It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 19:34

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

3 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2012
Posts: 56

Kudos [?]: 102 [3], given: 9

Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 May 2013, 14:17
3
This post received
KUDOS
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

59% (00:49) correct 41% (00:51) wrong based on 443 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

A) about if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

B) over whether the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

C) about whether the right to die should be viewed as if it was only a matter of conscience.

D) over if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience or not.

E) about whether the right to die should be viewed as being only a matter of conscience or not.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by doe007 on 14 May 2013, 21:51, edited 2 times in total.
Topic name updated

Kudos [?]: 102 [3], given: 9

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2012
Posts: 56

Kudos [?]: 102 [1], given: 9

Re: Medical ethicists... [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 May 2013, 14:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
argued about and argued over..which one is correct and why??
_________________

giving kudos is the best thing you can do for me..

Kudos [?]: 102 [1], given: 9

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 245

Kudos [?]: 219 [0], given: 99

Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GMAT Date: 07-25-2013
GPA: 3.83
WE: Architecture (Computer Hardware)
Re: Medical ethicists... [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 May 2013, 22:43
The answer should be C

Argue about is preferred in common language

OA pls
_________________

"Giving kudos" is a decent way to say "Thanks" and motivate contributors. Please use them, it won't cost you anything

Kudos [?]: 219 [0], given: 99

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2012
Posts: 56

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 9

Re: Medical ethicists... [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 May 2013, 00:52
skamal7 wrote:
The answer should be C

Argue about is preferred in common language

OA pls



that what i thought..

OA is B

Check OE below..
_________________

giving kudos is the best thing you can do for me..

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 9

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2012
Posts: 56

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 9

Re: Medical ethicists... [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 May 2013, 00:53
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Answer is B

Reason:
A. No. “Argued about if” is not idiomatic. The correct answer is B.
B. Yes. “Argued over whether” is idiomatic. The end of the sentence is written in the subjunctive mood, as it should be in hypothetical situations. The correct answer is B.
C. No. “Argued about” is not idiomatic. Since the second phrase is hypothetical, it should be in the subjunctive mood. The correct answer is B.
D. No. “If…or not” is not idiomatic. The correct answer is B.
E. No. “Argue about” is not idiomatic. Being is an unnecessary conjunction. “Or not” is redundant in the sentence, since the word whether already makes that clear. The correct answer is B.
_________________

giving kudos is the best thing you can do for me..

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 9

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Dec 2012
Posts: 156

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 67

Location: Poland
Re: Medical ethicists... [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 May 2013, 03:32
anish123ster wrote:
Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

A) about if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

B) over whether the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

C) about whether the right to die should be viewed as if it was only a matter of conscience.

D) over if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience or not.

E) about whether the right to die should be viewed as being only a matter of conscience or not.



OA B is wrong: "whether" has to include the "or" complement. As for the rest:
argue about = argue over.
A. ok
B. "whether" lacks "or"
C. "whether" lacks "or", "was" -> "were" (Hypothetical Subjunctive)
D. "if"+ "or"
E. as being is verbose.

Picked A, but open to dispute.
_________________

If I answered your question with this post, use the motivating power of kudos!

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 67

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Dec 2012
Posts: 156

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 67

Location: Poland
Re: Medical ethicists... [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 May 2013, 04:42
carcass wrote:
HumptyDumpty wrote:
anish123ster wrote:
Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

A) about if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

B) over whether the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

C) about whether the right to die should be viewed as if it was only a matter of conscience.

D) over if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience or not.

E) about whether the right to die should be viewed as being only a matter of conscience or not.



OA B is wrong: "whether" has to include the "or" complement. As for the rest:
argue about = argue over.
A. ok
B. "whether" lacks "or"
C. "whether" lacks "or", "was" -> "were" (Hypothetical Subjunctive)
D. "if"+ "or"
E. as being is verbose.

Picked A, but open to dispute.



OR can be even implied



Could you elaborate please? It's interesting.
_________________

If I answered your question with this post, use the motivating power of kudos!

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 67

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

Re: Medical ethicists... [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 May 2013, 05:10
anish123ster wrote:
argued about and argued over..which one is correct and why??


Both are correct respective of its use.
I guess "Argue about" is related to something abstract..like :
They argued about the meaning of life.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10130

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jul 2014, 18:15
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2013
Posts: 97

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 23

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
Schools: Insead '14, ISB '15
GMAT Date: 08-28-2014
GPA: 3.86
WE: Supply Chain Management (Manufacturing)
Re: Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jul 2014, 10:01
anish123ster wrote:
Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

A) about if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

B) over whether the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

C) about whether the right to die should be viewed as if it was only a matter of conscience.

D) over if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience or not.

E) about whether the right to die should be viewed as being only a matter of conscience or not.


My pick A

As I did not find any flaw in A,
In B : I believe correct usage of whether is with or ...which is missing
In C : Were need to be used with IF , irrespective of subject in Supposition
In D : or Not in end does not make any sense to me ( redundancy )
In E : Redundancy

But OA is B ??

What is the source of this question ?
_________________

G-prep1 540 --> Kaplan 580-->Veritas 640-->MGMAT 590 -->MGMAT 2 640 --> MGMAT 3 640 ---> MGMAT 4 650 -->MGMAT 5 680 -- >GMAT prep 1 570

Give your best shot...rest leave upto Mahadev, he is the extractor of all negativity in the world !!

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 23

BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
B
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 1437

Kudos [?]: 1309 [0], given: 819

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.35
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Feb 2015, 01:54
I followed a rather simplistic approach on this.

If vs Whether -> Whether wins (mostly)
Subjunctive form is required, only B satisfies both of these. Hence B is correct
_________________

ISB Preparation Kit | GMAT Debrief

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Kudos [?]: 1309 [0], given: 819

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 25 Nov 2015
Posts: 218

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 236

Location: India
GPA: 3.64
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Oct 2016, 11:44
Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.
A) about if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.
B) over whether the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.
C) about whether the right to die should be viewed as if it was only a matter of conscience.
D) over if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience or not.
E) about whether the right to die should be viewed as being only a matter of conscience or not.

I am utterly confused with this question. Please explain the correct answer.

Good questions deserve quodos!
_________________

When the going gets tough, the tough gets going...


Last edited by Vyshak on 28 Oct 2016, 12:01, edited 1 time in total.
Topic Merged. Refer to the above discussions

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 236

VP
VP
avatar
S
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1403

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 916

Re: Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Dec 2016, 09:53
anish123ster wrote:
Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

A) about if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

B) over whether the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

C) about whether the right to die should be viewed as if it was only a matter of conscience.

D) over if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience or not.

E) about whether the right to die should be viewed as being only a matter of conscience or not.


to show yes-no possibility, whether , not if, is used. a and d are gone
view somthing as something, not as being. this idiom is easy to remember. e is out
as if show a subjective clause following "as if" . this idiom is easy to remember, c is out
b is left
we do not need to know the idiom with "argue".
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 916

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 05 Dec 2016
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 41

Concentration: Finance, International Business
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jan 2017, 23:05
Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

A) about if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

B) over whether the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

C) about whether the right to die should be viewed as if it was only a matter of conscience.

D) over if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience or not.

E) about whether the right to die should be viewed as being only a matter of conscience or not.

I am confused in whether vs if
Isn't "whether" used to indicate conditions or scenarios and "if" used to indicate hypotheticals?

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 41

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Verbal Expert
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3148

Kudos [?]: 3282 [1], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jan 2017, 00:55
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
ilaukikt wrote:
Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

A) about if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

B) over whether the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

C) about whether the right to die should be viewed as if it was only a matter of conscience.

D) over if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience or not.

E) about whether the right to die should be viewed as being only a matter of conscience or not.

I am confused in whether vs if
Isn't "whether" used to indicate conditions or scenarios and "if" used to indicate hypotheticals?


"Whether" is used to introduce possibilities (scenarios) including yes/no scenarios or doubts.

"If" is used to introduce condition (introducing a hypothetical condition is only a specific usage of "if".) Introducing an "if" clause calls for a "then" clause.

Kudos [?]: 3282 [1], given: 22

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 15 Jun 2016
Posts: 91

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 3

Re: Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Feb 2017, 11:02
In option 'b', why we are using were in 'if it were'...?
why not 'if it was'

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 3

Math Forum Moderator
User avatar
G
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 3003

Kudos [?]: 1085 [0], given: 325

Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Feb 2017, 09:23
VKat wrote:
In option 'b', why we are using were in 'if it were'...?
why not 'if it was'


If it were = Represents Hypothetical situation ( The subjunctive mood )

Hence, (B) is acceptable here...

_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

Kudos [?]: 1085 [0], given: 325

Expert Post
Verbal Expert
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3148

Kudos [?]: 3282 [0], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Feb 2017, 12:08
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
VKat wrote:
In option 'b', why we are using were in 'if it were'...?
why not 'if it was'


Already explained by Abhishek - a bit more on this:

A hypothetical situation (unlikely event in future) within an IF clause is represented by simple past:

IF I became the minister, I would eradicate poverty.
IF he came, we would play.

However a special case is that the verb "was", though simple past, is never used in such situation. As a rule, the verb "was" is replaced by "were" irrespective of the subject.

IF I was WERE the king, I would eradicate poverty.

Kudos [?]: 3282 [0], given: 22

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 21 Jun 2015
Posts: 53

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 28

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
GPA: 3.32
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User
Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2017, 11:13
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
suru23 wrote:
anish123ster wrote:
argued about and argued over..which one is correct and why??


Both are correct respective of its use.
I guess "Argue about" is related to something abstract..like :
They argued about the meaning of life.


In SC, vertical scanning of answer choices is more important.

A) about if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

B) over whether the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience.

C) about whether the right to die should be viewed as if it was only a matter of conscience.

D) over if the right to die should be viewed as if it were only a matter of conscience or not.

E) about whether the right to die should be viewed as being only a matter of conscience or not.


If vs whether: whether should be used when we have options:yes or no. eliminate A,D
if it were vs if it was: if it were needs to be used when you are talking about 'would have been' scenarios eliminate C
'viewed as if' is correct.

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 28

Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die   [#permalink] 19 Sep 2017, 11:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Medical ethicists have argued about if the right to die

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.