It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 15:05

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2003
Posts: 82

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2003, 11:08
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

75% (00:44) correct 25% (00:00) wrong based on 6 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled areas of the world as it is in those already sampled, our current estimate of reserves that exist underground must be multiplied by a factor of 10,000. From this we can conclude that we can meet the oil needs of the entire world for at least five centuries, even assuming that future consumption grows at an accelerating rate.
To reach the stated conclusion, the author must assume which of the following?
A) It is possible to recover the oil contained in unexplored areas of the world
B) The consumption rate for oil will not grow rapidly
C) Oil will remain an important energy source for at least 500 years
D) The world will achieve and maintain zero population growth
E) New technology will make oil discovery and drilling more feasible than ever before

Sarnia

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 957

Kudos [?]: 178 [0], given: 0

Location: Florida

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2003, 11:27
A..

A and E hits the target, but only A says about the unexplored areas. E, nowhere author mentions about the drilling feasibility.. seems out of the way.
author says that oil reservers are there but assumes that we will be able to dig out the oil from all the known-unknown resources.

Kudos [?]: 178 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2003
Posts: 82

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2003, 11:41
The official answer is different. I'll post it later on.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 957

Kudos [?]: 178 [0], given: 0

Location: Florida

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2003, 11:44
now, that's making me wary of my thoughts... I choose C now.

Kudos [?]: 178 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3452

Kudos [?]: 924 [0], given: 781

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2003, 13:05
sarnia wrote:
The official answer is different. I'll post it later on.

A is best.

Negate every other statement, it does not make a difference to the

argument

Kudos [?]: 924 [0], given: 781

Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2003
Posts: 82

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2003, 13:26
B is the official answer which I suspect it's wrong.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 22 Aug 2015
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Apr 2016, 06:10
I think option C is more suitable here.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled   [#permalink] 14 Apr 2016, 06:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by