Caesar_1987 -
1) Yes, I definitely agree that an EMBA and FT MBA are organized differently are are two differnent beasts. EMBAs
typically want to advance in their respective companies or make a slight career change, whereas FT MBAs may be looking for a life break, seeking a larger career network or want the opportunity to leave their field entirely and break into finance. However, through my application and research process I am quickly learning that people who are interested in business school come from such diverse background and have such different priorities, that no matter which track they choose it is hard to pigeon hole their priorities.
What I am trying to convey is that I'm learning that some FT MBAs are interested in continuing with their company, they just want a break. And some EMBAs are trying to use the program to break into banking. There is no one-size-fits-all to this equation.
I'm trying to relate the idea that you should also consider the EMBA track if you are considering the part-time track, because to me they are similar and were the two options I was closely considering. The main difference for the EMBA, when compared to a FT MBA, is the fact that you are working full time and only get to experience the campus once a week vs being immersed in it 24/7.
They are obviously other differences, but one's full time work schedule and the impact that has on social networking is the biggest difference for me. But I believe the difference between EMBA and PT MBA is much, much smaller. That is why I was curious you were such an advocate of PT MBA and not EMBA, when I believe they are much similar to each other than when compared to a FT MBA. The difference between the people who go PT vs EMBA is not as large as you think. My experience in speaking with people who have done those two tracks was that I found them to be very similar, with work schedules being the biggest reason they chose their particular path.
I would like to argue that an EMBA would also be a beneficial path for you. Think about your example - you want to study with a student who is in a similar position as you, for the camaraderie and similar life experience. I am arguing that you would benefit much more from an older student who may be an expert in the new career path you want. I learn much more from colleagues older than me than colleagues the same age or younger than me. That is the point I am trying to convey.
I would not prefer to study with an investment banker in his early thirties like me. I want to study with a CEO of an agricultural business or a SVP of a Fortune 500 company or a consultant who runs his own business. I think because we have a different view on the ideal student body experience, our choice in program differs. Which is fine, to each their own.
2. Thanks for the link. I agree that living expenses should not be compared. The link states that 60 credits at approx. $2k (based on a nine-month academic year) a pop equals $120k. I am very surprised at that rate. Obviously, books and the like are extra. However, it also states you take about 18 credits a year, so the program will take a longer time to complete than an EMBA or FT MBA. That also would be a drawback for me, as I want the degree within two years. It is interesting to note than an NY EMBA costs $189,000, whereas Columbia's costs $205,000.
You have mentioned that $70k after tax money means something to you. I think to most normal people that amount does mean quite a bit. What I am trying to tell you is that you should look at that $70k in the grand scope of your life. I am not trying to trivialize the financial sacrifice $70k means to you right now. Heck, it means alot to me as well and I am cognizant of the money I will be sending to Columbia. What I am trying to say is that $70k becomes a much smaller amount when considered against your lifetime earnings. While you may not see an immediate improvement in your income upon graduation, prospective students like us believe an MBA will lead to better and more lucrative jobs in the future. If we didn't believe that, why the heck are we ponying up our time and money to get an MBA?!
You said it doesn't matter to your career whether you get a degree from Stern or Columbia. That statement surprised me. I think a school's brand and reputation matters in life. Now whether it matters alot or just a little...that is a debate for another time, but I think we can both agree it does have some impact. Now if you believe it will not directly impact your future prospects at your current company, I cannot argue that. But what about when you look for another job? What about when you switch careers and list it on your resume? From my own experience, just graduating from an Ivy has helped open doors for me. Now once you walk through the door, your success depends on you, but a good school does allow you to at least get a shot at cool opportunities. If it didn't, no one would pay the exorbitant tuition, right?
3. I guess this point is the crux of our discussion. You believe an EMBA will not provide you with leadership opportunities and I disagree. Leadership opportunities is such a nebulous phrase in and of itself, I'm unsure what you mean by it. I will try to convince you with the following thought:
If you believe yourself to be a bright and motivated individual and go to an EMBA program at a top tier University, do you think anything could hold you back? If you really wanted to seek out and find leadership opportunities on campus, would the fact you were in an EMBA program stop you from seizing those opportunities?
You state that the "Director of Sales" would just finish his class and go home. I would argue the opposite. The Director is spending not only money, but an even more precious commodity of his - time - to get a business degree. Why would he just try to get by doing the bare minimum of work and then go home? Why would a high achieving person behave like this? Why wouldn't he want to learn from his colleagues on campus? If someone is applying to Columbia or NYU there are most likely a smart and high achieving person. I feel like your example is more apt for a person going to a much lower ranked program and is just trying to check the box of getting a degree. Will some people at Columbia behave like your description, sure it is a possibility. But by that logic NYU will suffer from the same problem, right?
When I think of someone just doing the work to get a degree I actually think of a FT MBA student whose whole goal is to get a great job upon graduation. An EMBA student already has that job. He is going to school to learn, get better academically and experience something exciting outside of work. He has already proved himself to be successful and I just cannot imagine the type of people accepted into a top program would exhibit such a poor attitude.
My final point would be to go to an EMBA info session, both at NYU and Columbia, and get feedback right from the horse's mouth. Hear current students or people who have graduated from the program talk at these panels. I'm typically an ambivalent kind of guy, but these sessions really persuaded me to choose an EMBA at Columbia over NYU and Cornell.