Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 09:30 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 09:30

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13960
Own Kudos [?]: 32911 [20]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Posts: 368
Own Kudos [?]: 707 [14]
Given Kudos: 67
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: General Management
GPA: 3.9
Send PM
General Discussion
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2021
Posts: 149
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 22
Location: Canada
Send PM
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13960
Own Kudos [?]: 32911 [2]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: Musicologists concerned with the London Pianoforte school, the group [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
tkorzhan1995 wrote:
Sajjad1994, can you please post official explanations for Q7 and Q4?


Explanation


4. Which one of the following, if true, would most clearly undermine a portion of Ringer’s argument as the argument is described in the passage?

Difficulty Level: 700

Explanation

Ringer’s argument is described in Para 4, so you’ve got to look there for clues about what would undermine it. Lines 40-42 tell us that Ringer thought that Beethoven had to look outside of Austria for “creative” music models. This implies that Ringer believed that Austrian musicians weren’t creative. Thus, if Austrian musicians actually composed innovative piano music, Ringer’s argument about their creativity would certainly be undermined.

(B) According to lines 47-48, Ringer argues that the London Pianoforte school exercised influence on the music world “in the decades just before and after 1800.” Hence, the finding that Clementi et al.—who were members of this school—produced most of their compositions from 1790-1810 would, if anything, support Ringer’s view. It certainly wouldn’t undermine that view.

(C) Ringer asserts that Beethoven’s music was influenced by the works of the London Pianoforte school. That Beethoven’s music may also have been influenced by the works of Continental musicians does not undermine this view.

(D) According to lines 44-46, Ringer’s argument incorporates the idea that the musicians of the London Pianoforte school adopted similar stylistic principles.

(E) Where the members of the London Pianoforte school were born and why they ended up in London is not relevant to Ringer’s argument, which deals only with the music of this school and its influence on other musicians.

Answer: A
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13960
Own Kudos [?]: 32911 [1]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: Musicologists concerned with the London Pianoforte school, the group [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
tkorzhan1995 wrote:
Sajjad1994, can you please post official explanations for Q7 and Q4?


Explanation


7. The author of the passage is primarily concerned with

Difficulty Level: 600

Explanation

This question is a global question. Par 1 tells us that, historically, not much has been known about the London Pianoforte school. Para 2 tells us that Temperley’s anthology has changed this state of affairs, while Paras 3 and 4 point out how Temperley’s anthology has contributed to our knowledge of this school, helping to correct some past misconceptions about it. Only choice (E) is broad enough to capture the contents of all four Paras.

(A) The relationship between Beethoven’s music and the development of the piano is brought up only in Para 4.

(B) While lines 23-27 indicate that Temperley’s anthology should lead to new evaluations of the development of piano music in England and on the continent, his particular views on these issues are never described.

(C) Likewise, Temperley’s particular views on the matter of how changes in piano design may have affected the London Pianoforte school’s music aren’t mentioned.

(D) An alternative to Ringer’s theory is discussed only in Par 4.

Answer: E
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Dec 2020
Posts: 41
Own Kudos [?]: 17 [0]
Given Kudos: 29
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.64
Send PM
Re: Musicologists concerned with the London Pianoforte school, the group [#permalink]
Sajjad1994 can you please post the answer explanations to questions 2 and 5?
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13960
Own Kudos [?]: 32911 [0]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Musicologists concerned with the London Pianoforte school, the group [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Ivy17 wrote:
Sajjad1994 can you please post the answer explanations to questions 2 and 5?


Explanation


2. It can be inferred that which one of the following is true of the piano music of the London Pianoforte school?

Difficulty Level: 700

Explanation

Choice (E) echoes the idea expressed in lines 5-8: in modern times, even musicians haven’t been exposed to the work of the London Pianoforte school.

(A) The only reference to John Field’s nocturnes appears in lines 11-12, which state that his work, in contrast to that of most members of the London Pianoforte school, has been accessible to modern musicologists. That’s quite different from saying that his work typifies this school’s style. Indeed, paragraphs 3 and 4 make the point that this school had no typical musical style.

(B) Lines 10-12 state that Clementi’s Gradus ad Parnassum has “remained familiar enough” to modern musicologists. Again, that’s quite different from saying that it’s the “best-known work” of the London Pianoforte school.

(C) The passage never comments on whether “original scores” of the London Pianoforte school have survived. We only know that the music itself has survived. Hence, we can’t conclude that no “original scores” have survived to the present.

(D) The passage claims that Temperley’s anthology makes available much music that had previously been unavailable. It doesn’t claim that no one had tried to make this music available before him; rather, just that he’s the first one to succeed in making it available.

Answer: E
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13960
Own Kudos [?]: 32911 [0]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: Musicologists concerned with the London Pianoforte school, the group [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Ivy17 wrote:
Sajjad1994 can you please post the answer explanations to questions 2 and 5?


Explanation


5. It can be inferred that the author uses the word “advances” (line 49) to refer to

Difficulty Level; 600

Explanation

Right after the phrase “advances of the Broadwood piano” (lines 49-50), we’re given several specific examples of these advances (lines 50-51)—a “reinforced frame, extended compass, triple stringing, and pedals.” In other words, the word “advances” refers to improvements in the piano itself. Choice (B) reflects this idea, albeit in more general terms.

(A) What enticements? What instrument manufacturers? Neither enticements nor instrument manufacturers are mentioned in the passage.

(C) and (D) err in claiming that the word “advances” refers to piano music instead of the piano itself. The context in which this word is used, however, makes it evident that the word refers to the instrument.

(E), like (A), is outside the scope of the passage. We’re not given any information about musicians’ opinions of the piano.

Answer: B
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2020
Posts: 101
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 346
Send PM
Re: Musicologists concerned with the London Pianoforte school, the group [#permalink]
Hi Experts,

Please can you explain QS 6.

Thanks
Kitty
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13960
Own Kudos [?]: 32911 [0]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: Musicologists concerned with the London Pianoforte school, the group [#permalink]
Expert Reply
KittyDoodles wrote:
Hi Experts,

Please can you explain QS 6.

Thanks
Kitty


Explanation


6. It can be inferred from the passage as a whole that the author’s purpose in the third paragraph is primarily to

Difficulty Level: 700

Explanation

Despite the question stem’s claim, you don’t really need an overview of the entire passage to find the correct answer to this question. Indeed, the first sentence of Para 3 lets you know what the para is going to be about: whether the London Pianoforte school rightfully deserves to be called a school. The rest of the Para simply grapples with this question.

(A) The first couple of sentences of Para 2 make plain the author’s positive attitude toward Temperley’s anthology, which isn’t even mentioned in Para 3.

(C) Ringer’s argument is summarized in Para 4.

(D) In lines 31-38, the author notes that, musically speaking, the London Pianoforte school probably doesn’t deserve to be called a school at all. The musical styles of its members were too diverse for it to be labeled a school on this basis.

(E) Like Ringer’s argument, the London Pianoforte school’s contributions to music are discussed in Para 4.

Answer: B
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Jun 2018
Posts: 104
Own Kudos [?]: 35 [0]
Given Kudos: 80
Send PM
Re: Musicologists concerned with the London Pianoforte school, the group [#permalink]
To be honest, its not long text but super hard to understand....
Will we encounter this kind of text in business world?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Nov 2021
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 90
Send PM
Re: Musicologists concerned with the London Pianoforte school, the group [#permalink]
Hi Sajjad1994

Could you explain QS 1.

Thanks
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13960
Own Kudos [?]: 32911 [1]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: Musicologists concerned with the London Pianoforte school, the group [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
notshynotme wrote:
Hi Sajjad1994

Could you explain QS 1.

Thanks


Explanation


1. Which one of the following most accurately states the author’s main point?

Difficulty Level: 600-650

Explanation

The phrase “main point” in the question stem indicates a Global question; therefore, you’ve got to look for the answer choice that captures the passage’s basic theme. Para 1 introduces us to the London Pianoforte school, while Paras 2-4 explain how and why Temperley’s anthology contributes greatly to our understanding of this important musical school.

(A) focuses on an issue dealt with only in Paras 3 and 4. Hence, this choice isn’t broad enough to capture the passage’s basic theme. Besides, Temperley’s anthology merely redefines the essence of the London Pianoforte school, emphasizing historical era rather than musical style; he doesn’t ultimately claim that this school is an invention of later musicologists, the contents of lines 37-38 notwithstanding.

(C) distorts the thrust of the passage, which claims that Temperley’s anthology should improve scholarship about the London Pianoforte school. The author doesn’t make the claim that this school’s music itself “has been revived” by his work.

(D) This passage focuses specifically on Temperley’s anthology. It doesn’t dwell on the broader issue of the utility of primary sources in musicological research.

(E) Quite apart from the fact that this choice never mentions Temperley’s anthology, it focuses on an issue dealt with only in Paras 2 and 4. True, the development of the piano influenced European musicians (see especially lines 49-55); but its influence on these musicians isn’t the passage’s main concern.

Answer: B
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Musicologists concerned with the London Pianoforte school, the group [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13960 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne