Good passage. Took 11mins 11s and got all correct except the last question.
I was really confused as to why answer to question 5 is C and not D. After realising what I did wrong, I'm sharing my two cents on this in case it's helpful for someone else who lands in the same boat.
Let's look at the question again:
5. The passage suggests that the author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following claims about the Aurignacians?
(A) They were technologically no more advanced than the Neanderthals they supplanted.There's nothing mentioned in the passage that talks about technological advancement of either of the two groups, we can rule out A easily.
(B) They were the first humans known to have worn costumes for ceremonial purposes.While it is mentioned that Aurignacians worn consumed for ceremonial purposes, it's never mentioned that
they were the first humans to do so. We can rule out B.
(C) They had established some highly specialized social roles.Take a look at the last paragraph:
Quote:
There is also evidence that
ceremonies of some sort were performed before these
images. Well-worn footprints of dancers can still be
discerned in the clay floors of some caves, and
(55) pictures of what appear to be shamans, or religious
leaders, garbed in fantastic costumes, are found
among the painted animals.
There's some evidence that Aurignacians were shamans or religious leaders which implies they may have a specialized role in the society then.
C sounds good, let's hold onto it. (By the way, the first time I was doing this question I completely strike out C because I skimmed through the last few sentences of the third paragraph quickly. I noticed I do that for a lot of RC passages, especially when I feel I'm not doing well in terms of the time constraints, but a lesson here is to give each paragraph equal amount of deliberation when going through it so that you don't miss out on anything important from a high level overview)(D) They occupied a less hostile environment than the Neanderthals did.The only place where you can infer this from the passage is the first paragraph which talks about:
Quote:
Some anthropologists see these
paintings as evidence that the Aurignacians had a
(10) more secure life than the Neanderthals.
But wait, can you infer from the statement that
Aurignacians occupied a less hostile environment than the Neanderthals? Not quite. What the passage mentions is a
viewpoint, that too, of only
some anthropologists. The question, on the other hand, asks us
author would be most likely to agree with.
Further down in the second paragraph, we can see that the author calls into question the same viewpoint of those
"some of the anthropologists".
Quote:
Curiously, however, the paintings were usually
placed in areas accessible only with extreme effort
(25) and completely unilluminated by natural light. This
makes it unlikely that these representational cave
paintings arose simply out of a love of beauty or
pride in artistry—had aesthetic enjoyment been the
sole purpose of the paintings, they would presumably
(30) have been located where they could have been easily
seen and appreciated.
The author tells us another group's viewpoint that many anthropologists hypothesize that the paintings were also intended to provide a means of ensuring a steady supply of food.
Pausing a minute on option D and reflecting on the passage helps draw these findings out pretty easily. The mistake I made here which led me to choose D was that it was based
completely out of my memory. Hence I wrongly took "Some anthropologists see these paintings as evidence that the Aurignacians had a more secure life than the Neanderthals." to be "
All Aurignacians occupied a less hostile environment than the Neanderthals did". Had I taken a few seconds to go back to these lines in the passage, I wouldn't rely on my memory to select an answer choice.
(E) They carved images of their intended prey on their weapons to increase the weapons’ efficacy.A lot of people were confused as to why answer choice E is incorrect. Let's go back to the third paragraph:
Quote:
...many
(35) anthropologists hypothesize that the paintings were
also intended to provide a means of ensuring a steady
supply of food. Since it was common among
pretechnological societies to believe that one can gain
power over an animal by making an image of it,
(40) these anthropologists maintain that the Aurignacian
paintings were meant to grant magical power over the
Aurignacians’ prey—typically large, dangerous
animals such as mammoths and bison. The images
were probably intended to make these animals
(45) vulnerable to the weapons of the hunters, an
explanation supported by the fact that many of the
pictures show animals with their hearts outlined in
red, or with bright, arrow-shaped lines tracing paths
to vital organs.
Nowhere it's mentioned that the
Aurignacians carved images on the weapons for any purpose whatsoever. They used weapons to hunt animals, they put these animals in their paintings because they believed it'd help them become powerful enough to hunt them. How exactly? We don't know. To say that they carved images on the weapons is clearly out of scope because we don't know anything with certainty about how they used the paintings, if at all, with their weapons.
Therefore, E is incorrect. The correct answer choice is therefore, C.