Bunuel
For the period from the eighth century through the eleventh century, the shifting boundaries between Kingdom F and Kingdom G have not been well charted. Although a certain village in a border region between the two kingdoms usually belonged to Kingdom G, ninth-century artifacts found in the village were in the typical Kingdom F style of that time. It is unclear whether the village was actually a part of Kingdom F in the ninth century or whether it was a part of Kingdom G but had merely adopted Kingdom F's artistic styles under Kingdom F's cultural influence.
Which of the following would, if found in ninth-century sites in the village, best help in determining whether the village was a part of Kingdom F or Kingdom G in the ninth century?
(A) A trading contract written in the Kingdom G dialect
(B) A drawing of a dwelling complex known to have existed on the border of Kingdom F and Kingdom G in the ninth century
(C) Knives and other utensils made from metal typical of ninth-century mining sites in Kingdom F
(D) Some fragments of pottery made in the Kingdom G style from the seventh century out of materials only found in Kingdom F
(E) Numerous teeth from the ninth century with a chemical signature typical only of teeth from people who had grown up in the heart of Kingdom F
CR74541.01
OG2020 NEW QUESTION
Although the village usually belonged to Kingdom G, ninth-century artifacts found in the village were in the typical Kingdom F style of that time.
It is unclear whether the village was actually a part of Kingdom F in the ninth century or whether it was a part of Kingdom G but had merely adopted Kingdom F's artistic styles under Kingdom F's cultural influence.
- So the village was usually part of G. But some ninth century artefacts typical of F have been found (this is existing evidence of belonging to F).
IT IS UNCLEAR WHETHER the village was a part of F or G in 9th century. We have not established that the village belonged to F.
If we find some more artifacts typical of F, it does not establish that the village belonged to F in 9th century. There needs to be a stronger connection. Influence of neighbours is not sufficient evidence.
(A) A trading contract written in the Kingdom G dialect
Considering that boundaries were shifting from 8th century onwards, influence of kingdom G's dialect is understandable even if the village belonged to F.
(B) A drawing of a dwelling complex known to have existed on the border of Kingdom F and Kingdom G in the ninth century
Doesn't tell us about belonging to either G or F.
(C) Knives and other utensils made from metal typical of ninth-century mining sites in Kingdom F
Artifacts made from metals typical of F mining sites. There could be mining sites in G producing the same metal or metal could have been obtained from F or artifacts could have been made in F. Doesn't add much to the already existing evidence.
(D) Some fragments of pottery made in the Kingdom G style from the seventh century out of materials only found in Kingdom F
Artifacts were made out of kingdom F materials but in kingdom G style. Again confusing.
(E) Numerous teeth from the ninth century with a chemical signature typical only of teeth from people who had grown up in the heart of Kingdom F
Important point is "numerous". They are trying to say that it isn't like 3-4 people relocated to G from F. The teeth belonged to kingdom F people only. Possibly then, the village was a part of kingdom F. It is certainly more relevant than (A) and (C).
Answer (E)