Last visit was: 17 May 2026, 21:46 It is currently 17 May 2026, 21:46
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
waytowharton
Joined: 22 Apr 2021
Last visit: 16 Sep 2025
Posts: 126
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 409
Posts: 126
Kudos: 18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 13 May 2026
Posts: 16,465
Own Kudos:
79,642
 [2]
Given Kudos: 485
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,465
Kudos: 79,642
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Legallyblond
Joined: 14 May 2024
Last visit: 17 May 2026
Posts: 76
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,776
Location: India
Posts: 76
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 17 May 2026
Posts: 1,183
Own Kudos:
11,874
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,183
Kudos: 11,874
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
venmic
Many politicians, business leaders, and scholars discount the role of public policy and emphasize the role of the labor market when explaining employers’ maternity-leave policies, arguing that prior to the passage of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) of 1993, employers were already providing maternity leave in response to the increase in the number of women workers. Employers did create maternity-leave programs in the 1970’s and 1980’s, but not as a purely voluntary response in the absence of any government mandate. In 1972, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) ruled that employers who allowed leaves for disabling medical conditions must also allow them for maternity and that failure to do so would constitute sex discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. As early as 1973, a survey found that 58 percent of large employers had responded with new maternity-leave policies. Because the 1972 EEOC ruling was contested in court, the ruling won press attention that popularized maternity-leave policies. Yet perhaps because the Supreme Court later struck down the ruling, politicians and scholars have failed to recognize its effects, assuming that employers adopted maternity-leave policies in response to the growing feminization of the workforce.
4. According to the passage, the 1972 EEOC ruling did which of the following?

The passage argues employers’ maternity leave policies in the 1970s and 1980s were not purely voluntary. A key driver was a 1972 EEOC ruling: if employers allowed leave for disabling medical conditions, they also had to allow leave for maternity, otherwise it would be sex discrimination.

(A) It provided a government mandate for maternity-leave policies that employers were already offering voluntarily.

Wrong. The passage says employers did create programs, but not as a purely voluntary response without a mandate.

(B) It provoked a controversy among employers regarding the proper implementation of maternity-leave policies.

The ruling was contested in court, but the passage does not say employers were debating “proper implementation.” It focuses on legal challenge and publicity, not implementation disputes.

(C) It required all employers to provide employee leave for pregnant women and people with disabling medical conditions.

Wrong. It only applies conditionally: employers who already allow leave for disabling medical conditions must also allow it for maternity. It does not require leave for disabling conditions in the first place, and it does not apply to “all employers” regardless.

(D) It gave pregnant women the same rights to employee leave as people with disabling medical conditions.

Correct. That is exactly what the ruling said: maternity leave must be allowed wherever disability leave is allowed, otherwise it is discrimination. This matches the ruling’s content.

(E) It increased pregnant women's awareness of their rights to employee leave.

The passage says the court challenge and press attention popularized maternity leave policies, but it does not specifically mention women’s awareness of rights.

Answer: (D)
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 17 May 2026
Posts: 1,183
Own Kudos:
11,874
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,183
Kudos: 11,874
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Legallyblond
In my opinion same rights for Q4 is not a correct language as we dont know if they got the same rights... similar is acceptable but same i dont think so @bunnel what do you think?
“Same rights” is accurate here because the ruling is explicitly an equal treatment rule: if an employer offers leave for disabling medical conditions, it must also offer leave for maternity, and denying maternity leave in that situation counts as sex discrimination. That makes the entitlement the same in that respect.

“Similar rights” would be weaker and less precise, because it leaves open that maternity leave could still be meaningfully different, but the ruling’s point is parity in eligibility wherever disability leave exists.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7393 posts
575 posts
10 posts