Forum Home > GMAT > Quantitative > Problem Solving (PS)
Events & Promotions
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 1608:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
Are you stuck at a score and looking for effective score improvement strategies to achieve your target on GMAT? Meet Rajat, who improved his GMAT score by an incredible 70 points in just 12 days(and less than 50 hours of study) with GMATWhiz!
Sep 1201:30 PM IST
-11:30 PM IST
With brand new features like:AI-driven Planner tool, 850+ data Insights practice questions and GMAT Focus Edition Adaptive mock tests with ESR+ analysis and personal mentor support, our course is the most comprehensive course for GMAT Focus Edition.- Sep 15
06:30 AM PDT
-07:30 AM PDT
Solve GRE practice problems covering Quant (One answer choice and multiple answer choice), Data Interpretation, Text Completion, Sentence Equivalence, and Reading Comprehension Problems. - Sep 15
07:30 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Solve 30 GMAT Focus practice problems covering Problem Solving, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning. Take this GMAT practice quiz live with peers, analyze your GMAT study progress, and more. 
- Sep 17
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
In this video, Mayank Srivastava, Founder of Experts' Global, explains all the details about ISB PGP applications for 2024-25. 
Sep 2001:00 PM EDT
-02:00 PM EDT
Have you ever wondered how to score a PERFECT 805 on the GMAT? Meet Julia, a banking professional who used the Target Test Prep course to achieve this incredible feat. Julia's story is nothing short of an inspiration.- Sep 21
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this session to learn how to Deconstruct arguments, Pre-Think Author’s Assumptions, and apply Negation Test. 
Sep 2210:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
More and more TTP students are earning impressive scores on the GMAT. Now is the perfect time to join the many GMAT students who made the switch to TTP and surpassed their wildest expectations on test day.- Sep 22
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease.
Researchers conditioned a group of flies to associate a particular odo
[#permalink]
22 Sep 2019, 20:51
22 Sep 2019, 20:51
19
Kudos
190
Bookmarks
Show timer
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
55%
(hard)
Question Stats:
67% (02:32) correct
33%
(02:48)
wrong
based on 5330
sessions
Researchers conditioned a group of flies to associate a particular odor with a weak electric shock. Twenty-four and forty-eight hours later the researchers conducted tests on the flies, both individually and in groups, to determine whether the flies retained the conditioning. When tested individually, the flies were significantly less likely to avoid areas marked with the odor. The researchers hypothesized that in the presence of the odor, a fly that retains the conditioned association gives off an alarm signal that arouses the attention of any surrounding flies, retriggering the association in them and thereby causing them to avoid the odor.
The researchers' hypothesis requires which of the following assumptions?
A. The flies do not give off odors as alarm signals.
B. Flies that did not avoid the odor when tested individually were not merely following other flies' movements when tested in a group.
C. Flies that did not avoid the odor when tested individually were less likely than the other flies to avoid the odor when tested in a group.
D. Prior to their conditioning, the flies would likely have found the odor used in the experiment to be pleasant.
E. An electric shock was used during the flies' conditioning and during the later tests.
CR47931.01
The researchers' hypothesis requires which of the following assumptions?
A. The flies do not give off odors as alarm signals.
B. Flies that did not avoid the odor when tested individually were not merely following other flies' movements when tested in a group.
C. Flies that did not avoid the odor when tested individually were less likely than the other flies to avoid the odor when tested in a group.
D. Prior to their conditioning, the flies would likely have found the odor used in the experiment to be pleasant.
E. An electric shock was used during the flies' conditioning and during the later tests.
CR47931.01
Manager
Joined: 22 Jan 2020
Posts: 67
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47 
Re: Researchers conditioned a group of flies to associate a particular odo
[#permalink]
18 Jul 2020, 22:54
18 Jul 2020, 22:54
46
Kudos
18
Bookmarks
The Story
Researchers conditioned a group of flies to associate a particular odor with a weak electric shock. - A group of flies were conditioned to associate an odor with an electric shock.Twenty-four and forty-eight hours later the researchers conducted tests on the flies, both individually and in groups, to determine whether the flies retained the conditioning. - The flies were then tested to check whether they retained the conditioning. Two sets of tests were conducted - 24 and 48 hours after the conditioning. The flies were tested individually and in groups.
When tested individually, the flies were significantly less likely to avoid areas marked with the odor. - Individual flies were less likely to avoid odor-marked areas. (“less likely” indicates a comparison. Less likely than whom? Logically, individual flies were less likely to avoid odor-marked areas than flies in groups.)
The researchers hypothesized that in the presence of the odor, a fly that retains the conditioned association gives off an alarm signal that arouses the attention of any surrounding flies, retriggering the association in them and thereby causing them to avoid the odor. - Based on their findings (previous statement), the researchers have come up with a hypothesis. They hypothesize that a fly that still has the conditioning gives off an alarm signal in the presence of the odor. This alarm signal grabs the attention of the surrounding flies. The surrounding flies’ association gets retriggered. And that’s why the other flies in the group also avoid the odor. (A fairly long-ended hypothesis.)
Gist:
Flies in groups avoid odor-marked areas more than individual flies. Why? The researchers came up with a hypothesis.
A fly that retains the association gives off an alarm signal.
An alarm signal leads to retriggering of the association. A retriggered association leads to flies’ avoiding odor.
The Gap
- 1. What if the other flies avoided the odor-marked area simply because a fly gave off an alarm signal and they sensed something was amiss. The other flies need not have had the association retriggered in them.
2. What if there wasn’t even an alarm in the first place? Or, even if there was an alarm, what if the flies did not change course because of an alarm? There could have been some other reason that led to the other flies’ change of course.
The Goal
We have already discussed a couple of gaps in the above section. Each pertains to an assumption. There could, of course, be other assumptions as well.The Evaluation
A. The flies do not give off odors as alarm signals. Incorrect. Does the argument rely on what KIND of alarm signals the flies give off? Not at all. Moreover, even if the flies did give off odors as alarm signals, the hypothesis still holds as is.
B. Flies that did not avoid the odor when tested individually were not merely following other flies' movements when tested in a group.
Correct. This is in line with the second gap we discussed above. The hypothesis requires this assumption. If flies avoided the odor simply because they were following other flies, the researchers’ hypothesis falls flat. This would mean that the other flies did not change their course because of an alarm signal. They were simply following other flies when tested in groups.
C. Flies that did not avoid the odor when tested individually were less likely than the other flies to avoid the odor when tested in a group.
Incorrect. Let’s first understand what this statement is saying. Let’s say that ‘flies “did not avoid” the odor’, implies flies flew into the odor. And, let’s try to tackle the way-too-many negatives in the sentence. We can rewrite the statement as:
Flies that flew into the odor when flying individually were more likely to fly into the odor when flying in groups than flies that avoided the odor when flying individually.
The sentence is essentially dividing the flies into two segments and then comparing the likelihoods of the two segments to fly into the odor. Now, we can understand that the flies that flew into the odor when flying individually needed some external trigger (such as an alarm signal) to avoid the odor. But after they got the trigger, do we really care whether they avoided more, less, or equally the odor compared with the other segment of flies? The argument is based on an overall likelihood of flies to fly into the odor, not likelihoods of different segments of flies. Thus, this option does not have an impact.
D. Prior to their conditioning, the flies would likely have found the odor used in the experiment to be pleasant.
Incorrect. How flies found the odor prior to the conditioning is irrelevant to the hypothesis.
Even if somehow we do not see the irrelevance, we can see that it is not necessary for the flies to have found the odor pleasant prior to the conditioning for the hypothesis to hold. The hypothesis would hold as is even if the flies did not find the odor pleasant before their conditioning.
E. An electric shock was used during the flies' conditioning and during the later tests.
Incorrect. We already know that an electric shock was used during the flies’ conditioning. Thus, the new information that this option gives is that an electric shock was used during the later tests as well. If in the later tests an electric shock was used, we start to wonder whether the flies responded the way they did because of their conditioning towards the odor, or because of the electric shock used? If an electric shock was used during the later tests, it is possible that, while in groups, a fly that got the shock gave an alarm signal to others. In this case, the fly that gave off the alarm signal had not retained any conditioned association and the alarm signal just warned the other flies and not retriggered their association. Thus, this option rather weakens the argument and thus cannot be an assumption.
Additional Notes
SC Notes:
Let’s break down the last sentence of the passage to understand the modifiers better.
- The researchers hypothesized that (Main Clause)
- 1. in the presence (Prepositional Phrase modifying the verb “gives off”)
- of the odor, (Prepositional Phrase modifying “presence”)
- that retains the conditioned association (Another ‘that’ clause modifying ‘fly’)
- that arouses the attention (‘that’ clause modifying ‘alarm signal’)
- of any surrounding flies, (Prepositional Phrase modifying “attention”)
- retriggering the association in them (Comma+Verb-ing modifier modifying the previous clause ‘that arouses…’)
- and thereby causing them (Comma+Verb-ing modifier modifying the previous clause ‘that arouses…’)
- to avoid the odor. (Infinitive Phrase modifying “causing”)
If you have any doubts regarding any part of this solution, please feel free to ask.
Re: Researchers conditioned a group of flies to associate a particular odo
[#permalink]
29 Sep 2019, 02:42
29 Sep 2019, 02:42
6
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
gmatt1476
Researchers conditioned a group of flies to associate a particular odor with a weak electric shock. Twenty-four and forty-eight hours later the researchers conducted tests on the flies, both individually and in groups, to determine whether the flies retained the conditioning. When tested individually, the flies were significantly less likely to avoid areas marked with the odor. The researchers hypothesized that in the presence of the odor, a fly that retains the conditioned association gives off an alarm signal that arouses the attention of any surrounding flies, retriggering the association in them and thereby causing them to avoid the odor.
The researchers' hypothesis requires which of the following assumptions?
A. The flies do not give off odors as alarm signals.
B. Flies that did not avoid the odor when tested individually were not merely following other flies' movements when tested in a group.
C. Flies that did not avoid the odor when tested individually were less likely than the other flies to avoid the odor when tested in a group.
D. Prior to their conditioning, the flies would likely have found the odor used in the experiment to be pleasant.
E. An electric shock was used during the flies' conditioning and during the later tests.
CR47931.01
The researchers' hypothesis requires which of the following assumptions?
A. The flies do not give off odors as alarm signals.
B. Flies that did not avoid the odor when tested individually were not merely following other flies' movements when tested in a group.
C. Flies that did not avoid the odor when tested individually were less likely than the other flies to avoid the odor when tested in a group.
D. Prior to their conditioning, the flies would likely have found the odor used in the experiment to be pleasant.
E. An electric shock was used during the flies' conditioning and during the later tests.
CR47931.01
Official Explanation
Argument Construction
This question asks us for an assumption required by the hypothesis.
The researchers noted that the flies that had been conditioned to associate a particular odor with an electric shock were much less likely to avoid the odor when they were tested individually than when they were tested as a part of a group.
Based on this fact, the researchers hypothesized that the flies that had retained the conditioning would give off an alarm when they detected the odor. This alarm would then retrigger the association among the other flies, leading them to avoid the odor.
We must consider whether there is some other fact that could explain why the flies were more likely to respond to the odor in a group than when they are alone. If there were, that alternative explanation would severely call into question the researchers' hypothesis. The hypothesis therefore requires that any such alternative explanation be false.
A. It is possible that the flies do in fact give off odors as an alarm signal. Because the nature of the flies' alarm signal is not specified by the hypothesis, this is entirely consistent with the hypothesis and would not undermine it. Therefore, the hypothesis does not require that flies do not give off odors as alarm signals.
B. Correct. Suppose that the flies that did not avoid the odor when tested individually were more likely to avoid the odor when in groups. This may be simply because these flies were following the movements of the flies that were triggered. That is, the signal did not cause the other flies' reactions. Instead, the movements of the triggered flies did. It follows that this possibility must be ruled out in order for the hypothesis to be plausible, and this answer choice does precisely that.
C. The hypothesis would actually be more plausible if this statement were false. That is, the hypothesis would be more plausible if the flies that did not avoid the odor when tested individually were just as likely, when they were tested in a group, to avoid the odor as the other flies in the group.
D. The hypothesis is perfectly compatible with the assumption that, prior to their conditioning, the flies were entirely indifferent to the odor.
E. The principle of association—that the shock is associated with the odor even when the shock itself is not present—actually requires that this statement be false.
The correct answer is B.
