Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 10:52 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 10:52
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
24
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
778,306
 [6]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,306
 [6]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
43,704
 [4]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,704
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
rishika_agarwal11
Joined: 01 May 2024
Last visit: 21 Jan 2025
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u
Machines P, Q, and R produce aluminum cans at their respective constant rates. Is machine P's rate greater than machine Q's rate?

(1) Machine P's rate is greater than machine R's rate.
Nothing about Q.

(2) Machines P and R, working simultaneously, produce a total of 1,000 aluminum cans in half the time that it takes machine Q, working alone, to produce 1,000 aluminum cans.
Two cases
a) P and R have same rate, which will be then equal to Q.
b) P and R have different rates, then one will be greater and other lesser.


Combined.
We know P>R, so surely P>Q>R
Sufficient


C
Hi, I did not understand how did we conclude that P>Q>R.

Please explain.­
User avatar
rishika_agarwal11
Joined: 01 May 2024
Last visit: 21 Jan 2025
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

rishika_agarwal11

chetan2u
Machines P, Q, and R produce aluminum cans at their respective constant rates. Is machine P's rate greater than machine Q's rate?

(1) Machine P's rate is greater than machine R's rate.
Nothing about Q.

(2) Machines P and R, working simultaneously, produce a total of 1,000 aluminum cans in half the time that it takes machine Q, working alone, to produce 1,000 aluminum cans.
Two cases
a) P and R have same rate, which will be then equal to Q.
b) P and R have different rates, then one will be greater and other lesser.


Combined.
We know P>R, so surely P>Q>R
Sufficient


C
Hi, I did not understand how did we conclude that P>Q>R.

Please explain.­
­
Machines P, Q, and R produce aluminum cans at their respective constant rates. Is machine P's rate greater than machine Q's rate?

Assuming the rates of machines P, Q, and R are p, q, and r, respectively, the question asks whether q < p.

(1) Machine P's rate is greater than machine R's rate.

This tells us r < p, but doesn't provide information about q. Not sufficient.

(2) Machines P and R, working simultaneously, produce a total of 1,000 aluminum cans in half the time that it takes machine Q, working alone, to produce 1,000 aluminum cans.

This statement implies that the combined rate of machines P and R is twice that of the rate of machine Q, which translates to p + r = 2q, or q = (p + r)/2. This, in turn, implies that the value of q must be between the values of p and r (q cannot be less than both p and r or more than both p and r because in this case p + r = 2q won't hold, so we must have either p < q < r, p = q = r, or r < q < p). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Since from (1) r < p and from (2) we know that q must be between the values of p and r, then we have r < q < p. Sufficient.

Answer: C.­
­Thanks, I understood now..
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,589
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,589
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105390 posts
496 posts