thisisatestonlyatest wrote:
sumylal wrote:
thisisatestonlyatest wrote:
did you see owen jumped to 25 in usnews?
Just out of curiousity, why did you choose Owen over Tepper, Kenan-Flagler and Johnson?
I've gotten into UNC, and am waiting to hear back from Owen and Ross.
I wrote a big review on my decision. Look on my profile.
I'll explain my Philo. Think of your MBA like a trip. You want to get from point a( current job) to point b (new job). You can buy a plan ticket ( tuition). Cornell 110, unc 110, Ross 110, vandy 92. You can also get discounts (scholarships). Now about your destination. Cornell airline flies anywhere on the east coast some west coast. Ross pretty much the same. Unc anywhere in the southeast some north east. Vandy south east and some northeast. If you only want to go to the north east you probably wouldn't buy the cheaper ticket at vandy. But if you want a south east destination vandy. Also some places have nice airplanes (towns the MBA is in). Vandy is in Nashville awesome weather awesome night life cheap cost of living. Cornell and Ross are cold and in the middle of no where. Unc nice weather ok town. So if you want a 1st class flight to the southeast its vandy. If you want a seat in coach to the northeast well go to Ross or Johnson. I thought this would be a better read than just the normal fit, location, cost speech.
Just got a call from Vandy. I'm in with a 25k/year scholarship.
UNC would cost me 110k since they didn't offer me a scholarship, Vandy would cost me 42k. Lets see what happens with Ross.
What I feel like isn't discussed in your analysis is ROI. With a higher ranked school, wouldn't you have the benefit of making more money in the medium and long-term (assuming a scholarship makes a lower ranked school better in the short-term), and then possibly being able to settle down wherever you want because of the locational flexibility offered by attending a high-ranked school?