Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 01:45 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 01:45
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
655-705 Level|   Meaning/Logical Predication|   Modifiers|   Verb Tense/Form|                           
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,884
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,884
 [4]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,884
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
GMARKET
Joined: 12 Dec 2019
Last visit: 28 Nov 2020
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,511
 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMARKET
The reason why I didn’t choose C or D is because I thought the underlined part must be preceded by a semicolon. Can anyone explain why it doesn’t need to be?

Posted from my mobile device
Hello, GMARKET. The reason neither (C) nor (D) requires a semicolon is that the part after the comma is known as an absolute phrase. Notice the lack of a verb in the form of to be:

Quote:

Sound can travel through water for enormous distances, prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different temperatures and densities.

(C) its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by

(D) its acoustic energy prevented from being dissipated as a result of

That is, for either phrase to become a clause, you would need to see an is:

its acoustic energy is prevented from dissipating by

For more on absolute phrases, check out this article on Grammar Bytes! (The third example follows a similar construct as the sentence above.) If you have further questions, feel free to ask.

Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew
avatar
swadhakamal
Joined: 20 Oct 2018
Last visit: 21 Aug 2022
Posts: 17
Given Kudos: 679
Posts: 17
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat

How option C can be correct? we know that comma sholud be preceded by one of the FANBOYS.
Can you please explain?

(c) its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by

Thank you!
User avatar
Sapnilbhatnagar
Joined: 28 Jun 2020
Last visit: 12 Apr 2022
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 64
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GPA: 3.5
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
Posts: 48
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mike egmat GMATNinja
Can you please explain why the use of *ITS* is correct in option C, I rejected option C because I thought its can refer back to SOUND and WATER Both.

Sound can travel through water for enormous distances, prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different temperatures and densities.


(A) prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of

(B) prevented from having its acoustic energy dissipated by

(C) its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by

(D) its acoustic energy prevented from being dissipated as a result of

(E) preventing its acoustic energy from dissipating by
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
8,945
 [1]
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Economist
Sound can travel through water for enormous distances, prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different temperatures and densities.


(A) prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of

(B) prevented from having its acoustic energy dissipated by

(C) its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by

(D) its acoustic energy prevented from being dissipated as a result of

(E) preventing its acoustic energy from dissipating by

This question is based on Modifiers.

Options A and B are participle modifiers that modify ‘distances’. It is not distances that are prevented from dissipating their acoustic energy. Furthermore, the phrase “as a result of” is not as appropriate as the preposition ‘by’. So, Option A can be eliminated.

The participle ‘having’ further complicates the meaning in Option B. It implies that there is some other agent dissipating the energy. This agent would be ‘boundaries’, so the meaning is illogical. So, Option B can also be eliminated.

In Option E, the meaning conveyed is that sound prevents its acoustic energy from dissipating. This meaning is illogical as it is ‘boundaries’ that prevent the energy from dissipating. So, Option E can also be eliminated.

Options C and D have a different construction, that of a noun + noun modifier.

Option D is wordy. It also has the phrase “as a result of”. The phrase “prevented from dissipating by boundaries” is more appropriate than “prevented from dissipating as a result of boundaries”. So, Option D can be eliminated.

Option C is concise and clear. Therefore, C is the most appropriate option.

Jayanthi Kumar.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,781
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,781
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sapnilbhatnagar
mike egmat GMATNinja
Can you please explain why the use of *ITS* is correct in option C, I rejected option C because I thought its can refer back to SOUND and WATER Both.
...
The short answer is that pronoun ambiguity isn't an absolute rule on the GMAT (for more on that, check out this video). And from the context, we can logically infer that the "it" refers to "sound" and not "water."

Generally speaking, you don't want to eliminate something just because there's a little pronoun ambiguity. Look for other decision points and then, if needed, you can use the ambiguity factor to vote the remaining choices up or down.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,781
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
swadhakamal
egmat

How option C can be correct? we know that comma sholud be preceded by one of the FANBOYS.
Can you please explain?

(c) its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by

Thank you!
This is something that gets asked all the time... see if these two posts help answer your question:

User avatar
warrior1991
Joined: 03 Mar 2017
Last visit: 03 Feb 2022
Posts: 573
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 596
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
Products:
Posts: 573
Kudos: 437
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AndrewN VeritasKarishma

I have a question in general related to the Difference between 'Absolute Phrase' and 'Noun+Noun Modifier'.

I read an article from egmat that Noun+Noun Modifier can modify:-
1. Nearest Noun before a comma.
2. Noun in Middle in a preceding clause.
3. Preceding clause (Absolute Phrase situation)

How to identify in a sentence that we have to use Absolute phrase or Case 1 and 2 as mentioned above??
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,986
 [3]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,986
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
warrior1991
AndrewN VeritasKarishma

I have a question in general related to the Difference between 'Absolute Phrase' and 'Noun+Noun Modifier'.

I read an article from egmat that Noun+Noun Modifier can modify:-
1. Nearest Noun before a comma.
2. Noun in Middle in a preceding clause.
3. Preceding clause (Absolute Phrase situation)

How to identify in a sentence that we have to use Absolute phrase or Case 1 and 2 as mentioned above??

warrior1991 - Don't look for a list of rules because GMAT questions will not adhere to it. Look for context, what makes most sense in a certain situation and what options do I have available.
If you point to certain questions, I can tell you why a modifier modifies what it does and is the best option available.
If I tell you that a noun modifier usually modifies the directly preceding noun but could sometimes modify a far away noun too, how do you know whether a question falls under the "usual" or "sometimes" category? You don't. The only course of action we have is to see what works best in the context given to us.
User avatar
Rasalghul853
Joined: 24 Jan 2019
Last visit: 15 Jan 2024
Posts: 148
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 85
Location: India
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V39
GPA: 2.81
Products:
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V39
Posts: 148
Kudos: 43
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Shouldn't there be a ";" between the two clauses if C is the correct choice? How can we separate 2 independent clauses using a ","?
User avatar
FazliddinKD
Joined: 11 Apr 2019
Last visit: 21 Oct 2024
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 27
Location: Uzbekistan
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V29
GPA: 3
WE:Investment Banking (Finance: Investment Banking)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sound can travel through water for enormous distances, prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different temperatures and densities.


(A) prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of - V-ed modifier prevented modifies preceding noun "enormous distances" which does not make sense

(B) prevented from having its acoustic energy dissipated by - V-ed modifier prevented modifies preceding noun "enormous distances" which does not make sense

(C) its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by - antecedent of "its" is "sound", hence sound's acoustic energy prevented from - clear meaning

(D) its acoustic energy prevented from being dissipated as a result of - "as a result of" is redundant

(E) preventing its acoustic energy from dissipating by - V-ing modifier modifies "sound", "sound preventing its acoustic energy from" - meaning incorrect
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [1]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rasalghul853
Shouldn't there be a ";" between the two clauses if C is the correct choice? How can we separate 2 independent clauses using a ","?
Hi Rasalghul853,

You may find this post helpful.
User avatar
Crytiocanalyst
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Last visit: 27 May 2023
Posts: 950
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 309
Posts: 950
Kudos: 208
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Economist
Sound can travel through water for enormous distances, prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different temperatures and densities.


(A) prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of
as a result isn't the perfect idiomatic usage by is far more perfect

(B) prevented from having its acoustic energy dissipated by
having isn't the right usage therefore out

(C) its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by
idiomatic usage of disspating is right and by is also perfect

(D) its acoustic energy prevented from being dissipated as a result of
Being is a red flag and it's never correct therefore out

(E) preventing its acoustic energy from dissipating by
it's usage in the begining can be matched to sound however in the middle it's usage creates ambigiuty since we don't know whether it refers to road or sound therefore out

Therefore IMO C
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,781
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
doeadeer
GMATNinja could you please help with POE between B and C.

Many comments mark B incorrect on grounds that it is not modifying the subject, but Manhattan's thread on the same sentence claims that this cannot be grounds for elimination. Really confused here.
{...}
As explained in this post, if something "dissipates", it disperses on its own, and it makes more sense to say that the acoustic energy disperses on its own than to say that something else disperses the acoustic energy. The acoustic energy wants to dissipate (like steam), but something (the boundaries) prevents the acoustic energy from dissipating. As a result, the sound is able to travel through water for enormous distances.

This is the perfectly logical meaning suggested by choice (C) -- the boundaries are doing the preventing, but the acoustic energy itself is the thing that would do the dissipating:

Quote:
(C) its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by boundaries in the ocean...
Now look at (B):

Quote:
(B) prevented from having its acoustic energy dissipated by boundaries in the ocean...
Here the boundaries are preventing the sound from "having its acoustic energy dissipated" -- but having its acoustic energy dissipated by what? This passive construction suggests that there is some external thing that dissipates the energy, and that's not quite right.

You could also argue that, in (B), the boundaries are the thing that would dissipate the acoustic energy, but then we have the same issue: it makes more sense to say that the acoustic energy dissipates on its own. This interpretation would create another problem: if the boundaries are doing the dissipating, what's doing the preventing? We have no idea.

In (B), the meaning is open to interpretation, and neither interpretation works very well. In (C), the meaning is clear and makes perfect sense, so that's our winner.

I hope that helps!
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi egmat

Regarding the choice C ı can't really understand how it somehow modifies the noun "sound" in the beginning of the first sentence. I do understand that the second portion in C is noun-noun modifier but ı can't really figure out how sound's acoustic energy modifies sound.

For instance in one of the examples in the great article you posted on noun-noun modifiers;
James created a magnificent design by using latest graphic design tools, expensive but super helpful devices developed especially for minute detailing and elaboration.

ı can easily see that "helpful devices..." refers to design tools because tools are devices, but sound and sound's acoustic energy doesn't really connect with each other in the meaning wise

Thank you for your explanation
User avatar
Adeodatus
Joined: 18 Nov 2015
Last visit: 05 May 2022
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 53
Location: Philippines
Posts: 38
Kudos: 35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am not sure if this is a question of idiom but is clearly a meaning related one. "boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different temperatures and densities" refers to a noun/object, thus, "as a result of" should not work here. "as a result of" should refer to a process (e.g., "The building fell as a result of demolition activities"). "dissipating by" works better for things/objects. That's my two cents
User avatar
thakurarun85
Joined: 10 Jul 2021
Last visit: 21 Sep 2022
Posts: 224
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 224
Kudos: 53
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat
Please help.

When we talk about general truth we use simple present. Here why we are using " its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different temperatures and densities." the bold are all -ed form.
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,579
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
thakurarun85

Please help.

When we talk about general truth we use simple present. Here why we are using " its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different temperatures and densities." the bold are all -ed form.
Hi thakurarun85.

Those -ed words are modifiers that describe how things are in the present. So, they communicate that, in the present, the "acoustic energy" IS "prevented from dissipating" and that the "boundaries in the ocean" ARE "created by water layers."

Thus, they do communicate general truths about the present.
   1   2   3   4   5   6   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts