It is currently 23 Nov 2017, 11:52

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Something must be done to ease traffic congestion. In

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2004
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: By the desktop
Something must be done to ease traffic congestion. In [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Mar 2004, 02:24
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:09) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 11 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Something must be done to ease traffic congestion. In traditional small towns, people used to work and shop in the same town in which they lived; but now that stores and workplaces are located far away from residential areas, people cannot avoid traveling long distances each day. Traffic congestion is so heavy on all roads that, even on major highways where the maximum speed limit is 55 miles per hour, the actual speed averages only 35 miles per hour. So new businesses should be encouraged to locate closer to where their workers would live.

The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) Background that the argument depends on and conclusion that can be drawn from the argument.

(B) Part of evidence that the argument includes, and inference that can be drawn from this passage.

(C) Pre-evidence that the argument depends on and part of evidence that supports the conclusion.

(D) Background that argument depends on and part of evidence that supports the conclusion.

(E) Pre-evidence that argument includes and a method that helps to supports that conclusion.



Note: I dont have the official answer.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2004
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: By the desktop
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Mar 2004, 06:45
I too go for A


Here's wht I feel -


The options mainly talk to 4 roles viz

1. Background
2. Pre-evidence
3. Part of evidence
4. Conclusion

These 4 roles can be distinctly observed in the para -

1. In traditional small towns, people used to work and shop in the same town in which they lived; - Background

2. but now that stores and workplaces are located far away from residential areas, people cannot avoid traveling long distances each day. - Pre-evidence

3. Traffic congestion is so heavy on all roads that, even on major highways where the maximum speed limit is 55 miles per hour, the actual speed averages only 35 miles per hour. - Part of evidence

4. So new businesses should be encouraged to locate closer to where their workers would live. - Conclusion

The boldface is on 1 and 4.
Hence A[/b]

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Mar 2004, 06:55
A looks fine.

The word traditionally is the key here. The last one is definitely a conclusion.

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Posts: 460

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

Location: In the middle of nowhere
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Mar 2004, 16:12
A from me too..

Choice E says...'...method that helps to supports that conclusion.'

The last sentence 'So new businesses should be encouraged to locate closer to where their workers would live.' is already a conclusion and so does not fit into the second part of choice E.

Vivek.
_________________

"Start By Doing What Is Necessary ,Then What Is Possible & Suddenly You Will Realise That You Are Doing The Impossible"

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Posts: 155

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: New York
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Mar 2004, 18:06
I dont know this is a tough one for me. Id go with A, mainly b/c the second part states that its the evidence, which it is. Id like to see the official explanation.
_________________

---------------------------------------------------
The more I learn, the more I realize I know nothing!
----------------------------------------------------

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Dec 2003
Posts: 358

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

Location: India
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Mar 2004, 18:55
Hi

I would go for A. Explanation below....

The first bold face is the Background, somethings that starts the argument.
The second is the conclusion, because the 2nd boldface uses 'SO', similar to 'Hence".

Hence A is the right answer.

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 37

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Bombay
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Mar 2004, 21:13
hariom wrote:
I too go for A


Here's wht I feel -


The options mainly talk to 4 roles viz

1. Background
2. Pre-evidence
3. Part of evidence
4. Conclusion

These 4 roles can be distinctly observed in the para -

1. In traditional small towns, people used to work and shop in the same town in which they lived; - Background

2. but now that stores and workplaces are located far away from residential areas, people cannot avoid traveling long distances each day. - Pre-evidence

3. Traffic congestion is so heavy on all roads that, even on major highways where the maximum speed limit is 55 miles per hour, the actual speed averages only 35 miles per hour. - Part of evidence

4. So new businesses should be encouraged to locate closer to where their workers would live. - Conclusion

The boldface is on 1 and 4.
Hence A[/b]



Well, I may be wrong.

I broke the argument in a different way.

Conclusion: Something must be done to ease traffic congestion
Pre evidence: In traditional small towns, people used to work and shop in the same town in which they lived
Evidence: now that stores and workplaces are located far away from residential areas, people cannot avoid traveling long distances each day. Traffic congestion is so heavy on all roads that, even on major highways where the maximum speed limit is 55 miles per hour, the actual speed averages only 35 miles per hour.
Method that helps: So new businesses should be encouraged to locate closer to where their workers would live.
[/b]

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2015
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Something must be done to ease traffic congestion. In [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Apr 2016, 06:23
I think A is the right answer here

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Something must be done to ease traffic congestion. In   [#permalink] 14 Apr 2016, 06:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Something must be done to ease traffic congestion. In

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.