Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 12:43 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 12:43
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Sub 505 Level|   Meaning/Logical Predication|   Verb Tense/Form|                     
User avatar
AbdurRakib
Joined: 11 May 2014
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 465
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 220
Status:I don't stop when I'm Tired,I stop when I'm done
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GPA: 2.81
WE:Business Development (Real Estate)
Posts: 465
Kudos: 42,849
 [163]
27
Kudos
Add Kudos
135
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,786
 [46]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,786
 [46]
34
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
elegantm
Joined: 28 May 2017
Last visit: 11 Sep 2018
Posts: 223
Own Kudos:
745
 [39]
Given Kudos: 12
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Posts: 223
Kudos: 745
 [39]
29
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
User avatar
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Last visit: 17 Feb 2025
Posts: 1,694
Own Kudos:
15,177
 [32]
Given Kudos: 766
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,694
Kudos: 15,177
 [32]
18
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello Everyone!

Let’s tackle this question, one problem at a time, so we can come up with the right answer quickly! To get started, here is the original question with major differences highlighted in orange:

Between 14,000 and 8,000 b.c. the ice cap that covered northern Asia, Europe, and America began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied by migrating peoples moving northward.

A. began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied
B. began melting, to uncover vast new areas to be occupied
C. began, by melting, to uncover vast new areas for occupation
D. began, after melting, uncovering vast new areas which are to be occupied
E. would begin to uncover, through melting, vast new areas for occupation

After taking a quick glance over the options, some major differences between each option jumps out:

1. uncovering vs. to uncover
2. to be occupied vs. for occupation

Let’s start with #1 on our list: the use of “uncovering” or “to uncover.”

By saying “to uncover,” this means that the ice caps chose to melt. Since inanimate objects, such as ice caps, can’t make their own choices, it’s not a good idea to say that they melted with the purpose of doing something – they don’t have minds of their own!

This means we can eliminate options B, C, and E because they suggest that the ice caps chose to melt for a specific reason, which doesn’t make logical sense.

Now we’re left with only options A & D to choose from, so let’s see if we can find any more problems with either option:

A. began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied

This option is CORRECT! It is concise, has a clear meaning, and uses the correct past tense “were” to show all of the events happened in the past.

D. began, after melting, uncovering vast new areas which are to be occupied

This option is INCORRECT because it uses the future tense “are to be occupied,” which isn’t true because all of these events happened between 14,000 – 8,000 b.c., which is far, far away in the past!

There you have it – option A is the correct answer!



Don’t study for the GMAT. Train for it.
General Discussion
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 2,039
Own Kudos:
9,962
 [5]
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 2,039
Kudos: 9,962
 [5]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Between 14,000 and 8,000 b.c. the ice cap that covered northern Asia, Europe, and America began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied by migrating peoples moving northward.
A. began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied –Correct
B. began melting, to uncover vast new areas to be occupied – to uncover is illogical as it was not an intent
C. began, by melting, to uncover vast new areas for occupation to uncover is illogical as it was not an intent
D. began, after melting, uncovering vast new areas which are to be occupied – changes the meaning – the causal relationship between melting of ice caps and uncovering is lost ; Also which is incorrect as we need a comma before it
E. would begin to uncover, through melting, vast new areas for occupation – changes the meaning the causal relationship between melting of ice caps and uncovering is lost

Answer A
User avatar
warriorguy
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Last visit: 08 Feb 2023
Posts: 378
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 144
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Telecommunications)
Posts: 378
Kudos: 357
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello Team,
I have a query related to option A. I selected the correct answer based on PoE. In option A, we have ???ing verb used correctly to depict the result of some action i.e. the result of melting of ice cap. My query is for the verb tense. Why is ???were to???
considered correct in this sentence? Shouldn???t we be using, ideally, would in this scenario to depict something that happened in the future from past perspective?
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,887
 [4]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,887
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
elegantm
Between 14,000 and 8,000 b.c. the ice cap that covered northern Asia, Europe, and America began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied by migrating peoples moving northward.

A. began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied
Correct
B. began melting, to uncover vast new areas to be occupied
- - Changes the original intent of the sentence, conveying ICE CAPS began uncovering vast areas DIRECTLY. Original intent is "Vast areas were uncovered as a result of Melting
C. began, by melting, to uncover vast new areas for occupation
- Changes the original intent of the sentence, conveying ICE CAPS began uncovering vast areas DIRECTLY. Original intent is "Vast areas were uncovered as a result of Melting
D. began, after melting, uncovering vast new areas which are to be occupied
- "UNCOVERING" changes the original intent of the sentence, conveying ICE CAPS began uncovering vast areas DIRECTLY. Original intent is "Vast areas were uncovered as a result of Melting.
E. would begin to uncover, through melting, vast areas for occupation
- Use of "WOULD" is incorrect since it means that Melting would begin in sometime. Moreover, "WOULD BEGIN TO UNCOVER" changes the original intent of the sentence, conveying ICE CAPS began uncovering vast areas DIRECTLY. Original intent is "Vast areas were uncovered as a result of Melting.


Hello elegantm,


You have done a very good analysis of this official question. You actually applied the meaning approach to solve this one, that's really commendable. Keep up the good job. :)

I would just like to add that Choice B is worded such that it seems to suggest that the ice caps started melting with the intent to uncover vast areas. This is most certainly not the intended meaning as you have correctly pointed out in your analysis.

What you have mentioned about Choice B is certainly suitable for Choice C.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
User avatar
warriorguy
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Last visit: 08 Feb 2023
Posts: 378
Own Kudos:
357
 [1]
Given Kudos: 144
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Telecommunications)
Posts: 378
Kudos: 357
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
warriorguy
Hello Team,
I have a query related to option A. I selected the correct answer based on PoE. In option A, we have ???ing verb used correctly to depict the result of some action i.e. the result of melting of ice cap. My query is for the verb tense. Why is ???were to???
considered correct in this sentence? Shouldn???t we be using, ideally, would in this scenario to depict something that happened in the future from past perspective?

I think I agree with everything you've said here, warriorguy! Process of elimination should lead you to the right answer, even if you think "were to be" sounds ridiculous, or isn't an ideal form of the verb. You're always looking for four wrong answers -- and you've found them, so (A) must be correct. And that's the right way to approach everything on SC.

I also agree that "would be occupied" or "would later be occupied" or even "were later occupied" would be decent alternatives to "were to be occupied." But there's nothing wrong with "were to be": it's just another way to express the future from the vantage point of the past. Technically, I think it's a form of the past subjunctive that's almost never used in modern American English, so it sounds a little bit archaic to us. I'd never use it in real life, but it's not wrong.

In my opinion, (A) "sounds bad" in its current form, but sound NEVER matters. It's still the right answer, even if it sounds like hot garbage. ;)

I hope this helps!


Thanks for the clarification GMATNinja.

So takeaway from this question for me is that : both would and were are eligible to depict a future event from past PoV.
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,419
 [19]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,419
 [19]
13
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The melting was just incidental and not intentional. Therefore, the infinitive 'to uncover' is out of sync. Drop B, C, and E. Between A and D, " the phrase, 'which are to be occupied' in D makes no sense as if these areas are waiting for some 16000 years for someone to occupy. A is the best available among all
User avatar
NandishSS
Joined: 06 Jan 2015
Last visit: 28 Jan 2021
Posts: 720
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 579
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GPA: 3.35
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 720
Kudos: 1,721
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Between 14,000 and 8,000 b.c. the ice cap that covered northern Asia, Europe, and America began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied by migrating peoples moving northward.

A.began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied
B.began melting, to uncover vast new areas to be occupied
C.began, by melting, to uncover vast new areas for occupation
D.began, after melting, uncovering vast new areas which are to be occupied
E.would begin to uncover, through melting, vast new areas for occupation

Tagging GMATNinja

In D What uncovering is modifying? -ing modifier should nearest action (after melting).
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,887
 [2]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,887
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NandishSS
Between 14,000 and 8,000 b.c. the ice cap that covered northern Asia, Europe, and America began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied by migrating peoples moving northward.

A.began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied
B.began melting, to uncover vast new areas to be occupied
C.began, by melting, to uncover vast new areas for occupation
D.began, after melting, uncovering vast new areas which are to be occupied
E.would begin to uncover, through melting, vast new areas for occupation

Tagging GMATNinja

In D What uncovering is modifying? -ing modifier should nearest action (after melting).



Hello NandishSS,


I will be glad to help you out with this one. :-)


In Choice D, the word uncovering is not a modifier. It is a verb-ing noun word (gerund).

The sentence with Choice D actually says the ice cap began uncovering vast new areas after melting.

Basically, the modifier after melting has been placed between the two commas. So, the comma before uncovering does not belong to this word.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
User avatar
Cbirole
Joined: 16 May 2016
Last visit: 25 Sep 2022
Posts: 114
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 124
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.5
WE:Analyst (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
Posts: 114
Kudos: 381
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AbdurRakib
Between 14,000 and 8,000 b.c. the ice cap that covered northern Asia, Europe, and America began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied by migrating peoples moving northward.

A. began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied
B. began melting, to uncover vast new areas to be occupied
C. began, by melting, to uncover vast new areas for occupation
D. began, after melting, uncovering vast new areas which are to be occupied
E. would begin to uncover, through melting, vast new areas for occupation

The Official Guide for GMAT Review 2018

Practice Question
Sentence Correction
Question No.: 702

Answer is A but there is typo in sentence highlighted in Pink
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
418
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 768
Kudos: 418
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[quote="AbdurRakib"]Between 14,000 and 8,000 b.c. the ice cap that covered northern Asia, Europe, and America began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied by migrating peoples moving northward.

A. began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied
B. began melting, to uncover vast new areas to be occupied
C. began, by melting, to uncover vast new areas for occupation
D. began, after melting, uncovering vast new areas which are to be occupied
E. would begin to uncover, through melting, vast new areas for occupation

on GMAT SC, meaning relation between two verbs is tested frequently. this question is one example for that.

the intended meaning here is that the melting and uncovering are not separate and , of course, happen at the same time .this meaning relation is shown by comma+doing as in choice A.
choice B
"to uncover" dose not show that melting and uncovering happen at the same time. even "to uncover" show a future action . we do not even know wheather this future action happen. B is gone
choice C.
with the same thinking, "by melting" dose not shows that melting and uncovering happen at the same time. I go to us for mba by learning gmat. in this sentence, learning happen before going. in our question, in choice C, melting can happen before uncovering and this relation is ambiguous.
choice D
with the same thinging , melting happen before uncovering. this is clearly wrong.
choice E
we are not clear melting and uncovering happen at the same time clearly wrong.

comma+doing show an action NOT SEPARATE from the main action. this is tested with "and do" which show a action SEPARATE from main action.

"to do" show a future , non factual action, or at least an action which is not simultaneous with the main action
"would do" and "were to do" show a future action.

the main point here is
ACTION NOT SEPARATE FROM MAIN ACTION
is tested in comparision with
"to do" which is at least separate from the main action , which could be a future action or an factual action which happen after the main verb.

"by doing" show a separate action which could be not simultaneous with the main action. " I learn english by reading english books in evenings" show that "reading" is separate and not simultaneous with "learn".

I will come bank for "by doing" because I see i can know more about it.
User avatar
gmatman1031
Joined: 27 Nov 2018
Last visit: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 204
Posts: 40
Kudos: 40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I believe there are some situations when to + infinitive has a different meaning than -ing (AKA gerund); however, this isn't true for all situations and I don't think we can eliminate (C) and (E) based on the difference between "to uncover" and "uncovering". In (C) and (E) "to uncover" and "uncovering" both mean the same thing.

The issue with (C) is that "vast new areas for occupation" implies that either the ice cap uncovered vast new areas with the purpose of those areas being occupied by migrating peoples or the ice cap uncovered vast new areas that have the purpose of being occupied by migrating people. An ice cap doesn't have the ability to do either of those actions. Thus, we eliminate (C) for this reason.
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 768
Kudos: 418
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I consult dictionary and see that "to be to do" is used to show a plan or order. "to be to do" is not hard.
I am to go to us this year.
the son is to finish his homework.
User avatar
RamSep
Joined: 12 Mar 2018
Last visit: 23 Oct 2020
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105
Location: Iran (Islamic Republic of)
GPA: 3.64
WE:Management Consulting (Energy)
Posts: 35
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat
elegantm
Between 14,000 and 8,000 b.c. the ice cap that covered northern Asia, Europe, and America began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied by migrating peoples moving northward.

A. began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied
Correct
B. began melting, to uncover vast new areas to be occupied
- - Changes the original intent of the sentence, conveying ICE CAPS began uncovering vast areas DIRECTLY. Original intent is "Vast areas were uncovered as a result of Melting
C. began, by melting, to uncover vast new areas for occupation
- Changes the original intent of the sentence, conveying ICE CAPS began uncovering vast areas DIRECTLY. Original intent is "Vast areas were uncovered as a result of Melting
D. began, after melting, uncovering vast new areas which are to be occupied
- "UNCOVERING" changes the original intent of the sentence, conveying ICE CAPS began uncovering vast areas DIRECTLY. Original intent is "Vast areas were uncovered as a result of Melting.
E. would begin to uncover, through melting, vast areas for occupation
- Use of "WOULD" is incorrect since it means that Melting would begin in sometime. Moreover, "WOULD BEGIN TO UNCOVER" changes the original intent of the sentence, conveying ICE CAPS began uncovering vast areas DIRECTLY. Original intent is "Vast areas were uncovered as a result of Melting.


Hello elegantm,


You have done a very good analysis of this official question. You actually applied the meaning approach to solve this one, that's really commendable. Keep up the good job. :)

I would just like to add that Choice B is worded such that it seems to suggest that the ice caps started melting with the intent to uncover vast areas. This is most certainly not the intended meaning as you have correctly pointed out in your analysis.

What you have mentioned about Choice B is certainly suitable for Choice C.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha

Hi egmat
Although I answered this one correctly, there is something in A that annoys me a lot: According to e-gmat, for "comma+verb-ing" modifier to be correct logically, the doer of the main clause must be the same as doer of ing modifier. Could you please shed more light on answer choice A, from this point of view? I just can't imagine that ice cap began to melt and also uncovered new areas.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,786
 [8]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,786
 [8]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Hi egmat
Although I answered this one correctly, there is something in A that annoys me a lot: According to e-gmat, for "comma+verb-ing" modifier to be correct logically, the doer of the main clause must be the same as doer of ing modifier. Could you please shed more light on answer choice A, from this point of view? I just can't imagine that ice cap began to melt and also uncovered new areas.
There's a very subtle distinction here. When we have an "-ing" modifier, that modifier doesn't have to be an action performed by the previous subject - if it did, we'd just use an old-fashioned verb there, rather than a modifier. Instead, it can be a consequence of the action performed by the previous subject. In other words, remember that the "-ing" modifier isn't modifying the subject alone; it's modifying the entire previous clause.

Consider a simple example:

    "Dave's children screamed for chocolate for several hours, leading to an impromptu trip to Trader Joe's when Dave, in a bit of questionable parenting, finally gave in."

Notice that "leading" is modifying the clause "Dave's children screamed..." It's not quite accurate to say that Dave's children led to the trip to Trader Joe's; it was a result of them screaming. That's fine. So the subject matters, but the subject is not necessarily performing the action described in the modifier.

Same thing here: "the ice cap that covered northern Asia, Europe, and America began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied..." It's true that the ice cap did not itself uncover vast new areas, but the uncovering occurred as a result of the ice cap melting, so this construction is perfectly logical.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
BijayKru
Joined: 24 Sep 2018
Last visit: 05 Aug 2025
Posts: 60
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 27
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V37
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V37
Posts: 60
Kudos: 24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Between 14,000 and 8,000 b.c. the ice cap that covered northern Asia, Europe, and America began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied by migrating peoples moving northward.

(A) began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied (CORRECT)
(B) began melting, to uncover vast new areas to be occupied ( melting to cover: We are not covering its automatically getting cover.So to cover is wrong)
(C) began, by melting, to uncover vast new areas for occupation(to cover: We are not covering its automatically getting cover.So to cover is wrong))
(D) began, after melting, uncovering vast new areas which are to be occupied we are talking about past, and began, after melting( wrong uses)
(E) would begin to uncover, through melting, vast new areas for occupation(to cover: We are not covering its automatically getting cover.So to cover is wrong))
User avatar
Diwabag
Joined: 06 Mar 2019
Last visit: 13 Jan 2021
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 85
Schools: IMD '21
Schools: IMD '21
Posts: 28
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In option A. If began to melt was changed to "began melting", would that be correct? Doesn't melting sound more correct here since the melting of the ice cap happened continuously?

Pls help me clarify.

Thanks.
avatar
Kanika3agg
Joined: 09 May 2018
Last visit: 20 Feb 2021
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 75
Posts: 96
Kudos: 81
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Between 14,000 and 8,000 b.c. the ice cap that covered northern Asia, Europe, and America began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied by migrating peoples moving northward.

(A) began to melt, uncovering vast new areas that were to be occupied - no error as such
(B) began melting, to uncover vast new areas to be occupied - it is not an intention to uncover.
(C) began, by melting, to uncover vast new areas for occupation - it is not an intention to uncover, by melting is an essential information
(D) began, after melting, uncovering vast new areas which are to be occupied - after melting is essential info, wrong verb used
(E) would begin to uncover, through melting, vast new areas for occupation - we want to state that uncovering vast new areas was a result of melting and this is not stated here
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts