helpful.
User avatar
Kgmishra
Joined: 14 Nov 2024
Last visit: 16 May 2026
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 39
Location: India
GPA: 2.86
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I like the solution - it’s helpful. This question just pushed my reasoning skills notches above - Common sense.
User avatar
anushree01
Joined: 06 Apr 2024
Last visit: 03 Jun 2026
Posts: 205
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 164
Products:
Posts: 205
Kudos: 69
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
same meee too, indeed a very good question
Raunak_Bhatia
Damn!!! I feel so stupid seeing this solution, (I literally was calculating to and fro distance covered by the fly) Sometimes it just doesn't strike you in the test environment.
User avatar
luisdicampo
Joined: 10 Feb 2025
Last visit: 25 May 2026
Posts: 479
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 328
Products:
Posts: 479
Kudos: 82
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Deconstructing the Question
Initial Distance between hikers: 30 km.
Hiker 1 Speed: 5 km/h.
Hiker 2 Speed: 5 km/h.
Fly Speed: 10 km/h.
Scenario: The fly moves back and forth continuously until the hikers meet.

Target: Total distance flown by the fly.

Step 1: Calculate the Time until Hikers Meet
Instead of summing the infinite segments of the fly's path, we look at the time. The fly flies as long as the hikers are walking.
Since the hikers are moving towards each other, we add their speeds to find the relative speed.
\(V_{relative} = V_1 + V_2 = 5 + 5 = 10 \text{ km/h}\).

Time to meet (\(t\)):
\(t = \frac{\text{Distance}}{\text{Relative Speed}}\)
\(t = \frac{30}{10} = 3 \text{ hours}\).

Step 2: Calculate the Fly's Distance
The fly flies constantly at 10 km/h for exactly 3 hours.
\(D_{fly} = V_{fly} \times t\)
\(D_{fly} = 10 \times 3 = 30 \text{ km}\).

Answer: B
User avatar
Advait01
Joined: 09 Nov 2024
Last visit: 03 Jun 2026
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q81 V86 DI80
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q81 V86 DI80
Posts: 111
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I like the solution - it’s helpful.
User avatar
HeytorBB
Joined: 12 Feb 2025
Last visit: 14 May 2026
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 328
Location: Brazil
Posts: 10
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This question is poorly worded because it says, "At the moment of the encounter, the fly lands on the shoulder of the Kensington walker." For it to land on walker 1's shoulder, it has to return. I can't simply ignore this argument; either it returns, or I must assume it keeps returning in other directions. But if it can fly in different directions, I can also assume the walker can do that. This part about landing on the shoulder breaks the logical line of the question because I have to take into account that the fly can keep flying aimlessly until they meet. The point is, should I calculate as if it were a straight line? If so, I must take into account all the members of the question; if not, I can assume that the walkers don't walk in a straight line either
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 03 Jun 2026
Posts: 111,042
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 106,621
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 111,042
Kudos: 818,653
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
HeytorBB
This question is poorly worded because it says, "At the moment of the encounter, the fly lands on the shoulder of the Kensington walker." For it to land on walker 1's shoulder, it has to return. I can't simply ignore this argument; either it returns, or I must assume it keeps returning in other directions. But if it can fly in different directions, I can also assume the walker can do that. This part about landing on the shoulder breaks the logical line of the question because I have to take into account that the fly can keep flying aimlessly until they meet. The point is, should I calculate as if it were a straight line? If so, I must take into account all the members of the question; if not, I can assume that the walkers don't walk in a straight line either

The question is fine. “Continues to do so until the hikers meet” already fixes the fly’s path: it keeps going back and forth between them. The shoulder part only tells you where its final trip ends. No extra flying is implied.
User avatar
axeofflane
Joined: 18 Nov 2023
Last visit: 03 Jun 2026
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q82 V84 DI82
GPA: 9.28
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q82 V84 DI82
Posts: 45
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Whew, what an amazing question
User avatar
dignissimosminima
Joined: 27 Nov 2025
Last visit: 03 Jun 2026
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 21
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 9.1
Products:
Posts: 25
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Would have never seen this lol thanks!

mbadude2017
Bunuel, that is an amazing shortcut. For those who didn't see the shortcut (like me), this is also the sum of a geometric series, with the first term a = 20, and the common ratio r= 1/3. 20*(1/(1-1/3)) = 30.
User avatar
shubhisrivas
Joined: 27 Apr 2022
Last visit: 02 Jun 2026
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 5
Products:
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
when hikers will meet at midpoint at 15 km in 3 hrs, fly would have reached Reston in 3 hrs covering a total distance of 30 kms in 3 hrs at a speed to 10kmph. To and on hikers shoulders, fly has cover extra 15 kms.
it this case fly would not land on kensington hiker's shoulder.
Pls explain the logic for 30 kms and how it would satisfy this condition
Bunuel
Official Solution:

Two hikers simultaneously start walking towards each other from Kensington, MD and Reston, VA, which are 30 km apart. Both hikers walk at a constant speed of 5 km/hour each. At the same time, a fly takes off from Kensington and flies towards the Reston hiker at a speed of 10 km/hour. When the fly reaches the Reston hiker, it immediately turns around and flies back to the Kensington hiker, and it continues to do so until the hikers meet. At the moment when the hikers meet, the fly lands on the shoulder of the Kensington hiker. How many kilometers has the fly flown in total?

A. 25
B. 30
C. 37.5
D. 45
E. 60


To calculate how long the fly was flying, we first determine the time it takes for the hikers to meet. Since the hikers are walking towards each other at a speed of 5 km/hour each, their combined speed is 10 km/hour. Therefore, they will meet after \(\frac{30}{10}=3\) hours.

This means that the fly was flying for 3 hours at a speed of 10 km/hour, covering a distance of 30 km.


Answer: B
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 03 Jun 2026
Posts: 111,042
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 106,621
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 111,042
Kudos: 818,653
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shubhisrivas
when hikers will meet at midpoint at 15 km in 3 hrs, fly would have reached Reston in 3 hrs covering a total distance of 30 kms in 3 hrs at a speed to 10kmph. To and on hikers shoulders, fly has cover extra 15 kms.
it this case fly would not land on kensington hiker's shoulder.
Pls explain the logic for 30 kms and how it would satisfy this condition

The mistake is assuming the fly flies to Reston, the place.

It flies to the Reston hiker, who is moving toward Kensington. So the fly reaches that hiker before 3 hours, turns back, and keeps flying back and forth.

The fly is flying the whole time until the hikers meet. Since the hikers meet after 3 hours, the fly flies:

10 * 3 = 30 km

The shoulder condition only tells us where the fly is at the end. It does not add extra distance.

For more, please check the entire discussion. Hope it helps.
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
Math Expert
111042 posts
Founder
43372 posts