GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Feb 2019, 06:57

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in February
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272812
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### Free GMAT Prep Hour

February 20, 2019

February 20, 2019

08:00 PM EST

09:00 PM EST

Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. Wednesday, February 20th at 8 PM EST

February 21, 2019

February 21, 2019

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

Kick off your 2019 GMAT prep with a free 7-day boot camp that includes free online lessons, webinars, and a full GMAT course access. Limited for the first 99 registrants! Feb. 21st until the 27th.

# Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2011
Posts: 114
Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 05 Oct 2018, 04:58
5
13
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

67% (02:10) correct 33% (02:15) wrong based on 1081 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of serotonin molecules from the presynaptic cell to receptors on the postsynaptic cell has been identified as a successful treatment for clinical depression for many individuals. A new series of drugs, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, prevent the presynaptic cell from re-uptaking serotonin, thereby allowing normal amounts of serotonin to reach the receptors on the postsynaptic cell.

Which of the following can be correctly inferred from the above statements?

A. If too much serotonin is released to the receptors, a person will feel extremely euphoric.

B. Taking a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor is currently the only successful treatment for clinical depression.

C. Individuals who have normal levels of serotonin uptake do not run the risk of suffering from depression.

D. By not taking a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor, individuals with depression run the risk of depleting their serotonin levels.

E. Taking Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors reduces the incidence of depression in some people.

Any suggestions on how to approach such questions. I was not able to make much out of this, so just made a informed guess (chose E ) and moved on.

Originally posted by Chetangupta on 24 Jul 2011, 09:24.
Last edited by Bunuel on 05 Oct 2018, 04:58, edited 2 times in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Senior Manager
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 474
Re: Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2011, 18:03
2
I also picked E.

Since it is an inference question, the stated inference must be true without the need of an assumption. Looking at the choices, choices B and C look exaggerated, A looks out of scope as it talks about Euphoria. D talks about the scenario when Inhibitors are not taken.

So you are left with E. It is a mild statement (usage of word some) and hence correct choice.

Crick
Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1795
Re: Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2011, 18:03
2
Chetangupta wrote:
Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of serotonin molecules from the presynaptic cell to receptors on the postsynaptic cell has been identified as a successful treatment for clinical depression for many individuals. A new series of drugs, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, prevent the presynaptic cell from re-uptaking serotonin, thereby allowing normal amounts of serotonin to reach the receptors on the postsynaptic cell.

Slowing down the process of serotonin reduction can treat depression. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors slows down the process and helps treat depression.

Which of the following can be correctly inferred from the above statements?

If too much serotonin is released to the receptors, a person will feel extremely euphoric.
>No relation between serotonin and being euphoric is mentioned. We just don't know this info from the passage.

Taking a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor is currently the only successful treatment for clinical depression.
>This is one of the successful treatments. Not the ONLY treatment.

Individuals who have normal levels of serotonin uptake do not run the risk of suffering from depression.
>Serotonin is curative, not preventive.

By not taking a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor, individuals with depression run the risk of depleting their serotonin levels.
>Well well well!!! Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor is just one way to help regulate the serotonin deficit, it is not the ONLY inhibitor with such functionality.

Taking Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors reduces the incidence of depression in some people.
>For sure. Some people(safe word). Inhibitors-Curative. Proven good to treat depression.

Any suggestions on how to approach such questions. I was not able to make much out of this, so just made a informed guess (chose E ) and moved on.

_________________
Manager
Status: Target MBA
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 130
Location: Singapore
Re: Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Oct 2011, 05:58
1
1
Chetangupta wrote:
Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of serotonin molecules from the presynaptic cell to receptors on the postsynaptic cell has been identified as a successful treatment for clinical depression for many individuals. A new series of drugs, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, prevent the presynaptic cell from re-uptaking serotonin, thereby allowing normal amounts of serotonin to reach the receptors on the postsynaptic cell.

Which of the following can be correctly inferred from the above statements?

If too much serotonin is released to the receptors, a person will feel extremely euphoric.
Taking a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor is currently the only successful treatment for clinical depression.
Individuals who have normal levels of serotonin uptake do not run the risk of suffering from depression.
By not taking a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor, individuals with depression run the risk of depleting their serotonin levels.
Taking Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors reduces the incidence of depression in some people.

Any suggestions on how to approach such questions. I was not able to make much out of this, so just made a informed guess (chose E ) and moved on.

Wow wow wow!!! Such a time consuming one. It took me 2 mins to understand why depression is caused and how the new drug treats depression.

Let's do this inference question by POE -
(A) It is not mentioned in argument. Out of scope.
(B) There may other treatments available. Incorrect.
(C) Close one, but a bit extreme.
(D) Same as (C), a bit extreme.
(E) Not-extreme and yes, few people will be relieved on depression.

(E) wins.
_________________

Thanks and Regards,
GM.

Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1111
Location: India
Re: Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2015, 09:34
1
Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of serotonin molecules from the presynaptic cell to receptors on the postsynaptic cell has been identified as a successful treatment for clinical depression for many individuals. A new series of drugs, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, prevent the presynaptic cell from re-uptaking serotonin, thereby allowing normal amounts of serotonin to reach the receptors on the postsynaptic cell.

Which of the following can be correctly inferred from the above statements?

A. If too much serotonin is released to the receptors, a person will feel extremely euphoric......to much serotonin case is completely out of scope.

B. Taking a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor is currently the only successful treatment for clinical depression..............only plays the spoilsport here making this an extreme case.

C. Individuals who have normal levels of serotonin uptake do not run the risk of suffering from depression............we have an argument regarding treatment for depressed people through serotonin and their normal level case is completely out of scope.

I got stuck between D and E, and selected D as I got entrapped in clever wordplay between deficit and depletion of serotonin levels.

D. By not taking a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor, individuals with depression run the risk of depleting their serotonin levels.
This is incorrect for above reason.

E. Taking Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors reduces the incidence of depression in some people.
even though taking inhibitors reduces depression sounds a bit too strong, we have to see the word some which makes the whole sentence come in the scope of the argument.
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2587
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Re: Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Feb 2016, 15:13
Chetangupta wrote:
Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of serotonin molecules from the presynaptic cell to receptors on the postsynaptic cell has been identified as a successful treatment for clinical depression for many individuals. A new series of drugs, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, prevent the presynaptic cell from re-uptaking serotonin, thereby allowing normal amounts of serotonin to reach the receptors on the postsynaptic cell.

Which of the following can be correctly inferred from the above statements?

If too much serotonin is released to the receptors, a person will feel extremely euphoric.
Taking a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor is currently the only successful treatment for clinical depression.
Individuals who have normal levels of serotonin uptake do not run the risk of suffering from depression.
By not taking a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor, individuals with depression run the risk of depleting their serotonin levels.
Taking Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors reduces the incidence of depression in some people.

Any suggestions on how to approach such questions. I was not able to make much out of this, so just made a informed guess (chose E ) and moved on.

I got to C, and this is how I reached to the answer choice

reducing S -> successful treatment for clinical depression in many individuals.
new drug -> SSRI -> prevent from reaching again high levels of S.
thus, SSRI -> allows the "normal" amount of S to reach the receptors.

A. we do not have any information about being euphoric. out.
B. THE ONLY - way too extreme. the argument says that it has been identified as a treatment. not that it is the only treatment.
C. reducing S is a way to treat. but it might be the case that some people with depression do not have high level of S.
D. is too extreme.
E. reduces in some people. written in the same language as the argument...

E for me.
Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2016
Posts: 168
Re: Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2017, 15:58
SSRI is for treating depression. Option (E) talks about the incidence of depression. How can (E) be inferred? What is it that I'm missing here?
Retired Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2897
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2017, 07:16
manhasnoname wrote:
SSRI is for treating depression. Option (E) talks about the incidence of depression. How can (E) be inferred? What is it that I'm missing here?

Here "incidence of depression" is used in the sense "bout of depression". Successful treatment does not necessarily imply complete elimination of the problem - reducing bouts of depression can also be considered successful treatment - improvement in condition implies some level of success in treatment.
Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2016
Posts: 168
Re: Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2017, 16:40
sayantanc2k wrote:
manhasnoname wrote:
SSRI is for treating depression. Option (E) talks about the incidence of depression. How can (E) be inferred? What is it that I'm missing here?

Here "incidence of depression" is used in the sense "bout of depression". Successful treatment does not necessarily imply complete elimination of the problem - reducing bouts of depression can also be considered successful treatment - improvement in condition implies some level of success in treatment.

Once someone is depressed, SSRI will help as mentioned in the question stem.

"treatment", "improvement", "reducing" and even "complete elimination", all these are germane only after "incidence" of depression. (E) is talking about incidence, way before treating it or successfully treating it.

Quite unusually, on this one, it is very hard to buy your reasoning sayantanc2k.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2897
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jan 2017, 17:58
manhasnoname wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:
manhasnoname wrote:
SSRI is for treating depression. Option (E) talks about the incidence of depression. How can (E) be inferred? What is it that I'm missing here?

Here "incidence of depression" is used in the sense "bout of depression". Successful treatment does not necessarily imply complete elimination of the problem - reducing bouts of depression can also be considered successful treatment - improvement in condition implies some level of success in treatment.

Once someone is depressed, SSRI will help as mentioned in the question stem.

"treatment", "improvement", "reducing" and even "complete elimination", all these are germane only after "incidence" of depression. (E) is talking about incidence, way before treating it or successfully treating it.

Quite unusually, on this one, it is very hard to buy your reasoning sayantanc2k.

Please refer to my first sentence in the post: Here "incidence of depression" is used in the sense "bout of depression". In my opinion, the author of this question has used the phrase "incidence of depression" in the sense "bout of depression"(after the treatment), and not in the sense any "any occurrence of depression" (even before treatment) as you indicated. If the meaning you mentioned is what the author of the question meant, then, in my opinion, there is no way option E could be the answer.

If you could elaborate how the meaning you mentioned fits in the argument, then it would be more effective to discuss further.
Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2016
Posts: 168
Re: Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jan 2017, 20:20
sayantanc2k wrote:
manhasnoname wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:
Once someone is depressed, SSRI will help as mentioned in the question stem.

"treatment", "improvement", "reducing" and even "complete elimination", all these are germane only after "incidence" of depression. (E) is talking about incidence, way before treating it or successfully treating it.

Quite unusually, on this one, it is very hard to buy your reasoning sayantanc2k.

Please refer to my first sentence in the post: Here "incidence of depression" is used in the sense "bout of depression". In my opinion, the author of this question has used the phrase "incidence of depression" in the sense "bout of depression"(after the treatment), and not in the sense any "any occurrence of depression" (even before treatment) as you indicated. If the meaning you mentioned is what the author of the question meant, then, in my opinion, there is no way option E could be the answer.

If you could elaborate how the meaning you mentioned fits in the argument, then it would be more effective to discuss further.

I did not intend to convey that (E) is the correct answer based on my reasoning. My concern is that (E) cannot be the answer. (E) doesn't fit in the argument.

How is one supposed to infer authors intention that "incidence" is used in the sense "bout"?
Retired Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2897
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jan 2017, 22:41
manhasnoname wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:

Please refer to my first sentence in the post: Here "incidence of depression" is used in the sense "bout of depression". In my opinion, the author of this question has used the phrase "incidence of depression" in the sense "bout of depression"(after the treatment), and not in the sense any "any occurrence of depression" (even before treatment) as you indicated. If the meaning you mentioned is what the author of the question meant, then, in my opinion, there is no way option E could be the answer.

If you could elaborate how the meaning you mentioned fits in the argument, then it would be more effective to discuss further.

I did not intend to convey that (E) is the correct answer based on my reasoning. My concern is that (E) cannot be the answer. (E) doesn't fit in the argument.

How is one supposed to infer authors intention that "incidence" is used in the sense "bout"?

One Person may have multiple bouts or episodes of depression. The author considers each of such bout or episode one incidence. I do not see any problem with such interpretation. Taking SSRI reduces the number of bouts/ episodes (i.e., incidences) is a correct inference.

What I understand is that you are suggesting that the number of incidences refer to the number of people who get depression, i.e. even if one person gets depression repeatedly, his case would be considered one single incidence of depression. I am not sure whether this interpretation (in medical terms) is correct, but in context of this particular question, this is not the intended meaning of the author.
Director
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 628
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2017, 20:45
Only E is logical, Though i was perplexed by those complex terminology. I went through POE.
Other options are either definite or Extreme.
Only E shows a probable chance.
Hence, I opted E.
:D .
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2015
Posts: 432
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.33
Re: Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jul 2017, 05:32
+1 for option E. The vocabulary is tricky but the inference is best mentioned in option E.
_________________

" The few , the fearless "

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 3632
Re: Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Oct 2018, 04:36
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: Reducing the serotonin deficit caused by a breakdown in the passage of   [#permalink] 05 Oct 2018, 04:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by