GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 20 Jun 2019, 08:19

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Myrna: People should follow diets in which fat represents no more than

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Jan 2017
Posts: 295
Location: Canada
Reviews Badge
Myrna: People should follow diets in which fat represents no more than  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 04 Oct 2017, 02:41
10
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

66% (02:13) correct 34% (02:26) wrong based on 379 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Myrna: People should follow diets in which fat represents no more than 30 percent of total calories, not the 37 percent the average diet in this country contains.

Roland: If everyone in the country followed you recommendation during his or her entire life, just 0.2 percent would lengthen their live at all, and then only by an average of 3 months. Modifying our diet is not worthwhile. A lifetime of sacrifice spent eating an unappealing low-fat diet is too high a price to pay for the chance of extending that sacrifice for 3 months.

Myrna: But for everyone who dies early from a high-fat diet, many more people suffer from serious chronic diseases because they followed such diets.

Roland's argument assumes that

(A) it is desirable to live in such a way as to length life as much as possible

(B) a low-fat diet cannot readily be made appealing and satisfying to a person who follows it regularly

(C) diet is the only relevant factor to consider in computing influences on length of life

(D) the difference in tastiness between a diet in which fat represents 30 percent of total calories and one in which it represents 37 percent is not noticeable

(E) not everyone in the country eats the average diet

Source: LSAT

Originally posted by vikasp99 on 22 Feb 2017, 19:24.
Last edited by broall on 04 Oct 2017, 02:41, edited 2 times in total.
Reformatted question
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 19 Jul 2016
Posts: 14
Location: Moldova, Republic of
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
Re: Myrna: People should follow diets in which fat represents no more than  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Feb 2017, 19:25
Answer is B
Spotted this right after finishing reading Roland's reply, before getting to the question. He assumes that if a food is low in fat, it cannot taste good by definition.
I have a few friends who think like that :)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Mar 2018
Posts: 268
CAT Tests
Re: Myrna: People should follow diets in which fat represents no more than  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2018, 20:51
DavidTutorexamPAL why C is wrong ?
If we negate it the argument falls apart
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 30 Sep 2017
Posts: 135
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Myrna: People should follow diets in which fat represents no more than  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 May 2019, 12:20
teaserbae wrote:
DavidTutorexamPAL why C is wrong ?
If we negate it the argument falls apart


Diet happens to be the topic for discussion, but the two speakers are not deciding over which factors are important in extending ones life, i.e. they talk in the context of diet.

Hope this helps.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 12 Dec 2018
Posts: 4
Re: Myrna: People should follow diets in which fat represents no more than  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 May 2019, 22:09
Please help me understand why C is not the correct option here.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 18 Feb 2019
Posts: 10
GMAT ToolKit User
Myrna: People should follow diets in which fat represents no more than  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 24 May 2019, 10:49
vikasp99 wrote:
Myrna: People should follow diets in which fat represents no more than 30 percent of total calories, not the 37 percent the average diet in this country contains.

Roland: If everyone in the country followed you recommendation during his or her entire life, just 0.2 percent would lengthen their live at all, and then only by an average of 3 months. Modifying our diet is not worthwhile. A lifetime of sacrifice spent eating an unappealing low-fat diet is too high a price to pay for the chance of extending that sacrifice for 3 months.

Myrna: But for everyone who dies early from a high-fat diet, many more people suffer from serious chronic diseases because they followed such diets.

Roland's argument assumes that

(A) it is desirable to live in such a way as to length life as much as possible

(B) a low-fat diet cannot readily be made appealing and satisfying to a person who follows it regularly

(C) diet is the only relevant factor to consider in computing influences on length of life

(D) the difference in tastiness between a diet in which fat represents 30 percent of total calories and one in which it represents 37 percent is not noticeable

(E) not everyone in the country eats the average diet

Source: LSAT


Could someone explain why C is incorrect? I understand that the extreme of "...only relevant factor..." could make it an incorrect choice, but nevertheless, I don't see how B is making a better assumption.

In answer B, I can't find a reference to "satisfying" food. Roland only mentions the "appealing" part of the low-fat diet. But even then, the premise and his main conclusion focus on life expectancy rather than the appeal of the food.

Originally posted by yvankd on 24 May 2019, 08:03.
Last edited by yvankd on 24 May 2019, 10:49, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 15 Jan 2019
Posts: 3
Re: Myrna: People should follow diets in which fat represents no more than  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 May 2019, 08:55
The first thing that we need to know is that it is an inference question to Roland's argument. In this case, Roland argues, it is not worth it to sacrifice an appealing diet with only a three more month length of life.
So we need to look for the answer which supports the joy of food tastiness and does not support the low fat diet in the sacrifice for a short time of living.

(A) it is desirable to live in such a way as to length life as much as possible => It is part of Myrna's point of view, not Roland.

(B) a low-fat diet cannot readily be made appealing and satisfying to a person who follows it regularly => This choice support Roland's opinion. So it is a correct answer.

(C) diet is the only relevant factor to consider in computing influences on length of life. => Noone states that diet is the only factor.

(D) the difference in tastiness between a diet in which fat represents 30 percent of total calories and one in which it represents 37 percent is not noticeable. => this answer is totally different from Roland's argument. Roland supported that the high fat diet is significantly tastier than the regular diet, so that it is not worth sacrificing.

(E) not everyone in the country eats the average diet => Not relevant.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Myrna: People should follow diets in which fat represents no more than   [#permalink] 24 May 2019, 08:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Myrna: People should follow diets in which fat represents no more than

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne