Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 21:55 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 21:55
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2   3 
User avatar
GMATking94
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2022
Last visit: 18 Apr 2025
Posts: 180
Own Kudos:
75
Given Kudos: 125
Status:Do or Die
Location: India
Schools: IIMB '25 (A) IIMC '25 (A) IIMA '25 (D) ISB '25 (I)
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
GPA: 4
WE:Operations (Energy)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: IIMB '25 (A) IIMC '25 (A) IIMA '25 (D) ISB '25 (I)
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
Posts: 180
Kudos: 75
Regulators are likely to end what are, in effect, long-standing exempt 14 Feb 2023, 07:23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Experts,

GMATNinja egmat AndrewN GMATGuruNY

Can anyone please explain how we use parallelism in this question to eliminate the wrong answers. I followed the same but could not see how (E) is better.

Thanks.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [1]
Regulators are likely to end what are, in effect, long-standing exempt 22 Feb 2023, 08:42
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATking94
Hi Experts,

[url=https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=GMATNinja%5D%5Bb%5DGMATNinja%5B/b%5D%5B/url%5D [url=https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=egmat%5D%5Bb%5Degmat%5B/b%5D%5B/url%5D [url=https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=AndrewN%5D%5Bb%5DAndrewN%5B/b%5D%5B/url%5D [url=https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=GMATGuruNY%5D%5Bb%5DGMATGuruNY%5B/b%5D%5B/url%5D

Can anyone please explain how we use parallelism in this question to eliminate the wrong answers. I followed the same but could not see how (E) is better.

Thanks.
Show more
I probably wouldn't think of this as a parallelism question, exactly. The more important thing here is to focus on the structure and logic of the comparison. (For more on parallelism, start with this video.)

Here, you can scrap (B) and (D) right away because of the phrase "more hours per month as". It should be "more hours per month than" -- as in, "these pilots are permitted to fly more hours than those pilots".

There's a lot of discussion in the thread about "as much as" vs "as many as". Please review the earlier posts if you haven't already, but here are some extra examples that might help:

    "Pilots of small turboprop aircraft (s.t.a.) are permitted to fly as many as 50 more hours per month than pilots at larger airlines do."

Most people are okay with this one -- we're referring to some NUMBER of hours (the difference in hours between the two groups), and we use "many" since hours are countable.

    "Pilots of s.t.a. are permitted to fly as many as 20 percent more hours per month than pilots at larger airlines do."

Changing "50" to "20 percent" doesn't change the meaning: we're still talking about some NUMBER of hours, and since hours are countable, "many" is fine.

So (A) and (C) are out, and (E) is our best option.
User avatar
ahamd
User avatar
Joined: 25 Feb 2015
Last visit: 26 Jun 2024
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
4
Given Kudos: 148
Posts: 18
Kudos: 4
Regulators are likely to end what are, in effect, long-standing exempt 26 Mar 2023, 07:58
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
Hello Everyone!

Let's tackle this question, one problem at a time, and narrow it down to the right answer quickly! To begin, let's take a quick scan over the options and highlight any major differences in orange:

Regulators are likely to end what are, in effect, long-standing exemptions permitting pilots of small turboprop aircraft at small carriers to fly as much as 20 percent more hours per month than pilots at larger airlines fly, with the consequence that some carriers could be forced to hire additional pilots.

A. as much as 20 percent more hours per month than pilots at larger airlines fly, with the consequence that
B. as many as 20 percent more hours per month as pilots at larger airlines, and
C. more hours per month, as much as 20 percent, than pilots at larger airlines; consequently
D. as much as 20 percent more hours per month as larger airlines’ pilots, so
E. as many as 20 percent more hours per month than pilots at larger airlines do, and consequently

After a quick scan over the options, there are a few things we can focus on to narrow down our choices:

1. as much as vs. as many as (Idioms)
2. than vs. as (Comparisons/Idioms)
3. how each option ends (Meaning/Punctuation/Conjunctions)

Let's start with #1 on our list: as much as vs. as many as. This is a common grammar issue people often get mixed up, so here is a quick lesson on when to use "as much as" versus "as many as":

as much as = non-countable nouns & percentages
That pair of shoes costs as much as my last month's rent!
The failure rate for this class can be as much as 25 percent.

as many as = countable nouns
There will be as many as 250 people at our graduation party.
My coworkers work as many as 15 percent more hours than I do each week.

So let's take a closer look at our options and eliminate the ones that don't use the correct idiom:

A. as much as 20 percent more hours per month than pilots at larger airlines fly, with the consequence that
B. as many as 20 percent more hours per month as pilots at larger airlines, and
C. more hours per month, as much as 20 percent, than pilots at larger airlines; consequently
D. as much as 20 percent more hours per month as larger airlines’ pilots, so
E. as many as 20 percent more hours per month than pilots at larger airlines do, and consequently

We can eliminate options A, C, & D because they don't use the correct "as many as" to refer to "hours," which are countable.

Now that we have it narrowed down to only 2 options, let's take a closer look at each one to find any other problems. Remember, we can look at "than/as" and how each option ends to determine if they create a clear and concise statement!

B. as many as 20 percent more hours per month as pilots at larger airlines, and
This is INCORRECT for a couple reasons. First, when comparing two items, we must use "X is more than Y," and not "X is more as Y." Second, the comparisons aren't parallel. This sentence compares the hours pilots at smaller carriers fly to pilots at larger airlines. Comparing hours flown to pilots isn't parallel - we must compare hours to hours!

E. as many as 20 percent more hours per month than pilots at larger airlines do, and consequently
This is CORRECT! It uses the correct idioms "as many as" and "X is more than Y." It also compares the hours that pilots at smaller carriers fly to the hours pilots at larger airlines fly, which is parallel.

There you have it - option E is the correct choice! If you can become familiar with common idioms and comparison rules, these types of questions are much easier to tackle on the GMAT exam when you spot them!


Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
Show more

Hi,I'm confused with the use of "do".
I felt the that the verb is missing in the portion before than(pilots of small turboprop aircraft at small carriers to as many as 20 percent more hours per month).

Can you please help?
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
Regulators are likely to end what are, in effect, long-standing exempt 26 Mar 2023, 22:34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ahamd
Hi,I'm confused with the use of "do".
I felt the that the verb is missing in the portion before than(pilots of small turboprop aircraft at small carriers to as many as 20 percent more hours per month).

Can you please help?
Show more
Hi ahamd,

That do doesn't refer to a complete verb here. Instead, it refers back to a verb form (to fly).

1. ... exemptions permitting pilots of small turboprop aircraft at small carriers to fly as many as 20 percent more hours per month than pilots at larger airlines do...
User avatar
ahamd
User avatar
Joined: 25 Feb 2015
Last visit: 26 Jun 2024
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
4
Given Kudos: 148
Posts: 18
Kudos: 4
Regulators are likely to end what are, in effect, long-standing exempt 26 Mar 2023, 23:31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun
ahamd
Hi,I'm confused with the use of "do".
I felt the that the verb is missing in the portion before than(pilots of small turboprop aircraft at small carriers to as many as 20 percent more hours per month).

Can you please help?
Hi ahamd,

That do doesn't refer to a complete verb here. Instead, it refers back to a verb form (to fly).

1. ... exemptions permitting pilots of small turboprop aircraft at small carriers to fly as many as 20 percent more hours per month than pilots at larger airlines do...
Show more

Hi AjiteshArun,
Thanks for your kind response.
If you can help me with one more clarification ,it will be a great help
Can we say that "to" is silent before "do" as "to" is already used before fly?
User avatar
joe123x
User avatar
Joined: 03 Oct 2022
Last visit: 16 Oct 2025
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
21
 [1]
Given Kudos: 53
GMAT 1: 610 Q40 V34
GMAT 1: 610 Q40 V34
Posts: 84
Kudos: 21
 [1]
Regulators are likely to end what are, in effect, long-standing exempt 27 Mar 2023, 00:45
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ahamd
AjiteshArun
ahamd
Hi,I'm confused with the use of "do".
I felt the that the verb is missing in the portion before than(pilots of small turboprop aircraft at small carriers to as many as 20 percent more hours per month).

Can you please help?
Hi ahamd,

That do doesn't refer to a complete verb here. Instead, it refers back to a verb form (to fly).

1. ... exemptions permitting pilots of small turboprop aircraft at small carriers to fly as many as 20 percent more hours per month than pilots at larger airlines do...

Hi AjiteshArun,
Thanks for your kind response.
If you can help me with one more clarification ,it will be a great help
Can we say that "to" is silent before "do" as "to" is already used before fly?
Show more

Hello Ahmad,

No, "to" here is not needed befire do, as "do" refers to "fly". Remove everything between these sentences "permitting pilots to fly as many as...more than...larger airlines fly(do)"

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [1]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [1]
Regulators are likely to end what are, in effect, long-standing exempt 27 Mar 2023, 23:34
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ahamd
Hi AjiteshArun,
Thanks for your kind response.
If you can help me with one more clarification ,it will be a great help
Can we say that "to" is silent before "do" as "to" is already used before fly?
Show more
Hi ahamd,

As joe123x points out, there's no to before do. Do can refer to the verb form inside an infinitive. Here's an example:

1. I want you to eat more vegetables than I do.

1a. I want you to eat more vegetables than I want (you to eat vegetables).

1b. I want you to eat more vegetables than I to eat (vegetables).

1c. I want you to eat more vegetables than I eat (vegetables).
User avatar
varunkhanna9
User avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2021
Last visit: 19 Apr 2025
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
Schools: NUS '26 ESADE'26 IE'26 IIM EPGP '26 IMD'26 IESE '26 Imperial'26 ISB '26 Judge '26 LBS '26 FT MBA '26 IIM
GRE 1: Q167 V159
GPA: 3.1
Schools: NUS '26 ESADE'26 IE'26 IIM EPGP '26 IMD'26 IESE '26 Imperial'26 ISB '26 Judge '26 LBS '26 FT MBA '26 IIM
GRE 1: Q167 V159
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Regulators are likely to end what are, in effect, long-standing exempt 06 Apr 2023, 23:26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In option E, Is "as many as....THAN" considered correct? I believe "as" instead of "than" would've been ideal.
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
Regulators are likely to end what are, in effect, long-standing exempt 15 Apr 2023, 22:47
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
varunkhanna9

It's important to notice the word MORE in there. It's "AS MANY AS 20% more hours." 20% more than what? More than other pilots fly.
User avatar
S1ny1s
User avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2022
Last visit: 08 Jun 2024
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
6
Given Kudos: 40
Location: United States
Posts: 28
Kudos: 6
Regulators are likely to end what are, in effect, long-standing exempt 07 May 2023, 06:44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Regulators are likely to end what are, in effect, long-standing exemptions permitting pilots of small turboprop aircraft at small carriers to fly as much as 20 percent more hours per month than pilots at larger airlines fly, with the consequence that some carriers could be forced to hire additional pilots.

My understanding of the passage goes like this.

Regulators(the person that regulates something) are likely to stop long-standing exemptions, which have been provided for pilots of small turboprops aircraft.
but the question is Why Regulators are likely to stop...….?

to fly as many as 20 percent more hours per month than pilots at larger airlines do,

this leads to some carriers could be forced to hire additional pilots.

Dear DmitryFarber, correct me if my understanding was wrong.
User avatar
Dumsy_1711
User avatar
Joined: 23 May 2023
Last visit: 24 Jul 2024
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
44
Given Kudos: 305
Location: India
Concentration: Real Estate, Sustainability
GPA: 3.7
WE:Other (Other)
Posts: 57
Kudos: 44
Regulators are likely to end what are, in effect, long-standing exempt 27 Jul 2023, 04:54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:

Thank you for your helpful explanation. To clarify my understanding of the sentence structure for the correct answer (E), is the ",and consequently" an example of a comma conjunction independent clause?
Show more

Quote:
Hello woohoo921,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, yes; your understanding is correct: here, "and consequently" is a conjunctive phrase, and it is used alongside the comma to join two independent clauses.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
Show more




If the sentence is simplified, is it not:
Regulators are likely to end exemptions, and consequently some carriers could be forced to hire additional pilots.

I have a doubt in the and parallelism.

Is 'likely to' parallel to 'consequently' or is the clause ' Regulators are likely to end exemptions' parallel to the clause ' consequently some carriers could be forced to hire additional pilots.'

if it is the latter (clause and clause), are there any rules for parallelism that we can look out for?


.
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [1]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [1]
Regulators are likely to end what are, in effect, long-standing exempt 27 Jul 2023, 19:53
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dumsy_1711
If the sentence is simplified, is it not:
Regulators are likely to end exemptions, and consequently some carriers could be forced to hire additional pilots.

I have a doubt in the and parallelism.

Is 'likely to' parallel to 'consequently' or is the clause ' Regulators are likely to end exemptions' parallel to the clause ' consequently some carriers could be forced to hire additional pilots.'

if it is the latter (clause and clause), are there any rules for parallelism that we can look out for?
Show more
Hi Dumsy_1711,

Consequently is an adverb (modifier). We can use it (for example) to clarify the logical relationship between two clauses joined by an and.

1. Regulators are likely to end exemptions, and {consequently} some carriers could be forced to hire additional pilots.

We can put commas around consequently (this makes it easier to see that consequently isn't part of the second element joined by the and):

2. Regulators are likely to end exemptions, and, consequently, some carriers could be forced to hire additional pilots.
User avatar
ashutosh_73
User avatar
Joined: 19 Jan 2018
Last visit: 30 Oct 2024
Posts: 234
Own Kudos:
1,636
Given Kudos: 86
Location: India
Posts: 234
Kudos: 1,636
Regulators are likely to end what are, in effect, long-standing exempt 02 Aug 2023, 10:04
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ExpertsGlobal5
Varane
Is there a mistake in A also in the part where "with the consequence that" is used.

Posted from my mobile device

Hello Varane,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, the use of the phrase "with the consequence that" is not an error in Option A.

The phrase "with the result/consequence that" can be linked by a comma to a clause to refer to the outcome of the action described in the clause.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
Show more

Hi ExpertsGlobal5,

May be, my understanding is incorrect, but use of "WITH" seems incorrect. I was going through a post by Magoosh, wherein they described the uses of with. WITH is used to modify noun or action, but in this stimulus, "WITH" is connecting two different ICs.
Also, use of with is said to be incorrect if "action is done by a different agent.

Magoosh link: https://magoosh.com/gmat/with-noun-part ... orrection/

Please correct me if my understanding is wrong🙏🙏

Thanks
Ashutosh
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,836
Own Kudos:
986
Posts: 18,836
Kudos: 986
Regulators are likely to end what are, in effect, long-standing exempt 08 Nov 2025, 18:31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
   1   2   3 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
miag
188 posts