Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 20:12 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 20:12
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,754
Own Kudos:
37,012
 [10]
Given Kudos: 4,856
Posts: 4,754
Kudos: 37,012
 [10]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
TaN1213
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Last visit: 12 Mar 2019
Posts: 354
Own Kudos:
909
 [1]
Given Kudos: 644
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 354
Kudos: 909
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
broall
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Last visit: 07 Apr 2021
Posts: 1,138
Own Kudos:
7,148
 [2]
Given Kudos: 65
Status:Long way to go!
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 1,138
Kudos: 7,148
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmatexam439
User avatar
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,064
Own Kudos:
2,159
 [1]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Posts: 1,064
Kudos: 2,159
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The environmental community across the globe is currently in the middle of a huge debate whose aim is not only finding out the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also to determine whether such a move is warranted by the current situation.

(A) whose aim is not only finding out the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also to determine

(B) which is aimed at finding out not only the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also determining

(C) that is aimed at finding out not only the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also to determine

(D) the aim of which is to not only find out the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also to determine

(E) whose aim is not only to find out the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also to determine
User avatar
Turkish
Joined: 13 Jun 2012
Last visit: 09 Apr 2023
Posts: 164
Own Kudos:
594
 [2]
Given Kudos: 467
Location: United States
WE:Supply Chain Management (Computer Hardware)
Posts: 164
Kudos: 594
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Going with E

Reason Not only X but also Y ; also whose can refer to inanimate things. I remember this question, when RonPurewal said it okay to use whose. Below is the question.

In 1988, the Council on Economic Priorities began publishing Shopping for a Better World ,whose thesis was simple: consumers have the power to change companies by the simple expedient of refusing to buy.

Here few more examples he gave.

example:
california, whose hispanic population has been growing by X people per year, has...

or
i'm still looking for an editorial whose author is a bona fide conservative.
User avatar
reach_richa
Joined: 12 Jun 2017
Last visit: 24 Aug 2018
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
GMAT 1: 570 Q45 V23
GPA: 3.5
GMAT 1: 570 Q45 V23
Posts: 4
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can you please also throw some light on the usage of "whose" , "which", "them", "those" etc. Like exactly what is appropriate.
User avatar
sdlife
Joined: 21 Jul 2015
Last visit: 05 Nov 2025
Posts: 185
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 489
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
Posts: 185
Kudos: 68
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
reach_richa
Can you please also throw some light on the usage of "whose" , "which", "them", "those" etc. Like exactly what is appropriate.

Not sure I understand your question correctly, but use of which, whose, that, of which is CORRECT to refer to debate. The major issue in this question is parallelism, which determines the correct answer.
User avatar
sdlife
Joined: 21 Jul 2015
Last visit: 05 Nov 2025
Posts: 185
Own Kudos:
68
 [1]
Given Kudos: 489
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
Posts: 185
Kudos: 68
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
harsh2112
Can someone please explain the error in B?

B has parallelism issues. Not Only X but also Y idiom is used. In this idiom X and Y must be parallel.

'Not only' is followed by the feasibility (noun) while 'But also' is followed by determining (participle - simple gerund). Noun cannot be parallel to ING form.
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,393
Own Kudos:
15,523
 [3]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,393
Kudos: 15,523
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sdlife
harsh2112
Can someone please explain the error in B?

B has parallelism issues. Not Only X but also Y idiom is used. In this idiom X and Y must be parallel.

'Not only' is followed by the feasibility (noun) while 'But also' is followed by determining (participle - simple gerund). Noun cannot be parallel to ING form.

Not exactly - a noun can be parallel to an -ing form (e.g., a gerund - a gerund is a noun).

The problem in B is the meaning:

"Finding out" has two objects, "feasibilty" and "determining". "Finding out feasibilty" makes sense, but "finding out determing" does not make any sense.
User avatar
rahul16singh28
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Last visit: 09 Jun 2020
Posts: 428
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 752
Location: Malaysia
GPA: 3.95
WE:Consulting (Energy)
Posts: 428
Kudos: 499
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Isn't "whose" modifying huge debate?
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Although we normally use "whose" to refer to people, we can also use it where we might use the word "which's," since that isn't a word! ;)

So we can say "I work for an agency whose purpose is to eliminate corruption."
User avatar
adkikani
User avatar
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Last visit: 24 Dec 2023
Posts: 1,236
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Posts: 1,236
Kudos: 1,343
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja sayantanc2k generis
GMATNinjaTwo


I do not like - whose - much here.

Is not normally the pronoun - whose - is used a possessive pronoun.

E.g. A man,whose car got stolen, worked in a bank.

Here, in the main sentence, can whose refer to debate?
User avatar
abhinav2892
Joined: 07 Dec 2016
Last visit: 26 Nov 2024
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GPA: 4
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
Posts: 40
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The environmental community across the globe is currently in the middle of a huge debate whose aim is not only finding out the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also to determine whether such a move is warranted by the current situation.

(A) whose aim is not only finding out the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also to determine ( in case of not only X...... but also Y.... ) ( X & Y must be structurally parallel )

(B) which is aimed at finding out not only the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also determining ( in case of not only X...... but also Y.... ) ( X & Y must be structurally parallel )

(C) that is aimed at finding out not only the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also to determine - parallelism error ( in case of not only X...... but also Y.... ) ( X & Y must be structurally parallel )

(D) the aim of which is to not only find out the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also to determine ( in case of not only X...... but also Y.... ) ( X & Y must be structurally parallel )

(E) whose aim is not only to find out the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also to determine ( correct answer )
User avatar
Helium
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Last visit: 01 Jun 2020
Posts: 454
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 118
Location: France
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 3.82
WE:Consulting (Other)
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
Posts: 454
Kudos: 808
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The sentence is testing you on parallelism of not only...but also.
(A) Not only is followed by finding, but also should also be followed by determining and not to determine.
(B) The use of which without a preceding comma is incorrect; the placement of finding before not only is incorrect; finding needs to come after not only in order to parallel the
determining after but also.
(C) Placement of finding is a problem as described in B above.
(D) The to should be placed after not only so that it can be parallel to the to after but also.
(E) The placement of to find and to determine is perfectly parallel and makes E the correct answer.
User avatar
arvind910619
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 845
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 755
Status:Learning
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
Posts: 845
Kudos: 607
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
carcass
The environmental community across the globe is currently in the middle of a huge debate whose aim is not only finding out the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also to determine whether such a move is warranted by the current situation.


(A) whose aim is not only finding out the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also to determine

(B) which is aimed at finding out not only the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also determining

(C) that is aimed at finding out not only the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also to determine

(D) the aim of which is to not only find out the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also to determine

(E) whose aim is not only to find out the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also to determine


This is a very good question to test us on parallelism and idiom Not only but also.
Here is my take on this question.

A the parallelism is not proper here as clause after but also should be parallel to the the clause after Not only. finding and to determine are not parallel.
B again the the sentence is changed a little bit but the inherent flaw of parallelism is still present in the sentence. feasibility is not parallel to determining.
C parallelism error as feasibility is not parallel to to determine
D Again same parallelism issue and the aim of which is more wordy.
E correct as the parallelism fits nicely
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,087
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
carcass
The environmental community across the globe is currently in the middle of a huge debate whose aim is not only finding out the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also to determine whether such a move is warranted by the current situation.


(A) whose aim is not only finding out the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also to determine

(B) which is aimed at finding out not only the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also determining

(C) that is aimed at finding out not only the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also to determine

(D) the aim of which is to not only find out the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also to determine

(E) whose aim is not only to find out the feasibility of banning Chlorofluorocarbons altogether but also to determine



Official Explanation:



Answer: E

The sentence is testing you on parallelism of not only...but also.

(A) Not only is followed by finding, but also should also be followed by determining and not to determine.

(B) The use of which without a preceding comma is incorrect; the placement of finding before not only is incorrect; finding needs to come after not only in order to parallel the determining after but also.

(C) Placement of finding is a problem as described in B above.

(D) The to should be placed after not only so that it can be parallel to the to after but also.

(E) The placement of to find and to determine is perfectly parallel and makes E the correct answer.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,836
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,836
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts