|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 23 May 2013
Posts: 1
|
Re: So dogged were Frances Perkin's investigations of the garment industry [#permalink]
Show Tags
 29 Sep 2013, 09:33
raghupara wrote: chan4312 wrote: So dogged were Frances Perkins’ investigations of the garment industry, and her
lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, Alfred E. Smith and Franklin D.
Roosevelt recruited Perkins to work within the government, rather than as a social
worker.
A. and her lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent,
no correct idiom..
B. and lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, so that
parallelism fails
C. her lobbying for wage and hour reform persistent, that
correct. parallel ...ans also idiom so.that
D. lobbying for wage and hour reform was so persistent,
parallelism fails
E. so persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform, that
parallelism fails
IMO C Hi pal, C cannot be the choice because it uses-'Her' but there is no direct name referent. Thanks many  , Kudos if clarified!! 'her' is a valid usage in C as its in possessive form. However you cannot use a subject pronoun - 'she'
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 401
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
|
Re: So dogged were Frances Perkin's investigations of the garment industry [#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Jan 2014, 08:47
goalsnr wrote: So dogged were Frances Perkins’ investigations of the garment industry, and her
lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, Alfred E. Smith and Franklin D.
Roosevelt recruited Perkins to work within the government, rather than as a social
worker.
A. and her lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent,
B. and lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, so that
C. her lobbying for wage and hour reform persistent, that
D. lobbying for wage and hour reform was so persistent,
E. so persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform, that 2 Parallel Sentences here to be checked... So dogged were Frances Perkins’ investigations of the garment industry that Alfred E. Smith and Franklin D. Roosevelt ....... So persistent was her lobbying for wage and hour reform that Alfred E. Smith and Franklin D. Roosevelt ....... Here both colored portion are parallel and correct sentences independently. Here the sentences are joined, but second parallel structure is joined in. But the second parallel structure has been converted to a Absolute phrase by deleting the verb(was) from second sentence. So dogged were Frances Perkins’ investigations of the garment industry, so persistent was her lobbying for wage and hour reform, that Alfred E. Smith and Franklin D. Roosevelt recruited ....
_________________
If you know what you're worth, then go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain't where you wanna be because of anybody! Cowards do that and You're better than that!
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short; the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.
Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.
Failure establishes only this, that our determination to succeed was not strong enough.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
http://gmatclub.com/forum/1000-sc-notes-at-one-place-in-one-document-with-best-of-explanations-192961.html
Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 17 Jul 2013
Posts: 38
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Health Care)
|
Re: So dogged were Frances Perkin's investigations of the garment industry [#permalink]
Show Tags
17 May 2014, 12:43
Very informational post by e-GMAT! I almost took a little over 2 minutes (30 seconds to choose between C and E) and arrived at E only due to parallelism. C is in active voice and E is in the same voice as the clause before the underlined part. Is is safe to assume that this is a 700+ question? I have hardly observed such ellipsis at play questions on the mocks that I have given
_________________
I'm on 680... 20 days to reach 700 +
|
|
|
|
|
|
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2525
|
Re: So dogged were Frances Perkin's investigations of the garment industry [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 May 2014, 18:14
paranoidvik wrote: Very informational post by e-GMAT! I almost took a little over 2 minutes (30 seconds to choose between C and E) and arrived at E only due to parallelism. C is in active voice and E is in the same voice as the clause before the underlined part. Is is safe to assume that this is a 700+ question? I have hardly observed such ellipsis at play questions on the mocks that I have given Thanks alot @paranoidvik for your kind words of appreciation. It gives us immense pleasure when GMAT community gets benefited from our posts This question is a 700+ level question. So pat yourself for getting it correct. But at the same time, you took more than 2 minutes to answer it correctly. So you should spend the time learning from this question not just the concept but also the approach. Ask yourself - why did I take longer to answer this question? Why could I not spot the voice difference between choices C and E. In fact this is the key difference between the two close choices. From the meaning of the sentence you should have figured out that there are two things that the author talks about - so dogged was something, so persistent was something. And hence the requirement of making them parallel. So you should definitely introspect why you got tangled in these two choices. Now coming to ellipsis in this question - There are two official questions in this post itself in which we see such parallelism. Now is such ellipsis application very prevalent - I would say no. But its worth noting such usages down so that you are not stumped by them if you see such usage in the exam environment. From ellipsis standpoint, I suggest you review our article on ellipsis in detail if you have not already done so. Regards, Payal
_________________
 
| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 15 Jan 2014
Posts: 57
|
Re: So dogged were Frances Perkin's investigations of the garment industry [#permalink]
Show Tags
20 May 2014, 02:27
I have gone through all the mails posted by people in the above posts.
However I am still not clear why the correct option E actually does not use "and" in between the 2 parts of the sentence (So dogged were Frances Perkins’ investigations of the garment industry, AND so persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform).
Without the use of "and", option E really sounds very strange. So is there a grammar rule that someone can help me with, that is working in option E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 36
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
WE: Medicine and Health (Health Care)
|
Re: So dogged were Frances Perkin's investigations of the garment industry [#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Aug 2014, 04:59
icandy wrote: Like many SC Q's this is a direct pick up from NY Times http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.h ... A965958260E is correct. As goalsnr said, So X, So Y that Z is perfectly correct. Other wise NY Times would not use it. The NYT statement is as follows: So dogged were her investigations of the garment industry, and so persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform, that she was first recruited by Gov. Al Smith, and later by Gov. Franklin D. Roosevelt, to work within New York State government, rather than against it. "and" is missing in option E. How can it be correct? @mikemcgarry, please help...
Attachments
q2.JPG [ 48.43 KiB | Viewed 18708 times ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 03 Aug 2011
Posts: 289
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34 GMAT 2: 700 Q42 V44 GMAT 3: 680 Q44 V39 GMAT 4: 740 Q49 V41
GPA: 3.7
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
|
Re: So dogged were Frances Perkin's investigations of the garment industry [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Sep 2014, 06:50
Hi guys, I actually got this question on a GMATPrep CAT and unfortunately had an error. Now I directly saw the 'So X, so Y' structure, but thought (E) included an error, because it had "her" referring back to "Frances Perkins' ". Now I thought that her can refer back to a noun/subject and while in this case it appears it is referring back to Frances Perkins, it is referring back to the possessive "Frances Perkins' ". Is this possible and in what cases can we use "she" and "her"? Thanks!
_________________
Thank you very much for reading this post till the end! Kudos?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4345
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
|
Re: So dogged were Frances Perkin's investigations of the garment industry [#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jan 2016, 00:07
This is supposed to be an adaptation of an excerpt from the New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1993/11/14/books ... -club.htmlQuote: So dogged were her investigations of the garment industry, and so persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform, that she was first recruited by Gov. Al Smith, and later by Gov. Franklin D. Roosevelt, to work within New York State government, rather than against it.
Choice E that corresponds to the version in the magazine misses an important ‘ and’ before ‘so’; otherwise E may be the best choice. All the same, a disappointing question because of the poor transcription form the creator of this question, incidentally, GMATPREP Interesting to note Ron’s comments about this Re: SC set 27 Question 17 So dogged were Frances Perkins investi Quote: RonPurewal wrote:
If it's a correct answer, it's a correct answer.
This is a really, really old problem (over 10 years old, if it's in "set 27"). The current GMAT won't test such oddly constructed sentences, so it's best to forget about this one altogether.
_________________
you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1185
|
Re: So dogged were Frances Perkin's investigations of the garment industry [#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Feb 2016, 20:15
why the second clause contain no verb I think so persistent was is better. very strange pattern
_________________
visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 1678
|
Re: So dogged were Frances Perkin's investigations of the garment industry [#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Feb 2016, 04:44
thangvietnam wrote: why the second clause contain no verb
I think
so persistent was
is better.
very strange pattern You can find full explanation for that pattern here. I hope it helps. http://www.beatthegmat.com/parallelism- ... 96011.htmlso-dogged-were-frances-perkins-investigations-of-the-garment-93584.html?fl=similar
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2016
Posts: 213
Location: India
GPA: 3.2
|
Re: So dogged were Frances Perkin's investigations of the garment industry [#permalink]
Show Tags
11 May 2016, 23:04
tushain wrote: icandy wrote: Like many SC Q's this is a direct pick up from NY Times http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.h ... A965958260E is correct. As goalsnr said, So X, So Y that Z is perfectly correct. Other wise NY Times would not use it. The NYT statement is as follows: So dogged were her investigations of the garment industry, and so persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform, that she was first recruited by Gov. Al Smith, and later by Gov. Franklin D. Roosevelt, to work within New York State government, rather than against it. "and" is missing in option E. How can it be correct? mikemcgarry, please help... I agree with you, there is the conjunction 'and' in the original sentence. Not sure how this sentence is correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 01 Jul 2014
Posts: 27
Location: India
GPA: 3.2
|
Re: So dogged were Frances Perkin's investigations of the garment industry [#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Sep 2016, 13:52
So dogged were Frances Perkins’ investigations of the garment industry, and her lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, Alfred E. Smith and Franklin D. Roosevelt recruited Perkins to work within the government, rather than as a social worker.
A. and her lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, --> Wrong Structure: So X , and Y (missing "That")
B. and lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, so that --> Wrong Structure: So X , and Y, so that Z
C. her lobbying for wage and hour reform persistent, that --> Structure is correct "So X, Y, that" but Y does not logically fit into sentence, also X and Y are not parallel
"So dogged were Frances Perkins’ investigations of the garment industry, her lobbying for wage and hour reform persistent, that"
D. lobbying for wage and hour reform was so persistent, --> "that" missing
E. so persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform, that --> Correct structure: So X, so Y, that Z
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 05 Jan 2014
Posts: 43
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
|
Re: So dogged were Frances Perkin's investigations of the garment industry [#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Oct 2016, 02:54
hemant89 wrote: So dogged were Frances Perkins’ investigations of the garment industry, and her lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, Alfred E. Smith and Franklin D. Roosevelt recruited Perkins to work within the government, rather than as a social worker.
A. and her lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, --> Wrong Structure: So X , and Y (missing "That")
B. and lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, so that --> Wrong Structure: So X , and Y, so that Z
C. her lobbying for wage and hour reform persistent, that --> Structure is correct "So X, Y, that" but Y does not logically fit into sentence, also X and Y are not parallel
"So dogged were Frances Perkins’ investigations of the garment industry, her lobbying for wage and hour reform persistent, that"
D. lobbying for wage and hour reform was so persistent, --> "that" missing
E. so persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform, that --> Correct structure: So X, so Y, that Z The answer choice 'E' is also wrong. The second 'so' will be preceded by 'and'. Check the NYT link.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 27 Aug 2016
Posts: 25
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
GPA: 3.87
WE: Sales (Internet and New Media)
|
Re: So dogged were Frances Perkin's investigations of the garment industry [#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Nov 2016, 05:14
IMO E is the best choice for this question but it also has an error pointed out in the comments above: "her" in the second clause should refer to Francis Perkins,but actually "her" is referring to Francis Perkins' investigations in option e too. So how is option e or this question itself not wrong? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1160
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GRE 1: 314 Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
|
Re: So dogged were Frances Perkin's investigations of the garment industry [#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jun 2017, 08:34
We need to maintain parallelism between the investigation and her lobbying , also we need that before Alfred E. Smith. Option E has correct parallelism and correct placement of that. Correct idiom is So.........That
_________________
Please give kudos if you found my answers useful
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 20 Jan 2016
Posts: 211
|
Re: So dogged were Frances Perkin's investigations of the garment industry [#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Aug 2017, 03:07
I got this question and chose C because option E had so again. I wasn't aware of the idiom So X, So Y ...that
My question here is what the question is testing? I don't think it is just the So....that idiom....
Any suggestions/?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 27 Mar 2014
Posts: 103
|
Re: So dogged were Frances Perkin's investigations of the garment industry [#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Aug 2017, 10:50
So dogged were Frances Perkins’ investigations of the garment industry, and her lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, Alfred E. Smith and Franklin D. Roosevelt recruited Perkins to work within the government, rather than as a social worker.
A. and her lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent,
',' used to join IC( Alfred E...... social worker) with IC(her lobbying...persistent) : Incorrect
',and' used to join DC(so dogged...industry) with IC (her lobbying...persistent) : Incorrect
B. and lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, so that
',and' used to join DC(so dogged...industry) with IC (her lobbying...persistent) : Incorrect[/color]
C. her lobbying for wage and hour reform persistent, that
"her" works as adjective modifying ' lobbying' ; noun phrase "her lobbying for wage and hour reform persistent" wrongly modifies preceding clause. Incorrect
D. lobbying for wage and hour reform was so persistent,
wrong modification
E. so persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform, that
So X , So Y , That.... Correct
experts pls comment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: So dogged were Frances Perkin's investigations of the garment industry
[#permalink]
15 Aug 2017, 10:50
|
|
|
|
|
Go to page
Previous
1 2
[ 37 posts ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
close
