GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Oct 2019, 16:21 GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.  New Set: Number Properties!!!

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern  Joined: 11 Dec 2012
Posts: 13
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Schools: HKUST '15 (S)
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!  [#permalink]

Show Tags

1
1. E
2. D
3. E
4. E
5. C
6. C
7. A
8. E
9. C
10. D
11. D
Intern  Joined: 11 Dec 2012
Posts: 13
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Schools: HKUST '15 (S)
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!  [#permalink]

Show Tags

1
1
Rock750 wrote:
BONUS QUESTION:
11. If x and y are positive integers, is x a prime number?

(1) |x - 2| < 2 - y
(2) x + y - 3 = |1-y|

(1) |x - 2| < 2 - y

If x<2 --> x=1 because x is a positive integer then x is prime
If x=2 --> x is prime

If x>2 --> x - 2 < 2 - y
In this case :
if y<2 --> y = 1 -> x < 3 so x can take two values : 1 and 2 --> both are primes ; thus x is prime
if y = 2 -> x - 2 < 0 -> x<2 so x = 1 and thus x is prime
if y>2 hence 2 - y < 0 -> x - 2 < 2 - y < 0 -> x - 2 < 0 -> x < 2 -> x = 1 -> thus x is prime

(1) ALONE IS SUFFICIENT

2) x + y - 3 = |1-y|

y is a positive integer
--> if y = 1 --> x = 2 thus x is prime
--> if y>1 --> |1-y| = y - 1 --> x + y - 3 = y - 1 --> x = 2 and thus x is prime

(2) ALONE IS SUFFICIENT

Though your answer is correct, the reasoning you provided is incorrect.

1. FYI - 1 is NOT a prime number.
2. For statement 1: y<2 => 1<x<3 so x cannot be =1. Also, y>2 is not possible as |x-2| cannot be less than 0.

HTH.
Intern  Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 22
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44 Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!  [#permalink]

Show Tags

1
Bunuel PS comment on method used- If you have the time of course.
Attachments Gmatclub_02.jpg [ 56.12 KiB | Viewed 25192 times ] Gmatclub_01.jpg [ 60.39 KiB | Viewed 25180 times ]

Originally posted by samsonfred76 on 28 Mar 2013, 16:16.
Last edited by samsonfred76 on 28 Mar 2013, 16:28, edited 1 time in total.
Intern  Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 22
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44 Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!  [#permalink]

Show Tags

Bunuel PS comment on method used- If you have the time of course.
Attachments Gmatclub_03.jpg [ 54.37 KiB | Viewed 25131 times ]

Originally posted by samsonfred76 on 28 Mar 2013, 16:18.
Last edited by samsonfred76 on 29 Mar 2013, 08:16, edited 2 times in total.
Intern  Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 22
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44 Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!  [#permalink]

Show Tags

1
Bunuel PS comment on method used- If you have the time of course.
Attachments Gmatclub_06.jpg [ 58.12 KiB | Viewed 25137 times ] Gmatclub_05.jpg [ 69.29 KiB | Viewed 25147 times ]

Originally posted by samsonfred76 on 28 Mar 2013, 16:25.
Last edited by samsonfred76 on 28 Mar 2013, 16:29, edited 1 time in total.
Intern  Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 22
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44 Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!  [#permalink]

Show Tags

1
Bunuel PS comment on method used- If you have the time of course.
Attachments Gmatclub_07.jpg [ 80.53 KiB | Viewed 25150 times ]

Manager  Status: Final Lap
Joined: 25 Oct 2012
Posts: 227
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.54
WE: Project Management (Retail Banking)
Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!  [#permalink]

Show Tags

jonnyhh wrote:
Rock750 wrote:
BONUS QUESTION:
11. If x and y are positive integers, is x a prime number?

(1) |x - 2| < 2 - y
(2) x + y - 3 = |1-y|

(1) |x - 2| < 2 - y

If x<2 --> x=1 because x is a positive integer then x is prime
If x=2 --> x is prime

If x>2 --> x - 2 < 2 - y
In this case :
if y<2 --> y = 1 -> x < 3 so x can take two values : 1 and 2 --> both are primes ; thus x is prime
if y = 2 -> x - 2 < 0 -> x<2 so x = 1 and thus x is prime
if y>2 hence 2 - y < 0 -> x - 2 < 2 - y < 0 -> x - 2 < 0 -> x < 2 -> x = 1 -> thus x is prime

(1) ALONE IS SUFFICIENT

2) x + y - 3 = |1-y|

y is a positive integer
--> if y = 1 --> x = 2 thus x is prime
--> if y>1 --> |1-y| = y - 1 --> x + y - 3 = y - 1 --> x = 2 and thus x is prime

(2) ALONE IS SUFFICIENT

Though your answer is correct, the reasoning you provided is incorrect.

1. FYI - 1 is NOT a prime number.
2. For statement 1: y<2 => 1<x<3 so x cannot be =1. Also, y>2 is not possible as |x-2| cannot be less than 0.

HTH.

I Completely agree with you

Thank you
_________________
KUDOS is the good manner to help the entire community.

"If you don't change your life, your life will change you"
Manager  Joined: 02 Jan 2013
Posts: 54
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 GPA: 3.2
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!  [#permalink]

Show Tags

1
1
1] (1) |23.x| is a prime number. Since 23 is prime, and x is an integer, any other value of x other than +1 or -1
will result in a multiple of 23, therefore, nonprime number. Therefore, x = -1 or x = 1
Insufficient

(2) 2.|x| is a prime number. Any other value of x other than +1 or -1 will result in an even number other than 2. Therefore, x=-1 or x =1
Insufficient

(1)+(2) still gives x = 1 or x = -1 Insufficient

Originally posted by caioguima on 28 Mar 2013, 19:24.
Last edited by caioguima on 28 Mar 2013, 19:27, edited 1 time in total.
Manager  Joined: 02 Jan 2013
Posts: 54
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 GPA: 3.2
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!  [#permalink]

Show Tags

3
3]

(1) Both x and y have 3 factors. Which means that x and y are not only perfect squares, but also perfect squares of PRIME numbers. Let's remember that the only 2 consecutive prime numbers are 2 and 3, therefore: Sufficient

(2) This already gives us directly the same information that sqrt(x)=2, and sqrt(y) = 3, therefore: Sufficient

Manager  Joined: 02 Jan 2013
Posts: 54
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 GPA: 3.2
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!  [#permalink]

Show Tags

1
4]
(1) 444, 488 and 848 all fit the description with this information. Theferore, insufficient

(2) K is a multiple 3 if, and only if, the sum of its digits is a multiple of 3. Note that, applying this rule, only
444 and 888 are multiple of 3, from the possibilities that fit the stem description. All other possibilites are not multiples of 3.
Therefore, insufficient

(1) + (2): 488 and 848 are still a possibility. Insufficient

Manager  Joined: 02 Jan 2013
Posts: 54
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 GPA: 3.2
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!  [#permalink]

Show Tags

5]

(1) If a<b<c, then a! < b! < c! , which means that the median of the set {a!, b!,c!} is b!. If b! = odd, then b! = 1, which means b = 0 or b = 1. However, c can be any number greater than 1. Therefore, insufficient

(2) c! is prime, than c = 2. Which means, b=1, and a=0 (assuming that GMAT is not defining factorial functions for negative integers). Sufficient

Manager  Joined: 02 Jan 2013
Posts: 54
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 GPA: 3.2
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!  [#permalink]

Show Tags

2
6]
(1) Consider the sets: {-1,-2,-3} and {1,2,-3}, which both fit the stem description and statement 1. For one the answer is YES, for the other, the answer is NO. Therefore, Insufficient.

(2) Consider the sets: {1,2,3} and {-3,-2,-1}, which both fit the stem description and statement 2. For one the answer is YES, for the other, the answer is NO. Therefore, Insufficient

(1) + (2):
From the information in (2), we have that the largest and smallest number HAVE to be of the same sign. Therefore, for a three integer set, the middle number will have to be of the same sign. From statement (1), they all have to be negative.
Note that for sets with more than 3 integers, the fact that the product of any 3 integers have to be negative, forces the other numbers to be negative as well. Therefore, Sufficient

Manager  Joined: 02 Jan 2013
Posts: 54
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 GPA: 3.2
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!  [#permalink]

Show Tags

2
7]

(1) Look for patterns. For perfect squares, 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100, 121, 144, 169,... the remainders when divided by 12 are: 1, 4, 9,4,1,4,9,0, 1,4,9.... Therefore, the answer will always be no. Sufficient
(keep in mind, this is not a trivial nor formal passage, but this pattern check will do for gmat)

(2) Consider the numbers 16, and 100 (both perfect squares), and both have remainder 2 when divided by 14. Therefore, insufficient

Manager  Joined: 02 Jan 2013
Posts: 54
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 GPA: 3.2
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!  [#permalink]

Show Tags

1
1
8] Since we have an even number of elements in the set, the median will be the average of the two central numbers. Therefore, the median will be of type: (1/p + 1/q)/2 = (q+p)/(2.p.q), where p and q are primes.

(1) The reciprocal of the median, X = 2pq/(p+q) , is prime. So, pq/(p+q) = 1 (let me know if this passage was not trivial for you). Therefore: pq = p + q , which means p = q = 2. Since 1/2 is also the largest possibility of an element for S, we must have all numbers of the set equal to 1/2. Therefore, Sufficient

(2) The only terminating decimals of type 1/n, where n is a prime number are: 1/2 and 1/5. Set S has to have only elements equal to 1/2 and 1/5, which means the median can be equal to 1/2, 1/5 or something between 1/2 and 1/5. Therefore, the median is always greater than 1/5. Sufficient

Manager  Joined: 02 Jan 2013
Posts: 54
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 GPA: 3.2
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!  [#permalink]

Show Tags

1
9]
(1) a.b = 2 , therefore b = 2/a.
If a < 0 , [a]+[2/a] will be negative. Therefore [a]+[ b ] is not equal to 1.
If 0<a<1, [a] = 0, [2/a]>2. Therefore, [a]+[ b ] is not equal to 1.
If 1< a<2, [a] =1, [2/a]=1. Therefore, [a]+[ b ] is not equal to 1
If a>2, [2/a] = 0, [a] >=2. Therefore, [a]+[ b ] is not equal to 1.

Therefore, [a]+[ b ] is never iqual to 1. Sufficient

(2) 0 < a < b < 2
Consider a = 1/2, b = 3/2. In this case, the answer is yes, since [a] +[ b ] = 0 + 1 = 1
Consider a = 1/2, b= 3/4. In this case, the answer is no, since [a] + [ b ] = 0 + 0 = 0

Therefore, insufficient

Manager  Joined: 02 Jan 2013
Posts: 54
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 GPA: 3.2
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!  [#permalink]

Show Tags

2
10] (x+1).(y+1) = 12, results in the possible (x,y) pairs: (1,5), (2,3), (3,2), (5,1)

(1) If 9 is not a factor of N, then x < 2. Therefore N = 3.5^5. Sufficient

(2) If 125 is a factor of N, then y >=3. Therefore (x,y) can be either (1,5) or (2,3). Insufficient

Manager  Joined: 02 Jan 2013
Posts: 54
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 GPA: 3.2
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!  [#permalink]

Show Tags

2
11] (BONUS QUESTION)

(1) |x-2| < 2-y
=> y-2 < x - 2 < 2 - y
=> y < x < 4 -y
=> y = 1 (try, plugging y >1, to see what happens to the inequality)
=> 1 < x < 3
=> x = 2
=> x is prime

Sufficient

(2) x + y - 3 = |1-y|
As y is a positive integer, y>=1 always, which means |1-y| = y-1. Therefore, x + y - 3 = y -1, which implies x = 2.
Sufficient

Intern  Joined: 20 Dec 2012
Posts: 1
Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!  [#permalink]

Show Tags

Zarrolou wrote:
9. If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any number x, is [a] + [b] = 1 ?

(1) ab = 2
(2) 0 < a < b < 2

The question can be seen as (given statement 2):
$$[a] + [b] = 1$$
case 1:$$0<(=)a<1$$ => $$[a]=0$$ and $$1(=)<b<2$$ => $$[b]=1$$ so $$[a] + [b] = 1$$
or the opposite
case 2: $$0<(=)b<1$$ => $$[b]=0$$ and $$1(=)<a<2$$ => $$[a]=1$$ so $$[a] + [b] = 1$$

But as ab=2 we know that one term is $$\frac{1}{2}$$ and the other is $$2$$
So we are in one of the two senarios above, IMO C

Though I too think that the correct answer is "C", but the explanation is a little confusing..
as the stmt 1 says that the product of ab=2, so its not necessary that one will be 2 and the other be 1/2. It could be either(-1*-2) or (1/2*4). Hope you got my point here.
Verbal Forum Moderator B
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Posts: 590
Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!  [#permalink]

Show Tags

lahca007 wrote:
Zarrolou wrote:
9. If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x for any number x, is [a] + [b] = 1 ?

(1) ab = 2
(2) 0 < a < b < 2

The question can be seen as (given statement 2):
$$[a] + [b] = 1$$
case 1:$$0<(=)a<1$$ => $$[a]=0$$ and $$1(=)<b<2$$ => $$[b]=1$$ so $$[a] + [b] = 1$$
or the opposite
case 2: $$0<(=)b<1$$ => $$[b]=0$$ and $$1(=)<a<2$$ => $$[a]=1$$ so $$[a] + [b] = 1$$

But as ab=2 we know that one term is $$\frac{1}{2}$$ and the other is $$2$$
So we are in one of the two senarios above, IMO C

Though I too think that the correct answer is "C", but the explanation is a little confusing..
as the stmt 1 says that the product of ab=2, so its not necessary that one will be 2 and the other be 1/2. It could be either(-1*-2) or (1/2*4). Hope you got my point here.

From F.S 1 , we know that a,b both are not equal to zero. Also, it is being asked whether, [a]+[b] =1. b = 2/a.

Thus, the question is asking whether, [a] + [2/a] = 1? --> 1-[a] = [2/a]

Notice, for 0<a<1, we have [a] = 0, and [2/a] is atleast 2. Thus, 1-[a] is not equal to [2/a].

Similarly, for 1<a<2, we have [a] = 1, and [2/a] = 1. Thus, 1-[a] is not equal to [2/a].

For a>2, we have 1-[a] as negative and [2/a] as 0. Hence, not equal again.

Similarly, for a<0, we would always have 1-[a] as positive but [2/a] will always be negative and hence not equal.

One can check for a=1,2,-1,-2 and would still find they are not equal. Sufficient.

From F.S 2, we have 0<a<b<2. For a=0.1 and b=1, we have [a]+[b] =1, so a YES. However, for a=1 and b = 1.5, we have [a]+[b] = 2, hence a NO. Insufficient.

A.
_________________
Math Expert V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58445
Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!  [#permalink]

Show Tags

5
15
SOLUTIONS:

1. If x is an integer, what is the value of x?

(1) $$|23x|$$ is a prime number. From this statement it follows that x=1 or x=-1. Not sufficient.

(2) $$2\sqrt{x^2}$$ is a prime number. The same here: x=1 or x=-1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) x could be 1 or -1. Not sufficient.

_________________ Re: New Set: Number Properties!!!   [#permalink] 29 Mar 2013, 03:30

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9    Next  [ 165 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

New Set: Number Properties!!!

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne  