Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 16:09 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 16:09
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
vscid
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Last visit: 25 Feb 2011
Posts: 248
Own Kudos:
1,131
 [9]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 248
Kudos: 1,131
 [9]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dimitri92
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Last visit: 18 May 2019
Posts: 230
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Affiliations: SPG
Posts: 230
Kudos: 3,574
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
PTK
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Last visit: 06 Oct 2022
Posts: 1,138
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 622
Status:mission completed!
GPA: 3.77
Products:
Posts: 1,138
Kudos: 2,206
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,419
 [3]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,419
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have two objections to consider A the right choice. First, as every one has pointed out, A woefully is faulting on the correlative conjunction llism by bringing in a pronoun after the conjunction but in the second leg , while a verb should be present there to run in tandem with the verb ‘do’. Second, the use of the pronoun ‘they’ is redundant in my opinion, because, in two part sentences, where upon the subject of the first part can stand for the subject of the second part, the use of a pronoun Is unnecessary and wrong. Consider this:

We say; ‘Not only did Tom break his leg in the accident but also fractured his arm’.

We don’t say,

‘Not only did Tom break his leg in the accident but also he fractured his arm

Can the choice A stand the rigor of GMAT?
User avatar
nov79
Joined: 03 Sep 2010
Last visit: 30 Mar 2012
Posts: 52
Own Kudos:
92
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Israel
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GMAT 2: 670 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.2
WE:Operations (Non-Profit and Government)
GMAT 2: 670 Q48 V34
Posts: 52
Kudos: 92
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
+1 A for me.
As Pkit said, A is the best of the worst. I do not find any problem with the idiom not only do "deep sea divers (they) .... but they also.
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,419
 [1]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,419
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
@Pkit: Is it so? Coming as it is from the stable of Kaplan, there must be some reason why Kaplan, the grandpa of Test preps, has forborne such technical incongruities; obviously the intention may not be to train people to find the best among the worst. But it is true that choice A is better than the others, as they seem to have been added just to fill up the rest of the choices. But thanks to Kaplan for the opportunity to delve into some aspects of correlative conjunctions and their llism.
User avatar
PTK
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Last visit: 06 Oct 2022
Posts: 1,138
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 622
Status:mission completed!
GPA: 3.77
Products:
Posts: 1,138
Kudos: 2,206
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
thank you guys,

daagh this SC wondered me a lot too.

There is the explanation from Kaplan.

""Not only...but also" must connect similar terms. "Deep sea divers not only risk" and "but also fall prey" are correctly paralleled in (A). (B) would work if "and" was substituted for "but." There are two problems with (C): "nitrogen narcosis... is risked" and the fact that (C) is actually two complete sentences incorrectly linked with a comma. You'd need a period after "feet," and a capital "i" in "in." In (E), "they" doesn't refer clearly and unambiguously to one specific plural noun. In (A), "they" can only mean "divers.""

As you may see in theri explanations they say not only but also. but in choice A it is not so. I think it may be poorly constructed question.

Daagh you see you left them and the quality diminishes :)
User avatar
KapTeacherEli
User avatar
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Last visit: 03 Oct 2013
Posts: 610
Own Kudos:
682
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Cambridge, MA
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 610
Kudos: 682
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi folks,

Sentence Correct question ask you to pick the best answer possible--which isn't the same as a perfect answer. (A) definitely sounds fishy, but it gets the idiom right while maintaining parallelism between its elements. The sentence would probably feel more natural if it were rewritten entirely as "Deep-sea divers not only risk...but also fall prey...". However, it IS okay to break up the 'not only...but also' idiom with a pronoun; since every other answer makes an error in grammatical or idiomatic construction, and (A) does not, (A) must be correct even though it grates our ears.

That said, Pkit, you have spotted an error in our explanation: we incorrectly quote the original sentence, and that could definitely cause confusion. Sorry if our mistake made things more challenging than they needed to be, and thanks for calling it to our attention. Can the OP please tell me the specific Kaplan source that this came from so I can flag it for review?

Thanks!
User avatar
mun23
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Last visit: 26 Apr 2013
Posts: 97
Own Kudos:
1,776
 [1]
Given Kudos: 46
Status:struggling with GMAT
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Accounting
GMAT Date: 04-06-2013
GPA: 3.65
Posts: 97
Kudos: 1,776
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Not only do deep - sea drivers risk nitrogen narcosis ,often called "raptures of the deep",if they descend below 200 feet ,but they also fall prey to decompression sickness,commonly known as "the bends",if they ascend too quickly.

(A)Not only do deep - sea drivers risk nitrogen narcosis ,often called "raptures of the deep",if they descend below 200 feet ,but
(B)Deep-sea drivers risk nitrogen narcosis,often called "raptures of the deep",if they descend below 200 feet,but
\(C)Nitrogen narcosis,often called "raptures of the deep",is risked by deep-sea drivers if they descend below 200 feet,in addition
(D)The descending of deep-sea drivers to below 200 feet causes them risking nitrogen narcosis,often called "raptures of the deep",and
(E)Not only does a deep-sea driver risk nitrogen narcosis,often called "raptures of the deep",if they descend below 200 feet,but

Need every option`s explanation.

If you find my post helpful don`t forget to give kudos.
User avatar
btg9788
Joined: 22 Dec 2012
Last visit: 07 Nov 2013
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Posts: 50
Kudos: 38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let me try to explain this -

(A)Not only do deep - sea drivers risk nitrogen narcosis ,often called "raptures of the deep",if they descend below 200 feet ,but
This option has the correct use of "Not only ...but also ". Each usage of "they" alludes to sea divers ( or is it drivers??) only and there is no pronoun ambiguity.

(B)Deep-sea drivers risk nitrogen narcosis,often called "raptures of the deep",if they descend below 200 feet,but
Here "but they also" is not idiomatic. There is no "Not only"

(C)Nitrogen narcosis,often called "raptures of the deep",is risked by deep-sea drivers if they descend below 200 feet,in addition
The option here wrongly suggests that Nitrogen narcosis is risked by deep-sea drivers. "Risked" is exposing something to danger. The meaning is clearly nonsensical.

(D)The descending of deep-sea drivers to below 200 feet causes them risking nitrogen narcosis,often called "raptures of the deep",and
Same as C + they also is not idiomatic.

(E)Not only does a deep-sea driver risk nitrogen narcosis,often called "raptures of the deep",if they descend below 200 feet,but
Same as D.

Hope this helps!
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,368
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vscid
Not only do deep-sea divers risk nitrogen narcosis, often called "raptures of the deep", if they descend below 200 feet, but they also fall prey to decompression sickness, commonly known as the "bends", if they ascend too quickly.


A. Not only do deep-sea divers risk nitrogen narcosis, often called "raptures of the deep", if they descend below 200 feet, but

B. Deep-sea divers risk nitrogen narcosis, often called "raptures of the deep", if they descend below 200 feet, but

C. Nitrogen narcosis, often called "raptures of the deep", is risked by deep-sea divers if they descend below 200 feet, in addition

D. Descending below 200 feet causes deep-sea divers to risk nitrogen narcosis, often called "raptures of the deep" and

E. Not only does a deep-sea diver risk nitrogen narcosis, often called "raptures of the deep", if they descend below 200 feet, but

KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:



A.

“Not only . . .but also” must connect similar terms. “Deep sea divers not only risk” and “but also fall prey” are correctly paralleled in (A). (B) would work if“and”was substituted for “but.”There are two prob- lems with (C): “nitrogennarcosis . . . is risked” and the fact that (C) is actually two complete sentences incorrectly linked with a comma.You’d need a period after “feet,” anda capital “i” in “in.” In(E), “they” doesn’t refer clearly and unambiguously to one spe- cific plural noun. In (A),“they” can mean only “divers.”(D) The beginning of this sentence is a bit wordy and “causes themrisking . . .” sounds awkward. The infinite “to risk” is needed in place of “risking.”
User avatar
BARUAH
Joined: 25 Nov 2017
Last visit: 20 Jun 2022
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
GMAT 1: 590 Q47 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GPA: 3.56
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
Posts: 66
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
I have two objections to consider A the right choice. First, as every one has pointed out, A woefully is faulting on the correlative conjunction llism by bringing in a pronoun after the conjunction but in the second leg , while a verb should be present there to run in tandem with the verb ‘do’. Second, the use of the pronoun ‘they’ is redundant in my opinion, because, in two part sentences, where upon the subject of the first part can stand for the subject of the second part, the use of a pronoun Is unnecessary and wrong. Consider this:

We say; ‘Not only did Tom break his leg in the accident but also fractured his arm’.

We don’t say,

‘Not only did Tom break his leg in the accident but also he fractured his arm

Can the choice A stand the rigor of GMAT?

I read ur explanation. I have a doubt in the following sentence.
Not only did Tom break his leg in the accident but also fractured his arm’.

Since we are using "did break ", "fractured" should be "fracture".

daagh, Plz help.
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,419
 [2]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,419
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
What is after not only? A past tense verb 'did.' So for parallelism's sake, we require another past tense verb. That is why we have to say ' fractured" rather ' fracture."

Look at this

HIDE TIMER STATISTICS
The voluminous personal papers of Thomas Alva Edison reveal that his inventions typically sprang to life, not in a flash of inspiration but evolved slowly from previous works.


(A) sprang to life, not in a flash of inspiration but evolved slowly

(B) sprang to life, not in a flash of inspiration but were slowly evolved

(C) did not spring to life in a flash of inspiration but evolved slowly

(D) did not spring to life in a flash of inspiration but had slowly evolved

(E) did not spring to life in a flash of inspiration but they were slowly evolved

This is a "not... but" correlative. The correct choice uses 'evolved' rather than 'evolve.'
User avatar
BARUAH
Joined: 25 Nov 2017
Last visit: 20 Jun 2022
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
GMAT 1: 590 Q47 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GPA: 3.56
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
Posts: 66
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
What is after not only? A past tense verb 'did.' So for parallelism's sake, we require another past tense verb. That is why we have to say ' fractured" rather ' fracture."

Look at this

HIDE TIMER STATISTICS
The voluminous personal papers of Thomas Alva Edison reveal that his inventions typically sprang to life, not in a flash of inspiration but evolved slowly from previous works.


(A) sprang to life, not in a flash of inspiration but evolved slowly

(B) sprang to life, not in a flash of inspiration but were slowly evolved

(C) did not spring to life in a flash of inspiration but evolved slowly

(D) did not spring to life in a flash of inspiration but had slowly evolved

(E) did not spring to life in a flash of inspiration but they were slowly evolved

This is a "not... but" correlative. The correct choice uses 'evolved' rather than 'evolve.'


Thanks Daagh
User avatar
ProfChaos
Joined: 11 Apr 2020
Last visit: 06 Dec 2020
Posts: 122
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 630
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Posts: 122
Kudos: 352
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
Please help with this one.
I narrowed it down to A and B

How to eliminate option B?
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ProfChaos
GMATNinja
Please help with this one.
I narrowed it down to A and B

How to eliminate option B?

Hi

Let me try to address your query. Let us examine option (B):

B. Deep-sea divers risk nitrogen narcosis, often called "raptures of the deep", if they descend below 200 feet, but they also fall prey to decompression sickness, commonly known as the "bends", if they ascend too quickly.

The problem is with the last word of the underlined portion. "But" is a contrasting transitionary word which typically indicates that the sentence is set to move in a different direction. However, there is no contrast in the non-underlined portion - both portions tell us about hazards that deep sea divers face.

In option (A), on the other hand, we have the well accepted idiom "not only...but also". Here, "but" is followed by "also" which indicates continuation of the sentence in the same direction, which is consistent with the information given in the two portions. Hence option (A) does not have the same error as option (B).

Hope this helps.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,830
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,830
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts