Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 22 Mar 2017, 19:29

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Nuclear Fusion

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 100
Location: USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2004, 22:02
Nuclear fusion is the force that powers the Sun, the
stars, and hydrogen bombs, merging the nuclei of
atoms and not splitting them apart, as in nuclear
reactors.

(A) merging the nuclei of atoms and not splitting
them apart, as in nuclear reactors
(B) merging the nuclei of atoms instead of splitting
them apart, like nuclear reactors
(C) merging the nuclei of atoms rather than split-
ting them apart, as nuclear reactors do
(D) and merges the nuclei of atoms but does not
split them apart, as is done in unclear reactors
(E) and merges the nuclei of atoms, unlike atomic
reactors that split them apart.

I saw the msg board for this question as it has already been discussed but I could not understand how one can compare a Nuclear fusion with a 'atomic reactor'.

Any help from SC gurus plz
Thanks
Satya
If you have any questions
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Dec 2003
Posts: 359
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2004, 22:23
Hello Sathya

It is not comparing the Nuclear fussion with reactors ... it is comparing the Nuclear fussion - The process with the process in the reactor.

In the Sun, the nuclie of the atom megers, whereas in the reactor, the nuclie of the atoms split.

Nuclear fusion is the force that powers the Sun, the
stars, and hydrogen bombs, merging the nuclei of
atoms
and not splitting them apart, as in nuclear
reactors.

If still in doubts, let me know. (Feel free to ask Satya ....we would be more than glad to explain you till you get it )
Regards
_________________

Giving another SHOT

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4302
Followers: 40

Kudos [?]: 448 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2004, 22:58
Is the answer C? I'll try to explain to you if it is right
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Dec 2003
Posts: 359
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2004, 23:26
Pardon me... I did not give the answer.... The answer should be C.

Nuclear fusion is the force that powers the Sun, the
stars, and hydrogen bombs, merging the nuclei of
atoms and not splitting them apart, as in nuclear
reactors.
(take out the sentence #IS THE FORCE THAT POWERS THE SUN...BOMBS#) and then analyse..... the clauses that come in between should not alter the intended meaning, thats the catch.

(Look for parallelism and verb agreements - tips .... merging, spliting - this should eliminate some of them, in this case D and E). Now, A,B, C remain.

The sentence is comparing the 2 process, hence, words like rather, better, greater etc... to be used.

Nuclear fusion is

(A) merging the nuclei of atoms and not splitting
them apart, as in nuclear reactors - Wrong - This means that the Fusion process in the Sun is merging whereas the Fusion process in Reactors are spilting. But, spliting in not nuclear fusion, it is fission. Only one process is dicussed here, wherease the comparision is between 2 processes.

(B) merging the nuclei of atoms instead of splitting
them apart, like nuclear reactors - Wrong. Same case as above.

(C) merging the nuclei of atoms rather than split-
ting them apart, as nuclear reactors do - Correct. solves the parallelism and comparision factor.

(D) and merges the nuclei of atoms but does not
split them apart, as is done in unclear reactors - Wrong, not parallel

(E) and merges the nuclei of atoms, unlike atomic
reactors that split them apart. Wrong. Not parallel.

I hope this helped. Let me know.

Regards
_________________

Giving another SHOT

Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 245
Location: INDIA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2004, 03:41
C for me too...

great effort man ... thanks for the explanation...

HAVE FUN
_________________

the whole worldmakes way for the man who knows wer he's going... good luck

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4302
Followers: 40

Kudos [?]: 448 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2004, 11:27
Just my 2 cents here
A) use of conjunction "and" is wrong and does not contrast the two processes of merging(sun) vs splitting(nuclear reactors)
B) wrongly compares "merging" to "nuclear reactors". Furthermore, "instead of" is a conjunction and should have been replaced by "rather on". When preceding a verb, use "rather than" instead of "instead of". See Praet's explanation on "instead of" vs "rather than" http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=2458
C) properly uses "rather than" as a conjunction and makes the right contrast between the two processes of merging(sun) vs splitting(nuclear reactors). "do" is necessary because it ensures that it is not "the nuclear reactors" that split apart but rather, "do" the action of splitting apart.
D) I don't think this one has to do with parallelism. This sentence introduces 2 conjunctions is grammatically wrong:
Nuclear fusion is the force that powers the Sun, the stars, and hydrogen bombs, and merges the nuclei of atoms but does not split them apart, as is done in unclear reactors
We see above that the 3 elements[in red] the 2 conjunctions "and" and "but" are joining. Having 2 conjunctions in the sentence makes it unecessarily wordy and confusing. Furthermore, "but does not split them apart" should have been replaced by "rather than splits them apart". It better contrasts 2 actions; that of merging vs that of splitting.
E) erroneously comparing "nuclear fusion", a process, to "nuclear reactors", a device
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Manager
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 100
Location: USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2004, 21:41
Hi Carsen
Even I wrote the answer C but the OA is E.

I do not know why but I too think it should be C.

Any help from SC gurus.

Thanks
Satya
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Dec 2003
Posts: 359
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2004, 22:01
Hi Sathya

E is not correct. C fit the bill perfect.

Could you tell me the source of the this question?. Perhaps, the OA is wrong. The source will justify.

Regards
_________________

Giving another SHOT

Manager
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 100
Location: USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2004, 22:18
It is a question from 885SC posted my 'bogdan'. I think it is same as gmat plus.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4302
Followers: 40

Kudos [?]: 448 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Jun 2004, 00:03
carsen wrote:
Hi Sathya

E is not correct. C fit the bill perfect.

Could you tell me the source of the this question?. Perhaps, the OA is wrong. The source will justify.

Regards

Unless someone can defend E, I say it is wrong.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Director
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 577
Location: San Jose, CA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Jun 2004, 01:37
I think C is correct.
Have no clue why E may be OA
atomic reactors? we are not supposed to know what they are. Its out of scope!
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2004
Posts: 444
Location: Cary,NC
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Jun 2004, 01:38
[X is the force] that powers the sun............and merges the [atomic]

I think this seems the most parallel. E is better than D.

I also couldnt understand why E has atomic reactors.

- ash.
_________________

ash
________________________
I'm crossing the bridge.........

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4302
Followers: 40

Kudos [?]: 448 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Jun 2004, 01:40
Just to clarify my explanation for E.
E says: Nuclear fusion is [blah blah blah], unlike atomic reactors that [...]
E is comparing apples and oranges. It cannot certainly not be right
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2004
Posts: 444
Location: Cary,NC
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Jun 2004, 01:44
I'm getting silly thoughts !

could it be because atomic reactors split atoms into nuclei ........and nuclear fusion merges them ???

Also it seems strange that "nuclear fusion" [= a force] is being compared to nuclear and atomic reactors !!!!

Somebody help me

- ash
_________________

ash
________________________
I'm crossing the bridge.........

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 402
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2004, 03:55
I belive that (D) is better option as compared to either (C) or (E).
(E) as said has a comparison problem,
(A),(B),(C) sounds as if hydrogen bombs are merging.... and not the nuclear fusion.

Hence in my opinion (D) is better, (OA looks wrong to me)
Also there is no parallelism problem in (D), as "powers" ..... and "meges" exactly fits the parallelism.

any suggestions?
28 Jun 2004, 03:55
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Nuclear fusion 14 23 Nov 2008, 20:58
Soviet nuclear submarines 10 13 Nov 2008, 07:46
Nuclear Power Stations 12 04 Dec 2007, 20:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by