himanshukamra2711
I have a question.
From q1 i inferred within 20 seconds that neuroscientists view is opposite so what ethnologist will consider behavioral gene the same will not be considered by NS(means that Shacker is a behavioral gene),however in second question also if the viewpoint is opposite then why can't we say that if NS believes something to be a behavioral gene the EN will not.
Let's take a closer at what, exactly, question #2 is asking:
Quote:
2. It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following, if true, would be most likely to influence ethologists’ opinions about whether a particular gene in a species is a behavioral gene?
The question isn't asking us to identify which of the choices is true according to the passage. Instead, we must find the choice
that would most likely influence whether ethologists think a given gene is a behavioral gene.
We can eliminate (D) because nothing in the passage suggests that the opinion of neuroscientists influences the opinion of ethologists.
On the other hand, we are told that ethologists do not consider Shaker to be behavioral because shaking is not healthy. So if an ethologist were told that the only effect of a mutation is to make an organism ill, this new information would definitely have an impact on whether they classified the corresponding gene to be behavioral or not (they would classify it as not behavioral).
That's why (C) is the best answer choice, and (D) can be eliminated. Remember that the GMAT doesn't require you to connect every question for an RC passage to each other. You just need to answer the specific question being asked, then move on.
I hope this helps!
- When this question says influence, does it mean an option that could weaken the perspective?