Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 21:12 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 21:12
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 42,388
Own Kudos:
82,121
 [2]
Given Kudos: 24,110
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 42,388
Kudos: 82,121
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 42,388
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24,110
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 42,388
Kudos: 82,121
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bb
Thank you NaveenGJ, interesting first post. Is this a copy paste from somewhere?

No it isn't a copy paste. I wanted to post the graph or its imgur link as well but I can't as I haven't posted 5 comments on the forum.

Have done similar analysis of Verbal and overall GMAT FE vs Classic GMAT as well.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 42,388
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24,110
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 42,388
Kudos: 82,121
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Awesome! Thank you for a very thoughtful reply and kudos for doing an analysis!

PS. What does the verbal chart tell you?


NaveenGJ
bb
Thank you NaveenGJ, interesting first post. Is this a copy paste from somewhere?

No it isn't a copy paste. I wanted to post the graph or its imgur link as well but I can't as I haven't posted 5 comments on the forum.

Have done similar analysis of Verbal and overall GMAT FE vs Classic GMAT as well.

Posted from my mobile device
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bb
Awesome! Thank you for a very thoughtful reply and kudos for doing an analysis!

PS. What does the verbal chart tell you?


Old GMAT:
Concentration at the Top: In the Old GMAT, Verbal scores ranging from 45 to 51 are all in the 99th percentile. This concentration makes it challenging to distinguish among top performers who are all grouped into the same percentile. This lack of differentiation makes it less rewarding for incremental improvements at the high-end.

GMAT FE:
Expanded High-Scoring Range: In the GMAT FE, the 99th percentile starts at a Verbal score of 87 and extends to 90 for the 100th percentile. This expanded range allows for finer granularity among top scorers.

Clearer Incremental Progression: For instance, a one-point improvement from 86 (which is in the 98th percentile) to 87 moves the test-taker to the 99th percentile. This more clearly rewards incremental improvements.

I would have loved to post a graph for elucidating above points, but I can't because of the '5 post policy'.
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bb
NaveenGJ
bb
Awesome! Thank you for a very thoughtful reply and kudos for doing an analysis!

PS. What does the verbal chart tell you?


Old GMAT:
Concentration at the Top: In the Old GMAT, Verbal scores ranging from 45 to 51 are all in the 99th percentile. This concentration makes it challenging to distinguish among top performers who are all grouped into the same percentile. This lack of differentiation makes it less rewarding for incremental improvements at the high-end.

GMAT FE:
Expanded High-Scoring Range: In the GMAT FE, the 99th percentile starts at a Verbal score of 87 and extends to 90 for the 100th percentile. This expanded range allows for finer granularity among top scorers.

Clearer Incremental Progression: For instance, a one-point improvement from 86 (which is in the 98th percentile) to 87 moves the test-taker to the 99th percentile. This more clearly rewards incremental improvements.

I would have loved to post a graph for elucidating above points, but I can't because of the '5 post policy'.

You have 5 posts now :cool:

Here are the charts showing comparison between Classic and Focus versions of GMAT score & percentile for quant, verbal and overall scores.
Attachments

File comment: Classic v/s Focus GMAT score & percentile - Overall score
msg258668581-603430.jpg
msg258668581-603430.jpg [ 30.69 KiB | Viewed 8123 times ]

File comment: Classic v/s Focus GMAT score & percentile - Verbal
msg258668581-603429.jpg
msg258668581-603429.jpg [ 24.19 KiB | Viewed 8083 times ]

File comment: Classic v/s Focus GMAT score & percentile - Quant
msg258668581-603428.jpg
msg258668581-603428.jpg [ 24.33 KiB | Viewed 8088 times ]

User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 42,388
Own Kudos:
82,121
 [2]
Given Kudos: 24,110
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 42,388
Kudos: 82,121
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank you for doing this!!! I like your graph style. Very clean!

Here is my Verbal chart with some finagling of scales.

Attachment:
verbal-focus-classic-percentiles.gif
verbal-focus-classic-percentiles.gif [ 46.81 KiB | Viewed 9480 times ]
(Note that Classic X axis is at the top of the chart and the Focus X-axis is at the bottom)

I found it interesting that on VERBAL, the percentiles are being bunched together. Look at the distribution of the Standard Deviation interval (hopefully calculated correctly)
  • Classic: V20.5 - 37.5, that's 39% of the total scale (6 - 51)
  • Focus: V74.3 - 83.3, that's 32% of the total scale... maybe not such a big deal (

Lots of people will end up with Verbal Scores between 78 and 82. I feel this is due to the score being more driven by mistakes rather than the position of the mistakes in the test (though mistakes in the test should still have an impact as the test is adaptive but just not as profound)

Attachment:
histograms.gif
histograms.gif [ 65.63 KiB | Viewed 7890 times ]

At the same time, Quantitative scale will see the opposite effect - QUANT percentiles are being spread out.
So the same change has opposite effects on the Quant and Verbal sections.


So at the end, the result is the opposite, but largely unchanged :lol:
Candidates will have a bunched up Verbal Score and a Diverse Quant score instead of previously having a bunched up Quant.

On the positive side, I think it is going to be great to see some more space available for people to improve their Quant rather than being stuck with Q51 or Q50. (it was previously possible to get Q51 with 1-2 wrong but I guess now that will be a more stretched out space)
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,632
Own Kudos:
6,127
 [2]
Given Kudos: 173
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,632
Kudos: 6,127
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bb
Would anyone smart be able to tell me how GMAT Focus is planning to make a huge PIVOT in Percentiles while using the exactly same questions on the test?


I have overlaid percentiles for the Quant section: GMAT Focus with the GMAT Classic percentiles and ended up with this interesting chart for Quant. I am just trying to understand how they were able to chop off the top and spread it so nicely? Any ideas? To me the new percentiles are either unreliable or the scoring is really going to be extremely different... I have been pondering about this for a week now :dontknow:
I think the Quant section will achieve the new percentiles by just dinging your score for each missed question, scoring differently from the classic GMAT, on which you can score Q49 with 10 missed Quant questions, Q50 with a few missed questions, and even Q51 with a missed question or two.

On the Focus Edition, missing one Quant question will knock your score down to the upper 80s, missing two will knock it down to the mid 80s, etc. So, scores will be distributed more widely. Only test-takers who get all but one or two questions correct will get top scores. There won't be people missing eight questions and scoring within two points of the highest possible Quant score.
User avatar
raju1212
Joined: 02 Jun 2021
Last visit: 03 Oct 2024
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 248
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q40 V34
GMAT 1: 620 Q40 V34
Posts: 53
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyMurray
bb
Would anyone smart be able to tell me how GMAT Focus is planning to make a huge PIVOT in Percentiles while using the exactly same questions on the test?


I have overlaid percentiles for the Quant section: GMAT Focus with the GMAT Classic percentiles and ended up with this interesting chart for Quant. I am just trying to understand how they were able to chop off the top and spread it so nicely? Any ideas? To me the new percentiles are either unreliable or the scoring is really going to be extremely different... I have been pondering about this for a week now :dontknow:
I think the Quant section will achieve the new percentiles by just dinging your score for each missed question, scoring differently from the classic GMAT, on which you can score Q49 with 10 missed Quant questions, Q50 with a few missed questions, and even Q51 with a missed question or two.

On the Focus Edition, missing one Quant question will knock your score down to the upper 80s, missing two will knock it down to the mid 80s, etc. So, scores will be distributed more widely. Only test-takers who get all but one or two questions correct will get top scores. There won't be people missing eight questions and scoring within two points of the highest possible Quant score.

But don't you think things will be more dynamic, since this test is also sectional adaptive. So a person starting with VA DI and scoring very high in them 85+, will get relatively tougher question in QA, and perhaps can afford to make more mistakes?
User avatar
Sim_SG3
Joined: 18 Sep 2023
Last visit: 01 Feb 2024
Posts: 237
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 237
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Sustainability
Schools: NUS '27
GPA: 3.49
WE:Operations (Finance)
Schools: NUS '27
Posts: 237
Kudos: 185
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
raju1212
MartyMurray
bb
Would anyone smart be able to tell me how GMAT Focus is planning to make a huge PIVOT in Percentiles while using the exactly same questions on the test?


I have overlaid percentiles for the Quant section: GMAT Focus with the GMAT Classic percentiles and ended up with this interesting chart for Quant. I am just trying to understand how they were able to chop off the top and spread it so nicely? Any ideas? To me the new percentiles are either unreliable or the scoring is really going to be extremely different... I have been pondering about this for a week now :dontknow:
I think the Quant section will achieve the new percentiles by just dinging your score for each missed question, scoring differently from the classic GMAT, on which you can score Q49 with 10 missed Quant questions, Q50 with a few missed questions, and even Q51 with a missed question or two.

On the Focus Edition, missing one Quant question will knock your score down to the upper 80s, missing two will knock it down to the mid 80s, etc. So, scores will be distributed more widely. Only test-takers who get all but one or two questions correct will get top scores. There won't be people missing eight questions and scoring within two points of the highest possible Quant score.

But don't you think things will be more dynamic, since this test is also sectional adaptive. So a person starting with VA DI and scoring very high in them 85+, will get relatively tougher question in QA, and perhaps can afford to make more mistakes?

Wait, I thought the adaptive nature of the test wasn't across sections but just within the section? If the 3 sections are not treated separately, especially in terms of the questions being adaptive, there's no point in giving each section equal weightage in determining the overall score.

Someone doing exceedingly well in the first two sections would face hell in the third round and would be more likely to mess up. It'd be cruel to make the hard section count just as much as the two good ones.
Conversely, doing poorly in the first two sections would mean you'd only get low-level questions in the third section and would have virtually no way of saving your score.
Imagine equal weightage on top of all of that!
User avatar
Sim_SG3
Joined: 18 Sep 2023
Last visit: 01 Feb 2024
Posts: 237
Own Kudos:
185
 [1]
Given Kudos: 237
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Sustainability
Schools: NUS '27
GPA: 3.49
WE:Operations (Finance)
Schools: NUS '27
Posts: 237
Kudos: 185
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sim_SG3
raju1212

But don't you think things will be more dynamic, since this test is also sectional adaptive. So a person starting with VA DI and scoring very high in them 85+, will get relatively tougher question in QA, and perhaps can afford to make more mistakes?

Wait, I thought the adaptive nature of the test wasn't across sections but just within the section? If the 3 sections are not treated separately, especially in terms of the questions being adaptive, there's no point in giving each section equal weightage in determining the overall score.

Someone doing exceedingly well in the first two sections would face hell in the third round and would be more likely to mess up. It'd be cruel to make the hard section count just as much as the two good ones.
Conversely, doing poorly in the first two sections would mean you'd only get low-level questions in the third section and would have virtually no way of saving your score.
Imagine equal weightage on top of all of that!

Closing the loop on this - the exam isn't adaptive across sections. Hurray!

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbb3Rw5SOzA

Thanks to BottomJee for sharing the above and putting an end to my misery.

Best,
Sim
User avatar
raju1212
Joined: 02 Jun 2021
Last visit: 03 Oct 2024
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 248
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q40 V34
GMAT 1: 620 Q40 V34
Posts: 53
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sim_SG3
Sim_SG3
raju1212

But don't you think things will be more dynamic, since this test is also sectional adaptive. So a person starting with VA DI and scoring very high in them 85+, will get relatively tougher question in QA, and perhaps can afford to make more mistakes?

Wait, I thought the adaptive nature of the test wasn't across sections but just within the section? If the 3 sections are not treated separately, especially in terms of the questions being adaptive, there's no point in giving each section equal weightage in determining the overall score.

Someone doing exceedingly well in the first two sections would face hell in the third round and would be more likely to mess up. It'd be cruel to make the hard section count just as much as the two good ones.
Conversely, doing poorly in the first two sections would mean you'd only get low-level questions in the third section and would have virtually no way of saving your score.
Imagine equal weightage on top of all of that!

Closing the loop on this - the exam isn't adaptive across sections. Hurray!

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbb3Rw5SOzA

Thanks to BottomJee for sharing the above and putting an end to my misery.

Best,
Sim

https://youtu.be/Hfgby9-M__o?t=2746
Check this video.. it is in a way section adaptive. but the impact wont be significant. With adaptive questions getting harder, i just meant that there might be more room to make mistakes if average difficulty goes up, so we cant have pin point surety like in the classic,of how many mistake one can afford to make.. .
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [2]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
raju1212
https://youtu.be/Hfgby9-M__o?t=2746
Check this video.. it is in a way section adaptive. but the impact wont be significant. With adaptive questions getting harder, i just meant that there might be more room to make mistakes if average difficulty goes up, so we cant have pin point surety like in the classic,of how many mistake one can afford to make.. .
Hi raju1212,

Both the GMAT and GMAT Focus are question-adaptive. Here are some points we should keep in mind:

1. "Section-adaptive" means that the entire next section is selected on the basis of the test taker's performance in an earlier section or sections. This is not what the GMAT does. The GMAT incorporates information from the previous section in the selection of only the first question of the next section.

2. Looking at the previous section as a whole can be misleading. For example, some people think that the GMAT chooses a question on the basis of the test taker's performance on the previous question. This is incorrect. Both the GMAT and the GMAT Focus Edition use the test taker's performance on all the questions up to that point in that section to choose the next question (there are some additional constraints). So, to a certain extent, what the Focus Edition is really doing is that it's not treating Q/V/DI as being completely separate.

You are absolutely spot-on about accuracy not being a reliable predictor of score on an adaptive test like the GMAT/GMAT Focus.
User avatar
Sim_SG3
Joined: 18 Sep 2023
Last visit: 01 Feb 2024
Posts: 237
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 237
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Sustainability
Schools: NUS '27
GPA: 3.49
WE:Operations (Finance)
Schools: NUS '27
Posts: 237
Kudos: 185
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
raju1212
Sim_SG3
raju1212

But don't you think things will be more dynamic, since this test is also sectional adaptive. So a person starting with VA DI and scoring very high in them 85+, will get relatively tougher question in QA, and perhaps can afford to make more mistakes?

Closing the loop on this - the exam isn't adaptive across sections. Hurray!

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbb3Rw5SOzA

Thanks to BottomJee for sharing the above and putting an end to my misery.

Best,
Sim

https://youtu.be/Hfgby9-M__o?t=2746
Check this video.. it is in a way section adaptive. but the impact wont be significant. With adaptive questions getting harder, i just meant that there might be more room to make mistakes if average difficulty goes up, so we cant have pin point surety like in the classic,of how many mistake one can afford to make.. .

Ah, I understand now. I took "section adaptive" to mean what AjiteshArun described in his reply to this post. Thank you for clarifying!

Best,
Sim
Moderator:
General GMAT Forum Moderator
444 posts