Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 20:53 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 20:53
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
655-705 Level|   Meaning/Logical Predication|   Modifiers|   Verb Tense/Form|                           
avatar
arijitdas31
Joined: 05 Oct 2016
Last visit: 11 Jul 2018
Posts: 7
Posts: 7
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,419
 [17]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,419
 [17]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
deepakgarg1373
Joined: 17 Feb 2016
Last visit: 17 Nov 2019
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
5
 [2]
Given Kudos: 818
Posts: 5
Kudos: 5
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,393
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,393
Kudos: 15,523
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
deepakgarg1373
GMATNinja, could you help figuring out the difference between option C and E?

A present participle ("-ing") modifier may refer to the subject of the preceding clause. In E, the present participle "preventing.." refers to the subject of the previous clause ("sound") - the meaning implied is that the sound itself prevents its (own) acoustic energy from dissipating.

C does not convey this faulty meaning.
avatar
suresh918
Joined: 05 Feb 2015
Last visit: 26 Aug 2018
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 1
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

Why option 'C' can't be a run on sentence, as it has two clauses. I eliminated this because it has two clauses without any connector.
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
suresh918
Hi,

Why option 'C' can't be a run on sentence, as it has two clauses. I eliminated this because it has two clauses without any connector.
Hi suresh918, a run-on sentence is when two Independent clauses are connected by a comma.

In C, following is not an Independent clause.

its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by...

It is, what's called, an Absolute modifier: Noun (its acoustic energy) + Noun-modifier (prevented from dissipating by...)

By the way, prevented is used as a past participle here, and not as a verb.

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses Absolute Modifier, its application and examples in significant detail. If someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.
User avatar
anuj04
Joined: 25 Jul 2017
Last visit: 03 Jan 2020
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
96
 [3]
Given Kudos: 42
Posts: 66
Kudos: 96
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sound can travel through water for enormous distances, prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different temperatures and densities.
(A) prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of
(B) prevented from having its acoustic energy dissipated by
(C) its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by
(D) its acoustic energy prevented from being dissipated as a result of
(E) preventing its acoustic energy from dissipating by

POE: I am putting all my learning from all the experts. GMATNinja daagh mikemcgarry egmat. Please correct me if my learning is wrong.
(A) prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of- WRONG- Since Verb-ed modifier modifies the preceding noun or the noun phrase therefore, “prevented” here modifies “enormous distance” which is not logically right. It should modify “acoustic energy”
(B) prevented from having its acoustic energy dissipated by- Same as A
(C) its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by- Correct- IC+comma(,)+ Noun phrase (giving extra information) – Right construction- No problem with clear meaning. Let's keep it for a while till we get a better option
(D) its acoustic energy prevented from being dissipated as a result of – First usage of BEING is incorrect. From Daagh’s explanation I have taken this “Whenever you see, ‘being’, ask what is being or who is being. If you get a positive answer, then ‘being’ is a modifier and that structure is unacceptable in GMAT.” Here what is being? “Accoustic Energy”. We get the positive answer. Hence out.
(E) preventing its acoustic energy from dissipating by – WRONG- Whenever Verbing is used, it modifies the preceding clause and is associated with the subject of the preceding clause. Here SOUND is the subject, and it is not PREVENTING “its acoustic energy from dissipating”. Illogical.

Hence C is the answer.
avatar
financestudent
Joined: 01 Jul 2018
Last visit: 26 Jul 2018
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 96
Posts: 4
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi egmat,

Thank your for the explanations. In C, the part after the comma becomes fragment, if it is not fragment, what is the difference?

Thanks
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [1]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
financestudent
Hi egmat,

Thank your for the explanations. In C, the part after the comma becomes fragment, if it is not fragment, what is the difference?

Thanks
The part that you refer to as a fragment cannot be a complete thought (subject verb combination). If you want, you can take a look at this post and this post for answers to similar questions.
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,419
 [4]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,419
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In the correct option C, what ensures that "its" correctly refers to 'sound',but not to 'water'?


Sound can travel through water for enormous distances, prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different temperatures and densities.

C. Sound can travel through water for enormous distances, its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different temperatures and densities.


1. Technicals: The word 'acoustic' refers to sound and therefore acoustic energy means sound contained in sound waves. On the contrary, water's energy refers typically to the electricity generated from water.

2. Grammar. A pronoun's first choice of antecedent is always the subject, and if the subject doesn't suit, it may refer to a direct object or an object of the preposition that may be near to it. All in all, the logical meaning rather than the placements plays the decisive role.
avatar
HimanshuW11
Joined: 14 Jul 2014
Last visit: 24 Sep 2018
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
112
 [5]
Given Kudos: 71
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 620 Q41 V34
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT 1: 620 Q41 V34
Posts: 62
Kudos: 112
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
stanleygao
Sound can travel through water for enormous distances, prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different temperatures and densities.

The correct answer is D. its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by

I am confused with the sentence construction of this question. It looks like there are two complete sentences without a proper conjunction of "and" or ";".
First sentence: Sound can travel through water for enormous distances.
Second sentence: its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different temperatures and densities.

Can anyone explain it to me?

Dear stanleygao,

Two things about the query you raised.
1. "I am confused with the sentence construction of this question. It looks like there are two complete sentences without a proper conjunction of "and" or ";". "
GMAT doesn't allow 2 "two complete sentences"(sentences with subject and verb) to be connected with a conjunction, but rather they are combined with a semicolon(;).
2. In the above mentioned sentence. The first portion before the comma is a clause, but the second portion is a absolute phrase.
2 things here:
1. There isn't a verb in the second portion at all. "Prevented" is a past participle, and dissipating is a present participle, but not active verbs.
2. Absolute phrase:
The part after the comma (called the absolute phrase) has the following characteristics:
1. It starts with a possessive form (his, her, its, their etc.)
2. It only adds to the meaning (just additional or filler information). It is not core information.
3. It contains no verb (it is a phrase).
4. It is adverbial in nature (it goes back to the whole clause, not to a specific noun).
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 2,039
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 2,039
Kudos: 9,962
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Economist
Sound can travel through water for enormous distances, prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different temperatures and densities.


(A) prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of

(B) prevented from having its acoustic energy dissipated by

(C) its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by

(D) its acoustic energy prevented from being dissipated as a result of

(E) preventing its acoustic energy from dissipating by

I was in a fix between options C and E.
1. A lot of explanations state that in option E, verb-ing modifier 'preventing' does not make sense with the subject of preceding clause 'sound' - Sound itself did not prevent its acoustic energy...

But as per the official question ( https://gmatclub.com/forum/between-14-0 ... 42405.html ), we know that verb-ing modifier need not ALWAYS make sense with the subject of the preceding clause. In this official question, it makes sense only with the preceding action- verb-ing is an immediate consequence

Between 14,000 and 8,000 b.c. the ice cap that covered northern Asia, Europe, and America began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied by migrating peoples moving northward.

2. Is the option E incorrect because verb-ing 'preventing' does not even make sense with the preceding action?

3. The North American moose has long legs that enable it to move quickly through the woods, stepping easily over downed trees while predators pursuing it must leap over or go around them

In the above official example, verb-ing modifier modifies the that(which acts as modifier) clause.
What about the case in which 'that' acts as subordinator.
Subject + verb + that(as a subordinator) + subject + verb, verb-ing
In this scenario, will verb-ing refer to subordinate clause(the one that follows 'that') ?

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , MagooshExpert , GMATGuruNY , VeritasPrepBrian , MartyTargetTestPrep , DmitryFarber , VeritasKarishma , generis , jennpt , VeritasPrepErika , other experts - please enlighten
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,580
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,580
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Skywalker18
I was in a fix between options C and E.
1. A lot of explanations state that in option E, verb-ing modifier 'preventing' does not make sense with the subject of preceding clause 'sound' - Sound itself did not prevent its acoustic energy...

But as per the official question ( https://gmatclub.com/forum/between-14-0 ... 42405.html ), we know that verb-ing modifier need not ALWAYS make sense with the subject of the preceding clause. In this official question, it makes sense only with the preceding action- verb-ing is an immediate consequence

Between 14,000 and 8,000 b.c. the ice cap that covered northern Asia, Europe, and America began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied by migrating peoples moving northward.

2. Is the option E incorrect because verb-ing 'preventing' does not even make sense with the preceding action?
The ice cap sentence is a little sketchy but basically works, since, as a consequence of the ice cap's melting, the new areas were uncovered.

The version created via the use of (E) in this question is completely illogical. Sound does not come close to preventing its energy dissipating, and further the prevention of the energy dissipating is not a consequence of the traveling.

Quote:
3. The North American moose has long legs that enable it to move quickly through the woods, stepping easily over downed trees while predators pursuing it must leap over or go around them

In the above official example, verb-ing modifier modifies the that(which acts as modifier) clause.
I think it would be more accurate to say that the verb-ing modifier modifies the preceding actor-action pair, as in "it" and "to move quickly."

Quote:
What about the case in which 'that' acts as subordinator.
Subject + verb + that(as a subordinator) + subject + verb, verb-ing
In this scenario, will verb-ing refer to subordinate clause(the one that follows 'that') ?
It may, but it could modify the main clause, taking the subject of the main clause as agent the agent of the participle, as the closing modifier does in the following example:

    John argued that temperatures are going to rise quickly, supporting his case via the use of trend data.

The meaning of the above example is fairly clear.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [7]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [7]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This question popped up on our Ask Me Anything About SC thread. Reposting it here just in case it helps somebody else:

sefwow
Hey gmat ninja,

Was wondering if you could break down c and d for me here as you usually do - question here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/sound-can-tr ... 77588.html

Sound can travel through water for enormous distances, prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different temperatures and densities

(C) its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by

(D) its acoustic energy prevented from being dissipated as a result of

Cheers
The most straightforward decision point here is meaning. If something dissipates, it disperses on its own -- like steam, for example.

If something is being dissipated, it sounds as though there's an outside force causing the dispersion -- a farmer spreading seeds, perhaps. In this case, we're talking about the acoustic energy of sound. It makes far more sense to write that this energy disperses on its own than that a third-party is sprinkling bits of sound through the air. Because "being dissipated" is illogical here, we can eliminate (D).

Note also, that "by" is a cleaner more concise way of expressing "as a result of." So while "as a result of" isn't inherently wrong, in a side-by-side comparison with "by," it's a clear loser.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
mview
Joined: 03 Sep 2018
Last visit: 27 Mar 2024
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 47
Posts: 18
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Could you help me out??
It seems to me that the nytimes version is correct but that the answer choice C is not....
In "its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by" the participial "prevented" appears to incorrectly modify "its acoustic energy"

But in the nytimes version, "prevented" appears to correctly modify the sound: "Sound ...., (is) prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy by boundaries i... "

What am I missing? Thanks!!

Spoiler: ::
https://www.nytimes.com/1998/10/27/scie ... spute.html

Sound can travel through water for enormous distances, prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy by boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of differing temperatures and densities. In the final version of the experiment, loudspeakers were installed at two sites: one off the northwest coast of Hawaii's Big Island, and the other near Pioneer Seamount, a volcanic island in the Pacific Ocean 55 miles from San Francisco. The times of arrival of the sound at thousands of underwater microphones spanning the Pacific Ocean were then recorded and interpreted as water temperatures.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mview
Could you help me out??
It seems to me that the nytimes version is correct but that the answer choice C is not....
In "its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by" the participial "prevented" appears to incorrectly modify "its acoustic energy"

But in the nytimes version, "prevented" appears to correctly modify the sound: "Sound ...., (is) prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy by boundaries i... "

What am I missing? Thanks!!

Spoiler: ::
https://www.nytimes.com/1998/10/27/scie ... spute.html

Sound can travel through water for enormous distances, prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy by boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of differing temperatures and densities. In the final version of the experiment, loudspeakers were installed at two sites: one off the northwest coast of Hawaii's Big Island, and the other near Pioneer Seamount, a volcanic island in the Pacific Ocean 55 miles from San Francisco. The times of arrival of the sound at thousands of underwater microphones spanning the Pacific Ocean were then recorded and interpreted as water temperatures.
Keep in mind that the editors at the NY Times are NOT worried about what GMAC thinks of their articles. :)

Many of the things that we consider "rules" on the GMAT are not strictly followed in the real world, and even writers at the best, most well-respected publications will break them (wait, is "them" too ambiguous??).

On the GMAT, you'll never be asked to look at a single sentence in isolation and decide whether it's right or wrong. Instead, you are asked to "select the answer that produces the most effective sentence" -- that is, the BEST choice out of the five. So even on the test itself, it's not a matter of labeling each sentence as "wrong" or "right". Sure, there are certain errors that allow us to make easy eliminations (i.e. subject-verb agreement errors). But once you've eliminated the ones with obvious errors, you simply have to compare the remaining options and find the BEST answer.

Long story short: don't use the NY Times or any other non-GMAT publication as your source for GMAT grammar "rules"!
User avatar
lakshya14
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 27 Jul 2022
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 529
Posts: 360
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi, what's the problem with (E). The verb-ing is modifying the subject of the preceding clause, i.e. "sound". How can it be better than (C)?
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,511
 [4]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
lakshya14
Hi, what's the problem with (E). The verb-ing is modifying the subject of the preceding clause, i.e. "sound". How can it be better than (C)?
Hello, lakshya14. We are getting to be virtual pals, as often as we are crossing paths. Choice (E) has a fatal flaw that does not make logical sense. Try inserting it into the shell of the sentence:

Sound can travel through water for enormous distances, preventing its acoustic energy from dissipating by boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different temperatures and densities.

What, exactly, is preventing the acoustic energy of sound from dissipating? Would it make sense to say that sound prevents its own acoustic energy from dissipating? Is there some sort of built-in self-preservation mechanism that we need to be aware of? Are we then to understand that boundaries in the non-negotiable part of the sentence act as sound-dissipators? If so, that is actually the opposite of what the shell of the sentence would suggest. Would it not make more sense for a boundary to contain something? And if something is contained in water, then it does not dissipate, and that is what we are after. Compare to (C):

Sound can travel through water for enormous distances, its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different temperatures and densities.

Aha, so straightened out, with the sentence in a more active voice, we understand that boundaries in the ocean prevent the acoustic energy of sound from dissipating, thereby allowing sound to travel through water for enormous distances. That makes perfect sense, and we did not get tangled up in any seaweed following the logic.

I hope that helps. If you need further clarification, just ask.

- Andrew
User avatar
LIBERTYRodP
Joined: 30 Jan 2019
Last visit: 01 Apr 2024
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 127
Kudos: 78
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MODIFIERS

Here's my take on this question. It's a tough modifiers question, and if you are not careful enough, you'll soon find yourself in the deepest darkness


User avatar
gagan03
Joined: 18 Dec 2018
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 101
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 27
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34 (Online)
WE:Project Management (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34 (Online)
Posts: 101
Kudos: 35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In C is the usage an example of Noun plus Noun modifier?
   1   2   3   4   5   6   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts