doeadeer
GMATNinja could you please help with POE between B and C.
Many comments mark B incorrect on grounds that it is not modifying the subject, but Manhattan's thread on the same sentence claims that this cannot be grounds for elimination. Really confused here.
{...}
As explained in
this post, if something "dissipates", it disperses on its own, and it makes more sense to say that the acoustic energy disperses
on its own than to say that
something else disperses the acoustic energy. The acoustic energy wants to dissipate (like steam), but something (the boundaries) prevents the acoustic energy from dissipating. As a result, the sound is able to travel through water for enormous distances.
This is the perfectly logical meaning suggested by choice (C) -- the
boundaries are doing the
preventing, but the
acoustic energy itself is the thing that would do the
dissipating:
Quote:
(C)
its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by boundaries in the ocean...
Now look at (B):
Quote:
(B)
prevented from having its acoustic energy dissipated by boundaries in the ocean...
Here the boundaries are preventing the sound from "having its acoustic energy dissipated" -- but having its acoustic energy dissipated by what? This passive construction suggests that there is some external thing that dissipates the energy, and that's not quite right.
You could also argue that, in (B), the boundaries are the thing that would dissipate the acoustic energy, but then we have the same issue: it makes more sense to say that the acoustic energy dissipates on its own. This interpretation would create another problem: if the boundaries are doing the dissipating, what's doing the preventing? We have no idea.
In (B), the meaning is open to interpretation, and neither interpretation works very well. In (C), the meaning is clear and makes perfect sense, so that's our winner.
I hope that helps!