It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 07:26

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Over the last 150 years, large stretches of salmon habitat have been e

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
B
Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Posts: 185

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 48

Re: Over the last 150 years, large stretches of salmon habitat have been e [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Sep 2017, 14:15
pratik1709 wrote:
GMATNinjaTwo wrote:
pratik1709 wrote:
Hi Guys,

I found this passage extremely difficult.... Not able to eliminate answer choices for 4 out of 6 questions... And I took almost 14 mintutes of 6 question.

My worry is; what should be a strategy if this passage pops up in actual exam?

Experts : Please suggest.. bb mikemcgarry

Check out the Ultimate RC Guide for Beginners for some tips: https://gmatclub.com/forum/experts-topi ... l#p1857560



Thank you sir for this article.

Luckily I am following almost same strategy. Only issue is with RC initial passage reading. I take almost 4 minutes for easy passage and 4.5/5 minutes of difficult one such as this.

not sure If i can improve onto this .. If you can suggest your view here.

Try reading the last part of the article (Improving your fundamental reading skills).
_________________

www.gmatninja.com

Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 48

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
G
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1159

Kudos [?]: 1872 [1], given: 448

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Re: Over the last 150 years, large stretches of salmon habitat have been e [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2017, 08:50
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
pikolo2510 wrote:
hello experts,

can you explain the answer for this question?

4. The author mentions the “aftermath of the Mount Saint Helens eruption” most likely in order to

(A) provide an example of the process that allows the repopulation of rivers whose indigenous salmon population has become extinct
(B) indicate the extent to which the disturbance of salmon habitat by human activity in one stream might affect the genetic structure of salmon populations elsewhere
(C) provide a standard of comparison against which the impact of human activity on the gene flow among salmon populations should be measured
(D) show how salmons’ homing instinct can be impaired as a result of severe environmental degradation of their natal streams
(E) show why straying rates in salmon populations remain generally low except when spawning streams suffer severe environmental disturbance

First of all, what exactly was the "aftermath of the Mount Saint Helens eruption"?

Quote:
[the eruption] sent mud and debris into several tributaries of the Columbia River. For the next couple of years, steelhead trout (a species included among the salmonids) returning from the sea to spawn were forced to find alternative streams. As a consequence, their rates of straying, initially 16 percent, rose to more than 40 percent overall.

We are looking for an answer that choice that MOST LIKELY describes the reason why the author mentioned this aftermath:

Quote:
(A) provide an example of the process that allows the repopulation of rivers whose indigenous salmon population has become extinct

The Mount Saint Helens eruption involved an increase in straying rates and was not an example of repopulated rivers where salmon populations had become extinct. Eliminate (A).

Quote:
(B) indicate the extent to which the disturbance of salmon habitat by human activity in one stream might affect the genetic structure of salmon populations elsewhere

Choice (B) is tempting, but notice that it says, "in ONE stream", whereas the Mount Saint Helens example involved "several tributaries" of the Columbia River. Thus, this example would not provide an accurate indication of the extent to which damage to ONE stream might affect the genetic structure of salmon populations. This does not seem like a LIKELY reason for including the eruption example.

Quote:
(C) provide a standard of comparison against which the impact of human activity on the gene flow among salmon populations should be measured

The author suggests that the effect on straying rates due to human causes should be qualitatively similar to the effect on straying rates due to the Mount Saint Helens eruption. However, "no one has QUANTIFIED changes in the rate of straying as a result of the disturbances caused by humans."

The Mount Saint Helens example provides a benchmark (straying rates rose from 16 percent to 40 percent). If the effect on straying rates caused by human activities were measured, we could compare the numbers to the numbers from the eruption example. This would allow us to compare the effect of human activities to the effect of a natural phenomenon. Thus, the eruption example could in fact be used as a standard of comparison. This is a LIKELY reason for including the example, so hang on to choice (C).

Quote:
(D) show how salmons’ homing instinct can be impaired as a result of severe environmental degradation of their natal streams

The eruption example has nothing to do with salmons' homing instinct, so eliminate (D).

Quote:
(E) show why straying rates in salmon populations remain generally low except when spawning streams suffer severe environmental disturbance

The Mount Saint Helens example does not explain WHY straying rates remain low in the absence of a severe environmental disturbance. In fact, the passage doesn't even tell us that this is in fact the case. Eliminate (E).

Choice (C) is the best answer.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor at www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Friendly warning: I'm bad at PMs

GMAT Ninja Wednesdays LIVE on YouTube
Join us, and ask your questions in advance!

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99... in any section order

YouTube verbal webinars:
"Next-level" GMAT pronouns | Uses of "that" on the GMAT | Parallelism and meaning | Simplifying GMAT verb tenses | Comparisons, part I |
November webinar schedule

Kudos [?]: 1872 [1], given: 448

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Aug 2017
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Over the last 150 years, large stretches of salmon habitat have been e [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2017, 10:45
6. Which of the following does the author mention as support for the view that environmental disturbances caused by human activity could increase straying rates?

(A) The existence of salmon populations in rivers where the elimination of salmon habitat by human activity had previously made the fish extinct
(B) The results of studies measuring the impact on straying rates of habitat loss caused by human activity
(C) The potential for disturbances in one environment to cause the introduction of novel genes into salmon populations in neighboring areas
(D) The weaknesses in the view that the extinction of entire salmon populations is the only mechanism by which human destruction of salmon habitat reduces genetic diversity in salmon
(E) The absence of any reason for believing that disturbances brought about by human activitiy would differ in their effects from comparable disturbances brought about by natural causes

Why is option-E incorrect?

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Expert Post
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4488

Kudos [?]: 8739 [0], given: 105

Re: Over the last 150 years, large stretches of salmon habitat have been e [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2017, 13:21
pratik1709 wrote:
Hi Guys,

I found this passage extremely difficult.... Not able to eliminate answer choices for 4 out of 6 questions... And I took almost 14 mintutes of 6 question.

My worry is; what should be a strategy if this passage pops up in actual exam?

Experts : Please suggest.. bb mikemcgarry

Dear pratik1709,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

My friend, please don't bother bb--he's a busy man.

My friend, I think you need to practice reading in general. This is not about an isolated strategy. This is about building your deep understanding of English. See this article:
How to Improve Your GMAT Verbal Score

Does this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Kudos [?]: 8739 [0], given: 105

Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 18 Aug 2016
Posts: 550

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 134

GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Over the last 150 years, large stretches of salmon habitat have been e [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Oct 2017, 22:23
6. Which of the following does the author mention as support for the view that environmental disturbances caused by human activity could increase straying rates?

(A) The existence of salmon populations in rivers where the elimination of salmon habitat by human activity had previously made the fish extinct
(B) The results of studies measuring the impact on straying rates of habitat loss caused by human activity
(C) The potential for disturbances in one environment to cause the introduction of novel genes into salmon populations in neighboring areas
(D) The weaknesses in the view that the extinction of entire salmon populations is the only mechanism by which human destruction of salmon habitat reduces genetic diversity in salmon
(E) The absence of any reason for believing that disturbances brought about by human activitiy would differ in their effects from comparable disturbances brought about by natural causes

Can experts here help me understand the process to reach answer in this one.
I was able to remove only A and ended up selecting C :(
_________________

We must try to achieve the best within us


Thanks
Luckisnoexcuse

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 134

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Posts: 50

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 255

Schools: LBS '18
Re: Over the last 150 years, large stretches of salmon habitat have been e [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Oct 2017, 04:42
Luckisnoexcuse wrote:
6. Which of the following does the author mention as support for the view that environmental disturbances caused by human activity could increase straying rates?

(A) The existence of salmon populations in rivers where the elimination of salmon habitat by human activity had previously made the fish extinct
(B) The results of studies measuring the impact on straying rates of habitat loss caused by human activity
(C) The potential for disturbances in one environment to cause the introduction of novel genes into salmon populations in neighboring areas
(D) The weaknesses in the view that the extinction of entire salmon populations is the only mechanism by which human destruction of salmon habitat reduces genetic diversity in salmon
(E) The absence of any reason for believing that disturbances brought about by human activitiy would differ in their effects from comparable disturbances brought about by natural causes

Can experts here help me understand the process to reach answer in this one.
I was able to remove only A and ended up selecting C :(


Luckisnoexcuse not an expert but can try to help you with this
I spent a lot of time figuring why otion e is wrong and oprion d is right.
In para 1 author states that""""the numerical effect is obvious: there are fewer salmon in degraded regions than in pristine ones; however, habitat loss also has the potential to reduce genetic diversity. This is most evident in cases where it results in the extinction of entire salmon populations[/color]
Now according to him the habitat loss as well as population loss are both connected to the numerical effect
in the last paragraph author states thatAlthough no one has quantified changes in the rate of straying as a result of the disturbances caused by humans, there is no reason to suspect that the effect would be qualitatively different than what was seen in the aftermath of the Mount Saint Helens eruption.
what does this mean
it means that earlier author was talking about numbers effect on the habitat loss ((( loss of genes))
then he switches to the second paragraph and tells a whole deal about straying and then gives a particular example of Mount Saint Helens eruption. After that he makes an analogy of rate of habitat destruction by comparing the quantified analysis of mount saint Helens eruption mentioned in last lines of second paragraph to yet to be quantified analysis of human destruction of habitat by straying

So, we start the passage beliving that numerical effect is causing the habitat loss, move on to a discussion on straying as habitat loss , give an example, and in final paragraph we compare humans and mount Saint Helens eruptions rate of habitat destructions by straying
option d states that The weaknesses in the view that the extinction of entire salmon populations is the only mechanism by which human destruction of salmon habitat reduces genetic diversity in salmon
You can clearly see the weakness now .The view of numerical effect to consider the loss of habitat.However, its the
straying effect that hasnt been considered ((( yet to be quantified as mentioned in last paragraph)) totally in how humans are destroying loss of habitat
Hope it helps :)
Kudos are always welcome

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 255

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 03 Apr 2013
Posts: 276

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 854

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Over the last 150 years, large stretches of salmon habitat have been e [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Oct 2017, 00:51
uledssul wrote:
Over the last 150 years, large stretches of salmon habitat have been eliminated by human activity: mining, livestock grazing, timber harvesting, and agriculture as well as recreational and urban development. The numerical effect is obvious: there are fewer salmon in degraded regions than in pristine ones; however, habitat loss also has the potential to reduce genetic diversity. This is most evident in cases where it results in the extinction of entire salmon populations. Indeed, most analysts believe that some kind of environmental degradation underlies the demise of many extinct salmon populations. Although some rivers have been recolonized, the unique genes of the original populations have been lost.

Large-scale disturbances in one locale also have the potential to alter the genetic structure of populations in neighboring areas, even if those areas have pristine habitats. Why? Although the homing instinct of salmon to their natal stream is strong, a fraction of the fish returning from the sea (rarely more than 15 percent) stray and spawn in nearby streams. Low levels of straying are crucial, since the process provides a source of novel genes and a mechanism by which a location can be repopulated should the fish there disappear. Yet high rates of straying can be problematic because misdirected fish may interbreed with the existing stock to such a degree that any local adaptations that are present become diluted. Straying rates remain relatively low when environmental conditions are stable, but can increase dramatically when streams suffer severe disturbance. The 1980 volcanic eruption of Mount Saint Helens, for example, sent mud and debris into several tributaries of the Columbia River. For the next couple of years, steelhead trout (a species included among the salmonids) returning from the sea to spawn were forced to find alternative streams. As a consequence, their rates of straying, initially 16 percent, rose to more than 40 percent overall.

Although no one has quantified changes in the rate of straying as a result of the disturbances caused by humans, there is no reason to suspect that the effect would be qualitatively different than what was seen in the aftermath of the Mount Saint Helens eruption. Such a dramatic increase in straying from damaged areas to more pristine streams results in substantial gene flow, which can in turn lower the overall fitness of subsequent generations.
VRC000460-01
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) argue against a conventional explanation for the extinction of certain salmon populations and suggest an alternative
(B) correct a common misunderstanding about the behavior of salmon in response to environmental degradation caused by human activity
(C) compare the effects of human activity on salmon populations with the effects of natural disturbances on salmon populations
(D) differentiate the particular effects of various human activities on salmon habitats
(E) describe how environmental degradation can cause changes in salmon populations that extend beyond a numerical reduction


[Reveal] Spoiler:
E


VRC000460-02
2. It can be inferred from the passage that the occasional failure of some salmon to return to their natal streams in order to spawn provides a mechanism by which

(A) pristine streams that are near polluted streams become polluted themselves
(B) the particular adaptations of a polluted stream’s salmon population can be preserved without dilution
(C) the number of salmon in pristine habitats decreases relative to the number in polluted streams
(D) an environmentally degraded stream could be recolonized by new salmon populations should the stream recover
(E) the extinction of the salmon populations that spawn in polluted streams is accelerated


[Reveal] Spoiler:
D


VRC000460-03
3. According to the passage, human activity has had which of the following effects on salmon populations?

(A) An increase in the size of salmon populations in some previously polluted rivers
(B) A decline in the number of salmon in some rivers
(C) A decrease in the number straying salmon in some rivers
(D) A decrease in the gene flow between salmon populations that spawn in polluted streams and populations that spawn in pristine streams
(E) A decline in the vulnerability of some salmon populations to the effects of naturally occurring habitat destruction


[Reveal] Spoiler:
B


4. The author mentions the “aftermath of the Mount Saint Helens eruption” most likely in order to

(A) provide an example of the process that allows the repopulation of rivers whose indigenous salmon population has become extinct
(B) indicate the extent to which the disturbance of salmon habitat by human activity in one stream might affect the genetic structure of salmon populations elsewhere
(C) provide a standard of comparison against which the impact of human activity on the gene flow among salmon populations should be measured
(D) show how salmons’ homing instinct can be impaired as a result of severe environmental degradation of their natal streams
(E) show why straying rates in salmon populations remain generally low except when spawning streams suffer severe environmental disturbance


[Reveal] Spoiler:
C


VRC000460-05
5. The author's argument that increased straying can "lower the overall fitness of subsequent generations" (see hightlited text) is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) A disturbance of salmonid spawning streams caused by human activity could increase the straying rate of affected salmonid populations as much as the aftermath of the Mount Saint Helens eruption did.
(B) In the streams in which the straying salmonids spawn, these straying salmonids would amount to no more than 40 percent of the total spawning population
(C) Salmonids in some streams benefit from particular local adaptions.
(D) Nonenvironmental factors have no effect on salmonid straying rates.
(E) At least some of the streams in which straying salmonids would spawn are pristine, affected by neither natural nor artificial disturbances.


[Reveal] Spoiler:
C


VRC000460-07
6. Which of the following does the author mention as support for the view that environmental disturbances caused by human activity could increase straying rates?

(A) The existence of salmon populations in rivers where the elimination of salmon habitat by human activity had previously made the fish extinct
(B) The results of studies measuring the impact on straying rates of habitat loss caused by human activity
(C) The potential for disturbances in one environment to cause the introduction of novel genes into salmon populations in neighboring areas
(D) The weaknesses in the view that the extinction of entire salmon populations is the only mechanism by which human destruction of salmon habitat reduces genetic diversity in salmon
(E) The absence of any reason for believing that disturbances brought about by human activitiy would differ in their effects from comparable disturbances brought about by natural causes


[Reveal] Spoiler:
D



Hi GMATNinjaTwo,

Q6 seems to be controversial here(my take is E). Other than this, I got Q4 wrong.
I narrowed it down to B and C, and then chose B. Please compare the two options and explain why B is wrong.
_________________

Spread some love..Like = +1 Kudos :)

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 854

Expert Post
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
B
Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Posts: 185

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 48

Re: Over the last 150 years, large stretches of salmon habitat have been e [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Oct 2017, 14:27
ShashankDave wrote:
Other than this, I got Q4 wrong.
I narrowed it down to B and C, and then chose B. Please compare the two options and explain why B is wrong.

The following post provides explanations for each answer choice in Q4. See if this helps, and, if not, please post your additional concerns: https://gmatclub.com/forum/over-the-las ... l#p1923344
_________________

www.gmatninja.com

Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 48

Re: Over the last 150 years, large stretches of salmon habitat have been e   [#permalink] 24 Oct 2017, 14:27

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   [ 48 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Over the last 150 years, large stretches of salmon habitat have been e

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.