Quote:
The African Maasai have adopted the Living Wall project in their bid to save their livestock from attacks by predators; the natural fences built of myrrh trees have been designed to prevent the attacks, and they do.
A. natural fences built of myrrh trees have been designed to prevent the attacks, and they do
B. natural fences have been built of myrrh trees, designed to prevent the attacks, and they have been
C. natural fences built of myrrh trees are designed for preventing the attacks, and have
D. naturally built fences of myrrh trees have been designed for preventing the attacks, and it is
E. naturally built fences of myrrh trees are being designed to prevent the attacks, and they do
Grammar: what comes after the semi-colon must be an independent clause (subject+verb) that is in some way related to the previous clause (ie. if you were talking about your cat, then what comes after the semi-colon, must be related to your cat!).
Meaning: a group has adopted a wall to save their livestock from predators, then it gives details about the wall and what it does.
(B) "fences have been built", implies the fences were built in the past, but we intend to say the fences were designed in the past; "trees, designed…" past participle is mod the trees, should refer to the fences, unintended; also, "and they have been" wrong tense and a verb, such as preventing, is missing.
(C) "designed for preventing", they were designed with the intent "to prevent" the attacks, thus we need "to prevent" rather than "for preventing"; also, "and have" what? missing verb.
(D) "designed for preventing", unintended; also, "fences [plural]… trees [plural]" vs. "it [singular]" sva error.
(E) "are being designed…and they do" if the fences are still being designed, how could they have prevented the attacks? tense and unintended.
Answer (A): "the group adopted the wall… fences have been designed to prevent… and they do [prevent the attacks: why? because the group has already adopted them!]"