GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Oct 2018, 15:03

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Pronoun Revision: The lawyers for the patent holder

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Current Student
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4464
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Pronoun Revision: The lawyers for the patent holder  [#permalink]

Show Tags

Updated on: 20 Mar 2017, 01:19
1
11
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

63% (01:35) correct 37% (01:41) wrong based on 745 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

This question is part of the GMAT Club Sentence Correction : Pronoun Revision Project.

The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose an injunction against the hardware manufacturer, arguing that they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against their client.

A. they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against their client

B. the judge act immediately in order to prevent the client from suffering further damages of an economic nature

C. they should act immediately to prevent further economic damages being suffered by the client

D. the judge act immediately in order to prevent them from suffering economic damages further

E. immediate action should be taken to prevent their client from suffering further economic damages

_________________

Originally posted by souvik101990 on 27 Feb 2015, 00:39.
Last edited by abhimahna on 20 Mar 2017, 01:19, edited 1 time in total.
Corrected the underlined portion
Intern
Joined: 06 Mar 2013
Posts: 44
Re: Pronoun Revision: The lawyers for the patent holder  [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Feb 2015, 02:16
I believe E should be the answer. However, 'arguing that' should not be underlined in the original question.
_________________

Best Regards!

Consider +1 KUDOS if you find this post useful

Current Student
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4464
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: Pronoun Revision: The lawyers for the patent holder  [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Mar 2015, 23:38
1
3
The original sentence is problematic in a number of ways. First, its use of the pronoun
“they” is incorrect in the first instance. The first “they” should refer to the federal judge,
who is singular. Hence, the use of the plural pronoun “they” is incorrect, particularly
when viewed in conjunction with the second pronoun “their” which correctly refers to
the lawyers. Also, the sentence is unnecessarily wordy, with “in order to” detracting
from the sentence’s conciseness. “Damages against their client” is unidiomatic.

(A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.

(B) This answer choice corrects the pronoun issue. However, this sentence is even
more unnecessarily wordy and awkward, replacing “economic damages” with
“damages of an economic nature.” Also, “the client” is an awkward use of the article
“the” given that “the client” refers to the patent holder, which appears in the sentence.

(C) The sentence incorrectly retains the first “they” pronoun error, though it omits the
use of the second “their.” Also, “the client” is an awkward use of the article “the” given
that “the client” refers to the patent holder, which appears in the sentence.

(D) This choice’s use of “them” incorrectly suggests that the lawyers are to be
protected from economic harm rather than their client, the patent holder.

(E) CORRECT. This sentence remedies the pronoun issue, and uses “their” correctly
in the second part of the sentence. It is also clear and concise.
_________________
Retired Moderator
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 508
Re: Pronoun Revision: The lawyers for the patent holder  [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 May 2015, 05:25
souvik101990 wrote:
The original sentence is problematic in a number of ways. First, its use of the pronoun
“they” is incorrect in the first instance. The first “they” should refer to the federal judge,
who is singular. Hence, the use of the plural pronoun “they” is incorrect, particularly
when viewed in conjunction with the second pronoun “their” which correctly refers to
the lawyers. Also, the sentence is unnecessarily wordy, with “in order to” detracting
from the sentence’s conciseness. “Damages against their client” is unidiomatic.

(A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.

(B) This answer choice corrects the pronoun issue. However, this sentence is even
more unnecessarily wordy and awkward, replacing “economic damages” with
“damages of an economic nature.” Also, “the client” is an awkward use of the article
“the” given that “the client” refers to the patent holder, which appears in the sentence.

(C) The sentence incorrectly retains the first “they” pronoun error, though it omits the
use of the second “their.” Also, “the client” is an awkward use of the article “the” given
that “the client” refers to the patent holder, which appears in the sentence.

(D) This choice’s use of “them” incorrectly suggests that the lawyers are to be
protected from economic harm rather than their client, the patent holder.

(E) CORRECT. This sentence remedies the pronoun issue, and uses “their” correctly
in the second part of the sentence. It is also clear and concise.

In E, it is not clear who will take the action. The doer of the action is missing here. In original sentence it is mentioned that somebody (they - either lawyers or judge) will take the action. So, there is an information gap in this choice. Can a choice be considered correct without communicating all information?
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2014
Posts: 275
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.76
Re: Pronoun Revision: The lawyers for the patent holder  [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Jun 2015, 03:21
Can somebody throw more light on why B is incorrect
apart from being wordy
Intern
Joined: 06 Mar 2013
Posts: 44
Re: Pronoun Revision: The lawyers for the patent holder  [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Jun 2015, 01:00
kanigmat011 wrote:
Can somebody throw more light on why B is incorrect
apart from being wordy

Hi kanigmat011,

'Awkward/Wordy' is the only reason for elimination. I cannot find another reason either!
_________________

Best Regards!

Consider +1 KUDOS if you find this post useful

Director
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 511
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Pronoun Revision: The lawyers for the patent holder  [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Mar 2017, 12:15
This question is part of the GMAT Club Sentence Correction : Pronoun Revision Project.

The lawyers for the patent holder pressed the federal judge to impose an injunction against the hardware manufacturer, arguing that they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against their client.

A. they should take immediate action in order to prevent further economic damages against their client
'They' and 'Them' are ambigous

B. the judge act immediately in order to prevent the client from suffering further damages of an economic nature
Economic damages to damages of economic nature. .Option is unecessarily wordy.

C. they should act immediately to prevent further economic damages being suffered by the client
'They' is ambigious

D. the judge act immediately in order to prevent them from suffering economic damages further

E. immediate action should be taken to prevent their client from suffering further economic damages
Correct choice.
Intern
Joined: 25 May 2018
Posts: 9
Re: Pronoun Revision: The lawyers for the patent holder  [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Jun 2018, 07:15
hi

I have a doubt.

Is the "argue that.... " structure correct?
Argue does not take command subjunctive.

thanks
Re: Pronoun Revision: The lawyers for the patent holder &nbs [#permalink] 05 Jun 2018, 07:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Pronoun Revision: The lawyers for the patent holder

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.