rbsx wrote:
I think it's more the principle of the thing. It doesn't leave a good impression when a school can't be bothered to email you back. I've not had this experience with any other school that I've applied to, UCLA, UT, ASU, have all been more than helpful and have all gotten back to me expeditiously. Heck, one of the schools I applied to even offered to fast track my decisions so that I would hear from them around the same time as my other schools. It makes you feel wanted, it makes you want to go there more (or at worst, not not want to go there). At the end of the day, we're potential paying customers - yes we call ourselves students, but we are in fact 'customers'.
If you check the first page of the thread, I wrote about a similar experience I had with the school when I went to visit. Although I'm disappointed I didn't get an interview invite, in a weird sort of way I'm glad. I love LA, and I love USC, but the program appears to be in disarray from both the admissions office to the careers office, to the complete overhaul of the program a mere five years after the last overhaul.
<disappointment>
I can understand your frustration. But I wouldn't go so far as to say that the administrative pitfalls you've experienced are reason enough to not go to a school. You're going to be engulfed for two whole years in classes. team meetings, clubs, events, trips, parties, community service, networking...and none of that has anything to do with how quickly the admissions people get back to you. This is the nature of the process, ya know? Agreed - it might not be like this at other schools, but in the end, hopefully you will make a decision about going to the school that is best for you (considering the location, network, areas of specialty, likelihood of getting employment in your area of interest, etc.) Those admin hurdles are things you won't even remember once you become a student of the school.