GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 24 Sep 2018, 00:44

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Posts: 15
Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jan 2010, 12:48
1
3
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

64% (01:06) correct 36% (01:07) wrong based on 184 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its necessity if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is for men with comparable jobs and work experience.

(A) if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is
(B) if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
(C) because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those
(D) if only as a result of the fact that salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
(E) if only because women's average salaries are still considerably lower than it is

GMAT 800:B but I think this wrong,What do you think?
 Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount Codes Math Revolution Discount Codes e-GMAT Discount Codes
Intern
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 5
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Mar 2017, 09:36
5
the usage of IT IS here is wrong, Those makes better sense to the sentence , Nice explanation Cipher. kudos +1
##### General Discussion
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jun 2009
Posts: 281
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jan 2010, 15:32
2
samrand wrote:
Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its necessity if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is for men with comparable jobs and work experience.
1.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is
2.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
3.because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those
4.if only as a result of the fact that salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
5.if only because women's average salaries are still considerably lowerh than it is

GMAT 800:B but I think this wrong,What do you think?

I think its right,

1.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is --usage of IT IS is making a pronoun and comparison error here, average salaries for women is being compared with men' salary but with wrong pronoun
2.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those --Correct
3.because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those --removal of If only changes the meaning of the sentence
4.if only as a result of the fact that salaries for women are still considerably lower than those --As as result of the fact is making the sentence wordy
5.if only because women's average salaries are still considerably lowerh than it is --wrong way of comparison between Men's Salary and Women's Salary.
Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 83
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2012, 06:27
Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its necessity if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is for men with comparable jobs and work experience.

(A) if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is
(B) if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
(C) because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those
(D) if only as a result of the fact that salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
(E) if only because women's average salaries are still considerably lowerh than it is
Intern
Joined: 15 Apr 2012
Posts: 8
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2012, 06:36
syog wrote:
Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its necessity if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is for men with comparable jobs and work experience.
1.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is
2.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
3.because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those
4.if only as a result of the fact that salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
5.if only because women's average salaries are still considerably lowerh than it is

Why is "if only" here?

IMO
'If only' is used to suggest that there is only one reason for the equal rights amendment.... i.e. the inequality in their salaries.
Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 83
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2012, 06:57
Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary says -

if only

used to say that you wish something was true or that something had happened
If only I were rich.
If only I knew her name.
If only he'd remembered to send that letter.
If only I had gone by taxi.

mayankdangi wrote:
syog wrote:
Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its necessity if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is for men with comparable jobs and work experience.
1.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is
2.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
3.because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those
4.if only as a result of the fact that salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
5.if only because women's average salaries are still considerably lowerh than it is

Why is "if only" here?

IMO
'If only' is used to suggest that there is only one reason for the equal rights amendment.... i.e. the inequality in their salaries.
Manager
Joined: 05 Mar 2012
Posts: 53
Schools: Tepper '15 (WL)
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2012, 12:53
http://www.englishforums.com/English/Be ... g/post.htm

Apparently it is idiomatic. I have never heard anyone use "if only because" in a sentence though.
Manager
Status: Student
Joined: 26 Aug 2013
Posts: 207
Location: France
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: EMLYON FT'16
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
GPA: 3.44
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Dec 2013, 15:06
I only because is not wordy and not idiomatic?
_________________

Think outside the box

Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2012
Posts: 795
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Dec 2013, 18:41
I'm with cipher on this one...nice explanation. I'll make a quick comment here about option 3.

3.because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those --removal of If only changes the meaning of the sentence

I agree that there is a meaning difference when changing "if only" with "because", but the meaning is still very logical with "because". There is a bigger meaning issue with "only" in the sentence. Adding "only" in the sentence creates illogical meaning. Women's salaries are "only" lower than those for men? Does that mean that their wages are higher than those of aliens? Robots? That word "only" ruins the meaning of the sentence.

KW
_________________

Kyle Widdison | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | Utah

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4543
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Dec 2013, 22:02
2
1
Let me add yet another dimension to this tangle. Normally the expression ‘if only” is used to express a subjunctive desire or wish as in --- If only I were Bill Gates, I would donate half my earnings to charity, --- or --If only we had the means to control the rain gods, we would not suffer drought etc, etc; Mostly these are hypothetical fancying and unachievable in the normal course.

But in the context, four of the choices carry this phrase, which IMO is weird; unfortunately, the only other choice 3 is still more muddied because of the improper placement of the restrictive adverbial modifier ‘only’. For choice 3 to mean something worthwhile, we need to drop the word ‘only’ outright.

Among the rest of the four choices, 1 and 5 can be easily dropped on subject- pronoun number disagreement alone. Between 2 and 4, the construction is convoluted in choice 4, leaving only 2 as the best of the available choices. So one may see why we are forced to take B as somewhat correct.
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Director
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 523
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Mar 2017, 08:46
Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its necessity if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is for men with comparable jobs and work experience.
1.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is
Subject Verb agreement issue

2.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
Correct answer,with correct meaning

3.because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those
are only makes the sentence confusing because the meaning is altered.

4.if only as a result of the fact that salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
Change in meaning

5.if only because women's average salaries are still considerably lowerh than it is
Subject Verb Agreement issue
Manager
Joined: 10 Apr 2015
Posts: 195
GPA: 3.31
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Mar 2017, 08:43
Just going by grammar-
salaries - it = Wrong combination

Correct -
2.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
_________________

In case you find my posts helpful, give me Kudos. Thank you.

Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2018
Posts: 247
Location: United States (ID)
GPA: 3.33
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2018, 21:47
KyleWiddison wrote:
I'm with cipher on this one...nice explanation. I'll make a quick comment here about option 3.

3.because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those --removal of If only changes the meaning of the sentence

I agree that there is a meaning difference when changing "if only" with "because", but the meaning is still very logical with "because". There is a bigger meaning issue with "only" in the sentence. Adding "only" in the sentence creates illogical meaning. Women's salaries are "only" lower than those for men? Does that mean that their wages are higher than those of aliens? Robots? That word "only" ruins the meaning of the sentence.

KW

hello, so, Gmat really has such structure "if only" on the actual exam?
I almost never see such structure on gmat. Particularly, in this question, the word "only" is enough for test takers to find the correct answer. Help me.
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its &nbs [#permalink] 04 Feb 2018, 21:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

## Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.