Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Of the three digits greater than 700, how many have two digi [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Nov 2009, 10:07

1

This post received KUDOS

24

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

54% (03:06) correct
46% (02:08) wrong based on 458 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Of the three digits greater than 700, how many have two digits that are equal to each other and the remaining digit different from the other two

A) 90 B) 82 C) 80 D) 45 E) 36

Is there a faster method to find out the answer, because i listed down all the numbers and it took me hardly 1.5 mins. but what if there are more numbers ?

Of the three digits greater than 700, how many have two digits that are equal to each other and the remaining digit different from the other two

A) 90 B) 82 C) 80 D) 45 E) 36

Is there a faster method to find out the answer, because i listed down all the numbers and it took me hardly 1.5 mins. but what if there are more numbers ?

Step by step:

The number can have three forms:

XXY meaning that the first digit is the repeated digit; XYX meaning that the first digit is repeated digit; and YXX meaning that the first digit is not repeated digit.

XXY --> the repeated digits can be 7,8 or 9, so 3 possibilities and the third one can take 9 possible values total 3*9=27.

The same with XYX =3*9=27;

YXX --> the non repeated first digit can be 7, 8, 9, so 3 possibilities and the repeated digits can take 9 possible values, total 3*9=27. But this will give us the number 700 as well and we know that the number should be more than 700, hence 27-1=26.

Of the three digits greater than 700, how many have two digits that are equal to each other and the remaining digit different from the other two

A) 90 B) 82 C) 80 D) 45 E) 36

Is there a faster method to find out the answer, because i listed down all the numbers and it took me hardly 1.5 mins. but what if there are more numbers ?

Step by step:

The number can have three forms:

XXY meaning that the first digit is the repeated digit; XYX meaning that the first digit is repeated digit; and YXX meaning that the first digit is not repeated digit.

XXY --> the repeated digits can be 7,8 or 9, so 3 possibilities and the third one can take 9 possible values total 3*9=27.

The same with XYX =3*9=27;

YXX --> the non repeated first digit can be 7, 8, 9, so 3 possibilities and the repeated digits can take 9 possible values, total 3*9=27. But this will give us the number 700 as well and we know that the number should be more than 700, hence 27-1=26.

I don't understand how there is only 27 numbers based on your calculation. For example, XXY the first number has to be 7, 8 or 9 so 3 possibilities and the next number would also have to be 7, 8 or 9 but the last number could be 9 values but how is that equal to 3*9? Wouldn't that be 3*3*9? I'm don't understand.

I don't understand how there is only 27 numbers based on your calculation. For example, XXY the first number has to be 7, 8 or 9 so 3 possibilities and the next number would also have to be 7, 8 or 9 but the last number could be 9 values but how is that equal to 3*9? Wouldn't that be 3*3*9? I'm don't understand.

Adam in case of XXY, first digit is 7,8 or 9 then so 3 ways 2nd digit has be same as 1st so only one way you can also write it as 3*1*9 = 27

How have you guys become so confident, predicting :

700-999

XXY setup = t occurrences without a single calculation line etc...

Isnt there any mathematical way of solving it.
_________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ros. Nice Post + Some help + Lucid solution = Kudos

The greatest pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do | Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people. -------------------------------------------------------------------------

How have you guys become so confident, predicting :

700-999

XXY setup = t occurrences without a single calculation line etc...

Isnt there any mathematical way of solving it.

This is how I solved it:

Three digit number can have only following 3 patterns: A. all digits are distinct; B. two are alike and third is different; C. all three digits are alike.

We need to calculate B. B=Total - A - C

Total numbers from 700 to 999 = 299. A. all digits are distinct = 3(first digit can have only three values 7,8, or 9)*9*8=216; C. all three are alike = 3 (777, 888, 999)

So, 299-216-3=80.

Another way to solve this problem is in my first post.

I am getting 78 as the answer. So I went with closest answer 80 (C).

This is how I arrived @ 78:

For numbers greater than 700 we have following possibilities:

a=> 7xx .. Here x being any digit 0-9, excluding 7 and 0 {0 is excluded because number should be >700} b=> 7x7 .. Here x can be any digit from 0-9, excluding 7. {no 3 digits should be same} c=> 77x .. Here x can be any digit from 0-9, excluding 7 for same reason as above.

a + b + c = 8 + 9 + 9 = 26

Hence same is true with 8xx , 8x8, 88x and 9xx,9x9, 99x ...

So summing up I got 78 ...

Please help me if I am wrong here. I am unable to figure out where did I miss 2 more numbers. Any pointers ?

Of the three digits greater than 700, how many have two digits that are equal to each other and the remaining digit different from the other two

A) 90 B) 82 C) 80 D) 45 E) 36

Is there a faster method to find out the answer, because i listed down all the numbers and it took me hardly 1.5 mins. but what if there are more numbers ?

Step by step:

The number can have three forms:

XXY meaning that the first digit is the repeated digit; XYX meaning that the first digit is repeated digit; and YXX meaning that the first digit is not repeated digit.

XXY --> the repeated digits can be 7,8 or 9, so 3 possibilities and the third one can take 9 possible values total 3*9=27.

The same with XYX =3*9=27;

YXX --> the non repeated first digit can be 7, 8, 9, so 3 possibilities and the repeated digits can take 9 possible values, total 3*9=27. But this will give us the number 700 as well and we know that the number should be more than 700, hence 27-1=26.

TOTAL=27+27+26=80

Answer: C.

Hope it helps.

thanks! this is an efficient way to solve it. is this method feasible for this kind of questions--fundamental counting?

Thanks Bunuel for the effort but I dont really understand why you choose 299, and what is the meaning of distinct, and why is there 3, 9 , 8? Pleas explaing that to me thanks again

Thanks Bunuel for the effort but I dont really understand why you choose 299, and what is the meaning of distinct, and why is there 3, 9 , 8? Pleas explaing that to me thanks again

The question asks about three-digit integers greater than 700. So, all the numbers in the range 701 to 999, inclusive. There will be 999 - 701 + 1 = 299 such numbers in this range. (Whenever you want to count the number of objects in a range, subtract the smallest number from the greatest and add 1. For example, the number of integers in the range of 1 to 6 is 6 -1 +1 = 6).

"distinct" just means different. So, for example, in the number "799", the final two digits are NOT distinct. Here: 798, they are.

Re: Of the three digits greater than 700, how many have 2 digit [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Feb 2014, 19:42

We can fix 2 digits in 3 ways ie 7,8,9 and the third digit can be fixed in 9 ways(10 digits-1 repeating digit) Total=3*9=27 Since this is possible in 3 different ways(first digit diff from other two,second digit diff from other two and third digit diff from other two) we get 3* 27=81 but we subtract 1 for 700 Ans 80

Re: Of the three digits greater than 700, how many have two digi [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Feb 2015, 19:03

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Campus visits play a crucial role in the MBA application process. It’s one thing to be passionate about one school but another to actually visit the campus, talk...

Its been long time coming. I have always been passionate about poetry. It’s my way of expressing my feelings and emotions. And i feel a person can convey...

Written by Scottish historian Niall Ferguson , the book is subtitled “A Financial History of the World”. There is also a long documentary of the same name that the...

Post-MBA I became very intrigued by how senior leaders navigated their career progression. It was also at this time that I realized I learned nothing about this during my...