Thank you for sharing your experience, bb! I've been following the scholarship negotiation thread you created, where you mentioned that negotiation success rates are quite low, with failure rates over 80% if I recall correctly.
As an Indian IT candidate with a 770 GMAT, would peer schools typically be inclined to match competing offers to secure strong candidates?
Regarding your point about going back and forth - I'd love to understand the process better. For example, if School A offers $60K, I negotiate with School B using that offer, and School B increases their offer - can I then go back to School A with School B's improved offer?
I also have a question about negotiating based on total cost of attendance rather than just scholarship amounts. For instance:
- School A: $160K tuition - $60K scholarship = $100K total cost
- School B: $120K tuition - $60K scholarship = $60K total cost
Even with equal scholarship amounts, the final cost differs significantly. Would it be reasonable to negotiate with School A to match or come closer to School B's total cost of attendance, rather than just comparing scholarship amounts?
Would love to hear your thoughts on these strategies. I've signed up for the admit weekend this Saturday - really looking forward to it! Scholarship Negotiation topic feels like a bit of a black box, and I'm sure many admits would appreciate more insights since everyone loves the opportunity to reduce their costs.
bb
No, they do not communicate with each other.
The schools assume that you are negotiating and they will do their best understanding that it may still not result into you choosing the program.
However, there are no downsides really... I’ve known people who have gone back-and-forth in a circle leveraging one of the other. However, the efforts reached diminishing returns and some schools don’t negotiate, such as Ross, at least historically.