It is currently 18 Oct 2017, 08:29

Live Now:

GMAT Verbal Live on YouTube: Join Now!


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to di

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 540

Kudos [?]: 592 [0], given: 2

Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to di [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jan 2009, 13:48
17
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

65% (01:45) correct 35% (01:48) wrong based on 930 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to disseminate information that is then accessed by the public via personal computer. Since many groups are thus able to bypass traditional news sources, whose reporting is selective, and to present their political views directly to the public, information services present a more balanced picture of the complexities of political issues than any traditional news source presents.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

(A) Information services are accessible to enough people to ensure that political advocacy groups can use these services to reach as large a percentage of the public as they could through traditional news sources.

(B) People could get a thorough understanding of a particular political issue by sorting through information provided by several traditional news sources, each with differing editorial biases.

(C) Information on political issues disseminated through information services does not come almost entirely from advocacy groups that share a single bias.

(D) Traditional news sources seldom report the views of political advocacy groups accurately.

(E) Most people who get information on political issues from newspapers and other traditional news sources can readily identify the editorial biases of those sources.

Source : GMATPrep Default Exam Pack
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by hazelnut on 01 Oct 2017, 06:17, edited 2 times in total.
Edited the question.

Kudos [?]: 592 [0], given: 2

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 115

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Location: NYC Baby!!!
Re: Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to di [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jan 2009, 16:11
I picked E because the assumption is "information services present a more balanced picture of the complexities of political issues than any traditional news source presents." but that doesn't mean the public is aware of this or even interested in complexities of political issues.

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

4 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1402

Kudos [?]: 437 [4], given: 1

Re: Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to di [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jan 2009, 17:57
4
This post received
KUDOS
reply2spg wrote:
Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to disseminate information that is then accessed by the public via personal computer. Since many groups are thus able to bypasstraditional news sources, whose reporting is selective, and to present their political views directly to the public, information services present a more balanced picture of the complexities of political issues than any traditional news source presents.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

A. Information services are accessible to enough people to ensure that political advocacy groups can use these services to reach as large a percentage of the public as they could through traditional news sources.
B. People could get a thorough understanding of a particular political issue by sorting through information provided by several traditional news sources, each with differing editorial biases.
C. Information on political issues disseminated through information services does not come almost entirely from advocacy groups that share a single bias.
D. Traditional news sources seldom report the views of political advocacy groups accurately.
E. Most people who get information on political issues from newspapers and other traditional news sources can readily identify the editorial biases of those sources.


Clear C to me.

Apply the negation test and the conclusion falls apart

Conclusion is IS provides balanced view when compared with the TNS

Take C and negate. Info from IS comes from groups that share bias. Conclusion falls apart.

Kudos [?]: 437 [4], given: 1

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 414

Kudos [?]: 460 [0], given: 14

Re: Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to di [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2009, 02:39
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
clearly C.................

the last sentence of the argument itself states that "information services present a more balanced picture of the complexities of political issues than any traditional news source presents"....

now if we have a look at option C then it holds that since the information on poilitcal issues does not come entirely from advocay group that share a single bias so therfore the information services presents a more realistic and balanced picture of the complexities of political issues .

Kudos [?]: 460 [0], given: 14

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 120

Kudos [?]: 549 [2], given: 116

Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GMAT Date: 07-30-2012
GPA: 2.66
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to di [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2012, 10:28
2
This post received
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to disseminate information that is then accessed by the public via personal computer. Since many groups are thus able to bypass traditional news sources, whose reporting is selective, and to present their political views directly to the public, information services present a more balanced picture of the complexities of political issues than any traditional news source presents.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
A. Information services are accessible to enough people to ensure that political advocacy groups can use these services to reach as large a percentage of the public as they could through traditional news sources.
B. People could get a thorough understanding of a particular political issue by sorting through information provided by several traditional news sources, each with differing editorial biases.
C. Information on political issues disseminated through information services does not come almost entirely from advocacy groups that share a single bias.
D. Traditional news sources seldom report the views of political advocacy groups accurately.
E. Most people who get information on political issues from newspapers and other traditional news sources can readily identify the editorial biases of those sources.
Quote:
need help with the argument. could not understand what it is implying!

_________________

Please press Kudos if you found this post helpful

Kudos [?]: 549 [2], given: 116

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 120

Kudos [?]: 549 [2], given: 116

Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GMAT Date: 07-30-2012
GPA: 2.66
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to di [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2012, 10:33
2
This post received
KUDOS
9
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to disseminate information that is then accessed by the public via personal computer. Since many groups are thus able to bypass traditional news sources, whose reporting is selective, and to present their political views directly to the public, information services present a more balanced picture of the complexities of political issues than any traditional news source presents.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
A. Information services are accessible to enough people to ensure that political advocacy groups can use these services to reach as large a percentage of the public as they could through traditional news sources.
B. People could get a thorough understanding of a particular political issue by sorting through information provided by several traditional news sources, each with differing editorial biases.
C. Information on political issues disseminated through information services does not come almost entirely from advocacy groups that share a single bias.
D. Traditional news sources seldom report the views of political advocacy groups accurately.
E. Most people who get information on political issues from newspapers and other traditional news sources can readily identify the editorial biases of those sources.
Quote:
need help with the argument. could not understand what it is implying!

_________________

Please press Kudos if you found this post helpful

Kudos [?]: 549 [2], given: 116

3 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 536

Kudos [?]: 353 [3], given: 75

Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Re: Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to di [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2012, 11:11
3
This post received
KUDOS
maybeam wrote:
Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to disseminate information that is then accessed by the public via personal computer. Since many groups are thus able to bypass traditional news sources, whose reporting is selective, and to present their political views directly to the public, information services present a more balanced picture of the complexities of political issues than any traditional news source presents.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
A. Information services are accessible to enough people to ensure that political advocacy groups can use these services to reach as large a percentage of the public as they could through traditional news sources.
B. People could get a thorough understanding of a particular political issue by sorting through information provided by several traditional news sources, each with differing editorial biases.
C. Information on political issues disseminated through information services does not come almost entirely from advocacy groups that share a single bias.
D. Traditional news sources seldom report the views of political advocacy groups accurately.
E. Most people who get information on political issues from newspapers and other traditional news sources can readily identify the editorial biases of those sources.
Quote:
need help with the argument. could not understand what it is implying!


Premise:-

Political advocacy group ( group of people who speaks good about politics and politicians) have started some kind of information system (website etc) which can be only accessible through computers unlike the old medium of information medium such as newspaper or TV, political magazines etc.The group will be able to disseminate the information/views directly to the general public and the author believes that the public will be able to get a balanced / unbiased information of the complex political issues via this website.

At an initial level one can think of an assumption - whether everyone is accessible to use this info, i.e computer is available to everyone to access these info?But that is not mentioned in the premise and not the prime concern , because the author thinks that computer is accessible to almost a major part of the population.
which is mentioned in (A) which is incorrect

Now, traditional medium of information are usually unbiased because those are NOT Created or disseminated by the people involved in POLITICAL ADVOCACY and give info in a balanced way.
What does it means?
It means that, when people involved in political advocacy create information , there will be a chance that they might bias the info in favor of them.
(C) says that :-
C. Information on political issues disseminated through information services does not come almost entirely from advocacy groups that share a single bias.
so one can think of a balanced information which is unbiased.
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Kudos [?]: 353 [3], given: 75

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: Project Management Professional (PMP)
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Posts: 198

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 12

Location: New Delhi, India
Re: Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to di [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2012, 22:38
maybeam wrote:
Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to disseminate information that is then accessed by the public via personal computer. Since many groups are thus able to bypass traditional news sources, whose reporting is selective, and to present their political views directly to the public, information services present a more balanced picture of the complexities of political issues than any traditional news source presents.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
A. Information services are accessible to enough people to ensure that political advocacy groups can use these services to reach as large a percentage of the public as they could through traditional news sources.
B. People could get a thorough understanding of a particular political issue by sorting through information provided by several traditional news sources, each with differing editorial biases.
C. Information on political issues disseminated through information services does not come almost entirely from advocacy groups that share a single bias.
D. Traditional news sources seldom report the views of political advocacy groups accurately.
E. Most people who get information on political issues from newspapers and other traditional news sources can readily identify the editorial biases of those sources.
Quote:
need help with the argument. could not understand what it is implying!

Hi

Good Q...
According to me (C) is correct because if information on political issues disseminated through information services WERE almost entirely from advocacy groups that share a single bias, then you COULD NOT claim that information services present a more balanced picture of political issues than traditional news sources
_________________

Best
Vaibhav

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, Thanks

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 12

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2012
Posts: 25

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 1

Re: Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to di [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jul 2012, 03:39
1
This post received
KUDOS
Passage is making an argument that
"information services present a more balanced picture of the complexities of political issues than any traditional news source presents"

This claim will be possible only when we believe that traditional news source doesnt present a balanced picture. My analogy follows as

A. Information services are accessible to enough people to ensure that political advocacy groups can use these services to reach as large a percentage of the public as they could through traditional news sources. Passage doesnt argue over the reach of information services
B. People could get a thorough understanding of a particular political issue by sorting through information provided by several traditional news sources, each with differing editorial biases. This is against the argument and it still relies on traditional sources only
C. Information on political issues disseminated through information services does not come almost entirely from advocacy groups that share a single bias. This might be true but doesnt provide a base for the argument which says " a balanced picture will be provided by information services"
D. Traditional news sources seldom report the views of political advocacy groups accurately. Correct
E. Most people who get information on political issues from newspapers and other traditional news sources can readily identify the editorial biases of those sources.Argument doesnt say whether people can identify the bias or not

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 1

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 43

Kudos [?]: 154 [1], given: 26

GMAT Date: 09-17-2012
Re: Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to di [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jul 2012, 06:53
1
This post received
KUDOS
Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to disseminate information that is then accessed by the public via personal computer. Since many groups are thus able to bypass traditional news sources, whose reporting is selective, and to present their political views directly to the public, information services present a more balanced picture of the complexities of political issues than any traditional news source presents.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

Firstly we need to understand the argument.
Evidence:- It says that the political advocacy groups have started using info services to spread info because traditional sources reporting is selective,
Conclusion:- Information system presents a balanced picture of political issues.

The green part justifies the use of info services by the political advocacy groups.
The point of this argument is that there should not be info from one source. There we get our assumption for using info services.

A. Information services are accessible to enough people to ensure that political advocacy groups can use these services to reach as large a percentage of the public as they could through traditional news sources. irrelevant cause percentage
B. People could get a thorough understanding of a particular political issue by sorting through information provided by several traditional news sources, each with differing editorial biases.understanding of political issue? irrelevant
C. Information on political issues disseminated through information services does not come almost entirely from advocacy groups that share a single bias. Correct
D. Traditional news sources seldom report the views of political advocacy groups accurately.the groups were not having a prob wid the accuracy of traditional sources but that they were selective
E. Most people who get information on political issues from newspapers and other traditional news sources can readily identify the editorial biases of those sources.irrelevant

Kudos [?]: 154 [1], given: 26

Expert Post
Optimus Prep Instructor
User avatar
B
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Posts: 1905

Kudos [?]: 522 [0], given: 23

Re: Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to di [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 May 2015, 23:50
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to disseminate information that is then accessed by the public via personal computer. Since many groups are thus able to bypass traditional news sources, whose reporting is selective, and to present their political views directly to the public, information services present a more balanced picture of the complexities of political issues than any traditional news source presents.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
The argument is that information services can provide the public with a more balanced view of political issues, unlike traditional sources that present biased political views.
A. Information services are accessible to enough people to ensure that political advocacy groups can use these services to reach as large a percentage of the public as they could through traditional news sources. Accessibility is out of scope.
B. People could get a thorough understanding of a particular political issue by sorting through information provided by several traditional news sources, each with differing editorial biases.This would actually take away from the need for information services.
C. Information on political issues disseminated through information services does not come almost entirely from advocacy groups that share a single bias.If information services provides a perspective that is just as biased as that of traditional sources, the argument falls apart.
D. Traditional news sources seldom report the views of political advocacy groups accurately. Accuracy isn't in question.
E. Most people who get information on political issues from newspapers and other traditional news sources can readily identify the editorial biases of those sources. If they can readily identify biases there's no need for information services.
_________________

Janielle Williams

Customer Support

Special Offer: $80-100/hr. Online Private Tutoring
GMAT On Demand Course $299
Free Online Trial Hour

Kudos [?]: 522 [0], given: 23

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2015
Posts: 46

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 42

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 610 Q49 V27
GPA: 2.5
WE: Project Management (Telecommunications)
Re: Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to di [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jan 2016, 08:09
Here are my two cents
Tough one.
Premise 1: information service help people bypass the newspaper to present the information in public.
Premise 2: newspaper is selective
Conclusion: information service provide a more balanced view

Assumption Question Type, so negation method can be helpful
At first glance, i am confused between C and D:
Let us negate D and we get a sentence: Traditional news sources report the views of political advocacy groups accurately
Does this necessarily weaken the argument? Maybe a little.
Let us negate C: Information on political issues disseminated through information services come almost entirely from advocacy groups that share a single bias.
It exactly weakens the argument.

Hope it works for you.

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 42

VP
VP
avatar
S
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1403

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 916

Re: Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to di [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jun 2016, 03:28
reply2spg wrote:
Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to disseminate information that is then accessed by the public via personal computer. Since many groups are thus able to bypasstraditional news sources, whose reporting is selective, and to present their political views directly to the public, information services present a more balanced picture of the complexities of political issues than any traditional news source presents.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

A. Information services are accessible to enough people to ensure that political advocacy groups can use these services to reach as large a percentage of the public as they could through traditional news sources.
B. People could get a thorough understanding of a particular political issue by sorting through information provided by several traditional news sources, each with differing editorial biases.
C. Information on political issues disseminated through information services does not come almost entirely from advocacy groups that share a single bias.
D. Traditional news sources seldom report the views of political advocacy groups accurately.
E. Most people who get information on political issues from newspapers and other traditional news sources can readily identify the editorial biases of those sources.


i see c is best but I try to find out why D is wrong
d is attractive but it is still not right. if we have d, we still have a balanced view of political view. so, D is wrong. D is a typical attractive answer which seem to affect the conclusion but in fact dose not affect at all.

on cr, if we can go to 2 close choices, we need to find out one choice still dose not affect conclusion.
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 916

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2016
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 3

Re: Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to di [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2016, 05:52
maybeam wrote:
Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to disseminate information that is then accessed by the public via personal computer. Since many groups are thus able to bypass traditional news sources, whose reporting is selective, and to present their political views directly to the public, information services present a more balanced picture of the complexities of political issues than any traditional news source presents.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
A. Information services are accessible to enough people to ensure that political advocacy groups can use these services to reach as large a percentage of the public as they could through traditional news sources.
B. People could get a thorough understanding of a particular political issue by sorting through information provided by several traditional news sources, each with differing editorial biases.
C. Information on political issues disseminated through information services does not come almost entirely from advocacy groups that share a single bias.
D. Traditional news sources seldom report the views of political advocacy groups accurately.
E. Most people who get information on political issues from newspapers and other traditional news sources can readily identify the editorial biases of those sources.
Quote:
need help with the argument. could not understand what it is implying!


We can use assumpsion negative technique here.
In A,B,D,E if the statement not true, they can not damaged the conclusion that information services needed because of balancing covered view of political issues.
Whereas in C, if information is come from almost entirely group that share single bias, it will damaged the conclusion. Since we can not deferentiate which is tradional one or information one

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 3

Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 694

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 855

Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to di [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 May 2017, 22:37
The conclusion here is "information services present a more balanced picture of the complexities of political issues than any traditional news source presents"

What is the assumption here. That the political groups using information services will report their actual views and since all political groups will present their own views, the picture available to public is balanced.

A. Information services are accessible to enough people to ensure that political advocacy groups can use these services to reach as large a percentage of the public as they could through traditional news sources. - Irrelevant. The conclusion is never about the number of people it can reach, but it is about the balance of the political view itself. Hence wrong.

B. People could get a thorough understanding of a particular political issue by sorting through information provided by several traditional news sources, each with differing editorial biases. - If people can do this themselves, info services dont help.

C. Information on political issues disseminated through information services does not come almost entirely from advocacy groups that share a single bias. - The argument assumes something like this. that the filtered results will present a balanced picture and not a biased picture.

D. Traditional news sources seldom report the views of political advocacy groups accurately. - Not an assumption according to me. This is what line "whose reporting is selective" says.

E. Most people who get information on political issues from newspapers and other traditional news sources can readily identify the editorial biases of those sources. - If people can identify, there is no need for Info services.

Choice C Negated :-

Information on political issues disseminated through information services does come
almost entirely from advocacy groups that share a single bias.
{Now, if the information on political issues is coming from advocacy group sharing a single bias
then the conclusion which states that information services presents a more balanced picture is
invalidated}.
So, C is correct answer choice here.
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 855

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 30 Jul 2014
Posts: 137

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 98

GPA: 3.72
Reviews Badge
Re: Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to di [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Aug 2017, 12:00
IMO, the key to answer the question is to focus on the conclusion - "information services present a more balanced picture of ...". The conclusion doesn't say that the information is not "available" or is "used/processed/inferred" effectively, it only says that "it PRESENTS..." - therefore, answer choices A, and E would be wrong.
_________________

A lot needs to be learned from all of you.

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 98

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 01 Feb 2015
Posts: 54

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 36

Re: Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to di [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2017, 19:37
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
thevenus wrote:
maybeam wrote:
Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to disseminate information that is then accessed by the public via personal computer. Since many groups are thus able to bypass traditional news sources, whose reporting is selective, and to present their political views directly to the public, information services present a more balanced picture of the complexities of political issues than any traditional news source presents.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
A. Information services are accessible to enough people to ensure that political advocacy groups can use these services to reach as large a percentage of the public as they could through traditional news sources.
B. People could get a thorough understanding of a particular political issue by sorting through information provided by several traditional news sources, each with differing editorial biases.
C. Information on political issues disseminated through information services does not come almost entirely from advocacy groups that share a single bias.
D. Traditional news sources seldom report the views of political advocacy groups accurately.
E. Most people who get information on political issues from newspapers and other traditional news sources can readily identify the editorial biases of those sources.
Quote:
need help with the argument. could not understand what it is implying!


Premise:-

Political advocacy group ( group of people who speaks good about politics and politicians) have started some kind of information system (website etc) which can be only accessible through computers unlike the old medium of information medium such as newspaper or TV, political magazines etc.The group will be able to disseminate the information/views directly to the general public and the author believes that the public will be able to get a balanced / unbiased information of the complex political issues via this website.

At an initial level one can think of an assumption whether everyone is accessible to use this info, i.e computer is available to everyone to access these info? But that is not mentioned in the premise and not the prime concern , because the author thinks that computer is accessible to almost a major part of the population.
which is mentioned in (A) which is incorrect

Now, traditional medium of information are usually unbiased because those are NOT Created or disseminated by the people involved in POLITICAL ADVOCACY and give info in a balanced way.
What does it means?
It means that, when people involved in political advocacy create information , there will be a chance that they might bias the info in favor of them.
(C) says that :-
C. Information on political issues disseminated through information services does not come almost entirely from advocacy groups that share a single bias.
so one can think of a balanced information which is unbiased.


From where in the argument did you infer the statement mentioned in red ^ ?

Can someone please explain how option A is incorrect? It is assuming that the computer is available to everyone to access the information.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 36

Re: Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to di   [#permalink] 20 Aug 2017, 19:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Political advocacy groups have begun to use information services to di

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.