apoorv1031
Hey
GMATNinja, I agree with your explanation totally, however, in option A - is 'count typically' the correct usage? I feel that it means that the counting was typical. I'm sorry if I make no sense, but while reading the sentence, that specific part sounded really weird.
I understand your point! Does "typically" modify "have found" or "to count"?
Well, the first thing to realize is that, even if this is a problem, there is no way around it: we have something similar in all five answer choices, so it's not worth worrying about.
That said, does it make more sense for "typically" to modify "have found" or "to count"? If "typically" modifies "have found", that means that,
in most cases, the people who have tried to count have found about five thousand languages. This makes perfect sense: it tells us what MOST of those people have found when they have tried to count.
Now if "typically" modifies "to count", that means that there must be a "typical" way of counting and an "atypical" way of counting. What exactly are those ways? We have no idea -- this is certainly not common knowledge, and the sentence doesn't give us any other relevant information.
So
can "typically" modify "to count"? Technically, yes. But it makes much more sense for it to modify "have found".
Again -- and much more importantly -- we run into this apparent dilemma in all five choices, so we don't have to worry too much about it.
I hope that helps!