GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Dec 2018, 10:28

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • $450 Tuition Credit & Official CAT Packs FREE

     December 15, 2018

     December 15, 2018

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    Get the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth $100 with the 3 Month Pack ($299)
  • FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

     December 16, 2018

     December 16, 2018

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.

Scientists recognize semiconservative replication as the mechanism by

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Status: Trying...
Joined: 15 Aug 2016
Posts: 104
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q51 V27
GMAT 2: 690 Q48 V37
GPA: 4
WE: Consulting (Internet and New Media)
Scientists recognize semiconservative replication as the mechanism by  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 10 Nov 2017, 10:06
3
3
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 289 sessions

60% (03:56) correct 40% (03:41) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 270 sessions

66% (01:23) correct 34% (01:50) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 267 sessions

57% (01:17) correct 43% (01:34) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Scientists recognize semiconservative replication as the mechanism by which DNA replicates prior to cell division. In this process, the bases of the double helix are broken, and the molecule "unzips" into two strands. Each strand then joins with a new strand, so that each copy is an equal mix of old and new DNA.
Prior to the Meselson-Stahl experiment of 1958, other methods of DNA replication were suggested. In the conservative replication model, a completely new double helix would be formed, leaving the original intact. Dispersive replication, by contrast, breaks the DNA molecule into small segments, each of which joins with a complimentary segment. Then, the segments reform into two strands of DNA that contain pieces of the old and pieces of the new DNA.

In the Meselson-Stahl experiment, the scientists grew E. coli bacterial cultures, some with heavy nitrogen isotopes, and some with lighter nitrogen isotopes. This gave the scientists a way to distinguish between old and newly synthesized DNA. The bacteria grown in heavy nitrogen were then transferred to medium containing the lighter density DNA, which would incorporate into any newly synthesized DNA. After one generation, the DNA was of a density exactly intermediate to the heavy and light DNA. This eliminated the possibility of conservative replication, which would have resulted in equal amounts of the two separate densities. After two generations, half of the DNA was intermediate and half was light. This eliminated the possibility of dispersive replication, which would have produced DNA that was all of a density between the light and exactly intermediate DNA. E. coli are bacteria, and are thus prokaryotes, organisms that lack complex cell structures, but semiconservative replication also occurs in eukaryotes, organisms with complex cells such as animals and plants. Since each DNA molecule in a eukaryote is incorporated in one chromosome, human chromosome replication is also semiconservative.

When Watson and Crick deciphered the structure of DNA in 1953, they intuited that the semiconservative model was correct. However, this still amounted to a clever guess, and so it remained until Meselson and Stahl devised a way to differentiate between the original strands of DNA and future generations. Since then, autoradiographic images have confirmed the correctness of Watson and Crick's intuition and the effectiveness of Meselson and Stahl's elegant experiment.
Q1

The author mentions that eukaryotes replicate through semiconservative replication in order to make the point that

A)the choice of E. coli bacteria was a good one for the Meselson-Stahl experiment
B) semiconservative replication depends on an organism having a complex cell structure
C) Watson and Crick realized that their work would have implications for humans
D) the Meselson-Stahl had implications for forms of life beyond simple bacteria
E) each DNA molecule in a eukaryote is incorporated in one chromosome



Q2
According to the passage, which of the following is the reason that, had the conservative model been correct, the same number of heavy and light strands of DNA would have resulted?

A) Conservative replication breaks up the original DNA into small segments.
B) An equal mix of old and new DNA is formed using the conservative model.
C) Conservative replication would keep the original strands untouched.
D) The double helix of DNA is separated only in the conservative model of replication.
E) The conservative replication model splits the original DNA into four discrete strands.



Q3
It can be inferred from the passage that in the Meselson-Stahl experiment, a third generation of bacteria would produce bacteria with

A) some light density and some intermediate density DNA
B) some light density and some heavy density DNA
C) some heavy density and some intermediate density DNA
D) only light density DNA
E) only intermediate density DNA



Originally posted by mgcon on 20 Nov 2016, 20:41.
Last edited by Skywalker18 on 10 Nov 2017, 10:06, edited 2 times in total.
formatted
Director
Director
User avatar
S
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Posts: 533
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
Re: Scientists recognize semiconservative replication as the mechanism by  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Nov 2016, 15:35
3
Top Contributor
Q.1
Let us look at the sentence in the passage that states this -
"semiconservative replication also occurs in eukaryotes, organisms with complex cells such as animals and plants. Since each DNA molecule in a eukaryote is incorporated in one chromosome, human chromosome replication is also semiconservative."

Author mentions this to make the point that human chromosome replication is also semiconservative. Which answer option states this? Option D. (implications beyond simple bacteria. i.e. for eukaryotes too such as humans).

A - we cannot infer anything about this. And nowhere is this mentioned in the sentence above.
B - not true. We know that they can occur in prokaryotes too,
C- cannot be inferred. Watson and crick are not mentioned in the sentence.
D - correct answer.
E - this is just a statement of fact. this along with the previous sentence (semiconservative replication also occurs in eukaryotes) is used to draw the conclusion - human chromosome replication is also semiconservative.

Q2.
look at this sentence - "In the conservative replication model, a completely new double helix would be formed, leaving the original intact."
Which answer option states this? Option C.

Q3.
After one generation, the DNA was of a density exactly intermediate to the heavy and light DNA. (100% intermediate)
After two generations, half of the DNA was intermediate and half was light.(50% intermediate and 50% light)
third generation
50% intermediate would split into 25% intermediate and 25% light (As in second generation)
So, we have 25% intermediate and 75% light.

Only option A states this.
_________________

For more info on GMAT and MBA, follow us on @AskCrackVerbal

Register for the Free GMAT Video Training Course : https://crackverbal.com/MBA-Through-GMAT-2019-Registration

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 31 Dec 2016
Posts: 73
Re: Scientists recognize semiconservative replication as the mechanism by  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2017, 14:11
I had trouble understanding the English in this one and I am a native English speaker.

" The bacteria grown in heavy nitrogen were then transferred to medium containing the lighter density DNA"

What does transfer to medium mean? Do they mean transferred to a medium? If I insert the word A I get the paragraph but without it, I really have no idea what is going on.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 20 Sep 2015
Posts: 20
Re: Scientists recognize semiconservative replication as the mechanism by  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2017, 06:50
Official Answers from VeritasPrep:

Q 1

The point of the 3rd paragraph is that the experiment applies not only to "organisms that lack complex cell structures. . ." but also to "eukaryotes, organisms with complex cells such as animals and plants."
A - Since E. coli are prokaryotes, this answer choice does not make sense.
B - The passage contradicts this point by claiming that semiconservative replication applies to simple organisms (prokaryotes) and complex ones (eukaryotes).
C - We are not given any suggestions as to Watson and Crick's thoughts on this subject.
E - This is presented as a piece of evidence, not a reason for making the point that semiconservative replication applies to eukaryotes.

Q 2

In the 2nd paragraph, the passage states that "In the conservative replication model, a completely new double helix would be formed, leaving the original intact." Therefore, the original heavy strands would still be present, as would an equal number of light strands.
A - This is a description of dispersive replication
B - The conservative model does not mix, it keeps the originals untouched. D - This is not stated or implied in the passage. E - Nowhere is this implied; instead each method is said to double the DNA through replication.

Q 3

The 2nd generation produced light and intermediate density DNA, and the passage states that "the lighter density DNA . . . would incorporate into any newly synthesized DNA." Therefore the intermediate DNA of the 2nd generation will get lighter (but still be intermediate) and the light DNA will remain light. The explanation above should eliminate any of the incorrect choices.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 20 Sep 2015
Posts: 20
Re: Scientists recognize semiconservative replication as the mechanism by  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2017, 06:52
SamBoyle wrote:
I had trouble understanding the English in this one and I am a native English speaker.

" The bacteria grown in heavy nitrogen were then transferred to medium containing the lighter density DNA"

What does transfer to medium mean? Do they mean transferred to a medium? If I insert the word A I get the paragraph but without it, I really have no idea what is going on.


I concur. It should mean "a" medium.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 20 Sep 2015
Posts: 20
Re: Scientists recognize semiconservative replication as the mechanism by  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2017, 06:58
1
Q 4

The author suggests that autoradiographic visualization

A. gave Watson and Crick insights into the structure of DNA

B. made the Meselson-Stahl experiment possible

C. shows that before a cell can divide, the bases of the double helix must break

D. does not, by itself, provide a way to differentiate between original strands of DNA and future generations

E. put an end to the possibility of conservative replication in bacteria

OA in next post.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 20 Sep 2015
Posts: 20
Re: Scientists recognize semiconservative replication as the mechanism by  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2017, 06:59
Official Answers from VeritasPrep:

Q 4

Since semiconservative replication involves the breaking of the double helix (from the 1st paragraph), and since it is known that semiconservative replication is accurate, then autoradiographic visualization, which confirms the Meselson-Stahl experiment, would confirm this.

A - The passage does not mention that these men used autoradiographic visualization.
B - The passage does not state that autoradiographic visualization was employed or relied on in the Meselson-Stahl experiment.
D - This cannot be implied from the passage; autoradiographic visualization might be able to differentiate between the two.
E - The 2nd paragraph states that "Prior to the Meselson-Stahl experiment of 1958, other methods of DNA replication were suggested." Therefore this experiment put an end to the possibility of conservative replication
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 03 Mar 2018
Posts: 201
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Scientists recognize semiconservative replication as the mechanism by  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Dec 2018, 09:29
VeritasKarishma
Do we have a better explanation for question 3? I am not convinced with official explanation and with other explanations provided above.
Why do we assume third generation of bacteria should be of 25% intermediate density?
_________________

Please mention my name in your valuable replies.

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
P
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8678
Location: Pune, India
Re: Scientists recognize semiconservative replication as the mechanism by  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Dec 2018, 03:47
itisSheldon wrote:
VeritasKarishma
Do we have a better explanation for question 3? I am not convinced with official explanation and with other explanations provided above.
Why do we assume third generation of bacteria should be of 25% intermediate density?



There are two thing you need to understand:

What is semiconservative replication?
Semiconservative replication - In this process, the bases of the double helix are broken, and the molecule "unzips" into two strands. Each strand then joins with a new strand, so that each copy is an equal mix of old and new DNA.
Attachment:
800px_COLOURBOX3197667.jpg
800px_COLOURBOX3197667.jpg [ 44.44 KiB | Viewed 98 times ]

In semiconservative replication, the two interwoven strands are separated and each joins with a new strand. So one strand will be old and one will be new.

In the Meselson-Stahl experiment, the bacteria grown in heavy nitrogen were then transferred to medium containing the lighter density DNA, which would incorporate into any newly synthesized DNA. So bacteria grown in heavy nitrogen were transferred to light nitrogen so that new DNA has light DNA.
After one generation, the DNA was of a density exactly intermediate to the heavy and light DNA - makes sense since the heavy strands will recombine with the light strands (new ones) to give intermediate DNA.
After two generations, half of the DNA was intermediate and half was light - makes sense since each double helix will have one heavy and one light strand. The heavy will combine with light to give HL (intermediate) and light will combine with light (since new medium is all light) to give LL (light).
After three generations, HL will combine with light to give HL and LL while LL will combine with light to give LL and LL. So we will have 25% intermediate and 75% light (hence some intermediate, some light)

Hence option (A) is correct.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Scientists recognize semiconservative replication as the mechanism by &nbs [#permalink] 13 Dec 2018, 03:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Scientists recognize semiconservative replication as the mechanism by

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.