It is currently 29 Jun 2017, 04:19

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Q5: Vorland s government is planning a nationwide ban on

Author Message
SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1705
Location: Dhaka
Q5: Vorland s government is planning a nationwide ban on [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2005, 12:40
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Q5:
Vorlandâ€™s government is planning a nationwide ban on smoking in restaurants. The objection that the ban would reduce restaurantsâ€™ revenues is ill founded. Several towns in Vorland enacted restaurant smoking restrictions five years ago. Since then, the amount the government collects in restaurant meal taxes in those towns has increased 34 percent, on average, but only 26 percent elsewhere in Vorland. The amount collected in restaurant meal taxes closely reflects restaurantsâ€™ revenues.
Which of the following, if true, most undermines the defense of the governmentâ€™s plan?

A. When the state first imposed a restaurant meal tax, opponents predicted that restaurantsâ€™ revenues would decline as a result, a prediction that proved to be correct in the short term.
B. The tax on meals in restaurants is higher than the tax on many other goods and services.
C. Over the last five years, smoking has steadily declined throughout Vorland.
D. In many of the towns that restrict smoking in restaurants, restaurants can maintain separate dining areas where smoking is permitted.
E. Over the last five years, government revenues from sales taxes have grown no faster in the towns with restaurant smoking restrictions than in the towns that have no such restrictions.
_________________

hey ya......

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 483
Location: Chicago

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2005, 13:40
D..so people still can smoke in restaurants..
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Director
Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 591

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2005, 13:43
I agree, For me D is the best choice
Director
Joined: 21 Aug 2005
Posts: 789

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2005, 14:30
I think it is D. If it is really true, as in the past, that there might be a slump in revenues (eventhough short-term), the defense's argument is undermined.
SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1705
Location: Dhaka

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2005, 02:54
D is the OA.
_________________

hey ya......

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5218

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2005, 07:04
D undermines the the governments plan by effectively giving smokers another option: to smoke in a designated smoking section.
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 454
Location: New York
Re: CR # Vorland's Gorvemetn [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2005, 07:10
Another D. If you can still smoke in the restaurant, then revenues may still be there, but if smoking is banned altogether...then revenues may decrease...

nakib77 wrote:
Q5:
Vorlandâ€™s government is planning a nationwide ban on smoking in restaurants. The objection that the ban would reduce restaurantsâ€™ revenues is ill founded. Several towns in Vorland enacted restaurant smoking restrictions five years ago. Since then, the amount the government collects in restaurant meal taxes in those towns has increased 34 percent, on average, but only 26 percent elsewhere in Vorland. The amount collected in restaurant meal taxes closely reflects restaurantsâ€™ revenues.
Which of the following, if true, most undermines the defense of the governmentâ€™s plan?

A. When the state first imposed a restaurant meal tax, opponents predicted that restaurantsâ€™ revenues would decline as a result, a prediction that proved to be correct in the short term.
B. The tax on meals in restaurants is higher than the tax on many other goods and services.
C. Over the last five years, smoking has steadily declined throughout Vorland.
D. In many of the towns that restrict smoking in restaurants, restaurants can maintain separate dining areas where smoking is permitted.
E. Over the last five years, government revenues from sales taxes have grown no faster in the towns with restaurant smoking restrictions than in the towns that have no such restrictions.
Re: CR # Vorland's Gorvemetn   [#permalink] 11 Oct 2005, 07:10
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Og 2016 Q3 A provincial government plans to raise the gasoline tax 1 01 Sep 2015, 12:05
3 The people of Prohibitionland are considering banning the 7 10 Oct 2015, 03:43
The people of Prohibitionland are considering banning the 7 27 Nov 2009, 11:19
Vorland s government is planning a nationwide ban on smoking 5 21 Jul 2009, 08:43
The government has proposed a plan requiring young people to 8 06 Jun 2009, 13:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by