It is currently 25 Feb 2018, 01:56

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Posts: 15
Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jan 2010, 11:48
1
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

67% (01:02) correct 33% (01:03) wrong based on 128 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its necessity if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is for men with comparable jobs and work experience.

(A) if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is
(B) if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
(C) because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those
(D) if only as a result of the fact that salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
(E) if only because women's average salaries are still considerably lower than it is

[Reveal] Spoiler:
GMAT 800:B but I think this wrong,What do you think?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesMagoosh Discount CodesEconomist GMAT Tutor Discount Codes
2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2009
Posts: 294
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jan 2010, 14:32
2
This post received
KUDOS
samrand wrote:
Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its necessity if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is for men with comparable jobs and work experience.
1.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is
2.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
3.because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those
4.if only as a result of the fact that salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
5.if only because women's average salaries are still considerably lowerh than it is

GMAT 800:B but I think this wrong,What do you think?



I think its right,

1.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is --usage of IT IS is making a pronoun and comparison error here, average salaries for women is being compared with men' salary but with wrong pronoun
2.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those --Correct
3.because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those --removal of If only changes the meaning of the sentence
4.if only as a result of the fact that salaries for women are still considerably lower than those --As as result of the fact is making the sentence wordy
5.if only because women's average salaries are still considerably lowerh than it is --wrong way of comparison between Men's Salary and Women's Salary.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 86
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2012, 05:27
Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its necessity if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is for men with comparable jobs and work experience.

(A) if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is
(B) if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
(C) because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those
(D) if only as a result of the fact that salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
(E) if only because women's average salaries are still considerably lowerh than it is
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Apr 2012
Posts: 8
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2012, 05:36
syog wrote:
Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its necessity if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is for men with comparable jobs and work experience.
1.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is
2.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
3.because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those
4.if only as a result of the fact that salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
5.if only because women's average salaries are still considerably lowerh than it is


Why is "if only" here?


IMO
'If only' is used to suggest that there is only one reason for the equal rights amendment.... i.e. the inequality in their salaries.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 86
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2012, 05:57
Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary says -

if only

used to say that you wish something was true or that something had happened
If only I were rich.
If only I knew her name.
If only he'd remembered to send that letter.
If only I had gone by taxi.


mayankdangi wrote:
syog wrote:
Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its necessity if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is for men with comparable jobs and work experience.
1.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is
2.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
3.because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those
4.if only as a result of the fact that salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
5.if only because women's average salaries are still considerably lowerh than it is


Why is "if only" here?


IMO
'If only' is used to suggest that there is only one reason for the equal rights amendment.... i.e. the inequality in their salaries.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Mar 2012
Posts: 62
Schools: Tepper '15 (WL)
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2012, 11:53
http://www.englishforums.com/English/Be ... g/post.htm

Apparently it is idiomatic. I have never heard anyone use "if only because" in a sentence though.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Status: Student
Joined: 26 Aug 2013
Posts: 250
Location: France
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: EMLYON FT'16
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
GPA: 3.44
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Dec 2013, 14:06
I only because is not wordy and not idiomatic?
_________________

Think outside the box

Expert Post
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 30 Apr 2012
Posts: 798
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Dec 2013, 17:41
I'm with cipher on this one...nice explanation. I'll make a quick comment here about option 3.

3.because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those --removal of If only changes the meaning of the sentence

I agree that there is a meaning difference when changing "if only" with "because", but the meaning is still very logical with "because". There is a bigger meaning issue with "only" in the sentence. Adding "only" in the sentence creates illogical meaning. Women's salaries are "only" lower than those for men? Does that mean that their wages are higher than those of aliens? Robots? That word "only" ruins the meaning of the sentence.

KW
_________________


Kyle Widdison | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | Utah


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile



2 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4327
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Dec 2013, 21:02
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Let me add yet another dimension to this tangle. Normally the expression ‘if only” is used to express a subjunctive desire or wish as in --- If only I were Bill Gates, I would donate half my earnings to charity, --- or --If only we had the means to control the rain gods, we would not suffer drought etc, etc; Mostly these are hypothetical fancying and unachievable in the normal course.

But in the context, four of the choices carry this phrase, which IMO is weird; unfortunately, the only other choice 3 is still more muddied because of the improper placement of the restrictive adverbial modifier ‘only’. For choice 3 to mean something worthwhile, we need to drop the word ‘only’ outright.

Among the rest of the four choices, 1 and 5 can be easily dropped on subject- pronoun number disagreement alone. Between 2 and 4, the construction is convoluted in choice 4, leaving only 2 as the best of the available choices. So one may see why we are forced to take B as somewhat correct.
_________________

Can you solve at least some SC questions without delving into the initial statement?

Narendran 98845 44509

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10340
Premium Member
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Mar 2017, 09:44
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 479
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Mar 2017, 07:46
Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its necessity if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is for men with comparable jobs and work experience.
1.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is
Subject Verb agreement issue

2.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
Correct answer,with correct meaning

3.because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those
are only makes the sentence confusing because the meaning is altered.

4.if only as a result of the fact that salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
Change in meaning

5.if only because women's average salaries are still considerably lowerh than it is
Subject Verb Agreement issue
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 10 Apr 2015
Posts: 204
GPA: 3.31
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Mar 2017, 07:43
Just going by grammar-
salaries - it = Wrong combination

Correct -
2.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
_________________

In case you find my posts helpful, give me Kudos. Thank you.

5 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 5
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
Reviews Badge
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Mar 2017, 08:36
5
This post received
KUDOS
the usage of IT IS here is wrong, Those makes better sense to the sentence , Nice explanation Cipher. kudos +1
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 08 Jan 2018
Posts: 158
Location: United States (ID)
GPA: 3.33
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Feb 2018, 20:47
KyleWiddison wrote:
I'm with cipher on this one...nice explanation. I'll make a quick comment here about option 3.

3.because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those --removal of If only changes the meaning of the sentence

I agree that there is a meaning difference when changing "if only" with "because", but the meaning is still very logical with "because". There is a bigger meaning issue with "only" in the sentence. Adding "only" in the sentence creates illogical meaning. Women's salaries are "only" lower than those for men? Does that mean that their wages are higher than those of aliens? Robots? That word "only" ruins the meaning of the sentence.

KW


hello, so, Gmat really has such structure "if only" on the actual exam?
I almost never see such structure on gmat. Particularly, in this question, the word "only" is enough for test takers to find the correct answer. Help me.
Re: Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its   [#permalink] 04 Feb 2018, 20:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.