GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Dec 2018, 05:42

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### Happy Christmas 20% Sale! Math Revolution All-In-One Products!

December 20, 2018

December 20, 2018

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

This is the most inexpensive and attractive price in the market. Get the course now!
• ### Key Strategies to Master GMAT SC

December 22, 2018

December 22, 2018

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Attend this webinar to learn how to leverage Meaning and Logic to solve the most challenging Sentence Correction Questions.

# Taking a step towards going green, last year the state of Wississipi p

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2016
Posts: 93
Location: United States (OH)
GPA: 3.58
Taking a step towards going green, last year the state of Wississipi p  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2018, 06:29
4
1
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

49% (01:10) correct 51% (01:27) wrong based on 209 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Taking a step towards going green, last year the state of Wississipi planned on giving interest free loans and free installations for households installing solar power generators. Many houses in Wississipi took advantage of this and a report claimed that up to 10% of households in the state were benefiting from the scheme. But at the end of the year the state saw an increase in the demand for electricity.
Which of the following, if true, does most to explain the result that followed the implementation of the scheme?

A- During an internal audit it was proved that the claims of the report was not entirely true and had been slightly modified.
B- Last year, the sunlight hours were comparatively fewer than the year before.
C- Most people were not committed towards going green and thus did not take advantage of the scheme.
D- Many people who benefited from the scheme wasted most of the energy they got from solar generators in unwanted uses they might have avoided if solar energy had not been available in the first place.
E- Many new manufacturing plants that use lot of electricity started their operations in Wississipi towards the end of last year.

_________________

Kudos APPRECIATED!

SC Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1569
Re: Taking a step towards going green, last year the state of Wississipi p  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2018, 07:20
1
So what is the paradox ? Reports says only 10% has solar. But at the end of the year the state saw an increase in the demand for electricity.. So prethinking is that something came up and that is causing high demands of energy. Let's see the answer choices to see that. before start we have to give a moment to "if true" part. let's go !

A- During an internal audit it was proved that the claims of the report was not entirely true and had been slightly modified. --- which means actual figure was a bit less. let say only 9% has the solar. is it going to explain why new demands for energy came up.
B- Last year, the sunlight hours were comparatively fewer than the year before. --- lets notice that 10% were getting benefit from this scheme since last year. means 10% people increase since last year that are using solar. and still damands of extra light cause less sun/day time. This is not clearly explaining . clearly some hidden fact is there.
C- Most people were not committed towards going green and thus did not take advantage of the scheme. ---- out of scope.
D- Many people who benefited from the scheme wasted most of the energy they got from solar generators in unwanted uses they might have avoided if solar energy had not been available in the first place. --- seems a tempting option. so people started leaving their TV on for longer time but on solar . rest of the energy they are using as it or recklessly, well we don't know. anyways this is not explaining why demands are high.
E- Many new manufacturing plants that use lot of electricity started their operations in Wississipi towards the end of last year. --- clearly the answer. something in a dire need of energy.

I think its a very good question, a high quality one.
_________________

Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Simple strategy:
“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1| GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2 | How to Improve GMAT Quant from Q49 to a Perfect Q51

My Notes:
Reading comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Absolute Phrases | Subjunctive Mood

Manager
Joined: 18 Dec 2012
Posts: 97
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V32
GMAT 2: 530 Q37 V25
GPA: 3.32
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
Re: Taking a step towards going green, last year the state of Wississipi p  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2018, 07:21
1
SandhyAvinash wrote:
Taking a step towards going green, last year the state of Wississipi planned on giving interest free loans and free installations for households installing solar power generators. Many houses in Wississipi took advantage of this and a report claimed that up to 10% of households in the state were benefiting from the scheme. But at the end of the year the state saw an increase in the demand for electricity.
Which of the following, if true, does most to explain the result that followed the implementation of the scheme?

A- During an internal audit it was proved that the claims of the report was not entirely true and had been slightly modified.
B- Last year, the sunlight hours were comparatively fewer than the year before.
C- Most people were not committed towards going green and thus did not take advantage of the scheme.
D- Many people who benefited from the scheme wasted most of the energy they got from solar generators in unwanted uses they might have avoided if solar energy had not been available in the first place.
E- Many new manufacturing plants that use lot of electricity started their operations in Wississipi towards the end of last year.
The answer should be E. It says there is an alternate reason for an increase in demand for electricity.
A - Doesn't talk about the demand. Even if it is less than 10%, it is still significant
B - talks about amount of solar energy generated
C - irrelevant to the question
D - Usage is out of scope

Sent from my Pixel 2 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
_________________

I'm telling this because you don't get it. You think you get it which is not the same as actually getting it. Get it?

Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2018
Posts: 164
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Re: Taking a step towards going green, last year the state of Wississipi p  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Mar 2018, 07:43
After gravitating towards the right answer ended up selecting the wrong answer.Super question this!!!!
Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2016
Posts: 93
Location: United States (OH)
GPA: 3.58
Re: Taking a step towards going green, last year the state of Wississipi p  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Mar 2018, 15:51
aragonn wrote:
So what is the paradox ? Reports says only 10% has solar. But at the end of the year the state saw an increase in the demand for electricity.. So prethinking is that something came up and that is causing high demands of energy. Let's see the answer choices to see that. before start we have to give a moment to "if true" part. let's go !

A- During an internal audit it was proved that the claims of the report was not entirely true and had been slightly modified. --- which means actual figure was a bit less. let say only 9% has the solar. is it going to explain why new demands for energy came up.
B- Last year, the sunlight hours were comparatively fewer than the year before. --- lets notice that 10% were getting benefit from this scheme since last year. means 10% people increase since last year that are using solar. and still damands of extra light cause less sun/day time. This is not clearly explaining . clearly some hidden fact is there.
C- Most people were not committed towards going green and thus did not take advantage of the scheme. ---- out of scope.
D- Many people who benefited from the scheme wasted most of the energy they got from solar generators in unwanted uses they might have avoided if solar energy had not been available in the first place. --- seems a tempting option. so people started leaving their TV on for longer time but on solar . rest of the energy they are using as it or recklessly, well we don't know. anyways this is not explaining why demands are high.
E- Many new manufacturing plants that use lot of electricity started their operations in Wississipi towards the end of last year. --- clearly the answer. something in a dire need of energy.

I think its a very good question, a high quality one.

Thank you for a great explanation.
_________________

Kudos APPRECIATED!

Senior Manager
Joined: 31 May 2017
Posts: 320
Re: Taking a step towards going green, last year the state of Wississipi p  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Mar 2018, 20:54
A- During an internal audit it was proved that the claims of the report was not entirely true and had been slightly modified - This does not give us enough information about why demand for electricity was high. Incorrect

B- Last year, the sunlight hours were comparatively fewer than the year before - No sufficient information provided.

C- Most people were not committed towards going green and thus did not take advantage of the scheme - Out of scope

D- Many people who benefited from the scheme wasted most of the energy they got from solar generators in unwanted uses they might have avoided if solar energy had not been available in the first place - Out of scope for our question.

E- Many new manufacturing plants that use lot of electricity started their operations in Wississipi towards the end of last year - This gives us enough evidence to say why electricity demand was higher - Correct
_________________

Please give kudos if it helps

Resources
| | | | |

Manager
Joined: 03 Apr 2016
Posts: 93
Location: India
Schools: ISB '19, IIMB EPGP"20
GMAT 1: 580 Q43 V27
GMAT 2: 650 Q32 V48
GRE 1: Q160 V151
GPA: 3.99
WE: Design (Consulting)
Re: Taking a step towards going green, last year the state of Wississipi p  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2018, 19:00
SandhyAvinash wrote:
Taking a step towards going green, last year the state of Wississipi planned on giving interest free loans and free installations for households installing solar power generators. Many houses in Wississipi took advantage of this and a report claimed that up to 10% of households in the state were benefiting from the scheme. But at the end of the year the state saw an increase in the demand for electricity.
Which of the following, if true, does most to explain the result that followed the implementation of the scheme?

A- During an internal audit it was proved that the claims of the report was not entirely true and had been slightly modified.
B- Last year, the sunlight hours were comparatively fewer than the year before.
C- Most people were not committed towards going green and thus did not take advantage of the scheme.
D- Many people who benefited from the scheme wasted most of the energy they got from solar generators in unwanted uses they might have avoided if solar energy had not been available in the first place.
E- Many new manufacturing plants that use lot of electricity started their operations in Wississipi towards the end of last year.

I have read that right answer for paradox question should explain both sides of the paradox. Option E doesn’t talk about solar installations or households benefitting from the Free schemes. The scenario explained in option E can as well be true even if there weren’t any solar installations or any free schemes. E only explains one half of the paradox. Please correct me if am wrong . D on the other hand talks about solar installations and people using it recklessly which explains increase in demand.

Posted from my mobile device
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 473
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Taking a step towards going green, last year the state of Wississipi p  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Apr 2018, 04:26
Clear E

Choice B and D are clever trap answers.

Let x be amount of electricity used before solar power installation.
Now choice D says, people wasted the energy generated from solar power generator, and but it DOES NOT say they wasted energy from electricity. The amount of energy from electricity would have stayed as it is. But choice D does not explain help why there was increase in demand for electricity.

Likewise choice B, sunlight hours was not that high. so what? still they could have obtained say 'y' amount energy from solar and remaining x-y energy from electricity. But still choice B does not help resolve why there was increase in demand for electricity

on other choice E, clearly resolves the paradox, increase in demand was from somewhere else (new manufacturing plants)
Taking a step towards going green, last year the state of Wississipi p &nbs [#permalink] 26 Apr 2018, 04:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by